summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/llvm/lib/Target/PowerPC/PPCISelLowering.cpp
Commit message (Collapse)AuthorAgeFilesLines
* [Power9] Exploit vector integer extend instructions when indices aren't correct.Tony Jiang2017-07-051-0/+136
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | This patch adds on to the exploitation added by https://reviews.llvm.org/D33510. This now catches build vector nodes where the inputs are coming from sign extended vector extract elements where the indices used by the vector extract are not correct. We can still use the new hardware instructions by adding a shuffle to move the elements to the correct indices. I introduced a new PPCISD node here because adding a vector_shuffle and changing the elements of the vector_extracts was getting undone by another DAG combine. Commit on behalf of Zaara Syeda (syzaara@ca.ibm.com) Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D34009 llvm-svn: 307169
* Tidy up some calls to getRegister for readability.Eric Christopher2017-06-171-5/+6
| | | | llvm-svn: 305626
* Test commit - NFC.Lei Huang2017-06-141-1/+1
| | | | | | Modified a comment to confirm commit access functionality. llvm-svn: 305402
* Test commit - NFC.Kit Barton2017-06-131-1/+1
| | | | | | Modified a comment to confirm commit access functionality. llvm-svn: 305309
* PPCISelLowering.cpp: Fix warnings in r305214. [-Wdocumentation]NAKAMURA Takumi2017-06-131-3/+3
| | | | llvm-svn: 305277
* [PowerPC] Match vec_revb builtins to P9 instructions.Tony Jiang2017-06-121-7/+69
| | | | | | | | | | | | Power9 has instructions that will reverse the bytes within an element for all sizes (half-word, word, double-word and quad-word). These can be used for the vec_revb builtins in altivec.h. However, we implement these to match vector shuffle nodes as that will cover both the builtins and vector shuffles that occur in the SDAG through other means. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D33690 llvm-svn: 305214
* [Power9] Added support for the modsw, moduw, modsd, modud hardware instructions.Tony Jiang2017-06-121-5/+32
| | | | | | | | | | | Note that if we need the result of both the divide and the modulo then we compute the modulo based on the result of the divide and not using the new hardware instruction. Commit on behalf of STEFAN PINTILIE. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D33940 llvm-svn: 305210
* [DAG] add helper to bind memop chains; NFCISanjay Patel2017-06-121-0/+1
| | | | | | | | | | This step is just intended to reduce code duplication rather than change any functionality. A follow-up would be to replace PPCTargetLowering::spliceIntoChain() usage with this new helper. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D33649 llvm-svn: 305192
* Sort the remaining #include lines in include/... and lib/....Chandler Carruth2017-06-061-5/+5
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | I did this a long time ago with a janky python script, but now clang-format has built-in support for this. I fed clang-format every line with a #include and let it re-sort things according to the precise LLVM rules for include ordering baked into clang-format these days. I've reverted a number of files where the results of sorting includes isn't healthy. Either places where we have legacy code relying on particular include ordering (where possible, I'll fix these separately) or where we have particular formatting around #include lines that I didn't want to disturb in this patch. This patch is *entirely* mechanical. If you get merge conflicts or anything, just ignore the changes in this patch and run clang-format over your #include lines in the files. Sorry for any noise here, but it is important to keep these things stable. I was seeing an increasing number of patches with irrelevant re-ordering of #include lines because clang-format was used. This patch at least isolates that churn, makes it easy to skip when resolving conflicts, and gets us to a clean baseline (again). llvm-svn: 304787
* [PPC] Inline expansion of memcmpZaara Syeda2017-05-311-0/+4
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | This patch does an inline expansion of memcmp. It changes the memcmp library call into an inline expansion when the size is known at compile time and is under a target specified threshold. This expansion is implemented in CodeGenPrepare and expands into straight line code. The target specifies a maximum load size and the expansion works by using this size to load the two sources, compare, and exit early if a difference is found. It also has a special case when the memcmp result is used in a compare to zero equality. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D28637 llvm-svn: 304313
* [PowerPC] Fix a performance bug for PPC::XXPERMDI.Tony Jiang2017-05-311-12/+94
| | | | | | | | | | There are some VectorShuffle Nodes in SDAG which can be selected to XXPERMDI Instruction, this patch recognizes them and does the selection to improve the PPC performance. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D33404 llvm-svn: 304298
* [SelectionDAG] Set ISD::FPOWI to Expand by defaultCraig Topper2017-05-301-3/+0
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Summary: Currently FPOWI defaults to Legal and LegalizeDAG.cpp turns Legal into Expand for this opcode because Legal is a "lie". This patch changes the default for this opcode to Expand and removes the hack from LegalizeDAG.cpp. It also removes all the code in the targets that set this opcode to Expand themselves since they can just rely on the default. Reviewers: spatel, RKSimon, efriedma Reviewed By: RKSimon Subscribers: jfb, dschuff, sbc100, jgravelle-google, nemanjai, javed.absar, andrew.w.kaylor, llvm-commits Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D33530 llvm-svn: 304215
* [PPC] Add text for assert.Tim Shen2017-05-251-1/+1
| | | | llvm-svn: 303940
* [PPC] Fix atomics lowering in DAG lowering.Tim Shen2017-05-251-1/+3
| | | | | | | | | | | I forgot to forward the chain, causing some missing instruction dependencies. The test crashes the compiler without this patch. Inspired by the test case, D33519 also tries to remove the extra sync. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D33573 llvm-svn: 303931
* [PowerPC] Fix a performance bug for PPC::XXSLDWI.Tony Jiang2017-05-241-2/+86
| | | | | | | | There are some VectorShuffle Nodes in SDAG which can be selected to XXSLDWI instruction, this patch recognizes them and does the selection to improve the PPC performance. llvm-svn: 303822
* CodeGen: Power: Add lowering for shifts of v1i128.Kyle Butt2017-05-171-0/+15
| | | | | | | | | | | | When legalizing vector operations on vNi128, they will be split to v1i128 because that is a legal type on ppc64, but then the compiler will crash in selection dag because it fails to select for these operations. This patch fixes shift operations. Logical shift right and left shift can be performed in the vector unit, but algebraic shift right requires being split. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D32774 llvm-svn: 303307
* [PPC] Lower load acquire/seq_cst trailing fence to cmp + bne + isync.Tim Shen2017-05-161-5/+40
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Summary: This fixes pr32392. The lowering pipeline is: llvm.ppc.cfence in IR -> PPC::CFENCE8 in isel -> Actual instructions in expandPostRAPseudo. The reason why expandPostRAPseudo is chosen is because previous passes are likely eliminating instructions like cmpw 3, 3 (early CSE) and bne- 7, .+4 (some branch pass(s)). Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D32763 llvm-svn: 303205
* [PPC] Move the combine "a << (b % (sizeof(a) * 8)) -> (PPCshl a, b)" to the ↵Tim Shen2017-05-121-0/+64
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | backend. NFC. Summary: Eli pointed out that it's unsafe to combine the shifts to ISD::SHL etc., because those are not defined for b > sizeof(a) * 8, even after some of the combiners run. However, PPCISD::SHL defines that behavior (as the instructions themselves). Move the combination to the backend. The tests in shift_mask.ll still pass. Reviewers: echristo, hfinkel, efriedma, iteratee Subscribers: nemanjai, llvm-commits Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D33076 llvm-svn: 302937
* [Atomic] Remove IsStore/IsLoad in the interface, and pass the instruction ↵Tim Shen2017-05-091-7/+7
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | instead. NFC. Now both emitLeadingFence and emitTrailingFence take the instruction itself, instead of taking IsLoad/IsStore pairs. Instruction::mayReadFromMemory and Instrucion::mayWriteToMemory are used for determining those two booleans. The instruction argument is also useful for later D32763, in emitTrailingFence. For emitLeadingFence, it seems to have cleaner interface with the proposed change. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D32762 llvm-svn: 302539
* Add extra operand to CALLSEQ_START to keep frame part set up previouslySerge Pavlov2017-05-091-12/+8
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Using arguments with attribute inalloca creates problems for verification of machine representation. This attribute instructs the backend that the argument is prepared in stack prior to CALLSEQ_START..CALLSEQ_END sequence (see http://llvm.org/docs/InAlloca.htm for details). Frame size stored in CALLSEQ_START in this case does not count the size of this argument. However CALLSEQ_END still keeps total frame size, as caller can be responsible for cleanup of entire frame. So CALLSEQ_START and CALLSEQ_END keep different frame size and the difference is treated by MachineVerifier as stack error. Currently there is no way to distinguish this case from actual errors. This patch adds additional argument to CALLSEQ_START and its target-specific counterparts to keep size of stack that is set up prior to the call frame sequence. This argument allows MachineVerifier to calculate actual frame size associated with frame setup instruction and correctly process the case of inalloca arguments. The changes made by the patch are: - Frame setup instructions get the second mandatory argument. It affects all targets that use frame pseudo instructions and touched many files although the changes are uniform. - Access to frame properties are implemented using special instructions rather than calls getOperand(N).getImm(). For X86 and ARM such replacement was made previously. - Changes that reflect appearance of additional argument of frame setup instruction. These involve proper instruction initialization and methods that access instruction arguments. - MachineVerifier retrieves frame size using method, which reports sum of frame parts initialized inside frame instruction pair and outside it. The patch implements approach proposed by Quentin Colombet in https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=27481#c1. It fixes 9 tests failed with machine verifier enabled and listed in PR27481. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D32394 llvm-svn: 302527
* [KnownBits] Add wrapper methods for setting and clear all bits in the ↵Craig Topper2017-05-051-1/+1
| | | | | | | | | | underlying APInts in KnownBits. This adds routines for reseting KnownBits to unknown, making the value all zeros or all ones. It also adds methods for querying if the value is zero, all ones or unknown. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D32637 llvm-svn: 302262
* [PowerPC] Emit VMX loads/stores for aligned ops to avoid adding swaps on LENemanja Ivanovic2017-05-021-0/+15
| | | | | | | | | | | | | Fixes PR30730. This is a re-commit of a pulled commit. The commit was pulled because some software projects contained uses of Altivec vectors that violated alignment requirements. Known issues have now been fixed. Committing on behalf of Lei Huang. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D26861 llvm-svn: 301892
* Generalize the specialized flag-carrying SDNodes by moving flags into SDNode.Amara Emerson2017-05-011-5/+5
| | | | | | | | This removes BinaryWithFlagsSDNode, and flags are now all passed by value. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D32527 llvm-svn: 301803
* [SelectionDAG] Use KnownBits struct in DAG's computeKnownBits and ↵Craig Topper2017-04-281-24/+20
| | | | | | | | | | | | simplifyDemandedBits This patch replaces the separate APInts for KnownZero/KnownOne with a single KnownBits struct. This is similar to what was done to ValueTracking's version recently. This is largely a mechanical transformation from KnownZero to Known.Zero. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D32569 llvm-svn: 301620
* Move value type list from TargetRegisterClass to TargetRegisterInfoKrzysztof Parzyszek2017-04-241-2/+2
| | | | | | Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31937 llvm-svn: 301234
* Revert r301231: Accidentally committed stale filesKrzysztof Parzyszek2017-04-241-2/+2
| | | | | | I forgot to commit local changes before commit. llvm-svn: 301232
* Move value type list from TargetRegisterClass to TargetRegisterInfoKrzysztof Parzyszek2017-04-241-2/+2
| | | | | | Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31937 llvm-svn: 301231
* [DAGCombiner] Add vector demanded elements support to ↵Simon Pilgrim2017-03-311-0/+1
| | | | | | | | | | computeKnownBitsForTargetNode Follow up to D25691, this sets up the plumbing necessary to support vector demanded elements support in known bits calculations in target nodes. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31249 llvm-svn: 299201
* Kill some trailing whitespace to make some new changes a bit easier.Eric Christopher2017-03-231-12/+12
| | | | llvm-svn: 298637
* Make library calls sensitive to regparm module flag (Fixes PR3997).Nirav Dave2017-03-181-4/+3
| | | | | | | | | | Reviewers: mkuper, rnk Subscribers: mehdi_amini, jyknight, aemerson, llvm-commits, rengolin Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D27050 llvm-svn: 298179
* Remove getArgumentList() in favor of arg_begin(), args(), etcReid Kleckner2017-03-161-1/+1
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Users often call getArgumentList().size(), which is a linear way to get the number of function arguments. arg_size(), on the other hand, is constant time. In general, the fact that arguments are stored in an iplist is an implementation detail, so I've removed it from the Function interface and moved all other users to the argument container APIs (arg_begin(), arg_end(), args(), arg_size()). Reviewed By: chandlerc Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31052 llvm-svn: 298010
* Test commit.Hiroshi Inoue2017-03-161-1/+1
| | | | llvm-svn: 297959
* Revert "Revert "[PowerPC][ELFv2ABI] Allocate parameter area on-demand to ↵Tim Shen2017-03-081-5/+43
| | | | | | | | | | | | | reduce stack frame size"" After inspection, it's an UB in our code base. Someone cast a var-arg function pointer to a non-var-arg one. :/ Re-commit r296771 to continue testing on the patch. Sorry for the trouble! llvm-svn: 297256
* Revert "[PowerPC][ELFv2ABI] Allocate parameter area on-demand to reduce ↵Tim Shen2017-03-071-43/+5
| | | | | | | | | | | stack frame size" This reverts commit r296771. We found some wide spread test failures internally. I'm working on a testcase. Politely revert the patch in the mean time. :) llvm-svn: 297124
* [PowerPC] Fix failure with STBRX when store is narrower than the bswapNemanja Ivanovic2017-03-061-2/+5
| | | | | | | | | | | Fixes a crash caused by r296811 by truncating the input of the STBRX node when the bswap is wider than i32. Fixes https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=32140 Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D30615 llvm-svn: 297001
* [PPC] Fix code generation for bswap(int32) followed by store16Guozhi Wei2017-03-021-2/+10
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | This patch fixes pr32063. Current code in PPCTargetLowering::PerformDAGCombine can transform bswap store into a single PPCISD::STBRX instruction. but it doesn't consider the case that the operand size of bswap may be larger than store size. When it occurs, we need 2 modifications, 1 For the last operand of PPCISD::STBRX, we should not use DAG.getValueType(N->getOperand(1).getValueType()), instead we should use cast<StoreSDNode>(N)->getMemoryVT(). 2 Before PPCISD::STBRX, we need to shift the original operand of bswap to the right side. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D30362 llvm-svn: 296811
* [PowerPC][ELFv2ABI] Allocate parameter area on-demand to reduce stack frame sizeNemanja Ivanovic2017-03-021-5/+43
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | This patch reduces the stack frame size by not allocating the parameter area if it is not required. In the current implementation LowerFormalArguments_64SVR4 already handles the parameter area, but LowerCall_64SVR4 does not (when calculating the stack frame size). What this patch does is make LowerCall_64SVR4 consistent with LowerFormalArguments_64SVR4. Committing on behalf of Hiroshi Inoue. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D29881 llvm-svn: 296771
* [PowerPC] Expand ISEL instruction into if-then-else sequence.Tony Jiang2017-01-161-3/+2
| | | | | | | | | Generally, the ISEL is expanded into if-then-else sequence, in some cases (like when the destination register is the same with the true or false value register), it may just be expanded into just the if or else sequence. llvm-svn: 292154
* Revert "[PowerPC] Expand ISEL instruction into if-then-else sequence."Tony Jiang2017-01-161-2/+3
| | | | | | This reverts commit 1d0e0374438ca6e153844c683826ba9b82486bb1. llvm-svn: 292131
* [PowerPC] Expand ISEL instruction into if-then-else sequence.Tony Jiang2017-01-161-3/+2
| | | | | | | | | Generally, the ISEL is expanded into if-then-else sequence, in some cases (like when the destination register is the same with the true or false value register), it may just be expanded into just the if or else sequence. llvm-svn: 292128
* [PowerPC] Fix some Clang-tidy modernize and Include What You Use warnings; ↵Eugene Zelenko2017-01-131-112/+233
| | | | | | other minor fixes (NFC). llvm-svn: 291872
* [PowerPC] Fix logic dealing with nop after calls (and tail-call eligibility)Hal Finkel2017-01-041-40/+39
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | This change aims to unify and correct our logic for when we need to allow for the possibility of the linker adding a TOC restoration instruction after a call. This comes up in two contexts: 1. When determining tail-call eligibility. If we make a tail call (i.e. directly branch to a function) then there is no place for the linker to add a TOC restoration. 2. When determining when we need to add a nop instruction after a call. Likewise, if there is a possibility that the linker might need to add a TOC restoration after a call, then we need to put a nop after the call (the bl instruction). First problem: We were using similar, but different, logic to decide (1) and (2). This is just wrong. Both the resideInSameModule function (used when determining tail-call eligibility) and the isLocalCall function (used when deciding if the post-call nop is needed) were supposed to be determining the same underlying fact (i.e. might a TOC restoration be needed after the call). The same logic should be used in both places. Second problem: The logic in both places was wrong. We only know that two functions will share the same TOC when both functions come from the same section of the same object. Otherwise the linker might cause the functions to use different TOC base addresses (unless the multi-TOC linker option is disabled, in which case only shared-library boundaries are relevant). There are a number of factors that can cause functions to be placed in different sections or come from different objects (-ffunction-sections, explicitly-specified section names, COMDAT, weak linkage, etc.). All of these need to be checked. The existing logic only checked properties of the callee, but the properties of the caller must also be checked (for example, calling from a function in a COMDAT section means calling between sections). There was a conceptual error in the resideInSameModule function in that it allowed tail calls to functions with weak linkage and protected/hidden visibility. While protected/hidden visibility does prevent the function implementation from being replaced at runtime (via interposition), it does not prevent the linker from using an alternate implementation at link time (i.e. using some strong definition to replace the provided weak one during linking). If this happens, then we're still potentially looking at a required TOC restoration upon return. Otherwise, in general, the post-call nop is needed wherever ELF interposition needs to be supported. We don't currently support ELF interposition at the IR level (see http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2016-November/107625.html for more information), and I don't think we should try to make it appear to work in the backend in spite of that fact. Unfortunately, because of the way that the ABI works, we need to generate code as if we supported interposition whenever the linker might insert stubs for the purpose of supporting it. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D27231 llvm-svn: 291003
* Revert r289638: [PowerPC] Fix logic dealing with nop after calls (and ↵Chandler Carruth2016-12-161-25/+40
| | | | | | | | | | | | | tail-call eligibility) This patch appears to result in trampolines in vtables being miscompiled when they in turn tail call a method. I've posted some preliminary details about the failure on the thread for this commit and talked to Hal. He was comfortable going ahead and reverting until we sort out what is wrong. llvm-svn: 289928
* [PowerPC] Fix logic dealing with nop after calls (and tail-call eligibility)Hal Finkel2016-12-141-40/+25
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | This change aims to unify and correct our logic for when we need to allow for the possibility of the linker adding a TOC restoration instruction after a call. This comes up in two contexts: 1. When determining tail-call eligibility. If we make a tail call (i.e. directly branch to a function) then there is no place for the linker to add a TOC restoration. 2. When determining when we need to add a nop instruction after a call. Likewise, if there is a possibility that the linker might need to add a TOC restoration after a call, then we need to put a nop after the call (the bl instruction). First problem: We were using similar, but different, logic to decide (1) and (2). This is just wrong. Both the resideInSameModule function (used when determining tail-call eligibility) and the isLocalCall function (used when deciding if the post-call nop is needed) were supposed to be determining the same underlying fact (i.e. might a TOC restoration be needed after the call). The same logic should be used in both places. Second problem: The logic in both places was wrong. We only know that two functions will share the same TOC when both functions come from the same section of the same object. Otherwise the linker might cause the functions to use different TOC base addresses (unless the multi-TOC linker option is disabled, in which case only shared-library boundaries are relevant). There are a number of factors that can cause functions to be placed in different sections or come from different objects (-ffunction-sections, explicitly-specified section names, COMDAT, weak linkage, etc.). All of these need to be checked. The existing logic only checked properties of the callee, but the properties of the caller must also be checked (for example, calling from a function in a COMDAT section means calling between sections). There was a conceptual error in the resideInSameModule function in that it allowed tail calls to functions with weak linkage and protected/hidden visibility. While protected/hidden visibility does prevent the function implementation from being replaced at runtime (via interposition), it does not prevent the linker from using an alternate implementation at link time (i.e. using some strong definition to replace the provided weak one during linking). If this happens, then we're still potentially looking at a required TOC restoration upon return. Otherwise, in general, the post-call nop is needed wherever ELF interposition needs to be supported. We don't currently support ELF interposition at the IR level (see http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2016-November/107625.html for more information), and I don't think we should try to make it appear to work in the backend in spite of that fact. This will yield subtle bugs if interposition is attempted. As a result, regardless of whether we're in PIC mode, we don't assume that we need to add the nop to support the possibility of ELF interposition. However, the necessary check is in place (i.e. calling GV->isInterposable and TM.shouldAssumeDSOLocal) so when we have functions for which interposition is allowed at the IR level, we'll add the nop as necessary. In the mean time, we'll generate more tail calls and fewer nops when compiling position-independent code. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D27231 llvm-svn: 289638
* [PPC] Prefer direct move on power8 if load 1 or 2 bytes to VSRGuozhi Wei2016-12-121-1/+7
| | | | | | | | | Power8 has MTVSRWZ but no LXSIBZX/LXSIHZX, so move 1 or 2 bytes to VSR through MTVSRWZ is much faster than store the extended value into stack and load it with LXSIWZX. This patch fixes pr31144. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D27287 llvm-svn: 289473
* [PowerPC] Improvements for BUILD_VECTOR Vol. 2Nemanja Ivanovic2016-11-291-4/+98
| | | | | | | | | | This patch corresponds to review: https://reviews.llvm.org/D26023 This patch adds support for converting a vector of loads into a single load if the loads are consecutive (in either direction). llvm-svn: 288219
* [PowerPC] Improvements for BUILD_VECTOR Vol. 2Nemanja Ivanovic2016-11-291-1/+94
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | This patch corresponds to review: https://reviews.llvm.org/D25980 This is the 2nd patch in a series of 4 that improve the lowering and combining for BUILD_VECTOR nodes on PowerPC. This particular patch combines a build vector of fp-to-int conversions into an fp-to-int conversion of a build vector of fp values. For example: Converts (build_vector (fp_to_[su]i $A), (fp_to_[su]i $B), ...) Into (fp_to_[su]i (build_vector $A, $B, ...))). Which is a natural match for much cleaner code. llvm-svn: 288218
* Revert https://reviews.llvm.org/rL287679Nemanja Ivanovic2016-11-291-15/+0
| | | | | | | This commit caused some miscompiles that did not show up on any of the bots. Reverting until we can investigate the cause of those failures. llvm-svn: 288214
* [PowerPC] Improvements for BUILD_VECTOR Vol. 1Nemanja Ivanovic2016-11-291-23/+70
| | | | | | | | | | This patch corresponds to review: https://reviews.llvm.org/D25912 This is the first patch in a series of 4 that improve the lowering and combining for BUILD_VECTOR nodes on PowerPC. llvm-svn: 288152
* [PowerPC] Emit VMX loads/stores for aligned ops to avoid adding swaps on LENemanja Ivanovic2016-11-221-0/+15
| | | | | | | | | | | This patch corresponds to review: https://reviews.llvm.org/D26861 It also fixes PR30730. Committing on behalf of Lei Huang. llvm-svn: 287679
OpenPOWER on IntegriCloud