| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
| ... | |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Summary:
There is currently a correctness issue when unrolling loops containing
callbr's where their indirect targets are being updated correctly to the
newly created labels, but their operands are not. This manifests in
unrolled loops where the second and subsequent copies of callbr
instructions have blockaddresses of the label from the first instance of
the unrolled loop, which would result in nonsensical runtime control
flow.
For now, conservatively do not unroll the loop. In the future, I think
we can pursue unrolling such loops provided we transform the cloned
callbr's operands correctly.
Such a transform and its legalities are being discussed in:
https://reviews.llvm.org/D64101
Link: https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=42489
Link: https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/clang-built-linux/z-hRWP9KqPI
Reviewers: fhahn, hfinkel, efriedma
Reviewed By: fhahn, hfinkel, efriedma
Subscribers: efriedma, hiraditya, zzheng, dmgreen, llvm-commits, pirama, kees, nathanchance, E5ten, craig.topper, chandlerc, glider, void, srhines
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64368
llvm-svn: 366130
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
If a 1-bit value is in a 32-bit VGPR, the scalar opcodes set SCC to
whether the result is 0. If the inputs are SCC, these can be copied to
a 32-bit SGPR to produce an SCC result.
llvm-svn: 366125
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Add "memtag" sanitizer that detects and mitigates stack memory issues
using armv8.5 Memory Tagging Extension.
It is similar in principle to HWASan, which is a software implementation
of the same idea, but there are enough differencies to warrant a new
sanitizer type IMHO. It is also expected to have very different
performance properties.
The new sanitizer does not have a runtime library (it may grow one
later, along with a "debugging" mode). Similar to SafeStack and
StackProtector, the instrumentation pass (in a follow up change) will be
inserted in all cases, but will only affect functions marked with the
new sanitize_memtag attribute.
Reviewers: pcc, hctim, vitalybuka, ostannard
Subscribers: srhines, mehdi_amini, javed.absar, kristof.beyls, hiraditya, cryptoad, steven_wu, dexonsmith, cfe-commits, llvm-commits
Tags: #clang, #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64169
llvm-svn: 366123
|
| |
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 366121
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This is a hack until I come up with a better way of dealing with the
pseudo-register banks used for boolean values. If the use instruction
constrains the register, the selector for the def instruction won't
see that the bank was VCC. A 1-bit SReg_32 is could ambiguously have
been SCCRegBank or VCCRegBank in wave32.
This is necessary to successfully select branches with and and/or/xor
condition.
llvm-svn: 366120
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The extra test change is correct, although how it arrives there is a
bug that needs work. With wave32, the test for isVCC ambiguously
reports true for an SCC or VCC source. A new allocatable pseudo
register class for SCC may be necesssary.
llvm-svn: 366119
|
| |
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 366118
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
This was emitting a copy from a 32-bit register to a 64-bit.
llvm-svn: 366117
|
| |
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 366116
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
Turn the constant cases into G_EXTRACTs.
llvm-svn: 366115
|
| |
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 366114
|
| |
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 366113
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Summary:
Processing of command-line definition of variable and logic around
implicit not directives both reuse parsing code that expects a line
number to be defined. So far, a special line number of 0 was used for
those users of the parsing code where a line number does not make sense.
This commit instead represents line numbers as Optional values so that
they can be None for those cases.
Reviewers: jhenderson, chandlerc, jdenny, probinson, grimar, arichardson, rnk
Subscribers: JonChesterfield, rogfer01, hfinkel, kristina, rnk, tra, arichardson, grimar, dblaikie, probinson, llvm-commits, hiraditya
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64639
llvm-svn: 366109
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The construction was explained in
https://reviews.llvm.org/D44810?id=139526#inline-391999 but reading the code
shouldn't require hunting down old reviews to understand it.
The precomputed list was missing an entry for the empty list case, and
one entry at the very end. (The current last entry is the last one where
3 * BucketCount fits in a signed int, but the reference implementation
uses unsigneds as far as I can tell, so there's room for one more entry.)
No behavior change for inputs seen in practice.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64738
llvm-svn: 366107
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
We need to make sure that we are sensibly dealing with vectors of types v2i64
and v2f64, even if most of the time we cannot generate native operations for
them. This mostly adds a lot of testing, plus fixes up a couple of the issues
found. And, or and xor can be legal for v2i64, and shifts combining needs a
slight fixup.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64316
llvm-svn: 366106
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Reviewers: sbc100
Subscribers: dschuff, jgravelle-google, aheejin, sunfish, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64602
llvm-svn: 366104
|
| |
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 366103
|
| |
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 366102
|
| |
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 366099
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
inttofp (trunc (extelt X, 0)) --> inttofp (extelt (bitcast X), 0)
We have pseudo-vectorization of scalar int to FP casts, so this tries to
make that more likely by replacing a truncate with a bitcast. I didn't see
any test diffs starting from 'uitofp', so I left that as a TODO. We can't
only match the shorter trunc+extract pattern because there's an opposing
transform somewhere, so we infinite loop. Waiting to try this during
lowering is another possibility.
A motivating case is shown in PR39975 and included in the test diffs here:
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=39975
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64710
llvm-svn: 366098
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Summary:
Occasionally the build of LLVMLibDriver will fail because Attributes.inc has not been generated yet. Add an explicit dependency, so that we can guarantee that the file has been generated before LLVMLibDriver is build.
##[error]llvm\include\llvm\IR\Attributes.h(73,0): Error C1083: Cannot open include file: 'llvm/IR/Attributes.inc': No such file or directory
llvm\include\llvm/IR/Attributes.h(73): fatal error C1083: Cannot open include file: 'llvm/IR/Attributes.inc': No such file or directory [LLVMLibDriver.vcxproj]
Reviewers: asmith
Subscribers: mgorny, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64357
llvm-svn: 366097
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
out of range.
I think we only turn out of range shiftss to undef when
all elements are out of range or the shift amount is a splat out
of range. I'm not sure which, I didn't check.
During lowering we can split a shift where some elements
are out of range into multiple shifts. This can create a
new shift with a splat shift amount that is out of range.
This patch returns undef for this case.
Fixes PR42615.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64699
llvm-svn: 366096
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Insert these during codegenprepare.
This works around a DAG issue where generic combines eliminate the and
asserting the high bits are zero, which then exposes an unknown read
source to the mul combine. It doesn't worth the hassle of trying to
insert an AssertZext or something to try to deal with it.
llvm-svn: 366094
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
NFC at the momemnt, needed for future commit.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64761
llvm-svn: 366092
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
There are scenarios where mutually recursive functions may cause the SCC
to contain both read only and write only functions. This removes an
assertion when adding read attributes which caused a crash with a the
provided test case, and instead just doesn't add the attributes.
Patch by Luke Lau <luke.lau@intel.com>
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60761
llvm-svn: 366090
|
| |
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 366089
|
| |
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 366087
|
| |
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 366086
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
For some reason scheduler can send down an SUnit without an
instruction.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64709
llvm-svn: 366074
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Reviewers: artem.tamazov, arsenm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64729
llvm-svn: 366071
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
See bug 42599: https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=42599
Reviewers: artem.tamazov, arsenm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64716
llvm-svn: 366067
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
formed. NFCI.
While we don't make any assumptions about the actual mask, assert that the expected mask only contains valid mask element values.
llvm-svn: 366066
|
| |
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 366064
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This adds basic lowering for MVE shifts. There are many shifts in MVE, but the
instructions handled here are:
VSHL (imm)
VSHRu (imm)
VSHRs (imm)
VSHL (vector)
VSHL (register)
MVE, like NEON before it, doesn't have shift right by a vector (or register).
We instead have to negate the amount and shift in the opposite direction. This
means we have to convert any SHR's into a form of SHL (that is still signed or
unsigned) with a negated condition and selecting from there. MVE still does
have shifting by an immediate for SHL, ASR and LSR.
This adds lowering for these and for register forms, which work well for shift
lefts but may require an extra fold of neg(vdup(x)) -> vdup(neg(x)) to potentially
work optimally for right shifts.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64212
llvm-svn: 366056
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This just moves the shift instruction definitions further down the
ARMInstrMVE.td file, to make positioning patterns slightly more natural.
llvm-svn: 366054
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This adjusts the way that we lower NEON shifts to use a DAG target node, not
via a neon intrinsic. This is useful for handling MVE shifts operations in the
same the way. It also renames some of the immediate shift nodes for
consistency, and moves some of the processing of immediate shifts into
LowerShift allowing it to capture more cases.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64426
llvm-svn: 366051
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
It is possible that loop exit has two predecessors in a loop body.
In this case after the peeling the iDom of the exit should be a clone of
iDom of original exit but no a clone of a block coming to this exit.
Reviewers: reames, fhahn
Reviewed By: reames
Subscribers: hiraditya, zzheng, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64618
llvm-svn: 366050
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
We do not compute the scalarization overhead in getVectorIntrinsicCost
and TTI::getIntrinsicInstrCost requires the full arguments list.
llvm-svn: 366049
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This CL enables peeling of the loop with multiple exits where
one exit should be from latch and others are basic blocks with
call to deopt.
The peeling is enabled under the flag which is false by default.
Reviewers: reames, mkuper, iajbar, fhahn
Reviewed By: reames
Subscribers: xbolva00, hiraditya, zzheng, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D63923
llvm-svn: 366048
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Summary:
Porting nonnull attribute to attributor.
Reviewers: jdoerfert, sstefan1
Reviewed By: jdoerfert
Subscribers: xbolva00, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D63604
llvm-svn: 366043
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
With this patch the getLoopEstimatedTripCount function will
accept also the loops where there are more than one exit but
all exits except latch block should ends up with a call to deopt.
This side exits should not impact the estimated trip count.
Reviewers: reames, mkuper, danielcdh
Reviewed By: reames
Subscribers: fhahn, lebedev.ri, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64553
llvm-svn: 366042
|
| |
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 366041
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Extract the code from LoopUnrollRuntime into utility function to
re-use it in D63923.
Reviewers: reames, mkuper
Reviewed By: reames
Subscribers: fhahn, hiraditya, zzheng, dmgreen, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64548
llvm-svn: 366040
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
On PowerPC, IEEE 754 quadruple-precision libcall names use "kf" instead of "tf".
In libgcc, libgcc/config/rs6000/float128-sed converts TF names to KF
names. This patch implements its 24 substitution rules.
Reviewed By: hfinkel
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64282
llvm-svn: 366039
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Summary:
This is analogous to the int2ptr/ptr2int instruction handling introduced
in D54956.
Reviewers: fhahn, efriedma, spatel, nlopes, sanjoy, lebedev.ri
Subscribers: hiraditya, bollu, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64708
llvm-svn: 366036
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
size of the result type. Use them improve the codegen of v2f32 loads/stores with sse1 only.
Summary:
SSE1 only supports v4f32. But does have instructions like movlps/movhps that load/store 64-bits of memory.
This patch breaks the connection between the node VT of the vzext_load/vextract_store patterns and the memory VT. Enabling a v4f32 node with a 64-bit memory VT. I've used i64 as the memory VT here. I've written the PatFrag predicate to just check the store size not the specific VT. I think the VT will only matter for CSE purposes. We could use v2f32, but if we want to start using these operations in more places a simple integer type might make the most sense.
I'd like to maybe use this same thing for SSE2 and later as well, but that will need more work to be supported by EltsFromConsecutiveLoads to avoid regressing lit tests. I'd maybe also like to combine bitcasts with these load/stores nodes now that the types are disconnected. And I'd also like to consider canonicalizing (scalar_to_vector + load) to vzext_load.
If you want I can split the mechanical tablegen stuff where I added the 32/64 off from the sse1 change.
Reviewers: spatel, RKSimon
Reviewed By: RKSimon
Subscribers: hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64528
llvm-svn: 366034
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Teaches ARM::appendArchExtFeatures to account dependencies when processing
target features: i.e. when you say -march=armv8.1-m.main+mve.fp+nofp it
means mve.fp should get discarded too. (Split from D63936)
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64048
llvm-svn: 366031
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Loop invariant operands do not need to be scalarized, as we are using
the values outside the loop. We should ignore them when computing the
scalarization overhead.
Fixes PR41294
Reviewers: hsaito, rengolin, dcaballe, Ayal
Reviewed By: Ayal
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59995
llvm-svn: 366030
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
When processing the command line options march, mcpu and mfpu, we store
the implied target features on a vector. The change D62998 introduced a
temporary vector, where the processed features get accumulated. When
calling DecodeARMFeaturesFromCPU, which sets the default features for
the specified CPU, we certainly don't want to override the features
that have been explicitly specified on the command line. Therefore, the
default features should appear first in the final vector. This problem
became evident once I added the missing (unhandled) target features in
ARM::getExtensionFeatures.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D63936
llvm-svn: 366027
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This recommits r365750 (git commit 8b222ecf2769ee133691f208f6166ce118c4a164)
Original message:
Currently invalid bitcode files can cause a crash, when OpNum exceeds
the number of elements in Record, like in the attached bitcode file.
The test case was generated by clusterfuzz: https://bugs.chromium.org/p/oss-fuzz/issues/detail?id=15698
Reviewers: t.p.northover, thegameg, jfb
Reviewed By: jfb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64507
llvm-svn: 365750jkkkk
llvm-svn: 366018
|