| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
| ... | |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Summary:
Add the following DAGCombiner folds for mulfix being
one of SMULFIX/UMULFIX/SMULFIXSAT:
(mulfix x, undef, scale) -> 0
(mulfix x, 0, scale) -> 0
Also added canonicalization of constants to RHS.
Reviewers: RKSimon, craig.topper, spatel
Reviewed By: RKSimon
Subscribers: hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D66052
llvm-svn: 369103
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
In r369026 we disabled spill-recognition in LiveDebugValues for anything
that has a complex expression. This is because it's hard to recover the
complex expression once the spill location is baked into it.
This patch re-enables spill-recognition and slightly adjusts the DBG_VALUE
insts that LiveDebugValues tracks: instead of tracking the last DBG_VALUE
for a variable, it tracks the last _unspilt_ DBG_VALUE. The spill-restore
code is then able to access and copy the original complex expression; but
the rest of LiveDebugValues has to be aware of the slight semantic shift,
and produce a new spilt location if a spilt location is propagated between
blocks.
The test added produces an incorrect variable location (see FIXME), which
will be the subject of future work.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D65368
llvm-svn: 369092
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Summary:
This patch adds G_GEP to `shouldCSEOpc` so that it can be CSEd. It also refactors
`translateGetElementPtr` by replacing `createGenericVirtualRegister` calls with types.
Reviewers: aditya_nandakumar, arsenm, dsanders, paquette, aemerson
Reviewed By: aditya_nandakumar
Subscribers: wdng, rovka, javed.absar, hiraditya, Petar.Avramovic, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D66316
llvm-svn: 369070
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Summary:
This clang-tidy check is looking for unsigned integer variables whose initializer
starts with an implicit cast from llvm::Register and changes the type of the
variable to llvm::Register (dropping the llvm:: where possible).
Partial reverts in:
X86FrameLowering.cpp - Some functions return unsigned and arguably should be MCRegister
X86FixupLEAs.cpp - Some functions return unsigned and arguably should be MCRegister
X86FrameLowering.cpp - Some functions return unsigned and arguably should be MCRegister
HexagonBitSimplify.cpp - Function takes BitTracker::RegisterRef which appears to be unsigned&
MachineVerifier.cpp - Ambiguous operator==() given MCRegister and const Register
PPCFastISel.cpp - No Register::operator-=()
PeepholeOptimizer.cpp - TargetInstrInfo::optimizeLoadInstr() takes an unsigned&
MachineTraceMetrics.cpp - MachineTraceMetrics lacks a suitable constructor
Manual fixups in:
ARMFastISel.cpp - ARMEmitLoad() now takes a Register& instead of unsigned&
HexagonSplitDouble.cpp - Ternary operator was ambiguous between unsigned/Register
HexagonConstExtenders.cpp - Has a local class named Register, used llvm::Register instead of Register.
PPCFastISel.cpp - PPCEmitLoad() now takes a Register& instead of unsigned&
Depends on D65919
Reviewers: arsenm, bogner, craig.topper, RKSimon
Reviewed By: arsenm
Subscribers: RKSimon, craig.topper, lenary, aemerson, wuzish, jholewinski, MatzeB, qcolombet, dschuff, jyknight, dylanmckay, sdardis, nemanjai, jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, sbc100, jgravelle-google, kristof.beyls, hiraditya, aheejin, kbarton, fedor.sergeev, javed.absar, asb, rbar, johnrusso, simoncook, apazos, sabuasal, niosHD, jrtc27, MaskRay, zzheng, edward-jones, atanasyan, rogfer01, MartinMosbeck, brucehoult, the_o, tpr, PkmX, jocewei, jsji, Petar.Avramovic, asbirlea, Jim, s.egerton, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D65962
llvm-svn: 369041
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
AMDGPU has some buffer intrinsics which theoretically could use
this. Some of the generated tables include the 3 and 4 element vector
versions of these rounded to 64-bits, which is ambiguous. Add these to
help the table disambiguate these.
Assertion change is for the path odd sized vectors now take for R600.
v3i16 is widened to v4i16, which then needs to be promoted to v4i32.
llvm-svn: 369038
|
| |
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 369037
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This patch avoids a crash caused by DW_OP_LLVM_fragments being dropped
from DIExpressions by LiveDebugValues spill-restore code. The appearance
of a previously unseen fragment configuration confuses LDV, as documented
in PR42773, and reproduced by the test function this patch adds (Crashes
on a x86_64 debug build).
To avoid this, on spill restore, we now use fragment information from the
spilt-location-expression.
In addition, when spilling, we now don't spill any DBG_VALUE with a complex
expression, as it can't be safely restored and will definitely lead to an
incorrect variable location. The discussion of this is in D65368.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D66284
llvm-svn: 369026
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Now that we've moved to C++14, we no longer need the llvm::make_unique
implementation from STLExtras.h. This patch is a mechanical replacement
of (hopefully) all the llvm::make_unique instances across the monorepo.
llvm-svn: 369013
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
SmallBitVector/BitVector types aren't used at all in the cpp file.
llvm-svn: 369008
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
BitVector type isn't used at all in the cpp file.
llvm-svn: 369007
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Set the StartIdx type to size_t so that it matches the StoreNodes SmallVector size() and index types.
Silences the MSVC analyzer warning that unsigned increment might overflow before exceeding size_t on 64-bit targets - this isn't likely to happen but it means we use consistent types and reduces the warning "noise" a little.
llvm-svn: 368998
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
blocks
Summary:
This patch has trigger a bug of r368339, and the r368339 has been reverted, So upstream this patch again.
In `block-placement` pass, it will create some patterns for unconditional we can do the simple early retrun.
But the `early-ret` pass is before `block-placement`, we don't want to run it again.
This patch is to do the simple early return to optimize the blocks at the last of `block-placement`.
Reviewed By: efriedma
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D63972
llvm-svn: 368997
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
If the last step in an FP add reduction allows reassociation and doesn't care
about -0.0, then we are free to recognize that computation as a reduction
that may reorder the intermediate steps.
This is requested directly by PR42705:
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=42705
and solves PR42947 (if horizontal math instructions are actually faster than
the alternative):
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=42947
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D66236
llvm-svn: 368995
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This patch adds a ptrmask intrinsic which allows masking out bits of a
pointer that must be zero when accessing it, because of ABI alignment
requirements or a restriction of the meaningful bits of a pointer
through the data layout.
This avoids doing a ptrtoint/inttoptr round trip in some cases (e.g. tagged
pointers) and allows us to not lose information about the underlying
object.
Reviewers: nlopes, efriedma, hfinkel, sanjoy, jdoerfert, aqjune
Reviewed by: sanjoy, jdoerfert
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59065
llvm-svn: 368986
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
vector zeroinitializer indices in addition to scalar zeroes.
llvm-svn: 368926
|
| |
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 368905
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Summary: There are places where a case that debug label scope has an extra lexical block file is not considered properly. The modified test won't pass without this patch.
Reviewers: aprantl, HsiangKai
Subscribers: hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D66187
llvm-svn: 368891
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
MCP currently uses changeDebugValuesDefReg / collectDebugValues to find
debug users of a register, however those functions assume that all
DBG_VALUEs immediately follow the specified instruction, which isn't
necessarily true. This is going to become very often untrue when we turn
off CodeGenPrepare::placeDbgValues.
Instead of calling changeDebugValuesDefReg on an instruction to change its
debug users, in this patch we instead collect DBG_VALUEs of copies as we
iterate over insns, and update the debug users of copies that are made
dead. This isn't a non-functional change, because MCP will now update
DBG_VALUEs that aren't immediately after a copy, but refer to the same
register. I've hijacked the regression test for PR38773 to test for this
new behaviour, an entirely new test seemed overkill.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56265
llvm-svn: 368835
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
In MCAsmStreamer:
.type foo,@function # <--- this is redundant
.type foo,@gnu_indirect_function
In MCELFStreamer, the latter STT_GNU_IFUNC overrides STT_FUNC.
llvm-svn: 368823
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
source index
https://reviews.llvm.org/D66182
llvm-svn: 368781
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
https://reviews.llvm.org/D66171
llvm-svn: 368753
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
Odd sized vectors aren't handled yet.
llvm-svn: 368713
|
| |
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 368709
|
| |
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 368705
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Currently shufflemasks get emitted as any other constant, and you end
up with a bunch of virtual registers of G_CONSTANT with a
G_BUILD_VECTOR. The AArch64 selector then asserts on anything that
doesn't fit this pattern. This isn't an ideal representation, and
should avoid legalization and have fewer opportunities for a
representational error.
Rather than invent a new shuffle mask operand type, similar to what
ShuffleVectorSDNode does, just track the original IR Constant mask
operand. I don't completely like the idea of adding another link to
the IR, but MIR is already quite dependent on IR constants already,
and this will allow sharing the shuffle mask utility functions with
the IR.
llvm-svn: 368704
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Summary:
This implements an optimization described in Hacker's Delight 10-17:
when `C` is constant, the result of `X % C == 0` can be computed
more cheaply without actually calculating the remainder.
The motivation is discussed here: https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=35479.
One huge caveat: this signed case is only valid for positive divisors.
While we can freely negate negative divisors, we can't negate `INT_MIN`,
so for now if `INT_MIN` is encountered, we bailout.
As a follow-up, it should be possible to handle that more gracefully
via extra `and`+`setcc`+`select`.
This passes llvm's test-suite, and from cursory(!) cross-examination
the folds (the assembly) match those of GCC, and manual checking via alive
did not reveal any issues (other than the `INT_MIN` case)
Reviewers: RKSimon, spatel, hermord, craig.topper, xbolva00
Reviewed By: RKSimon, xbolva00
Subscribers: xbolva00, thakis, javed.absar, hiraditya, dexonsmith, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D65366
llvm-svn: 368702
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The comment initially matched the code, but the code was incorrect
and was fixed after the initial revert back back when it was introduced,
but the comment was never updated.
llvm-svn: 368701
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
SimplifyMultipleUseDemandedBits for ISD::EXTRACT_VECTOR_ELT"
This introduced a false positive MemorySanitizer warning about use of
uninitialized memory in a vectorized crc function in Chromium. That suggests
maybe something is not right with this transformation. See
https://crbug.com/992853#c7 for a reproducer.
This also reverts the follow-up commits r368307 and r368308 which
depended on this.
> This patch attempts to peek through vectors based on the demanded bits/elt of a particular ISD::EXTRACT_VECTOR_ELT node, allowing us to avoid dependencies on ops that have no impact on the extract.
>
> In particular this helps remove some unnecessary scalar->vector->scalar patterns.
>
> The wasm shift patterns are annoying - @tlively has indicated that the wasm vector shift codegen are to be refactored in the near-term and isn't considered a major issue.
>
> Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D65887
llvm-svn: 368660
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
to be maintained.
Currently we can't keep any state in the selector object that we get from
subtarget. As a result we have to plumb through all our variables through
multiple functions. This change makes it non-const and adds a virtual init()
method to allow further state to be captured for each target.
AArch64 makes use of this in this patch to cache a call to hasFnAttribute()
which is expensive to call, and is used on each selection of G_BRCOND.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D65984
llvm-svn: 368652
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
https://reviews.llvm.org/D66119
llvm-svn: 368648
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Summary:
This was mostly an experiment to assess the feasibility of completely
eliminating a problematic implicit conversion case in D61321 in advance of
landing that* but it also happens to align with the goal of propagating the
use of Register/MCRegister instead of unsigned so I believe it makes sense
to commit it.
The overall process for eliminating the implicit conversions from
Register/MCRegister -> unsigned was to:
1. Add an explicit conversion to support genuinely required conversions to
unsigned. For example, using them as an index for IndexedMap. Sadly it's
not possible to have an explicit and implicit conversion to the same
type and only deprecate the implicit one so I called the explicit
conversion get().
2. Temporarily annotate the implicit conversion to unsigned with
LLVM_ATTRIBUTE_DEPRECATED to make them visible
3. Eliminate implicit conversions by propagating Register/MCRegister/
explicit-conversions appropriately
4. Remove the deprecation added in 2.
* My conclusion is that it isn't feasible as there's too much code to
update in one go.
Depends on D65678
Reviewers: arsenm
Subscribers: MatzeB, wdng, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D65685
llvm-svn: 368643
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
https://reviews.llvm.org/D66039
We were using getIndexSize instead of getIndexSizeInBits().
Added test case for G_PTRTOINT and G_INTTOPTR.
llvm-svn: 368618
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
It caused assertions to fire when building Chromium:
lib/CodeGen/LiveDebugValues.cpp:331: bool
{anonymous}::LiveDebugValues::OpenRangesSet::empty() const: Assertion
`Vars.empty() == VarLocs.empty() && "open ranges are inconsistent"' failed.
See https://crbug.com/992871#c3 for how to reproduce.
> Patch https://reviews.llvm.org/D43256 introduced more aggressive loop layout optimization which depends on profile information. If profile information is not available, the statically estimated profile information(generated by BranchProbabilityInfo.cpp) is used. If user program doesn't behave as BranchProbabilityInfo.cpp expected, the layout may be worse.
>
> To be conservative this patch restores the original layout algorithm in plain mode. But user can still try the aggressive layout optimization with -force-precise-rotation-cost=true.
>
> Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D65673
llvm-svn: 368579
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
to optimize the blocks
llvm-svn: 368574
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Summary:
When eliminating an unreachable block we must remove any call site
information for calls residing in the block.
This was originally found on a downstream target, and the attached x86
test case was produced by hand-modifying some MIR.
Reviewers: aprantl, asowda, NikolaPrica, djtodoro, ivanbaev, vsk
Reviewed By: NikolaPrica, vsk
Subscribers: vsk, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #debug-info, #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64500
llvm-svn: 368566
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
blocks
Summary:
In `block-placement` pass, it will create some patterns for unconditional we can do the simple early retrun.
But the `early-ret` pass is before `block-placement`, we don't want to run it again.
This patch is to do the simple early return to optimize the blocks at the last of `block-placement`.
Reviewed By: efriedma
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D63972
llvm-svn: 368565
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
to optimize the blocks"
> In `block-placement` pass, it will create some patterns for unconditional we can do the simple early retrun.
> But the `early-ret` pass is before `block-placement`, we don't want to run it again.
> This patch is to do the simple early return to optimize the blocks at the last of `block-placement`.
>
> Reviewed By: efriedma
>
> Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D63972
This also revertes follow-ups r368514 and r368532.
llvm-svn: 368560
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
for ISD::TRUNCATE
llvm-svn: 368553
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Summary:
After the commits that changed x86 backend to widen vectors
instead of using promotion some of our downstream tests
started to fail. It was noticed that WidenVectorResult has
been missing support for SMULFIX/UMULFIX/SMULFIXSAT. This
patch adds the missing functionality.
Reviewers: craig.topper, RKSimon
Reviewed By: craig.topper
Subscribers: hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D66051
llvm-svn: 368540
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
MachineBlockPlacement::optimizeBranches()
This will pass EXPENSIVE check.
llvm-svn: 368532
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
MachineBlockPlacement::optimizeBranches()
llvm-svn: 368514
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
blocks
Summary:
In `block-placement` pass, it will create some patterns for unconditional we can do the simple early retrun.
But the `early-ret` pass is before `block-placement`, we don't want to run it again.
This patch is to do the simple early return to optimize the blocks at the last of `block-placement`.
Reviewed By: efriedma
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D63972
llvm-svn: 368509
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This is the codegen part of fixing:
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=32939
Even with the optimal/canonical IR that is ideally created by D65954,
we would reverse that transform in DAGCombiner and end up with the same
asm on AArch64 or x86.
I see 2 options for trying to correct this:
1. Limit isNegatibleForFree() by special-casing the fmul pattern (this patch).
2. Avoid creating (fmul X, 2.0) in the 1st place by adding a special-case
transform to SelectionDAG::getNode() and/or SelectionDAGBuilder::visitFMul()
that matches the transform done by DAGCombiner.
This seems like the less intrusive patch, but if there's some other reason to
prefer 1 option over the other, we can change to the other option.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D66016
llvm-svn: 368490
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Summary:
Targets often have instructions that can sign-extend certain cases faster
than the equivalent shift-left/arithmetic-shift-right. Such cases can be
identified by matching a shift-left/shift-right pair but there are some
issues with this in the context of combines. For example, suppose you can
sign-extend 8-bit up to 32-bit with a target extend instruction.
%1:_(s32) = G_SHL %0:_(s32), i32 24 # (I've inlined the G_CONSTANT for brevity)
%2:_(s32) = G_ASHR %1:_(s32), i32 24
%3:_(s32) = G_ASHR %2:_(s32), i32 1
would reasonably combine to:
%1:_(s32) = G_SHL %0:_(s32), i32 24
%2:_(s32) = G_ASHR %1:_(s32), i32 25
which no longer matches the special case. If your shifts and extend are
equal cost, this would break even as a pair of shifts but if your shift is
more expensive than the extend then it's cheaper as:
%2:_(s32) = G_SEXT_INREG %0:_(s32), i32 8
%3:_(s32) = G_ASHR %2:_(s32), i32 1
It's possible to match the shift-pair in ISel and emit an extend and ashr.
However, this is far from the only way to break this shift pair and make
it hard to match the extends. Another example is that with the right
known-zeros, this:
%1:_(s32) = G_SHL %0:_(s32), i32 24
%2:_(s32) = G_ASHR %1:_(s32), i32 24
%3:_(s32) = G_MUL %2:_(s32), i32 2
can become:
%1:_(s32) = G_SHL %0:_(s32), i32 24
%2:_(s32) = G_ASHR %1:_(s32), i32 23
All upstream targets have been configured to lower it to the current
G_SHL,G_ASHR pair but will likely want to make it legal in some cases to
handle their faster cases.
To follow-up: Provide a way to legalize based on the constant. At the
moment, I'm thinking that the best way to achieve this is to provide the
MI in LegalityQuery but that opens the door to breaking core principles
of the legalizer (legality is not context sensitive). That said, it's
worth noting that looking at other instructions and acting on that
information doesn't violate this principle in itself. It's only a
violation if, at the end of legalization, a pass that checks legality
without being able to see the context would say an instruction might not be
legal. That's a fairly subtle distinction so to give a concrete example,
saying %2 in:
%1 = G_CONSTANT 16
%2 = G_SEXT_INREG %0, %1
is legal is in violation of that principle if the legality of %2 depends
on %1 being constant and/or being 16. However, legalizing to either:
%2 = G_SEXT_INREG %0, 16
or:
%1 = G_CONSTANT 16
%2:_(s32) = G_SHL %0, %1
%3:_(s32) = G_ASHR %2, %1
depending on whether %1 is constant and 16 does not violate that principle
since both outputs are genuinely legal.
Reviewers: bogner, aditya_nandakumar, volkan, aemerson, paquette, arsenm
Subscribers: sdardis, jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, rovka, kristof.beyls, javed.absar, hiraditya, jrtc27, atanasyan, Petar.Avramovic, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D61289
llvm-svn: 368487
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Summary:
A block address may be used in inline assembly. In which case it
requires a name so that the asm parser has something to parse. Creating
a name for every block address is a large hammer, but is necessary
because at the point when a temp symbol is created we don't necessarily
know if it's used in inline asm. This ensures that it exists regardless.
Reviewers: nickdesaulniers, craig.topper
Subscribers: nathanchance, javed.absar, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D65352
llvm-svn: 368478
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Summary:
This patch keeps track of MCSymbols created for blocks that were
referenced in inline asm. It prevents creating a new symbol which
doesn't refer to the block.
Inline asm may have a reference to a label. The asm parser however
doesn't recognize it as a label and tries to create a new symbol. The
result being that instead of the original symbol (e.g. ".Ltmp0") the
parser replaces it in the inline asm with the new one (e.g. ".Ltmp00")
without updating it in the symbol table. So the machine basic block
retains the "old" symbol (".Ltmp0"), but the inline asm uses the new one
(".Ltmp00").
Reviewers: nickdesaulniers, craig.topper
Subscribers: nathanchance, javed.absar, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D65304
llvm-svn: 368477
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This is handled at node creation time (similar to X/1.0)
after:
rL357029
(no fast-math-flags needed)
llvm-svn: 368443
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Summary:
This is exposed by adding a new testcase in PowerPC in
https://reviews.llvm.org/rL367732
The testcase got different output on different platform, hence breaking
buildbots.
The problem is that we get differnt FuncUnitOrder when calculateResMII.
The root cause is:
1. Two MachineInstr might get SAME priority(MFUsx) from minFuncUnits.
2. Current comparison operator() will return `MFUs1 > MFUs2`.
3. We use iterators for MachineInstr, so the input to FuncUnitSorter
might be different on differnt platform due to the iterator nature.
So for two MI with same MFU, their order is actually depends on the
iterator order, which is platform (implemtation) dependent.
This is risky, and may cause cross-compiling problems.
The fix is to check make sure we assign a determine order when they are
equal.
Reviewers: bcahoon, hfinkel, jmolloy
Subscribers: nemanjai, hiraditya, MaskRay, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D65992
llvm-svn: 368441
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
I've now needed to add an extra parameter to this call twice recently. Not only
is the signature getting extremely unwieldy, but just updating all of the
callsites and implementations is a pain. Putting the parameters in a struct
sidesteps both issues.
llvm-svn: 368408
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
mload/mstore/mgather/mscatter from DAGCombiner to the type legalizer.
We may be able to look to how VSELECT is handled to further
improve this, but this appears to be neutral or an improvement
on the test cases we have.
llvm-svn: 368344
|