| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
When we call checkResourceLimit in bumpCycle or bumpNode, and we
know the resource count has just reached the limit (the equations
are equal). We should return true to mark that we are resource
limited for next schedule, or else we might continue to schedule
in favor of latency for 1 more schedule and create a schedule that
actually overbook the resource.
When we call checkResourceLimit to estimate the resource limite before
scheduling, we don't need to return true even if the equations are
equal, as it shouldn't limit the schedule for it .
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D62345
llvm-svn: 362805
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This is to address some of the problems in existing P9 resource modeling,
especially about the dispatching rules.
Instead of using a hypothetical DISPATCHER , we try to use the number of
actual dispatch slots, and define SchedWriteRes to model dispatch rules,
then update instruction classes according to dispatch rules.
All the dispatch rules and instruction classes update are made according
to POWER9 User Manual.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D61873
llvm-svn: 362509
|
