summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorebotcazou <ebotcazou@138bc75d-0d04-0410-961f-82ee72b054a4>2013-12-04 11:11:56 +0000
committerebotcazou <ebotcazou@138bc75d-0d04-0410-961f-82ee72b054a4>2013-12-04 11:11:56 +0000
commit42f6cff195a783e3de220c83b3d1503795d430c4 (patch)
treea9c83bb498c53c5a70e1f2b28addca926c4699b6
parent8c1dfa9438b159a6ebb683da469978761a4dcd31 (diff)
downloadppe42-gcc-42f6cff195a783e3de220c83b3d1503795d430c4.tar.gz
ppe42-gcc-42f6cff195a783e3de220c83b3d1503795d430c4.zip
* gcc-interface/trans.c (Case_Statement_to_gnu): Do not push a binding
level for each branch if this is a case expression in Ada 2012. (gnat_to_gnu) <case N_Expression_With_Actions>: Adjust comment. git-svn-id: svn+ssh://gcc.gnu.org/svn/gcc/trunk@205662 138bc75d-0d04-0410-961f-82ee72b054a4
-rw-r--r--gcc/ada/ChangeLog6
-rw-r--r--gcc/ada/gcc-interface/trans.c17
2 files changed, 17 insertions, 6 deletions
diff --git a/gcc/ada/ChangeLog b/gcc/ada/ChangeLog
index f1f73169933..504f358a782 100644
--- a/gcc/ada/ChangeLog
+++ b/gcc/ada/ChangeLog
@@ -1,3 +1,9 @@
+2013-12-04 Eric Botcazou <ebotcazou@adacore.com>
+
+ * gcc-interface/trans.c (Case_Statement_to_gnu): Do not push a binding
+ level for each branch if this is a case expression in Ada 2012.
+ (gnat_to_gnu) <case N_Expression_With_Actions>: Adjust comment.
+
2013-11-29 Eric Botcazou <ebotcazou@adacore.com>
PR ada/54040
diff --git a/gcc/ada/gcc-interface/trans.c b/gcc/ada/gcc-interface/trans.c
index e533de6dcbf..2eae39976d8 100644
--- a/gcc/ada/gcc-interface/trans.c
+++ b/gcc/ada/gcc-interface/trans.c
@@ -2348,12 +2348,17 @@ Case_Statement_to_gnu (Node_Id gnat_node)
}
}
- /* Push a binding level here in case variables are declared as we want
- them to be local to this set of statements instead of to the block
- containing the Case statement. */
+ /* This construct doesn't define a scope so we shouldn't push a binding
+ level around the statement list. Except that we have always done so
+ historically and this makes it possible to reduce stack usage. As a
+ compromise, we keep doing it for case statements, for which this has
+ never been problematic, but not for case expressions in Ada 2012. */
if (choices_added_p)
{
- tree group = build_stmt_group (Statements (gnat_when), true);
+ const bool is_case_expression
+ = (Nkind (Parent (gnat_node)) == N_Expression_With_Actions);
+ tree group
+ = build_stmt_group (Statements (gnat_when), !is_case_expression);
bool group_may_fallthru = block_may_fallthru (group);
add_stmt (group);
if (group_may_fallthru)
@@ -7002,8 +7007,8 @@ gnat_to_gnu (Node_Id gnat_node)
/****************/
case N_Expression_With_Actions:
- /* This construct doesn't define a scope so we don't wrap the statement
- list in a BIND_EXPR; however, we wrap it in a SAVE_EXPR to protect it
+ /* This construct doesn't define a scope so we don't push a binding level
+ around the statement list; but we wrap it in a SAVE_EXPR to protect it
from unsharing. */
gnu_result = build_stmt_group (Actions (gnat_node), false);
gnu_result = build1 (SAVE_EXPR, void_type_node, gnu_result);
OpenPOWER on IntegriCloud