| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Reviewers: arsenm, nhaehnle
Subscribers: kzhuravl, wdng, yaxunl, rovka, kristof.beyls, dstuttard, tpr, llvm-commits, t-tye
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D46172
llvm-svn: 337056
|
| |
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 337055
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
When we're linking an alias which will be defined later, we neeed to
build a GlobalAlias, or else we'll crash later in
IRLinker::linkGlobalValueBody.
clang sometimes constructs aliases like this for C++ destructors.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D49316
llvm-svn: 337053
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
In order to always import the same copy of a linkonce function,
even when encountering it with different thresholds (a higher one then a
lower one), keep track of the summary we decided to import.
This ensures that the backend only gets a single definition to import
for each GUID, so that it doesn't need to choose one.
Move the largest threshold the GUID was considered for import into the
current module out of the ImportMap (which is part of a larger map
maintained across the whole index), and into a new map just maintained
for the current module we are computing imports for. This saves some
memory since we no longer have the thresholds maintained across the
whole index (and throughout the in-process backends when doing a normal
non-distributed ThinLTO build), at the cost of some additional
information being maintained for each invocation of ComputeImportForModule
(the selected summary pointer for each import).
There is an additional map lookup for each callee being considered for
importing, however, this was able to subsume a map lookup in the
Worklist iteration that invokes computeImportForFunction. We also are
able to avoid calling selectCallee if we already failed to import at the
same or higher threshold.
I compared the run time and peak memory for the SPEC2006 471.omnetpp
benchmark (running in-process ThinLTO backends), as well as for a large
internal benchmark with a distributed ThinLTO build (so just looking at
the thin link time/memory). Across a number of runs with and without
this change there was no significant change in the time and memory.
(I tried a few other variations of the change but they also didn't
improve time or peak memory).
Reviewers: davidxl
Subscribers: mehdi_amini, inglorion, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48670
llvm-svn: 337050
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Reviewers: arsenm, nhaehnle
Subscribers: kzhuravl, wdng, yaxunl, rovka, kristof.beyls, dstuttard, tpr, t-tye, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D45882
llvm-svn: 337046
|
| |
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 337045
|
| |
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 337043
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
[[ https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=38149 | PR38149 ]]
As discussed in https://reviews.llvm.org/D49179#1158957 and later,
the IR for 'check for [no] signed truncation' pattern can be improved:
https://rise4fun.com/Alive/gBf
^ that pattern will be produced by Implicit Integer Truncation sanitizer,
https://reviews.llvm.org/D48958 https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=21530
in signed case, therefore it is probably a good idea to improve it.
The DAGCombine will reverse this transform, see
https://reviews.llvm.org/D49266
llvm-svn: 337042
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Summary:
Currently LowerTypeTests emits jumptable entries for all live external
and address-taken functions; however, we could limit the number of
functions that we emit entries for significantly.
For Cross-DSO CFI, we continue to emit jumptable entries for all
exported definitions. In the non-Cross-DSO CFI case, we only need to
emit jumptable entries for live functions that are address-taken in live
functions. This ignores exported functions and functions that are only
address taken in dead functions. This change uses ThinLTO summary data
(now emitted for all modules during ThinLTO builds) to determine
address-taken and liveness info.
The logic for emitting jumptable entries is more conservative in the
regular LTO case because we don't have summary data in the case of
monolithic LTO builds; however, once summaries are emitted for all LTO
builds we can unify the Thin/monolithic LTO logic to only use summaries
to determine the liveness of address taking functions.
This change is a partial fix for PR37474. It reduces the build size for
nacl_helper by ~2-3%, the reduction is due to nacl_helper compiling in
lots of unused code and unused functions that are address taken in dead
functions no longer being being considered live due to emitted jumptable
references. The reduction for chromium is ~0.1-0.2%.
Reviewers: pcc, eugenis, javed.absar
Reviewed By: pcc
Subscribers: aheejin, dexonsmith, dschuff, mehdi_amini, eraman, steven_wu, llvm-commits, kcc
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D47652
llvm-svn: 337038
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
For instance, When dumping .apple_types, the second atom represents the
DW_TAG. In addition to printing the raw value, we now also pretty print
the value if the ATOM tells us how.
llvm-svn: 337026
|
| |
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 337024
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This was completely broken if there was ever a struct argument, as
this information is thrown away during the argument analysis.
The offsets as passed in to LowerFormalArguments are not useful,
as they partially depend on the legalized result register type,
and they don't consider the alignment in the first place.
Ignore the Ins array, and instead figure out from the raw IR type
what we need to do. This seems to fix the padding computation
if the DAG lowering is forced (and stops breaking arguments
following padded arguments if the arguments were only partially
lowered in the IR)
llvm-svn: 337021
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This reverts commit r336419: use-after-free on CallGraph::FunctionMap elements
due to the use of a stale iterator in CGPassManager::runOnModule.
The iterator may be invalidated if a pass removes a function, ex.:
llvm::LegacyInlinerBase::inlineCalls
inlineCallsImpl
llvm::CallGraph::removeFunctionFromModule
llvm-svn: 337018
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
pattern
See D49247, D49266
I'm only adding the sane negative tests, and not
adding the one-use tests yet. Also, not adding
negative tests for the second pattern with inverted operands yet,
since it's handling will be added in later differential.
llvm-svn: 337014
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
This stops the tests I added in r337007 from running when AArch64 is not a supported target.
llvm-svn: 337012
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Instead of printing
DW_AT_APPLE_runtime_class (0x10)
we now print
DW_AT_APPLE_runtime_class (DW_LANG_ObjC)
llvm-svn: 337011
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Revision r322373 fixed a bug in how we materialize constants when the CR-field
needs to be set.
However the fix is overly conservative. It will only do the transform if
AND-ing the input with the new constant produces the same new constant.
This is of course correct, but not necessarily required.
If there are no futher uses of the constant, the constant can be changed.
If there are no uses of the GPR result, the final result of the materialization
isn't important other than it needs to compare to zero correctly (lt, gt, eq).
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D42109
llvm-svn: 337008
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This patch adds support for AArch64 to cfi-verify.
This required three changes to cfi-verify. First, it generalizes checking if an instruction is a trap by adding a new isTrap flag to TableGen (and defining it for x86 and AArch64). Second, the code that ensures that the operand register is not clobbered between the CFI check and the indirect call needs to allow a single dereference (in x86 this happens as part of the jump instruction). Third, we needed to ensure that return instructions are not counted as indirect branches. Technically, returns are indirect branches and can be covered by CFI, but LLVM's forward-edge CFI does not protect them, and x86 does not consider them, so we keep that behavior.
In addition, we had to improve AArch64's code to evaluate the branch target of a MCInst to handle calls where the destination is not the first operand (which it often is not).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48836
llvm-svn: 337007
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Summary: The path to the python executable can contain spaces, so it should be specified with quotes.
Reviewers: asmith, simon_tatham
Reviewed By: simon_tatham
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D49258
llvm-svn: 337006
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
update_llc_test_checks.py. NFC
llvm-svn: 337004
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Summary:
This commit does two things:
1. modified the existing DivergenceAnalysis::dump() so it dumps the
whole function with added DIVERGENT: annotations;
2. added code to do that dump if the appropriate -debug-only option is
on.
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D47700
Change-Id: Id97b605aab1fc6f5a11a20c58a99bbe8c565bf83
llvm-svn: 336998
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Spectre variant #1 for x86.
There is a lengthy, detailed RFC thread on llvm-dev which discusses the
high level issues. High level discussion is probably best there.
I've split the design document out of this patch and will land it
separately once I update it to reflect the latest edits and updates to
the Google doc used in the RFC thread.
This patch is really just an initial step. It isn't quite ready for
prime time and is only exposed via debugging flags. It has two major
limitations currently:
1) It only supports x86-64, and only certain ABIs. Many assumptions are
currently hard-coded and need to be factored out of the code here.
2) It doesn't include any options for more fine-grained control, either
of which control flow edges are significant or which loads are
important to be hardened.
3) The code is still quite rough and the testing lighter than I'd like.
However, this is enough for people to begin using. I have had numerous
requests from people to be able to experiment with this patch to
understand the trade-offs it presents and how to use it. We would also
like to encourage work to similar effect in other toolchains.
The ARM folks are actively developing a system based on this for
AArch64. We hope to merge this with their efforts when both are far
enough along. But we also don't want to block making this available on
that effort.
Many thanks to the *numerous* people who helped along the way here. For
this patch in particular, both Eric and Craig did a ton of review to
even have confidence in it as an early, rough cut at this functionality.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D44824
llvm-svn: 336990
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
(REAPPLIED-2)
We currently only support binary instructions in the alternate opcode shuffles.
This patch is an initial attempt at adding cast instructions as well, this raises several issues that we probably want to address as we continue to generalize the alternate mechanism:
1 - Duplication of cost determination - we should probably add scalar/vector costs helper functions and get BoUpSLP::getEntryCost to use them instead of determining costs directly.
2 - Support alternate instructions with the same opcode (e.g. casts with different src types) - alternate vectorization of calls with different IntrinsicIDs will require this.
3 - Allow alternates to be a different instruction type - mixing binary/cast/call etc.
4 - Allow passthrough of unsupported alternate instructions - related to PR30787/D28907 'copyable' elements.
Reapplied with fix to only accept 2 different casts if they come from the same source type (PR38154).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D49135
llvm-svn: 336989
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
landing the patch. =/
llvm-svn: 336986
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
flow patterns including forks, merges, and even cyles.
This tries to cover a reasonably comprehensive set of patterns that
still don't require PHIs or PHI placement. The coverage was inspired by
the amazing variety of patterns produced when copy EFLAGS and restoring
it to implement Speculative Load Hardening. Without this patch, we
simply cannot make such complex and invasive changes to x86 instruction
sequences due to EFLAGS.
I've added "just" one test, but this test covers many different
complexities and corner cases of this approach. It is actually more
comprehensive, as far as I can tell, than anything that I have
encountered in the wild on SLH.
Because the test is so complex, I've tried to give somewhat thorough
comments and an ASCII-art diagram of the control flows to make it a bit
easier to read and maintain long-term.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D49220
llvm-svn: 336985
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This patch adds support for the following unpack instructions:
- PUNPKLO, PUNPKHI Unpack elements from low/high half and
place into elements of twice their size.
e.g. punpklo p0.h, p0.b
- UUNPKLO, UUNPKHI Unpack elements from low/high half and
SUNPKLO, SUNPKHI place into elements of twice their size
after zero- or sign-extending the values.
e.g. uunpklo z0.h, z0.b
llvm-svn: 336982
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
As suggested by @efriedma on D49262 - changed the extractelement to a store to prevent SimplifyDemandedVectorElts from simplifying the build vectors - this keeps the immediate generation which was the point of the tests.
llvm-svn: 336981
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
As requested on D49262
llvm-svn: 336980
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Insert general purpose register into shifted vector, e.g.
insr z0.s, w0
insr z0.d, x0
Insert SIMD&FP scalar register into shifted vector, e.g.
insr z0.b, b0
insr z0.h, h0
insr z0.s, s0
insr z0.d, d0
llvm-svn: 336979
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
During the execution of long functions or functions that have a lot of
inlined code it could come to the situation where tracked value could be
transferred from one register to another. The transfer is recognized only if
destination register is a callee saved register and if source register is
killed. We do not salvage caller-saved registers since there is a great
chance that killed register would outlive it.
Patch by Nikola Prica.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D44016
llvm-svn: 336978
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
record entry in FDR mode
Summary:
llvm-xray changes:
- account-mode - process-id {...} shows after thread-id
- convert-mode - process {...} shows after thread
- parses FDR and basic mode pid entries
- Checks version number for FDR log parsing.
Basic logging changes:
- Update header version from 2 -> 3
FDR logging changes:
- Update header version from 2 -> 3
- in writeBufferPreamble, there is an additional PID Metadata record (after thread id record and tsc record)
Test cases changes:
- fdr-mode.cc, fdr-single-thread.cc, fdr-thread-order.cc modified to catch process id output in the log.
Reviewers: dberris
Reviewed By: dberris
Subscribers: hiraditya, llvm-commits, #sanitizers
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D49153
llvm-svn: 336974
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
scalar intrinsic instructions.
This is not an optimization we should be doing in isel. This is more suitable for a DAG combine.
My main concern is a future time when we support more FPENV. Changing a packed op to a scalar op could cause us to miss some exceptions that should have occured if we had done a packed op. A DAG combine would be better able to manage this.
llvm-svn: 336971
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
-v prints all directive pattern matches.
-vv additionally prints info that might be noise to users but that can
be helpful to FileCheck developers.
To maximize code reuse and to make diagnostics more consistent, this
patch also adjusts and extends some of the existing diagnostics.
CHECK-NOT failures now report variables uses. Many more diagnostics
now report the check prefix and kind of directive.
Reviewed By: probinson
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D47114
llvm-svn: 336967
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This bug was created by rL335258 because we used to always call instsimplify
after trying the associative folds. After that change it became possible
for subsequent folds to encounter unsimplified code (and potentially assert
because of it).
Instead of carrying changed state through instcombine, we can just return
immediately. This allows instsimplify to run, so we can continue assuming
that easy folds have already occurred.
llvm-svn: 336965
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Summary:
This patch is crucial for proving equality laundered/stripped
pointers. eg:
bool foo(A *a) {
return a == std::launder(a);
}
Clang with -fstrict-vtable-pointers will emit something like:
define dso_local zeroext i1 @_Z3fooP1A(%struct.A* %a) {
entry:
%c = bitcast %struct.A* %a to i8*
%call = tail call i8* @llvm.launder.invariant.group.p0i8(i8* %c)
%0 = bitcast %struct.A* %a to i8*
%1 = tail call i8* @llvm.strip.invariant.group.p0i8(i8* %0)
%2 = tail call i8* @llvm.strip.invariant.group.p0i8(i8* %call)
%cmp = icmp eq i8* %1, %2
ret i1 %cmp
}
and because %2 can be replaced with @llvm.strip.invariant.group(%0)
and that %2 and %1 will produce the same value (because strip is readnone)
we can replace compare with true.
Reviewers: rsmith, hfinkel, majnemer, amharc, kuhar
Subscribers: llvm-commits, hiraditya
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D47423
llvm-svn: 336963
|
| |
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 336958
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
These are the patterns for matching fceil, ffloor, and sqrt to intrinsic instructions if they have a MOVSS/SD.
llvm-svn: 336954
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
patterns so we get EVEX instructions." and "foo"
One of them had a bad title and they should have been squashed.
llvm-svn: 336953
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
These are the patterns for matching fceil, ffloor, and sqrt to intrinsic instructions if they have a MOVSS/SD.
llvm-svn: 336951
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
instructions. (REAPPLIED)"
This reverts commit r336812, which broke compilation of a number
of projects, see PR38154.
llvm-svn: 336949
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Not all programs want section ordering when compiled with LTO.
In particular, the Linux kernel is very sensitive when it comes to linking, and
doesn't boot when each function is placed in its own sections.
Reviewed By: pcc
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48756
llvm-svn: 336943
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Add the two options -ppc-vsr-nums-as-vr and -ppc-asm-full-reg-names to
the __float128 tests. Then modify the tests as required.
llvm-svn: 336940
|
| |
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 336939
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
observe a failure to select EVEX instructions.
The one I noticed is sqrtsss/sd, but there could be others.
I had to add a couple new tests that don't have insertelement in there to catch this on the fast-isel path. Otherwise we trigger an abort and use SelectionDAG.
llvm-svn: 336938
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The piece above probably has the same problem, but I need
to try to come up with a test for it.
llvm-svn: 336935
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
support for split DWARF
and no use of DW_FORM_rnglistx with the DW_AT_ranges attribute.
Reviewer: aprantl
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D49214
llvm-svn: 336927
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Summary:
This option appears to have been dropped as part of the refactoring in
r331663. Unfortunately, if we want to use llvm-strip as a drop-in
replacement for strip, this option should still be available.
Reviewers: alexshap
Reviewed By: alexshap
Subscribers: meikeb, kongyi, chh, jakehehrlich, llvm-commits, pirama
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D49226
llvm-svn: 336921
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Summary:
[[ https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=38149 | PR38149 ]]
As discussed in https://reviews.llvm.org/D49179#1158957 and later,
the IR can be improved:
https://rise4fun.com/Alive/gBf
^ that pattern will be produced by Implicit Integer Truncation sanitizer,
https://reviews.llvm.org/D48958
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=21530
in signed case, therefore it is probably a good idea to improve it.
But as it looks from these tests,
i think we want to revert at least some cases in DAGCombine.
Reviewers: spatel, craig.topper, RKSimon, javed.absar
Reviewed By: spatel
Subscribers: kristof.beyls, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D49247
llvm-svn: 336917
|
| |
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 336914
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
While that fold is clearly not happening [anymore],
we do now have separate test cases for these cases,
so we should be ok to slightly adjust these tests
to not potentially loose test coverage.
As suggested by Hiroshi Yamauchi in
https://reviews.llvm.org/D49179#1159345
llvm-svn: 336912
|