diff options
author | Kang Zhang <shkzhang@cn.ibm.com> | 2019-04-18 07:24:15 +0000 |
---|---|---|
committer | Kang Zhang <shkzhang@cn.ibm.com> | 2019-04-18 07:24:15 +0000 |
commit | 009a21d2fdff9117cafc853a2fe7e8355d2d31cc (patch) | |
tree | b1da08dadad6873449d0f57db75029e384715c28 /llvm/lib/Target | |
parent | 4f471ee99098d06b3ad74cd5ee06f82737bcbbd6 (diff) | |
download | bcm5719-llvm-009a21d2fdff9117cafc853a2fe7e8355d2d31cc.tar.gz bcm5719-llvm-009a21d2fdff9117cafc853a2fe7e8355d2d31cc.zip |
[PowerPC] Fix wrong ElemSIze when calling isConsecutiveLS()
Summary:
This issue from the bugzilla: https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=41177
When the two operands for BUILD_VECTOR are same, we will get assert error.
llvm::SDValue combineBVOfConsecutiveLoads(llvm::SDNode*, llvm::SelectionDAG&):
Assertion `!(InputsAreConsecutiveLoads && InputsAreReverseConsecutive) &&
"The loads cannot be both consecutive and reverse consecutive."' failed.
This error caused by the wrong ElemSIze when calling isConsecutiveLS(). We
should use `getScalarType().getStoreSize();` to get the ElemSize instread of
`getScalarSizeInBits() / 8`.
Reviewed By: jsji
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60811
llvm-svn: 358644
Diffstat (limited to 'llvm/lib/Target')
-rw-r--r-- | llvm/lib/Target/PowerPC/PPCISelLowering.cpp | 2 |
1 files changed, 1 insertions, 1 deletions
diff --git a/llvm/lib/Target/PowerPC/PPCISelLowering.cpp b/llvm/lib/Target/PowerPC/PPCISelLowering.cpp index d5a5cc30e62..f95c88f5a3e 100644 --- a/llvm/lib/Target/PowerPC/PPCISelLowering.cpp +++ b/llvm/lib/Target/PowerPC/PPCISelLowering.cpp @@ -12175,7 +12175,7 @@ static SDValue combineBVOfConsecutiveLoads(SDNode *N, SelectionDAG &DAG) { SDLoc dl(N); bool InputsAreConsecutiveLoads = true; bool InputsAreReverseConsecutive = true; - unsigned ElemSize = N->getValueType(0).getScalarSizeInBits() / 8; + unsigned ElemSize = N->getValueType(0).getScalarType().getStoreSize(); SDValue FirstInput = N->getOperand(0); bool IsRoundOfExtLoad = false; |