| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
branch issue.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D31350
llvm-svn: 300142
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This was producing an illegal reg_sequence defining
a physical register with virtual register inputs.
llvm-svn: 299997
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Rename from addOperand to just add, to match the other method that has been
added to MachineInstrBuilder for adding more than just 1 operand.
See https://reviews.llvm.org/D28057 for the whole discussion.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D28556
llvm-svn: 291891
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Summary:
If we write an immediate to a VGPR and then copy the VGPR to an
SGPR, we can replace the copy with a S_MOV_B32 sgpr, imm, rather than
moving the copy to the SALU.
Reviewers: arsenm
Subscribers: kzhuravl, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, llvm-commits, tony-tye
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D27272
llvm-svn: 288849
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
branches
Reviewers: arsenm
Subscribers: arsenm, llvm-commits, kzhuravl
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D23417
llvm-svn: 288095
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Summary:
This pass was assuming that when a PHI instruction defined a register
used by another PHI instruction that the defining insstruction would
be legalized before the using instruction.
This assumption was causing the pass to not legalize some PHI nodes
within divergent flow-control.
This fixes a bug that was uncovered by r285762.
Reviewers: nhaehnle, arsenm
Subscribers: kzhuravl, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, tony-tye, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D26303
llvm-svn: 286676
|
|
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 283004
|
|
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 274978
|
|
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 274939
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Split AMDGPUSubtarget into amdgcn/r600 specific subclasses.
This removes most of the static_casting of the basic codegen
classes everywhere, and tries to restrict the features
visible on the wrong target.
llvm-svn: 273652
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
I get this wrong every time I try to debug this.
llvm-svn: 267030
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Summary:
Multi-dword constant loads generated unnecessary moves from SGPRs into VGPRs,
increasing the code size and VGPR pressure. These moves are now folded away.
Note that this lack of operand folding was not a problem for VMEM loads,
because COPY nodes from VReg_Nnn to VGPR32 are eliminated by the register
coalescer.
Some tests are updated, note that the fsub.ll test explicitly checks that
the move is elided.
With the IR generated by current Mesa, the changes are obviously relatively
minor:
7063 shaders in 3531 tests
Totals:
SGPRS: 351872 -> 352560 (0.20 %)
VGPRS: 199984 -> 200732 (0.37 %)
Code Size: 9876968 -> 9881112 (0.04 %) bytes
LDS: 91 -> 91 (0.00 %) blocks
Scratch: 1779712 -> 1767424 (-0.69 %) bytes per wave
Wait states: 295164 -> 295337 (0.06 %)
Totals from affected shaders:
SGPRS: 65784 -> 66472 (1.05 %)
VGPRS: 38064 -> 38812 (1.97 %)
Code Size: 1993828 -> 1997972 (0.21 %) bytes
LDS: 42 -> 42 (0.00 %) blocks
Scratch: 795648 -> 783360 (-1.54 %) bytes per wave
Wait states: 54026 -> 54199 (0.32 %)
Reviewers: tstellarAMD, arsenm, mareko
Subscribers: arsenm, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D15875
llvm-svn: 257074
|
|
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 251995
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This was causing a variety of test failures when v2i64
is added as a legal type.
SIFixSGPRCopies should correctly handle the case of vector inputs
to a scalar reg_sequence, so this isn't necessary anymore. This
was hiding some deficiencies in how reg_sequence is handled later,
but this shouldn't be a problem anymore since the register class
copy of a reg_sequence is now done before the reg_sequence.
llvm-svn: 251860
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Make the REG_SEQUENCE be a VGPR, and do the register class
copy first.
llvm-svn: 251855
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
It should now correctly handle physical registers and make
it easier to identify the other direction.
llvm-svn: 250132
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
I'm not sure why this would be necessary, and no tests fail with
them removed. Looking at the uses is suspect as well because
the use reg classes will likely change when the users are moved
as a result of moving this instruction.
llvm-svn: 249493
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
There's no point in checking VReg_1 because all uses
of it should already have been removed by SILowerI1Copies.
llvm-svn: 249081
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
SIFixSGPRCopies does not modify the CFG, but this was
being recomputed before running SIFoldOperands.
llvm-svn: 248587
|
|
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 248172
|
|
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 247345
|
|
llvm-svn: 239657
|