| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
| ... | |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Summary:
This adds the `MVE_qDest_qSrc` superclass and all instructions that
inherit from it. It's not the complete class of _everything_ with a
q-register as both destination and source; it's a subset of them that
all have similar encodings (but it would have been hopelessly unwieldy
to call it anything like MVE_111x11100).
This category includes add/sub with carry; long multiplies; halving
multiplies; multiply and accumulate, and some more complex
instructions.
Reviewers: dmgreen, samparker, SjoerdMeijer, t.p.northover
Subscribers: javed.absar, kristof.beyls, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D62677
llvm-svn: 364037
|
| |
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 364030
|
| |
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 364028
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Summary:
These take a pair of vector register to compare, and a comparison type
(written in the form of an Arm condition suffix); they output a vector
of booleans in the VPR register, where predication can conveniently
use them.
Reviewers: dmgreen, samparker, SjoerdMeijer, t.p.northover
Subscribers: javed.absar, kristof.beyls, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D62676
llvm-svn: 364027
|
| |
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 364026
|
| |
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 364025
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
Use the isConstOrConstSplat helper instead of inspecting the build vector manually.
llvm-svn: 364024
|
| |
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 364022
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Summary:
This includes floating-point basic arithmetic (add/sub/multiply),
complex add/multiply, unary negation and absolute value, rounding to
integer value, and conversion to/from integer formats.
Reviewers: dmgreen, samparker, SjoerdMeijer, t.p.northover
Subscribers: javed.absar, kristof.beyls, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D62675
llvm-svn: 364013
|
| |
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 364006
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
builds after D63541
llvm-svn: 364003
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
instructions.
G_INTTOPTR can prevent the localizer from moving G_CONSTANTs, but since it's
essentially a side effect free cast instruction we can remat both instructions.
This patch changes the localizer to enable localization of the chains by
iterating over the entry block instructions in reverse order. That way, uses will
localized first, and then the defs are free to be localized as well.
This also changes the previous SmallPtrSet of localized instructions to use a
SetVector instead. We're dealing with pointers and need deterministic iteration
order.
Overall, this change improves ARM64 -O0 CTMark code size by around 0.7% geomean.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D63630
llvm-svn: 364001
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Also, add a FIXME for the unsafe transform on a unary FNeg. A unary FNeg can only be transformed to a FMul by -1.0 when the nnan flag is present. The unary FNeg project is a WIP, so the unsafe transformation is acceptable until that work is complete.
The bogus assert with introduced in D63445.
llvm-svn: 363998
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
As discussed in PR42314:
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=42314
Improving the canonicalization for these patterns:
rL363956
...means we should adjust/enhance the related simplification.
https://rise4fun.com/Alive/w1cp
Name: isPow2 or zero
%x = and i32 %xx, 2048
%a = add i32 %x, -1
%r = and i32 %a, %x
=>
%r = i32 0
llvm-svn: 363997
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Every called function could possibly need this to calculate the
absolute address of stack objectst, and this avoids inserting a copy
around every call site in the kernel. It's also somewhat cleaner to
keep this in a callee saved SGPR.
llvm-svn: 363990
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Teach RegisterBankInfo to use the correct register class, and tell the
legalizer it's legal. Everything else just works.
The one thing that's slightly weird about this compared to SelectionDAG
isel is that legalization can't distinguish between i64 and <1 x i64>,
so we might end up with more NEON instructions than the user expects.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D63585
llvm-svn: 363989
|
| |
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 363987
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Currently, many profiling tests on Solaris FAIL like
Command Output (stderr):
--
Undefined first referenced
symbol in file
__llvm_profile_register_names_function /tmp/lit_tmp_Nqu4eh/infinite_loop-9dc638.o
__llvm_profile_register_function /tmp/lit_tmp_Nqu4eh/infinite_loop-9dc638.o
Solaris 11.4 ld supports the non-standard GNU ld extension of adding
__start_SECNAME and __stop_SECNAME labels to sections whose names are valid
as C identifiers. Given that we already use Solaris 11.4-only features
like ld -z gnu-version-script-compat and fully working .preinit_array
support in compiler-rt, we don't need to worry about older versions of
Solaris ld.
The patch documents that support (although the comment in
lib/Transforms/Instrumentation/InstrProfiling.cpp
(needsRuntimeRegistrationOfSectionRange) is quite cryptic what it's
actually about), and adapts the affected testcase not to expect the
alternativeq __llvm_profile_register_functions and __llvm_profile_init.
It fixes all affected tests.
Tested on amd64-pc-solaris2.11.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D41111
llvm-svn: 363984
|
| |
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 363983
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Summary:
The getClobberingMemoryAccess API checks for clobbering accesses in a loop by walking the backedge. This may check if a memory access is being
clobbered by the loop in a previous iteration, depending how smart AA got over the course of the updates in MemorySSA (it does not occur when built from scratch).
If no clobbering access is found inside the loop, it will optimize to an access outside the loop. This however does not mean that access is safe to sink.
Given:
```
for i
load a[i]
store a[i]
```
The access corresponding to the load can be optimized to outside the loop, and the load can be hoisted. But it is incorrect to sink it.
In order to sink the load, we'd need to check no Def clobbers the Use in the same iteration. With this patch we currently restrict sinking to either
Defs not existing in the loop, or Defs preceding the load in the same block. An easy extension is to ensure the load (Use) post-dominates all Defs.
Caught by PR42294.
This issue also shed light on the converse problem: hoisting stores in this same scenario would be illegal. With this patch we restrict
hoisting of stores to the case when their corresponding Defs are dominating all Uses in the loop.
Reviewers: george.burgess.iv
Subscribers: jlebar, Prazek, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D63582
llvm-svn: 363982
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
It is necessary to emit this loop around GWS operations in case the
wave is preempted pre-GFX9.
llvm-svn: 363979
|
| |
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 363974
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This fixes CodeGen/available-externally-suppress.c when the new pass manager is
turned on by default. available_externally was not emitted during -O2 -flto
runs when it should still be retained for link time inlining purposes. This can
be fixed by checking that we aren't LTOPrelinking when adding the
EliminateAvailableExternallyPass.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D63580
llvm-svn: 363971
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
I can't actually come up with a test case this triggers on without an out of tree change, but in theory, it's a bug in the recently added multiple exit LFTR support. The root issue is that an exiting block common to two loops can (in theory) have computable exit counts for both loops. Rewriting the exit of an inner loop in terms of the outer loops IV would cause the inner loop to either a) run forever, or b) terminate on the first iteration.
In practice, we appear to get lucky and not have the exit count computable for the outer loop, except when it's trivially zero. Given we bail on zero exit counts, we don't appear to ever trigger this. But I can't come up with a reason we *can't* compute an exit count for the outer loop on the common exiting block, so this may very well be triggering in some cases.
llvm-svn: 363964
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Summary:
BLSI sets the C flag is the input is not zero. So if its followed
by a TEST of the input where only the Z flag is consumed, we can
replace it with the opposite check of the C flag.
We should be able to do the same for BLSMSK and BLSR, but the
naive test case for those is being optimized to a subo by
CodeGenPrepare.
Reviewers: spatel, RKSimon
Subscribers: hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D63589
llvm-svn: 363957
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The form that compares against 0 is better because:
1. It removes a use of the input value.
2. It's the more standard form for this pattern: https://graphics.stanford.edu/~seander/bithacks.html#DetermineIfPowerOf2
3. It results in equal or better codegen (tested with x86, AArch64, ARM, PowerPC, MIPS).
This is a root cause for PR42314, but probably doesn't completely answer the codegen request:
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=42314
Alive proof:
https://rise4fun.com/Alive/9kG
Name: is power-of-2
%neg = sub i32 0, %x
%a = and i32 %neg, %x
%r = icmp eq i32 %a, %x
=>
%dec = add i32 %x, -1
%a2 = and i32 %dec, %x
%r = icmp eq i32 %a2, 0
Name: is not power-of-2
%neg = sub i32 0, %x
%a = and i32 %neg, %x
%r = icmp ne i32 %a, %x
=>
%dec = add i32 %x, -1
%a2 = and i32 %dec, %x
%r = icmp ne i32 %a2, 0
llvm-svn: 363956
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
Better handling of out-of-i64-range values due to large integer types or from fuzz tests.
llvm-svn: 363955
|
| |
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 363954
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
use that
as the variable address for NRVO variables.
Subscribers: hiraditya, cfe-commits, llvm-commits
Tags: #clang, #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D63361
llvm-svn: 363952
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Summary: Signedness does not change number of trailing zeros.
Reviewers: spatel, lebedev.ri, nikic
Reviewed By: spatel
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D63534
llvm-svn: 363951
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The attribute can specify elimination for leaf or non-leaf, so it
should always be considered. I copied this bug from AArch64, which
probably should also be fixed.
llvm-svn: 363949
|
| |
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 363947
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This should only matter in vectors with an undef component, since a
full undef vector would have been folded out.
llvm-svn: 363941
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This includes integer arithmetic of various kinds (add/sub/multiply,
saturating and not), and the immediate forms of VMOV and VMVN that
load an immediate into all lanes of a vector.
Reviewers: dmgreen, samparker, SjoerdMeijer, t.p.northover
Subscribers: javed.absar, kristof.beyls, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D62674
llvm-svn: 363936
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D63204
llvm-svn: 363934
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
C)) non-uniform folds.
Use matchBinaryPredicate instead of isConstOrConstSplat to let us handle non-uniform shift cases.
llvm-svn: 363929
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
We tend to only test for scalar/scalar consts when really we could support non-uniform vectors using ISD::matchUnaryPredicate/matchBinaryPredicate etc.
llvm-svn: 363924
|
| |
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 363922
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Fixes cppcheck warning.
Use the more capable getAPIntVal() instead of getZExtValue() as well since I'm here.
llvm-svn: 363921
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Select G_SITOFP and G_UITOFP for MIPS32.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D63542
llvm-svn: 363912
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Select G_FPTOSI and G_FPTOUI for MIPS32.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D63541
llvm-svn: 363911
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The caller of this is looking for comparisons of the input
to these instructions with 0. But the memory instructions
input is an addess not a value input in a register.
llvm-svn: 363907
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
seemed obviously missing.
llvm-svn: 363906
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Introducing VCC defs during SIFixSGPRCopies is generally
problematic. Avoid it by starting with the VOP3 form with the general
condition register. This is the easiest to fix instance, but doesn't
solve any specific problems I'm looking at.
llvm-svn: 363904
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The ARMDisassembler changes allow changing between ARM and Thumb mode
based on the MCSubtargetInfo, rather than the Target, which simplifies
the other changes a bit.
I'm not really happy with adding more target-specific logic to
tools/llvm-objdump/, but there isn't any easy way around it: the logic
in question specifically applies to disassembling an object file, and
that code simply isn't located in lib/Target, at least at the moment.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60927
llvm-svn: 363903
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This is incomplete, and ideally these would all be removed, but it's
better to localize them to the subtarget first with comments about
what they're for.
llvm-svn: 363902
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Summary:
Stop referring to "numeric expression", using simply the term
"expression" instead. Likewise for numeric operation since operations
are only used in numeric expressions.
Reviewers: jhenderson, jdenny, probinson, arichardson
Subscribers: hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D63500
llvm-svn: 363901
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Summary:
Make use of Error and Expected to bubble up diagnostics and force
checking of errors in the callers.
Reviewers: jhenderson, jdenny, probinson, arichardson
Subscribers: hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D63125
llvm-svn: 363900
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
Should avoid regression from D62341
llvm-svn: 363899
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
Use getAPIntValue() in a few more places. Most of the time getZExtValue() is fine, but occasionally there's fuzzed code or someone decides to create i65536 or something.....
llvm-svn: 363887
|