| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
|---|
| ... | |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
Thanks to Bill Schmidt for pointing this out during code review!
llvm-svn: 178170
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
As part of the the sequence generated to implement long double -> int
conversions, we need to perform an FADD in round-to-zero mode. This is
problematical since the FPSCR is not at all modeled at the SelectionDAG
level, and thus there is a risk of getting floating point instructions
generated out of sequence with the instructions to modify FPSCR.
The current code handles this by somewhat "special" patterns that in part
have dummy operands, and/or duplicate existing instructions, making them
awkward to handle in the asm parser.
This commit changes this by leaving the "FADD in round-to-zero mode"
as an atomic operation on the SelectionDAG level, and only split it up into
real instructions at the MI level (via custom inserter). Since at *this*
level the FPSCR *is* modeled (via the "RM" hard register), much of the
"special" stuff can just go away, and the resulting patterns can be used by
the asm parser.
No significant change in generated code expected.
llvm-svn: 178006
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This commit changes the ISEL patterns to use a CCBITRC operand
instead of a "pred" operand. This matches the actual instruction
text more directly, and simplifies use of ISEL with the asm parser.
In addition, this change allows some simplification of handling
the "pred" operand, as this is now only used by BCC.
No change in generated code.
llvm-svn: 178003
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
We currently have a duplicated set of call instruction patterns depending
on the ABI to be followed (Darwin vs. Linux). This is a bit odd; while the
different ABIs will result in different instruction sequences, the actual
instructions themselves ought to be independent of the ABI. And in fact it
turns out that the only nontrivial difference between the two sets of
patterns is that in the PPC64 Linux ABI, the instruction used for indirect
calls is marked to take X11 as extra input register (which is indeed used
only with that ABI to hold an incoming environment pointer for nested
functions). However, this does not need to be hard-coded at the .td
pattern level; instead, the C++ code expanding calls can simply add that
use, just like it adds uses for argument registers anyway.
No change in generated code expected.
llvm-svn: 177735
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
PPCTargetLowering::getPreIndexedAddressParts currently provides
the base part of a memory address in the offset result, and the
offset part in the base result. That swap is then undone again
when an MI instruction is generated (in PPCDAGToDAGISel::Select
for loads, and using .md Pat patterns for stores).
This patch reverts this double swap, to make common code and
back-end be in sync as to which part of the address is base
and which is offset.
To avoid performance regressions in certain cases, target code
now checks whether the choice of base register would be rejected
for pre-inc accesses by common code, and attempts to swap base
and offset again in such cases. (Overall, this means that now
pre-ice accesses are generated *more* frequently than before.)
llvm-svn: 177733
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
As Jakob pointed out in his review of r177423, having a shared ZERO
register between the 32- and 64-bit register classes causes this
odd G8RC_NOX0_and_GPRC_NOR0 class to be created. As recommended,
this adds a ZERO8 register which differentiates the 32- and 64-bit
zeros.
No functionality change intended.
llvm-svn: 177683
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This implements SJLJ lowering on PPC, making the Clang functions
__builtin_{setjmp/longjmp} functional on PPC platforms. The implementation
strategy is similar to that on X86, with the exception that a branch-and-link
variant is used to get the right jump address. Credit goes to Bill Schmidt for
suggesting the use of the unconditional bcl form (instead of the regular bl
instruction) to limit return-address-cache pollution.
Benchmarking the speed at -O3 of:
static jmp_buf env_sigill;
void foo() {
__builtin_longjmp(env_sigill,1);
}
main() {
...
for (int i = 0; i < c; ++i) {
if (__builtin_setjmp(env_sigill)) {
goto done;
} else {
foo();
}
done:;
}
...
}
vs. the same code using the libc setjmp/longjmp functions on a P7 shows that
this builtin implementation is ~4x faster with Altivec enabled and ~7.25x
faster with Altivec disabled. This comparison is somewhat unfair because the
libc version must also save/restore the VSX registers which we don't yet
support.
llvm-svn: 177666
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The old code used to lower FRAMEADDR tried to replicate the logic in the real
frame-lowering code that determines whether or not the frame pointer (r31) will
be used. When it seemed as through the frame pointer would not be used, the
stack pointer (r1) was used instead. Unfortunately, because the stack size is
not yet known, this does not work. Instead, this change introduces new
always-reserved pseudo-registers (FP and FP8) that are replaced during prologue
insertion with the real frame-pointer register (either r1 or r31).
It is important that this intrinsic always return a valid frame address because
it is used by Clang to store the frame address as part of code generation for
__builtin_setjmp.
llvm-svn: 177653
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Currently the PPC r0 register is unconditionally reserved. There are two reasons
for this:
1. r0 is treated specially (as the constant 0) by certain instructions, and so
cannot be used with those instructions as a regular register.
2. r0 is used as a temporary register in the CR-register spilling process
(where, under some circumstances, we require two GPRs).
This change addresses the first reason by introducing a restricted register
class (without r0) for use by those instructions that treat r0 specially. These
register classes have a new pseudo-register, ZERO, which represents the r0-as-0
use. This has the side benefit of making the existing target code simpler (and
easier to understand), and will make it clear to the register allocator that
uses of r0 as 0 don't conflict will real uses of the r0 register.
Once the CR spilling code is improved, we'll be able to allocate r0.
Adding these extra register classes, for some reason unclear to me, causes
requests to the target to copy 32-bit registers to 64-bit registers. The
resulting code seems correct (and causes no test-suite failures), and the new
test case covers this new kind of asymmetric copy.
As r0 is still reserved, no functionality change intended.
llvm-svn: 177423
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
PPC64 supports unaligned loads and stores of 64-bit values, but
in order to use the r+i forms, the offset must be a multiple of 4.
Unfortunately, this cannot always be determined by examining the
immediate itself because it might be available only via a TOC entry.
In order to get around this issue, we additionally predicate the
selection of the r+i form on the alignment of the load or store
(forcing it to be at least 4 in order to select the r+i form).
llvm-svn: 177338
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Unaligned access is supported on PPC for non-vector types, and is generally
more efficient than manually expanding the loads and stores.
A few of the existing test cases were using expanded unaligned loads and stores
to test other features (like load/store with update), and for these test cases,
unaligned access remains disabled.
llvm-svn: 177160
|
| |
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 176648
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
to TargetFrameLowering, where it belongs. Incidentally, this allows us
to delete some duplicated (and slightly different!) code in TRI.
There are potentially other layering problems that can be cleaned up
as a result, or in a similar manner.
The refactoring was OK'd by Anton Korobeynikov on llvmdev.
Note: this touches the target interfaces, so out-of-tree targets may
be affected.
llvm-svn: 175788
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
http://llvm.org/docs/CodingStandards.html#name-types-functions-variables-and-enumerators-properly
ivars should be camel-case and start with an upper-case letter. A few in
TargetLowering were starting with a lower-case letter.
No functional change intended.
llvm-svn: 175667
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This handles the cases where the 6-bit splat element is odd, converting
to a three-instruction sequence to add or subtract two splats. With this
fix, the XFAIL in test/CodeGen/PowerPC/vec_constants.ll is removed.
llvm-svn: 175663
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The PPC backend doesn't handle these correctly. This patch uses logic
similar to that in the X86 and ARM backends to track these arguments
properly.
llvm-svn: 175635
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
During lowering of a BUILD_VECTOR, we look for opportunities to use a
vector splat. When the splatted value fits in 5 signed bits, a single
splat does the job. When it doesn't fit in 5 bits but does fit in 6,
and is an even value, we can splat on half the value and add the result
to itself.
This last optimization hasn't been working recently because of improved
constant folding. To circumvent this, create a pseudo VADD_SPLAT that
can be expanded during instruction selection.
llvm-svn: 175632
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Most of PPCCallingConv.td is used only by the 32-bit SVR4 ABI. Rename
things to clarify this. Also delete some code that's been commented out
for a long time.
llvm-svn: 174526
|
| |
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 174409
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
I didn't see those because the test case used "not grep". FileCheck the test and
XFAIL it, preserving the old optimization, so this can be fixed eventually.
llvm-svn: 174330
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This required disabling a PowerPC optimization that did the following:
input:
x = BUILD_VECTOR <i32 16, i32 16, i32 16, i32 16>
lowered to:
tmp = BUILD_VECTOR <i32 8, i32 8, i32 8, i32 8>
x = ADD tmp, tmp
The add now gets folded immediately and we're back at the BUILD_VECTOR we
started from. I don't see a way to fix this currently so I left it disabled
for now.
Fix some trivially foldable X86 tests too.
llvm-svn: 174325
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
conditions are met:
1. They share the same operand and are in the same BB.
2. Both outputs are used.
3. The target has a native instruction that maps to ISD::FSINCOS node or
the target provides a sincos library call.
Implemented the generic optimization in sdisel and enabled it for
Mac OSX. Also added an additional optimization for x86_64 Mac OSX by
using an alternative entry point __sincos_stret which returns the two
results in xmm0 / xmm1.
rdar://13087969
PR13204
llvm-svn: 173755
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
into their new header subdirectory: include/llvm/IR. This matches the
directory structure of lib, and begins to correct a long standing point
of file layout clutter in LLVM.
There are still more header files to move here, but I wanted to handle
them in separate commits to make tracking what files make sense at each
layer easier.
The only really questionable files here are the target intrinsic
tablegen files. But that's a battle I'd rather not fight today.
I've updated both CMake and Makefile build systems (I think, and my
tests think, but I may have missed something).
I've also re-sorted the includes throughout the project. I'll be
committing updates to Clang, DragonEgg, and Polly momentarily.
llvm-svn: 171366
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
directly.
This is in preparation for removing the use of the 'Attribute' class as a
collection of attributes. That will shift to the AttributeSet class instead.
llvm-svn: 171253
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Use of store or load with the atomic specifier on 64-bit types would
cause instruction-selection failures. As with the 32-bit case, these
can use the default expansion in terms of cmp-and-swap.
llvm-svn: 171072
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
There's probably a better expansion for those nodes than the default for
altivec, but this is better than crashing. VSELECTs occur in loop vectorizer
output.
llvm-svn: 170551
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
single attribute in the future.
llvm-svn: 170502
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
for a wider range of GOT entries that can hold thread-relative offsets.
This matches the behavior of GCC, which was not documented in the PPC64 TLS
ABI. The ABI will be updated with the new code sequence.
Former sequence:
ld 9,x@got@tprel(2)
add 9,9,x@tls
New sequence:
addis 9,2,x@got@tprel@ha
ld 9,x@got@tprel@l(9)
add 9,9,x@tls
Note that a linker optimization exists to transform the new sequence into
the shorter sequence when appropriate, by replacing the addis with a nop
and modifying the base register and relocation type of the ld.
llvm-svn: 170209
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
some hackery in place that hid my poor use of TblGen, which I've now sorted
out and cleaned up. No change in observable behavior, so no new test cases.
llvm-svn: 170149
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
avoiding use of machine operand flags. No change in observable behavior, so
no new test cases.
llvm-svn: 170141
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
PowerPC target. This is the last of the four models, so we now have
full TLS support.
This is mostly a straightforward extension of the general dynamic model.
I had to use an additional Chain operand to tie ADDIS_DTPREL_HA to the
register copy following ADDI_TLSLD_L; otherwise everything above the
ADDIS_DTPREL_HA appeared dead and was removed.
As before, there are new test cases to test the assembly generation, and
the relocations output during integrated assembly. The expected code
gen sequence can be read in test/CodeGen/PowerPC/tls-ld.ll.
There are a couple of things I think can be done more efficiently in the
overall TLS code, so there will likely be a clean-up patch forthcoming;
but for now I want to be sure the functionality is in place.
Bill
llvm-svn: 170003
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
mention the inline memcpy / memset expansion code is a mess?
This patch split the ZeroOrLdSrc argument into two: IsMemset and ZeroMemset.
The first indicates whether it is expanding a memset or a memcpy / memmove.
The later is whether the memset is a memset of zero. It's totally possible
(likely even) that targets may want to do different things for memcpy and
memset of zero.
llvm-svn: 169959
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Also added more comments to explain why it is generally ok to return true.
- Rename getOptimalMemOpType argument IsZeroVal to ZeroOrLdSrc. It's meant to
be true for loaded source (memcpy) or zero constants (memset). The poor name
choice is probably some kind of legacy issue.
llvm-svn: 169954
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Given a thread-local symbol x with global-dynamic access, the generated
code to obtain x's address is:
Instruction Relocation Symbol
addis ra,r2,x@got@tlsgd@ha R_PPC64_GOT_TLSGD16_HA x
addi r3,ra,x@got@tlsgd@l R_PPC64_GOT_TLSGD16_L x
bl __tls_get_addr(x@tlsgd) R_PPC64_TLSGD x
R_PPC64_REL24 __tls_get_addr
nop
<use address in r3>
The implementation borrows from the medium code model work for introducing
special forms of ADDIS and ADDI into the DAG representation. This is made
slightly more complicated by having to introduce a call to the external
function __tls_get_addr. Using the full call machinery is overkill and,
more importantly, makes it difficult to add a special relocation. So I've
introduced another opcode GET_TLS_ADDR to represent the function call, and
surrounded it with register copies to set up the parameter and return value.
Most of the code is pretty straightforward. I ran into one peculiarity
when I introduced a new PPC opcode BL8_NOP_ELF_TLSGD, which is just like
BL8_NOP_ELF except that it takes another parameter to represent the symbol
("x" above) that requires a relocation on the call. Something in the
TblGen machinery causes BL8_NOP_ELF and BL8_NOP_ELF_TLSGD to be treated
identically during the emit phase, so this second operand was never
visited to generate relocations. This is the reason for the slightly
messy workaround in PPCMCCodeEmitter.cpp:getDirectBrEncoding().
Two new tests are included to demonstrate correct external assembly and
correct generation of relocations using the integrated assembler.
Comments welcome!
Thanks,
Bill
llvm-svn: 169910
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
on 64-bit PowerPC ELF.
The patch includes code to handle external assembly and MC output with the
integrated assembler. It intentionally does not support the "old" JIT.
For the initial-exec TLS model, the ABI requires the following to calculate
the address of external thread-local variable x:
Code sequence Relocation Symbol
ld 9,x@got@tprel(2) R_PPC64_GOT_TPREL16_DS x
add 9,9,x@tls R_PPC64_TLS x
The register 9 is arbitrary here. The linker will replace x@got@tprel
with the offset relative to the thread pointer to the generated GOT
entry for symbol x. It will replace x@tls with the thread-pointer
register (13).
The two test cases verify correct assembly output and relocation output
as just described.
PowerPC-specific selection node variants are added for the two
instructions above: LD_GOT_TPREL and ADD_TLS. These are inserted
when an initial-exec global variable is encountered by
PPCTargetLowering::LowerGlobalTLSAddress(), and later lowered to
machine instructions LDgotTPREL and ADD8TLS. LDgotTPREL is a pseudo
that uses the same LDrs support added for medium code model's LDtocL,
with a different relocation type.
The rest of the processing is straightforward.
llvm-svn: 169281
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Sooooo many of these had incorrect or strange main module includes.
I have manually inspected all of these, and fixed the main module
include to be the nearest plausible thing I could find. If you own or
care about any of these source files, I encourage you to take some time
and check that these edits were sensible. I can't have broken anything
(I strictly added headers, and reordered them, never removed), but they
may not be the headers you'd really like to identify as containing the
API being implemented.
Many forward declarations and missing includes were added to a header
files to allow them to parse cleanly when included first. The main
module rule does in fact have its merits. =]
llvm-svn: 169131
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The default for 64-bit PowerPC is small code model, in which TOC entries
must be addressable using a 16-bit offset from the TOC pointer. Additionally,
only TOC entries are addressed via the TOC pointer.
With medium code model, TOC entries and data sections can all be addressed
via the TOC pointer using a 32-bit offset. Cooperation with the linker
allows 16-bit offsets to be used when these are sufficient, reducing the
number of extra instructions that need to be executed. Medium code model
also does not generate explicit TOC entries in ".section toc" for variables
that are wholly internal to the compilation unit.
Consider a load of an external 4-byte integer. With small code model, the
compiler generates:
ld 3, .LC1@toc(2)
lwz 4, 0(3)
.section .toc,"aw",@progbits
.LC1:
.tc ei[TC],ei
With medium model, it instead generates:
addis 3, 2, .LC1@toc@ha
ld 3, .LC1@toc@l(3)
lwz 4, 0(3)
.section .toc,"aw",@progbits
.LC1:
.tc ei[TC],ei
Here .LC1@toc@ha is a relocation requesting the upper 16 bits of the
32-bit offset of ei's TOC entry from the TOC base pointer. Similarly,
.LC1@toc@l is a relocation requesting the lower 16 bits. Note that if
the linker determines that ei's TOC entry is within a 16-bit offset of
the TOC base pointer, it will replace the "addis" with a "nop", and
replace the "ld" with the identical "ld" instruction from the small
code model example.
Consider next a load of a function-scope static integer. For small code
model, the compiler generates:
ld 3, .LC1@toc(2)
lwz 4, 0(3)
.section .toc,"aw",@progbits
.LC1:
.tc test_fn_static.si[TC],test_fn_static.si
.type test_fn_static.si,@object
.local test_fn_static.si
.comm test_fn_static.si,4,4
For medium code model, the compiler generates:
addis 3, 2, test_fn_static.si@toc@ha
addi 3, 3, test_fn_static.si@toc@l
lwz 4, 0(3)
.type test_fn_static.si,@object
.local test_fn_static.si
.comm test_fn_static.si,4,4
Again, the linker may replace the "addis" with a "nop", calculating only
a 16-bit offset when this is sufficient.
Note that it would be more efficient for the compiler to generate:
addis 3, 2, test_fn_static.si@toc@ha
lwz 4, test_fn_static.si@toc@l(3)
The current patch does not perform this optimization yet. This will be
addressed as a peephole optimization in a later patch.
For the moment, the default code model for 64-bit PowerPC will remain the
small code model. We plan to eventually change the default to medium code
model, which matches current upstream GCC behavior. Note that the different
code models are ABI-compatible, so code compiled with different models will
be linked and execute correctly.
I've tested the regression suite and the application/benchmark test suite in
two ways: Once with the patch as submitted here, and once with additional
logic to force medium code model as the default. The tests all compile
cleanly, with one exception. The mandel-2 application test fails due to an
unrelated ABI compatibility with passing complex numbers. It just so happens
that small code model was incredibly lucky, in that temporary values in
floating-point registers held the expected values needed by the external
library routine that was called incorrectly. My current thought is to correct
the ABI problems with _Complex before making medium code model the default,
to avoid introducing this "regression."
Here are a few comments on how the patch works, since the selection code
can be difficult to follow:
The existing logic for small code model defines three pseudo-instructions:
LDtoc for most uses, LDtocJTI for jump table addresses, and LDtocCPT for
constant pool addresses. These are expanded by SelectCodeCommon(). The
pseudo-instruction approach doesn't work for medium code model, because
we need to generate two instructions when we match the same pattern.
Instead, new logic in PPCDAGToDAGISel::Select() intercepts the TOC_ENTRY
node for medium code model, and generates an ADDIStocHA followed by either
a LDtocL or an ADDItocL. These new node types correspond naturally to
the sequences described above.
The addis/ld sequence is generated for the following cases:
* Jump table addresses
* Function addresses
* External global variables
* Tentative definitions of global variables (common linkage)
The addis/addi sequence is generated for the following cases:
* Constant pool entries
* File-scope static global variables
* Function-scope static variables
Expanding to the two-instruction sequences at select time exposes the
instructions to subsequent optimization, particularly scheduling.
The rest of the processing occurs at assembly time, in
PPCAsmPrinter::EmitInstruction. Each of the instructions is converted to
a "real" PowerPC instruction. When a TOC entry needs to be created, this
is done here in the same manner as for the existing LDtoc, LDtocJTI, and
LDtocCPT pseudo-instructions (I factored out a new routine to handle this).
I had originally thought that if a TOC entry was needed for LDtocL or
ADDItocL, it would already have been generated for the previous ADDIStocHA.
However, at higher optimization levels, the ADDIStocHA may appear in a
different block, which may be assembled textually following the block
containing the LDtocL or ADDItocL. So it is necessary to include the
possibility of creating a new TOC entry for those two instructions.
Note that for LDtocL, we generate a new form of LD called LDrs. This
allows specifying the @toc@l relocation for the offset field of the LD
instruction (i.e., the offset is replaced by a SymbolLo relocation).
When the peephole optimization described above is added, we will need
to do similar things for all immediate-form load and store operations.
The seven "mcm-n.ll" test cases are kept separate because otherwise the
intermingling of various TOC entries and so forth makes the tests fragile
and hard to understand.
The above assumes use of an external assembler. For use of the
integrated assembler, new relocations are added and used by
PPCELFObjectWriter. Testing is done with "mcm-obj.ll", which tests for
proper generation of the various relocations for the same sequences
tested with the external assembler.
llvm-svn: 168708
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This patch lowers the llvm.floor, llvm.ceil, llvm.trunc, and
llvm.nearbyint to Altivec instruction when using 4 single-precision
float vectors.
llvm-svn: 168086
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
instruction selection won't fail.
llvm-svn: 168028
|
| |
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 168025
|
| |
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 167922
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
to be extended to a full register. This is modeled in the IR by marking
the return value (or argument) with a signext or zeroext attribute.
However, while these attributes are respected for function arguments,
they are currently ignored for function return values by the PowerPC
back-end. This patch updates PPCCallingConv.td to ask for the promotion
to i64, and fixes LowerReturn and LowerCallResult to implement it.
The new test case verifies that both arguments and return values are
properly extended when passing them; and also that the optimizers
understand incoming argument and return values are in fact guaranteed
by the ABI to be extended.
The patch caused a spurious breakage in CodeGen/PowerPC/coalesce-ext.ll,
since the test case used a "ret" instruction to create a use of an i32
value at the end of the function (to set up data flow as required for
what the test is intended to test). Since there's now an implicit
promotion to i64, that data flow no longer works as expected. To fix
this, this patch now adds an extra "add" to ensure we have an appropriate
use of the i32 value.
llvm-svn: 167396
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The Z constraint specifies an r+r memory address, and the y modifier expands
to the "r, r" in the asm string. For this initial implementation, the base
register is forced to r0 (which has the special meaning of 0 for r+r addressing
on PowerPC) and the full address is taken in the second register. In the
future, this should be improved.
llvm-svn: 167388
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This patch expands the SEXTLOAD, ZEXTLOAD, and EXTLOAD operations for
vector types when altivec is enabled.
llvm-svn: 167386
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
getIntPtrType support for multiple address spaces via a pointer type,
and also introduced a crasher bug in the constant folder reported in
PR14233.
These commits also contained several problems that should really be
addressed before they are re-committed. I have avoided reverting various
cleanups to the DataLayout APIs that are reasonable to have moving
forward in order to reduce the amount of churn, and minimize the number
of commits that were reverted. I've also manually updated merge
conflicts and manually arranged for the getIntPtrType function to stay
in DataLayout and to be defined in a plausible way after this revert.
Thanks to Duncan for working through this exact strategy with me, and
Nick Lewycky for tracking down the really annoying crasher this
triggered. (Test case to follow in its own commit.)
After discussing with Duncan extensively, and based on a note from
Micah, I'm going to continue to back out some more of the more
problematic patches in this series in order to ensure we go into the
LLVM 3.2 branch with a reasonable story here. I'll send a note to
llvmdev explaining what's going on and why.
Summary of reverted revisions:
r166634: Fix a compiler warning with an unused variable.
r166607: Add some cleanup to the DataLayout changes requested by
Chandler.
r166596: Revert "Back out r166591, not sure why this made it through
since I cancelled the command. Bleh, sorry about this!
r166591: Delete a directory that wasn't supposed to be checked in yet.
r166578: Add in support for getIntPtrType to get the pointer type based
on the address space.
llvm-svn: 167221
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
parameters. Examples of these are:
struct { } a;
union { } b[256];
int a[0];
An empty aggregate has an address, although dereferencing that address is
pointless. When passed as a parameter, an empty aggregate does not consume
a protocol register, nor does it consume a doubleword in the parameter save
area. Passing an empty aggregate by reference passes an address just as
for any other aggregate. Returning an empty aggregate uses GPR3 as a hidden
address of the return value location, just as for any other aggregate.
The patch modifies PPCTargetLowering::LowerFormalArguments_64SVR4 and
PPCTargetLowering::LowerCall_64SVR4 to properly skip empty aggregate
parameters passed by value. The handling of return values and by-reference
parameters was already correct.
Built on powerpc64-unknown-linux-gnu and tested with no new regressions.
A test case is included to test proper handling of empty aggregate
parameters on both sides of the function call protocol.
llvm-svn: 167090
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This patch expands FSQRT for floating point vector types when altivec is
used.
llvm-svn: 167034
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This patch adds more support for vector type comparisons using altivec.
It adds correct support for v16i8, v8i16, v4i32, and v4f32 vector
types for comparison operators ==, !=, >, >=, <, and <=.
llvm-svn: 167015
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
ELF ABI.
A varargs parameter consisting of a single-precision floating-point value,
or of a single-element aggregate containing a single-precision floating-point
value, must be passed in the low-order (rightmost) four bytes of the
doubleword stack slot reserved for that parameter. If there are GPR protocol
registers remaining, the parameter must also be mirrored in the low-order
four bytes of the reserved GPR.
Prior to this patch, such parameters were being passed in the high-order
four bytes of the stack slot and the mirrored GPR.
The patch adds a new test case to verify the correct code generation.
llvm-svn: 166968
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
This fixes PR12757.
llvm-svn: 166943
|
