summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/llvm/test/CodeGen/PowerPC/debuginfo-split-int.ll
Commit message (Collapse)AuthorAgeFilesLines
* Rename ExpandISelPseudo->FinalizeISel, delay register reservationMatt Arsenault2019-06-191-1/+1
| | | | | | | | | | | This allows targets to make more decisions about reserved registers after isel. For example, now it should be certain there are calls or stack objects in the frame or not, which could have been introduced by legalization. Patch by Matthias Braun llvm-svn: 363757
* MachineOperand/MIParser: Do not print debug-use flag, infer itMatthias Braun2018-10-301-2/+2
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | The debug-use flag must be set exactly for uses on DBG_VALUEs. This is so obvious that it can be trivially inferred while parsing. This will reduce noise when printing while omitting an information that has little value to the user. The parser will keep recognizing the flag for compatibility with old `.mir` files. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D53903 llvm-svn: 345671
* [DebugInfo] Add DILabel metadata and intrinsic llvm.dbg.label.Shiva Chen2018-05-091-1/+1
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | In order to set breakpoints on labels and list source code around labels, we need collect debug information for labels, i.e., label name, the function label belong, line number in the file, and the address label located. In order to keep these information in LLVM IR and to allow backend to generate debug information correctly. We create a new kind of metadata for labels, DILabel. The format of DILabel is !DILabel(scope: !1, name: "foo", file: !2, line: 3) We hope to keep debug information as much as possible even the code is optimized. So, we create a new kind of intrinsic for label metadata to avoid the metadata is eliminated with basic block. The intrinsic will keep existing if we keep it from optimized out. The format of the intrinsic is llvm.dbg.label(metadata !1) It has only one argument, that is the DILabel metadata. The intrinsic will follow the label immediately. Backend could get the label metadata through the intrinsic's parameter. We also create DIBuilder API for labels to be used by Frontend. Frontend could use createLabel() to allocate DILabel objects, and use insertLabel() to insert llvm.dbg.label intrinsic in LLVM IR. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D45024 Patch by Hsiangkai Wang. llvm-svn: 331841
* Followup on Proposal to move MIR physical register namespace to '$' sigil.Puyan Lotfi2018-01-311-4/+4
| | | | | | | | | | | | Discussed here: http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2018-January/120320.html In preparation for adding support for named vregs we are changing the sigil for physical registers in MIR to '$' from '%'. This will prevent name clashes of named physical register with named vregs. llvm-svn: 323922
* [CodeGen] Always use `printReg` to print registers in both MIR and debugFrancis Visoiu Mistrih2017-11-301-2/+2
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | output As part of the unification of the debug format and the MIR format, always use `printReg` to print all kinds of registers. Updated the tests using '_' instead of '%noreg' until we decide which one we want to be the default one. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D40421 llvm-svn: 319445
* MIR: Print the register class or bank in vreg defsJustin Bogner2017-10-241-2/+2
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | This updates the MIRPrinter to include the regclass when printing virtual register defs, which is already valid syntax for the parser. That is, given 64 bit %0 and %1 in a "gpr" regbank, %1(s64) = COPY %0(s64) would now be written as %1:gpr(s64) = COPY %0(s64) While this change alone introduces a bit of redundancy with the registers block, it allows us to update the tests to be more concise and understandable and brings us closer to being able to remove the registers block completely. Note: We generally only print the class in defs, but there is one exception. If there are uses without any defs whatsoever, we'll print the class on all uses. I'm not completely convinced this comes up in meaningful machine IR, but for now the MIRParser and MachineVerifier both accept that kind of stuff, so we don't want to have a situation where we can print something we can't parse. llvm-svn: 316479
* [DebugInfo] Handle endianness when moving debug info for split integer ↵Bjorn Pettersson2017-10-031-0/+66
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | values (reapplied) Summary: Take the target's endianness into account when splitting the debug information in DAGTypeLegalizer::SetExpandedInteger. This patch fixes so that, for big-endian targets, the fragment expression corresponding to the high part of a split integer value is placed at offset 0, in order to correctly represent the memory address order. I have attached a PPC32 reproducer where the resulting DWARF pieces for a 64-bit integer were incorrectly reversed. Original patch was reverted due to using -stop-after=isel in the test case (but that is only working when AMDGPU target is included in the llc build). The test case has now been updated to use -stop-before=expand-isel-pseudos instead. Patch by: dstenb Reviewers: JDevlieghere, aprantl, dblaikie Reviewed By: JDevlieghere, aprantl, dblaikie Subscribers: nemanjai Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D38172 llvm-svn: 314781
* [PowerPC] Revert r314666.Tim Shen2017-10-021-68/+0
| | | | | | | | | See https://reviews.llvm.org/D38172. I tried to XFAIL it, but sometimes XPASS triggers the bot. Simply revert it. llvm-svn: 314739
* [PowerPC] Temporarily disable the test introduced by r314666Tim Shen2017-10-021-0/+2
| | | | | | See https://reviews.llvm.org/D38172 for details. llvm-svn: 314732
* [Debug info] Handle endianness when moving debug info for split integer valuesBjorn Pettersson2017-10-021-0/+66
Summary: Take the target's endianness into account when splitting the debug information in DAGTypeLegalizer::SetExpandedInteger. This patch fixes so that, for big-endian targets, the fragment expression corresponding to the high part of a split integer value is placed at offset 0, in order to correctly represent the memory address order. I have attached a PPC32 reproducer where the resulting DWARF pieces for a 64-bit integer were incorrectly reversed. Patch by: dstenb Reviewers: JDevlieghere, aprantl, dblaikie Reviewed By: JDevlieghere, aprantl, dblaikie Subscribers: nemanjai Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D38172 llvm-svn: 314666
OpenPOWER on IntegriCloud