| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
... | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
When loading or storing AVX512 registers we were not using the AVX512
variant of the load and store for VR128 and VR256 like registers.
Thus, we ended up with the wrong encoding and actually were dropping the
high bits of the instruction. The result was that we load or store the
wrong register. The effect is visible only when we emit the object file
directly and disassemble it. Then, the output of the disassembler does
not match the assembly input.
This is related to llvm.org/PR27481.
llvm-svn: 269001
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This reapplies commit r268796, with a fix for the setting of the inline asm
constraints. I.e., "mark" LOW32_ADDR_ACCESS_RBP as a GR variant, so that the
regular processing of the GR operands (setting of the subregisters) happens.
Original commit log:
[X86] Add a new LOW32_ADDR_ACCESS_RBP register class.
ABIs like NaCl uses 32-bit addresses but have 64-bit frame.
The new register class reflects those constraints when choosing a
register class for a address access.
llvm-svn: 268955
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This reverts commit r268796.
I believe it breaks test/CodeGen/X86/asm-mismatched-types.ll with:
Cannot emit physreg copy instruction
llvm-svn: 268799
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
ABIs like NaCl uses 32-bit addresses but have 64-bit frame.
The new register class reflects those constraints when choosing a
register class for a address access.
llvm-svn: 268796
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This register class may be used by any ABIs that uses x86_64 ISA while
using 32-bit addresses, not just in X32 cases. Make sure the name
reflects that.
llvm-svn: 268795
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
According to H.J. Lu <hjl.tools@gmail.com>, this register class is never
used.
llvm-svn: 268771
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The new register classes allow to tell the machine verifier that it is
fine to use RIP for address accesses in x32 mode. Prior to that patch,
we would complain that we are using a GR64 in place of GR32, whereas it
is actually fine to use GR64 for x32 as long as the 32 high bits are 0s.
RIP has this property and is used for RIP-relative addressing.
This partially fixes http://llvm.org/PR27481.
llvm-svn: 268567
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D18716
llvm-svn: 265997
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Summary:
Refactor common value, scope, and label tracking logic out of DwarfDebug
into a common base class called DebugHandlerBase.
Update an old LLVM IR test case to avoid an assertion in LexicalScopes.
Reviewers: dblaikie, majnemer
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D16931
llvm-svn: 260432
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This is the same change on x86-64 as r255821 on AArch64.
rdar://9001553
llvm-svn: 257428
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
used by AsmParser library without depending on X86CodeGen library.
llvm-svn: 256428
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
getX86SubSuperRegister with just an unsigned representing size.
This a is step towards fixing a layering violation so the X86 AsmParser won't depending on CodeGen types.
llvm-svn: 256425
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
getX86SubSuperRegister. Most place don't care about this argument. NFC
llvm-svn: 256424
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
recursively. It should call itself instead. Otherwise it might fire an assertion when it was designed not too.
llvm-svn: 256422
|
|
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 256420
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/cfe-dev/2015-September/045171.html
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D15567
llvm-svn: 256155
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This commit adds a new target-independent calling convention for C++ TLS
access functions. It aims to minimize overhead in the caller by perserving as
many registers as possible.
The target-specific implementation for X86-64 is defined as following:
Arguments are passed as for the default C calling convention
The same applies for the return value(s)
The callee preserves all GPRs - except RAX and RDI
The access function makes C-style TLS function calls in the entry and exit
block, C-style TLS functions save a lot more registers than normal calls.
The added calling convention ties into the existing implementation of the
C-style TLS functions, so we can't simply use existing calling conventions
such as preserve_mostcc.
rdar://9001553
llvm-svn: 254737
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Caller saved regs differ between SysV and Win64. Use the tail call available set to scavenge from.
Refactor register info to create new helper to get at tail call GPRs. Added a new test case for windows. Fixed up a number of X64 tests since now RCX is preferred over RDX on SysV.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D14878
llvm-svn: 253927
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Calls involved in thread-local variable lookup save more registers
than normal calls.
rdar://problem/23073171
llvm-svn: 252837
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
We made them SP relative back in March (r233137) because that's the
value the runtime passes to EH functions. With the new cleanuppad IR,
funclets adjust their frame argument from SP to FP, so our offsets
should now be FP-relative.
llvm-svn: 250088
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
HHVM calling convention, hhvmcc, is used by HHVM JIT for
functions in translated cache. We currently support LLVM back end to
generate code for X86-64 and may support other architectures in the
future.
In HHVM calling convention any GP register could be used to pass and
return values, with the exception of R12 which is reserved for
thread-local area and is callee-saved. Other than R12, we always
pass RBX and RBP as args, which are our virtual machine's stack pointer
and frame pointer respectively.
When we enter translation cache via hhvmcc function, we expect
the stack to be aligned at 16 bytes, i.e. skewed by 8 bytes as opposed
to standard ABI alignment. This affects stack object alignment and stack
adjustments for function calls.
One extra calling convention, hhvm_ccc, is used to call C++ helpers from
HHVM's translation cache. It is almost identical to standard C calling
convention with an exception of first argument which is passed in RBP
(before we use RDI, RSI, etc.)
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D12681
llvm-svn: 248832
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
related. NFC.
Eric has replied and has demanded the patch be reverted.
llvm-svn: 247702
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
and related. NFC.
Summary:
This is the first patch in the series to migrate Triple's (which are ambiguous)
to TargetTuple's (which aren't).
For the moment, TargetTuple simply passes all requests to the Triple object it
holds. Once it has replaced Triple, it will start to implement the interface in
a more suitable way.
This change makes some changes to the public C++ API. In particular,
InitMCSubtargetInfo(), createMCRelocationInfo(), and createMCSymbolizer()
now take TargetTuples instead of Triples. The other public C++ API's have
been left as-is for the moment to reduce patch size.
This commit also contains a trivial patch to clang to account for the C++ API
change. Thanks go to Pavel Labath for fixing LLDB for me.
Reviewers: rengolin
Subscribers: jyknight, dschuff, arsenm, rampitec, danalbert, srhines, javed.absar, dsanders, echristo, emaste, jholewinski, tberghammer, ted, jfb, llvm-commits, rengolin
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D10969
llvm-svn: 247692
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
LLDB needs to be updated in the same commit.
llvm-svn: 247686
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Summary:
This is the first patch in the series to migrate Triple's (which are ambiguous)
to TargetTuple's (which aren't).
For the moment, TargetTuple simply passes all requests to the Triple object it
holds. Once it has replaced Triple, it will start to implement the interface in
a more suitable way.
This change makes some changes to the public C++ API. In particular,
InitMCSubtargetInfo(), createMCRelocationInfo(), and createMCSymbolizer()
now take TargetTuples instead of Triples. The other public C++ API's have
been left as-is for the moment to reduce patch size.
This commit also contains a trivial patch to clang to account for the C++ API
change.
Reviewers: rengolin
Subscribers: jyknight, dschuff, arsenm, rampitec, danalbert, srhines, javed.absar, dsanders, echristo, emaste, jholewinski, tberghammer, ted, jfb, llvm-commits, rengolin
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D10969
llvm-svn: 247683
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The old implementation assumed LP64 which is broken for x32. Specifically, the
MOVE8rm_NOREX and MOVE8mr_NOREX, when selected, would cause a 'Cannot emit
physreg copy instruction' error message to be reported.
This patch also enable the h-register*ll tests for x32.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D12336
Patch by João Porto
llvm-svn: 247058
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
function.
This was the same as getFrameIndexReference, but without the FrameReg
output.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D12042
llvm-svn: 245148
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Summary:
@rnk pointed out in [1] that x86's canRealignStack logic should match that in CantUseSP from hasBasePointer.
[1]: http://reviews.llvm.org/D11160?id=29713#inline-89350
Reviewers: rnk
Subscribers: rnk, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D11377
llvm-svn: 243772
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This patch does the following:
* Fix FIXME on `needsStackRealignment`: it is now shared between multiple targets, implemented in `TargetRegisterInfo`, and isn't `virtual` anymore. This will break out-of-tree targets, silently if they used `virtual` and with a build error if they used `override`.
* Factor out `canRealignStack` as a `virtual` function on `TargetRegisterInfo`, by default only looks for the `no-realign-stack` function attribute.
Multiple targets duplicated the same `needsStackRealignment` code:
- Aarch64.
- ARM.
- Mips almost: had extra `DEBUG` diagnostic, which the default implementation now has.
- PowerPC.
- WebAssembly.
- x86 almost: has an extra `-force-align-stack` option, which the default implementation now has.
The default implementation of `needsStackRealignment` used to just return `false`. My current patch changes the behavior by simply using the above shared behavior. This affects:
- AMDGPU
- BPF
- CppBackend
- MSP430
- NVPTX
- Sparc
- SystemZ
- XCore
- Out-of-tree targets
This is a breaking change! `make check` passes.
The only implementation of the `virtual` function (besides the slight different in x86) was Hexagon (which did `MF.getFrameInfo()->getMaxAlignment() > 8`), and potentially some out-of-tree targets. Hexagon now uses the default implementation.
`needsStackRealignment` was being overwritten in `<Target>GenRegisterInfo.inc`, to return `false` as the default also did. That was odd and is now gone.
Reviewers: sunfish
Subscribers: aemerson, llvm-commits, jfb
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D11160
llvm-svn: 242727
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Summary:
The target frame lowering's concrete type is always known in RegisterInfo, yet it's only sometimes devirtualized through a static_cast. This change adds an auto-generated static function <Target>GenRegisterInfo::getFrameLowering(const MachineFunction &MF) which does this devirtualization, and uses this function in all targets which can.
This change was suggested by sunfish in D11070 for WebAssembly, I figure that I may as well improve the other targets while I'm here.
Subscribers: sunfish, ted, llvm-commits, jfb
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D11093
llvm-svn: 241921
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The incoming EBP value points to the end of a local stack allocation, so
we can use that to restore ESI, the base pointer. Once we do that, we
can use local stack allocations. If we know we need stack realignment,
spill the original frame pointer in the prologue and reload it after
restoring ESI.
llvm-svn: 241648
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Summary:
Initially, these intrinsics seemed like part of a family of "frame"
related intrinsics, but now I think that's more confusing than helpful.
Initially, the LangRef specified that this would create a new kind of
allocation that would be allocated at a fixed offset from the frame
pointer (EBP/RBP). We ended up dropping that design, and leaving the
stack frame layout alone.
These intrinsics are really about sharing local stack allocations, not
frame pointers. I intend to go further and add an `llvm.localaddress()`
intrinsic that returns whatever register (EBP, ESI, ESP, RBX) is being
used to address locals, which should not be confused with the frame
pointer.
Naming suggestions at this point are welcome, I'm happy to re-run sed.
Reviewers: majnemer, nicholas
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D11011
llvm-svn: 241633
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This is a new version of http://reviews.llvm.org/D10260.
It turned out that when you specify an integer register in inline asm on
x86 you get the register of the required type size back. That means that
X86TargetLowering::getRegForInlineAsmConstraint() has to accept any of
the integer registers and adapt its size to the given target size which
may be any 8/16/32/64 bit sized type. Surprisingly that means given a
constraint of "{ax}" and a type of MVT::F32 we need to return X86::EAX.
This change makes this face explicit, the previous code seemed like
working by accident because there it never returned an error once a
register was found. On the other hand this rewrite allows to actually
return errors for invalid situations like requesting an integer register
for an i128 type.
Related to rdar://21042280
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D10813
llvm-svn: 241002
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Apparently, the style needs to be agreed upon first.
llvm-svn: 240390
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The patch is generated using this command:
tools/clang/tools/extra/clang-tidy/tool/run-clang-tidy.py -fix \
-checks=-*,llvm-namespace-comment -header-filter='llvm/.*|clang/.*' \
llvm/lib/
Thanks to Eugene Kosov for the original patch!
llvm-svn: 240137
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Remove the EFLAGS from the stackmap live-out mask. The EFLAGS register is not
supposed to be part of that set, because the X86 calling conventions mark the
register as NOT preserved.
Also remove the IP registers, since spilling and restoring those doesn't really
make any sense.
Related to rdar://problem/21019635.
llvm-svn: 239568
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
non-Windows.
Summary:
A small bit that I missed when I updated the X86 backend to account for
the Win64 calling convention on non-Windows. Now we don't use dead
non-volatile registers when emitting a Win64 indirect tail call on
non-Windows.
Should fix PR23710.
Test Plan: Added test for the correct behavior based on the case I posted to PR23710.
Reviewers: rnk
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D10258
llvm-svn: 239111
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The problem was that I slipped a change required for shrink-wrapping, namely I
used getFirstTerminator instead of the getLastNonDebugInstr that was here before
the refactoring, whereas the surrounding code is not yet patched for that.
Original message:
[X86] Refactor the prologue emission to prepare for shrink-wrapping.
- Add a late pass to expand pseudo instructions (tail call and EH returns).
Instead of doing it in the prologue emission.
- Factor some static methods in X86FrameLowering to ease code sharing.
NFC.
Related to <rdar://problem/20821487>
llvm-svn: 238035
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
compilers."
Revert "[X86] Refactor the prologue emission to prepare for shrink-wrapping."
This reverts commit 6b3b93fc8b68a2c806aa992ee4bd3d7f61898d4b.
This reverts commit ab0b15dff8539826283a59c2dd700a18a9680e0f.
llvm-svn: 238011
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
- Add a late pass to expand pseudo instructions (tail call and EH returns).
Instead of doing it in the prologue emission.
- Factor some static methods in X86FrameLowering to ease code sharing.
NFC.
Related to <rdar://problem/20821487>
llvm-svn: 237977
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
We can't use TargetFrameLowering::getFrameIndexOffset directly, because
Win64 really wants the offset from the stack pointer at the end of the
prologue. Instead, use X86FrameLowering::getFrameIndexOffsetFromSP(),
which is a pretty close approximiation of that. It fails to handle cases
with interestingly large stack alignments, which is pretty uncommon on
Win64 and is TODO.
llvm-svn: 233137
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
classes. Use a Triple instead and simplify a lot of the querying
logic to use lookups on the Triple.
llvm-svn: 232071
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
MachineFunction argument so that we can grab subtarget specific
features off of it.
llvm-svn: 231979
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
MachineFunction argument so that it can look up the subtarget
rather than using a cached one in some Targets.
llvm-svn: 231888
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Turns out it's pretty straightforward and simplifies the implementation.
Reviewers: andrew.w.kaylor
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D8051
llvm-svn: 231386
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Summary:
This change causes us to actually save non-volatile registers in a Win64
ABI function that calls a System V ABI function, and vice-versa.
Reviewers: rnk
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D7919
llvm-svn: 230714
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This should have gone into r230334.
llvm-svn: 230339
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This fixes the original issue in PR22655, but not the secondary one.
llvm-svn: 230334
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Canonicalize access to function attributes to use the simpler API.
getAttributes().getAttribute(AttributeSet::FunctionIndex, Kind)
=> getFnAttribute(Kind)
getAttributes().hasAttribute(AttributeSet::FunctionIndex, Kind)
=> hasFnAttribute(Kind)
llvm-svn: 229214
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This moves the transformation introduced in r223757 into a separate MI pass.
This allows it to cover many more cases (not only cases where there must be a
reserved call frame), and perform rudimentary call folding. It still doesn't
have a heuristic, so it is enabled only for optsize/minsize, with stack
alignment <= 8, where it ought to be a fairly clear win.
(Re-commit of r227728)
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D6789
llvm-svn: 227752
|