summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/lldb/source/Commands/CommandObjectPlatform.cpp
Commit message (Collapse)AuthorAgeFilesLines
* [lldb][NFC] Remove unnecessary includes in source/CommandsRaphael Isemann2019-12-161-3/+0
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | Summary: This removes most of unnecessary includes in the `source/Commands` directory. This was generated by IWYU and a script that fixed all the bogus reports from IWYU. Patch is tested on Linux and macOS. Reviewers: JDevlieghere Reviewed By: JDevlieghere Subscribers: krytarowski, lldb-commits Tags: #lldb Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71489
* Run clang-format on lldb/source/Commands (NFC)Adrian Prantl2019-10-301-4/+2
| | | | | These files had a lot of whitespace errors in them which was a constant source of merge conflicts downstream.
* [platform process list] add a flag for showing the processes of all usersWalter Erquinigo2019-10-121-0/+4
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Summary: For context: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68293 We need a way to show all the processes on android regardless of the user id. When you run `platform process list`, you only see the processes with the same user as the user that launched lldb-server. However, it's quite useful to see all the processes, though, and it will lay a foundation for full apk debugging support from lldb. Before: ``` PID PARENT USER TRIPLE NAME ====== ====== ========== ======================== ============================ 3234 1 aarch64-unknown-linux-android adbd 8034 3234 aarch64-unknown-linux-android sh 9096 3234 aarch64-unknown-linux-android sh 9098 9096 aarch64-unknown-linux-android lldb-server (lldb) ^D ``` Now: ``` (lldb) platform process list -x 205 matching processes were found on "remote-android" PID PARENT USER TRIPLE NAME ====== ====== ========== ======================== ============================ 1 0 init 524 1 init 525 1 init 531 1 ueventd 568 1 logd 569 1 aarch64-unknown-linux-android servicemanager 570 1 aarch64-unknown-linux-android hwservicemanager 571 1 aarch64-unknown-linux-android vndservicemanager 577 1 aarch64-unknown-linux-android qseecomd 580 577 aarch64-unknown-linux-android qseecomd ... 23816 979 com.android.providers.calendar 24600 979 com.verizon.mips.services 27888 979 com.hualai 28043 2378 com.android.chrome:sandboxed_process0 31449 979 com.att.shm 31779 979 com.samsung.android.authfw 31846 979 com.samsung.android.server.iris 32014 979 com.samsung.android.MtpApplication 32045 979 com.samsung.InputEventApp ``` Reviewers: labath,xiaobai,aadsm,clayborg Subscribers: > llvm-svn: 374584 llvm-svn: 374631
* Revert "[platform process list] add a flag for showing the processes of all ↵Walter Erquinigo2019-10-121-4/+0
| | | | | | | | users" This reverts commit f670a5edfc70066872e1795d650ed6e1ac62b6a8. llvm-svn: 374630
* [platform process list] add a flag for showing the processes of all usersWalter Erquinigo2019-10-121-0/+4
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Summary: For context: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68293 We need a way to show all the processes on android regardless of the user id. When you run `platform process list`, you only see the processes with the same user as the user that launched lldb-server. However, it's quite useful to see all the processes, though, and it will lay a foundation for full apk debugging support from lldb. Before: ``` PID PARENT USER TRIPLE NAME ====== ====== ========== ======================== ============================ 3234 1 aarch64-unknown-linux-android adbd 8034 3234 aarch64-unknown-linux-android sh 9096 3234 aarch64-unknown-linux-android sh 9098 9096 aarch64-unknown-linux-android lldb-server (lldb) ^D ``` Now: ``` (lldb) platform process list -x 205 matching processes were found on "remote-android" PID PARENT USER TRIPLE NAME ====== ====== ========== ======================== ============================ 1 0 init 524 1 init 525 1 init 531 1 ueventd 568 1 logd 569 1 aarch64-unknown-linux-android servicemanager 570 1 aarch64-unknown-linux-android hwservicemanager 571 1 aarch64-unknown-linux-android vndservicemanager 577 1 aarch64-unknown-linux-android qseecomd 580 577 aarch64-unknown-linux-android qseecomd ... 23816 979 com.android.providers.calendar 24600 979 com.verizon.mips.services 27888 979 com.hualai 28043 2378 com.android.chrome:sandboxed_process0 31449 979 com.att.shm 31779 979 com.samsung.android.authfw 31846 979 com.samsung.android.server.iris 32014 979 com.samsung.android.MtpApplication 32045 979 com.samsung.InputEventApp ``` Reviewers: labath,xiaobai,aadsm,clayborg Subscribers: > llvm-svn: 374584 llvm-svn: 374626
* Revert "[platform process list] add a flag for showing the processes of all ↵Walter Erquinigo2019-10-121-4/+0
| | | | | | | | users" This reverts commit 90d0de4999354a5223f08ad714222b0a5dca3cad. llvm-svn: 374625
* [platform process list] add a flag for showing the processes of all usersWalter Erquinigo2019-10-121-0/+4
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Summary: For context: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68293 We need a way to show all the processes on android regardless of the user id. When you run `platform process list`, you only see the processes with the same user as the user that launched lldb-server. However, it's quite useful to see all the processes, though, and it will lay a foundation for full apk debugging support from lldb. Before: ``` PID PARENT USER TRIPLE NAME ====== ====== ========== ======================== ============================ 3234 1 aarch64-unknown-linux-android adbd 8034 3234 aarch64-unknown-linux-android sh 9096 3234 aarch64-unknown-linux-android sh 9098 9096 aarch64-unknown-linux-android lldb-server (lldb) ^D ``` Now: ``` (lldb) platform process list -x 205 matching processes were found on "remote-android" PID PARENT USER TRIPLE NAME ====== ====== ========== ======================== ============================ 1 0 init 524 1 init 525 1 init 531 1 ueventd 568 1 logd 569 1 aarch64-unknown-linux-android servicemanager 570 1 aarch64-unknown-linux-android hwservicemanager 571 1 aarch64-unknown-linux-android vndservicemanager 577 1 aarch64-unknown-linux-android qseecomd 580 577 aarch64-unknown-linux-android qseecomd ... 23816 979 com.android.providers.calendar 24600 979 com.verizon.mips.services 27888 979 com.hualai 28043 2378 com.android.chrome:sandboxed_process0 31449 979 com.att.shm 31779 979 com.samsung.android.authfw 31846 979 com.samsung.android.server.iris 32014 979 com.samsung.android.MtpApplication 32045 979 com.samsung.InputEventApp ``` Reviewers: labath,xiaobai,aadsm,clayborg Subscribers: > llvm-svn: 374584 llvm-svn: 374622
* Revert "[platform process list] add a flag for showing the processes of all ↵Walter Erquinigo2019-10-121-4/+0
| | | | | | | | users" This reverts commit 08781f4c53a177662c029d3da9c407ba65ae6747. llvm-svn: 374621
* [platform process list] add a flag for showing the processes of all usersWalter Erquinigo2019-10-121-0/+4
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Summary: For context: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68293 We need a way to show all the processes on android regardless of the user id. When you run `platform process list`, you only see the processes with the same user as the user that launched lldb-server. However, it's quite useful to see all the processes, though, and it will lay a foundation for full apk debugging support from lldb. Before: ``` PID PARENT USER TRIPLE NAME ====== ====== ========== ======================== ============================ 3234 1 aarch64-unknown-linux-android adbd 8034 3234 aarch64-unknown-linux-android sh 9096 3234 aarch64-unknown-linux-android sh 9098 9096 aarch64-unknown-linux-android lldb-server (lldb) ^D ``` Now: ``` (lldb) platform process list -x 205 matching processes were found on "remote-android" PID PARENT USER TRIPLE NAME ====== ====== ========== ======================== ============================ 1 0 init 524 1 init 525 1 init 531 1 ueventd 568 1 logd 569 1 aarch64-unknown-linux-android servicemanager 570 1 aarch64-unknown-linux-android hwservicemanager 571 1 aarch64-unknown-linux-android vndservicemanager 577 1 aarch64-unknown-linux-android qseecomd 580 577 aarch64-unknown-linux-android qseecomd ... 23816 979 com.android.providers.calendar 24600 979 com.verizon.mips.services 27888 979 com.hualai 28043 2378 com.android.chrome:sandboxed_process0 31449 979 com.att.shm 31779 979 com.samsung.android.authfw 31846 979 com.samsung.android.server.iris 32014 979 com.samsung.android.MtpApplication 32045 979 com.samsung.InputEventApp ``` Reviewers: labath,xiaobai,aadsm,clayborg Subscribers: > llvm-svn: 374584 llvm-svn: 374620
* Temporarily Revert [platform process list] add a flag for showing the ↵Adrian Prantl2019-10-121-4/+0
| | | | | | | | | | processes of all users as it breaks the bots. This reverts r374609 (git commit 696d3cf8ad6f3a0b3019c87526d561bb77ad538e) llvm-svn: 374616
* [platform process list] add a flag for showing the processes of all usersWalter Erquinigo2019-10-111-0/+4
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Summary: For context: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68293 We need a way to show all the processes on android regardless of the user id. When you run `platform process list`, you only see the processes with the same user as the user that launched lldb-server. However, it's quite useful to see all the processes, though, and it will lay a foundation for full apk debugging support from lldb. Before: ``` PID PARENT USER TRIPLE NAME ====== ====== ========== ======================== ============================ 3234 1 aarch64-unknown-linux-android adbd 8034 3234 aarch64-unknown-linux-android sh 9096 3234 aarch64-unknown-linux-android sh 9098 9096 aarch64-unknown-linux-android lldb-server (lldb) ^D ``` Now: ``` (lldb) platform process list -x 205 matching processes were found on "remote-android" PID PARENT USER TRIPLE NAME ====== ====== ========== ======================== ============================ 1 0 init 524 1 init 525 1 init 531 1 ueventd 568 1 logd 569 1 aarch64-unknown-linux-android servicemanager 570 1 aarch64-unknown-linux-android hwservicemanager 571 1 aarch64-unknown-linux-android vndservicemanager 577 1 aarch64-unknown-linux-android qseecomd 580 577 aarch64-unknown-linux-android qseecomd ... 23816 979 com.android.providers.calendar 24600 979 com.verizon.mips.services 27888 979 com.hualai 28043 2378 com.android.chrome:sandboxed_process0 31449 979 com.att.shm 31779 979 com.samsung.android.authfw 31846 979 com.samsung.android.server.iris 32014 979 com.samsung.android.MtpApplication 32045 979 com.samsung.InputEventApp ``` Reviewers: labath,xiaobai,aadsm,clayborg Subscribers: > llvm-svn: 374584 llvm-svn: 374609
* Revert "[platform process list] add a flag for showing the processes of all ↵Walter Erquinigo2019-10-111-4/+0
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | users" Summary: This reverts commit e4ac611cd787f3f0e727a394e96fb1a5c3b19ccb. There's a failure according to http://lab.llvm.org:8080/green/view/LLDB/job/lldb-cmake/2538/testReport/junit/lldb-api/functionalities_gdb_remote_client/TestPlatformClient_py/ Reviewers: labath, aadsm, clayborg Subscribers: lldb-commits Tags: #lldb Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68883 llvm-svn: 374603
* [platform process list] add a flag for showing the processes of all usersWalter Erquinigo2019-10-111-0/+4
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Summary: For context: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68293 We need a way to show all the processes on android regardless of the user id. When you run `platform process list`, you only see the processes with the same user as the user that launched lldb-server. However, it's quite useful to see all the processes, though, and it will lay a foundation for full apk debugging support from lldb. Before: ``` PID PARENT USER TRIPLE NAME ====== ====== ========== ======================== ============================ 3234 1 aarch64-unknown-linux-android adbd 8034 3234 aarch64-unknown-linux-android sh 9096 3234 aarch64-unknown-linux-android sh 9098 9096 aarch64-unknown-linux-android lldb-server (lldb) ^D ``` Now: ``` (lldb) platform process list -x 205 matching processes were found on "remote-android" PID PARENT USER TRIPLE NAME ====== ====== ========== ======================== ============================ 1 0 init 524 1 init 525 1 init 531 1 ueventd 568 1 logd 569 1 aarch64-unknown-linux-android servicemanager 570 1 aarch64-unknown-linux-android hwservicemanager 571 1 aarch64-unknown-linux-android vndservicemanager 577 1 aarch64-unknown-linux-android qseecomd 580 577 aarch64-unknown-linux-android qseecomd ... 23816 979 com.android.providers.calendar 24600 979 com.verizon.mips.services 27888 979 com.hualai 28043 2378 com.android.chrome:sandboxed_process0 31449 979 com.att.shm 31779 979 com.samsung.android.authfw 31846 979 com.samsung.android.server.iris 32014 979 com.samsung.android.MtpApplication 32045 979 com.samsung.InputEventApp ``` Reviewers: labath,xiaobai,aadsm,clayborg Subscribers: llvm-svn: 374584
* Revert "[platform process list] add a flag for showing the processes of all ↵Shafik Yaghmour2019-10-081-4/+0
| | | | | | | | | | | users" This reverts commit 080f35fb875f52c924ee37ed4d56a51fe7056afa. Conflicts: packages/Python/lldbsuite/test/functionalities/gdb_remote_client/TestPlatformClient.py llvm-svn: 374077
* [platform process list] add a flag for showing the processes of all usersWalter Erquinigo2019-10-071-0/+4
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Summary: For context: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68293 We need a way to show all the processes on android regardless of the user id. When you run `platform process list`, you only see the processes with the same user as the user that launched lldb-server. However, it's quite useful to see all the processes, though, and it will lay a foundation for full apk debugging support from lldb. Before: ``` PID PARENT USER TRIPLE NAME ====== ====== ========== ======================== ============================ 3234 1 aarch64-unknown-linux-android adbd 8034 3234 aarch64-unknown-linux-android sh 9096 3234 aarch64-unknown-linux-android sh 9098 9096 aarch64-unknown-linux-android lldb-server (lldb) ^D ``` Now: ``` (lldb) platform process list -x 205 matching processes were found on "remote-android" PID PARENT USER TRIPLE NAME ====== ====== ========== ======================== ============================ 1 0 init 524 1 init 525 1 init 531 1 ueventd 568 1 logd 569 1 aarch64-unknown-linux-android servicemanager 570 1 aarch64-unknown-linux-android hwservicemanager 571 1 aarch64-unknown-linux-android vndservicemanager 577 1 aarch64-unknown-linux-android qseecomd 580 577 aarch64-unknown-linux-android qseecomd ... 23816 979 com.android.providers.calendar 24600 979 com.verizon.mips.services 27888 979 com.hualai 28043 2378 com.android.chrome:sandboxed_process0 31449 979 com.att.shm 31779 979 com.samsung.android.authfw 31846 979 com.samsung.android.server.iris 32014 979 com.samsung.android.MtpApplication 32045 979 com.samsung.InputEventApp ``` Reviewers: labath,xiaobai,aadsm,clayborg Subscribers: llvm-svn: 373931
* [lldb][NFC] Remove ArgEntry::ref memberRaphael Isemann2019-09-131-2/+2
| | | | | | | | | | | The StringRef should always be identical to the C string, so we might as well just create the StringRef from the C-string. This might be slightly slower until we implement the storage of ArgEntry with a string instead of a std::unique_ptr<char[]>. Until then we have to do the additional strlen on the C string to construct the StringRef. llvm-svn: 371842
* [lldb][NFC] Add ProcessInfo::GetNameAsStringRef to simplify some codeRaphael Isemann2019-08-261-3/+1
| | | | llvm-svn: 369880
* [lldb][NFC] Remove unused return value from HandleOptionArgumentCompletionRaphael Isemann2019-08-221-5/+5
| | | | llvm-svn: 369635
* [lldb][NFC] NFC cleanup for the completion codeRaphael Isemann2019-08-221-25/+26
| | | | llvm-svn: 369632
* [lldb][NFC] Remove dead code that is supposed to handle invalid command optionsRaphael Isemann2019-08-221-17/+6
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Summary: We currently have a bunch of code that is supposed to handle invalid command options, but all this code is unreachable because invalid options are already handled in `Options::Parse`. The only way we can reach this code is when we declare but then not implement an option (which will be made impossible with D65386, which is also when we can completely remove the `default` cases). This patch replaces all this code with `llvm_unreachable` to make clear this is dead code that can't be reached. Reviewers: JDevlieghere Reviewed By: JDevlieghere Subscribers: lldb-commits Tags: #lldb Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D66522 llvm-svn: 369625
* [lldb][NFC] Remove WordComplete mode, make result array indexed from 0 and ↵Raphael Isemann2019-08-221-2/+1
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | remove any undocumented/redundant return values Summary: We still have some leftovers of the old completion API in the internals of LLDB that haven't been replaced by the new CompletionRequest. These leftovers are: * The return values (int/size_t) in all completion functions. * Our result array that starts indexing at 1. * `WordComplete` mode. I didn't replace them back then because it's tricky to figure out what exactly they are used for and the completion code is relatively untested. I finally got around to writing more tests for the API and understanding the semantics, so I think it's a good time to get rid of them. A few words why those things should be removed/replaced: * The return values are really cryptic, partly redundant and rarely documented. They are also completely ignored by Xcode, so whatever information they contain will end up breaking Xcode's completion mechanism. They are also partly impossible to even implement as we assign negative values special meaning and our completion API sometimes returns size_t. Completion functions are supposed to return -2 to rewrite the current line. We seem to use this in some untested code path to expand the history repeat character to the full command, but I haven't figured out why that doesn't work at the moment. Completion functions return -1 to 'insert the completion character', but that isn't implemented (even though we seem to activate this feature in LLDB sometimes). All positive values have to match the number of results. This is obviously just redundant information as the user can just look at the result list to get that information (which is what Xcode does). * The result array that starts indexing at 1 is obviously unexpected. The first element of the array is reserved for the common prefix of all completions (e.g. "foobar" and "footar" -> "foo"). The idea is that we calculate this to make the life of the API caller easier, but obviously forcing people to have 1-based indices is not helpful (or even worse, forces them to manually copy the results to make it 0-based like Xcode has to do). * The `WordComplete` mode indicates that LLDB should enter a space behind the completion. The idea is that we let the top-level API know that we just provided a full completion. Interestingly we `WordComplete` is just a single bool that somehow represents all N completions. And we always provide full completions in LLDB, so in theory it should always be true. The only use it currently serves is providing redundant information about whether we have a single definitive completion or not (which we already know from the number of results we get). This patch essentially removes `WordComplete` mode and makes the result array indexed from 0. It also removes all return values from all internal completion functions. The only non-redundant information they contain is about rewriting the current line (which is broken), so that functionality was moved to the CompletionRequest API. So you can now do `addCompletion("blub", "description", CompletionMode::RewriteLine)` to do the same. For the SB API we emulate the old behaviour by making the array indexed from 1 again with the common prefix at index 0. I didn't keep the special negative return codes as we either never sent them before (e.g. -2) or we didn't even implement them in the Editline handler (e.g. -1). I tried to keep this patch minimal and I'm aware we can probably now even further simplify a bunch of related code, but I would prefer doing this in follow-up NFC commits Reviewers: JDevlieghere Reviewed By: JDevlieghere Subscribers: arphaman, abidh, lldb-commits Tags: #lldb Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D66536 llvm-svn: 369624
* [lldb] Also include the array definition in CommandOptions.incRaphael Isemann2019-07-281-12/+0
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Summary: Right now our CommandOptions.inc only generates the initializer for the options list but not the array declaration boilerplate around it. As the array definition is identical for all arrays, we might as well also let the CommandOptions.inc generate it alongside the initializers. This patch will also allow us to generate additional declarations related to that option list in the future (e.g. a enum class representing the specific options which would make our handling code less prone). This patch also fixes a few option tables that didn't follow our naming style. Reviewers: JDevlieghere Reviewed By: JDevlieghere Subscribers: abidh, lldb-commits Tags: #lldb Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D65331 llvm-svn: 367186
* [lldb] Don't dynamically allocate the posix option validator.Raphael Isemann2019-07-261-18/+2
| | | | | | | | We dynamically allocate the option validator which means we can't mark this list of OptionDefinitions as constexpr. It's also more complicated than necessary. llvm-svn: 367102
* [lldb] Fix build errors from tablegenify platform commitRaphael Isemann2019-07-241-1/+1
| | | | | | Forgot to stage some changes... llvm-svn: 366892
* [lldb][NFC] Tablegenify platformRaphael Isemann2019-07-241-46/+12
| | | | llvm-svn: 366891
* Fix integer literals which are cast to boolJonas Devlieghere2019-05-241-1/+1
| | | | | | | | | This change replaces built-in types that are implicitly converted to booleans. Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D62284 llvm-svn: 361580
* [CommandObject] Use GetDebugger() helper method (NFC)Jonas Devlieghere2019-04-271-33/+27
| | | | | | | | | | In r359354 a GetDebugger() method was added to the CommandObject class, so that we didn't have to go through the command interpreter to obtain the script interpreter. This patch simplifies other call sites where m_interpreter.GetDebugger() was used, and replaces them with a shorter call to the new method. llvm-svn: 359373
* [NFC] Remove ASCII lines from commentsJonas Devlieghere2019-04-101-46/+0
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | A lot of comments in LLDB are surrounded by an ASCII line to delimit the begging and end of the comment. Its use is not really consistent across the code base, sometimes the lines are longer, sometimes they are shorter and sometimes they are omitted. Furthermore, it looks kind of weird with the 80 column limit, where the comment actually extends past the line, but not by much. Furthermore, when /// is used for Doxygen comments, it looks particularly odd. And when // is used, it incorrectly gives the impression that it's actually a Doxygen comment. I assume these lines were added to improve distinguishing between comments and code. However, given that todays editors and IDEs do a great job at highlighting comments, I think it's worth to drop this for the sake of consistency. The alternative is fixing all the inconsistencies, which would create a lot more churn. Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60508 llvm-svn: 358135
* Refactor user/group name resolving codePavel Labath2019-03-041-8/+6
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Summary: This creates an abstract base class called "UserIDResolver", which can be implemented to provide user/group ID resolution capabilities for various objects. Posix host implement a PosixUserIDResolver, which does that using posix apis (getpwuid and friends). PlatformGDBRemote forwards queries over the gdb-remote link, etc. ProcessInstanceInfo class is refactored to make use of this interface instead of taking a platform pointer as an argument. The base resolver class already implements caching and thread-safety, so implementations don't have to worry about that. The main motivating factor for this was to remove external dependencies from the ProcessInstanceInfo class (so it can be put next to ProcessLaunchInfo and friends), but it has other benefits too: - ability to test the user name caching code - ability to test ProcessInstanceInfo dumping code - consistent interface for user/group resolution between Platform and Host classes. Reviewers: zturner, clayborg, jingham Subscribers: mgorny, lldb-commits Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58167 llvm-svn: 355323
* Update the file headers across all of the LLVM projects in the monorepoChandler Carruth2019-01-191-4/+3
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | to reflect the new license. We understand that people may be surprised that we're moving the header entirely to discuss the new license. We checked this carefully with the Foundation's lawyer and we believe this is the correct approach. Essentially, all code in the project is now made available by the LLVM project under our new license, so you will see that the license headers include that license only. Some of our contributors have contributed code under our old license, and accordingly, we have retained a copy of our old license notice in the top-level files in each project and repository. llvm-svn: 351636
* Do not use PATH_MAX with SmallStringStella Stamenova2018-12-101-1/+1
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | Summary: Instead use a more reasonable value to start and rely on the fact that SmallString will resize if necessary. Reviewers: labath, asmith Reviewed By: labath Subscribers: lldb-commits Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D55457 llvm-svn: 348775
* Remove header grouping comments.Jonas Devlieghere2018-11-111-4/+0
| | | | | | | | This patch removes the comments grouping header includes. They were added after running IWYU over the LLDB codebase. However they add little value, are often outdates and burdensome to maintain. llvm-svn: 346626
* [FileSystem] Move path resolution logic out of FileSpecJonas Devlieghere2018-11-011-18/+18
| | | | | | | | | This patch removes the logic for resolving paths out of FileSpec and updates call sites to rely on the FileSystem class instead. Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D53915 llvm-svn: 345890
* [FileSystem] Remove Exists() from FileSpecJonas Devlieghere2018-11-011-1/+1
| | | | | | | | | This patch removes the Exists method from FileSpec and updates its uses with calls to the FileSystem. Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D53845 llvm-svn: 345854
* Replace "nullptr-terminated" C-arrays of OptionValueEnumeration with safer ↵Tatyana Krasnukha2018-09-261-40/+40
| | | | | | | | llvm::ArrayRef Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D49017 llvm-svn: 343130
* Narrow the CompletionRequest API to being append-only.Raphael Isemann2018-07-271-3/+3
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Summary: We currently allow any completion handler to read and manipulate the list of matches we calculated so far. This leads to a few problems: Firstly, a completion handler's logic can now depend on previously calculated results by another handlers. No completion handler should have such an implicit dependency, but the current API makes it likely that this could happen (or already happens). Especially the fact that some completion handler deleted all previously calculated results can mess things up right now. Secondly, all completion handlers have knowledge about our internal data structures with this API. This makes refactoring this internal data structure much harder than it should be. Especially planned changes like the support of descriptions for completions are currently giant patches because we have to refactor every single completion handler. This patch narrows the contract the CompletionRequest has with the different handlers to: 1. A handler can suggest a completion. 2. A handler can ask how many suggestions we already have. Point 2 obviously means we still have a dependency left between the different handlers, but getting rid of this is too large to just append it to this patch. Otherwise this patch just completely hides the internal StringList to the different handlers. The CompletionRequest API now also ensures that the list of completions is unique and we don't suggest the same value multiple times to the user. This property has been so far only been ensured by the `Option` handler, but is now applied globally. This is part of this patch as the OptionHandler is no longer able to implement this functionality itself. Reviewers: jingham, davide, labath Reviewed By: davide Subscribers: lldb-commits Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D49322 llvm-svn: 338151
* Replaced more boilerplate code with CompletionRequest (NFC)Raphael Isemann2018-07-131-17/+6
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Summary: As suggested in D48796, this patch replaces even more internal calls that were using the old completion API style with a single CompletionRequest. In some cases we also pass an option vector/index, but as we don't always have this information, it currently is not part of the CompletionRequest class. The constructor of the CompletionRequest is now also more sensible. You only pass the user input, cursor position and your list of matches to the request and the rest will be inferred (using the same code we used before to calculate this). You also have to pass these match window parameters to it, even though they are unused right now. The patch shouldn't change any behavior. Reviewers: jingham Reviewed By: jingham Subscribers: lldb-commits Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48976 llvm-svn: 337031
* Get rid of the C-string parameter in DoExecuteRaphael Isemann2018-07-121-2/+2
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Summary: This patch gets rid of the C-string parameter in the RawCommandObject::DoExecute function, making the code simpler and less memory unsafe. There seems to be a assumption in some command objects that this parameter could be a nullptr, but from what I can see the rest of the API doesn't actually allow this (and other command objects and related code pieces dereference this parameter without any checks). Especially CommandObjectRegexCommand has error handling code for a nullptr that is now gone. Reviewers: davide, jingham, teemperor Reviewed By: teemperor Subscribers: jingham, lldb-commits Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D49207 llvm-svn: 336955
* Refactor parsing of option lists with a raw string suffix.Raphael Isemann2018-07-101-28/+5
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Summary: A subset of the LLDB commands follows this command line interface style: <command name> [arguments] -- <string suffix> The parsing code for this interface has been so far been duplicated into the different command objects which makes it hard to maintain and reuse elsewhere. This patches improves the situation by adding a OptionsWithRaw class that centralizes the parsing logic and allows easier testing. The different commands now just call this class to extract the arguments and the raw suffix from the provided user input. Reviewers: jingham Reviewed By: jingham Subscribers: mgorny, lldb-commits Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D49106 llvm-svn: 336723
* Refactoring for for the internal command line completion API (NFC)Raphael Isemann2018-07-021-9/+10
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Summary: This patch refactors the internal completion API. It now takes (as far as possible) a single CompletionRequest object instead o half a dozen in/out/in-out parameters. The CompletionRequest contains a common superset of the different parameters as far as it makes sense. This includes the raw command line string and raw cursor position, which should make the `expr` command possible to implement (at least without hacks that reconstruct the command line from the args). This patch is not intended to change the observable behavior of lldb in any way. It's also as minimal as possible and doesn't attempt to fix all the problems the API has. Some Q&A: Q: Why is this not fixing all the problems in the completion API? A: Because is a blocker for the expr command completion which I want to get in ASAP. This is the smallest patch that unblocks the expr completion patch and which allows trivial refactoring in the future. The patch also doesn't really change the internal information flow in the API, so that hopefully saves us from ever having to revert and resubmit this humongous patch. Q: Can we merge all the copy-pasted code in the completion methods (like computing the current incomplete arg) into CompletionRequest class? A: Yes, but it's out of scope for this patch. Q: Why the `word_complete = request.GetWordComplete(); ... ` pattern? A: I don't want to add a getter that returns a reference to the internal integer. So we have to use a temporary variable and the Getter/Setter instead. We don't throw exceptions from what I can tell, so the behavior doesn't change. Q: Why are we not owning the list of matches? A: Because that's how the previous API works. But that should be fixed too (in another patch). Q: Can we make the constructor simpler and compute some of the values from the plain command? A: I think this works, but I rather want to have this in a follow up commit. Especially when making nested request it's a bit awkward that the parsed arguments behave as both input/output (as we should in theory propagate the changes on the nested request back to the parent request if we don't want to change the behavior too much). Q: Can't we pass one const request object and then just return another result object instead of mixing them together in one in/out parameter? A: It's hard to get keep the same behavior with that pattern, but I think we can also get a nice API with just a single request object. If we make all input parameters read-only, we have a clear separation between what is actually an input and what an output parameter (and hopefully we get rid of the in-out parameters). Q: Can we throw out the 'match' variables that are not implemented according to the comment? A: We currently just forward them as in the old code to the different methods, even though I think they are really not used. We can easily remove and readd them once every single completion method just takes a CompletionRequest, but for now I prefer NFC behavior from the perspective of the API user. Reviewers: davide, jingham, labath Reviewed By: jingham Subscribers: mgorny, friss, lldb-commits Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48796 llvm-svn: 336146
* [FileSpec] Make style argument mandatory for SetFile. NFCJonas Devlieghere2018-06-131-12/+13
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | SetFile has an optional style argument which defaulted to the native style. This patch makes that argument mandatory so clients of the FileSpec class are forced to think about the correct syntax. At the same time this introduces a (protected) convenience method to update the file from within the FileSpec class that keeps the current style. These two changes together prevent a potential pitfall where the style might be forgotten, leading to the path being updated and the style unintentionally being changed to the host style. llvm-svn: 334663
* Convert all RunShellCommand functions to use the Timeout classPavel Labath2018-05-101-4/+6
| | | | | | | this completes the Timeout migration started in r331880 with the Predicate class. llvm-svn: 331970
* Reflow paragraphs in comments.Adrian Prantl2018-04-301-8/+7
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | This is intended as a clean up after the big clang-format commit (r280751), which unfortunately resulted in many of the comment paragraphs in LLDB being very hard to read. FYI, the script I used was: import textwrap import commands import os import sys import re tmp = "%s.tmp"%sys.argv[1] out = open(tmp, "w+") with open(sys.argv[1], "r") as f: header = "" text = "" comment = re.compile(r'^( *//) ([^ ].*)$') special = re.compile(r'^((([A-Z]+[: ])|([0-9]+ )).*)|(.*;)$') for line in f: match = comment.match(line) if match and not special.match(match.group(2)): # skip intentionally short comments. if not text and len(match.group(2)) < 40: out.write(line) continue if text: text += " " + match.group(2) else: header = match.group(1) text = match.group(2) continue if text: filled = textwrap.wrap(text, width=(78-len(header)), break_long_words=False) for l in filled: out.write(header+" "+l+'\n') text = "" out.write(line) os.rename(tmp, sys.argv[1]) Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D46144 llvm-svn: 331197
* Move Args.cpp from Interpreter to UtilityPavel Labath2018-04-171-1/+1
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Summary: The Args class is used in plenty of places besides the command interpreter (e.g., anything requiring an argc+argv combo, such as when launching a process), so it needs to be in a lower layer. Now that the class has no external dependencies, it can be moved down to the Utility module. This removes the last (direct) dependency from the Host module to Interpreter, so I remove the Interpreter module from Host's dependency list. Reviewers: zturner, jingham, davide Subscribers: mgorny, lldb-commits Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D45480 llvm-svn: 330200
* Invert ArchSpec<->Platform dependencyPavel Labath2017-10-311-2/+2
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Summary: ArchSpec::SetTriple was taking a Platform as an argument, and used it to fill in missing pieces of the specified triple. I invert the dependency by moving this code to other classes. For this purpose, I've created three new functions. - HostInfo::GetAugmentedArchSpec: fills in the triple using the host platform (this used to be implemented by passing a null platform pointer). By putting this code in the Host module, we can provide a way to anyone who does not have a platform instance (lldb-server) an easy way to get Host data. - Platform::GetAugmentedArchSpec: if you have a platform instance, you can call this to let it fill in the triple. - static Platform::GetAugmentedArchSpec: implements the "if platform == 0 then use_host() else use_platform()" part. Reviewers: zturner, jingham, clayborg Subscribers: mgorny, javed.absar, lldb-commits Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D39387 llvm-svn: 316987
* Fix typo in error message in 'platform status'.Bruce Mitchener2017-07-211-1/+1
| | | | llvm-svn: 308716
* Rename Error -> Status.Zachary Turner2017-05-121-34/+35
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | This renames the LLDB error class to Status, as discussed on the lldb-dev mailing list. A change of this magnitude cannot easily be done without find and replace, but that has potential to catch unwanted occurrences of common strings such as "Error". Every effort was made to find all the obvious things such as the word "Error" appearing in a string, etc, but it's possible there are still some lingering occurences left around. Hopefully nothing too serious. llvm-svn: 302872
* Delete some more dead includes.Zachary Turner2017-03-221-0/+1
| | | | | | | This breaks the cycle between Target and PluginLanguageC++, reducing the overall cycle count from 43 to 42. llvm-svn: 298561
* Move DataBuffer / DataExtractor and friends from Core -> Utility.Zachary Turner2017-03-041-1/+1
| | | | llvm-svn: 296943
* Fix a couple of corner cases in NameMatchesPavel Labath2017-02-201-12/+12
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Summary: I originally set out to move the NameMatches closer to the relevant function and add some unit tests. However, in the process I've found a couple of bugs in the implementation: - the early exits where not always correct: - (test==pattern) does not mean the match will always suceed because of regular expressions - pattern.empty() does not mean the match will fail because the "" is a valid prefix of any string So I cleaned up those and added some tests. The only tricky part here was that regcomp() implementation on darwin did not recognise the empty string as a regular expression and returned an REG_EMPTY error instead. The simples fix here seemed to be to replace the empty expression with an equivalent non-empty one. Reviewers: clayborg, zturner Subscribers: mgorny, lldb-commits Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D30094 llvm-svn: 295651
OpenPOWER on IntegriCloud