summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/lldb/packages/Python/lldbsuite/test/tools/lldb-vscode/lldbvscode_testcase.py
Commit message (Collapse)AuthorAgeFilesLines
* [lldb-vscode] Centrally skip debug info variants for vscode testsPavel Labath2019-12-171-0/+2
| | | | Previously each test was annotated manually. This does the same thing.
* [lldb][NFC] Remove 'from __future__ import print_function' from all tests ↵Raphael Isemann2019-12-131-1/+0
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | that don't actually call 'print()' Summary: A lot of tests do this trick but the vast majority of them don't even call `print()`. Most of this patch was generated by a script that just looks at all the files and deletes the line if there is no `print (` or `print(` anywhere else in the file. I checked the remaining tests manually and deleted the import if we never call print (but instead do stuff like `expr print(...)` and similar false-positives). I also corrected the additional empty lines after the import in the files that I manually edited. Reviewers: JDevlieghere, labath, jfb Reviewed By: labath Subscribers: dexonsmith, wuzish, nemanjai, kbarton, christof, arphaman, abidh, lldb-commits Tags: #lldb Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71452
* The field ‘totalFrames’ which is total number of frames available, is ↵Serhiy Redko2019-12-091-4/+18
| | | | | | | | | | | | mandatory in StackTraces response for VSCode extension that implements DAP and declares capability 'supportsDelayedStackTraceLoading': "The debug adapter supports the delayed loading of parts of the stack, which requires that both the 'startFrame' and 'levels' arguments and the 'totalFrames' result of the 'StackTrace' request are supported." Lack of this field makes VSCode incorrectly display stack traces information D71034
* [lldb-vscode] support the completion requestWalter Erquinigo2019-11-151-1/+1
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Summary: The DAP has a completion request that has been unimplemented. It allows showing autocompletion tokens inside the Debug Console. I implemented it in a very simple fashion mimicking what the user would see when autocompleting an expression inside the CLI. There are two cases: normal variables and commands. The latter occurs when a text is prepepended with ` in the Debug Console. These two cases work well and have tests. Reviewers: clayborg, aadsm Subscribers: lldb-commits Tags: #lldb Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D69873
* [dotest] Centralize initialization commands even morePavel Labath2019-09-051-1/+1
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Summary: In r367234 we introduced a central place to hold the set up commands for the various ways we have of launching lldb. However, a number of commands still remained outside of that. This patch moves the remaining set up commands into this function, which allows us to remove manual clang module path setting code in TestBatchMode. One unfortunate victim of this approach is TestSTTYBeforeAndAfter which, due to how it launches lldb (pexpect->expect->lldb), fails get the quoting right. It would be possible to fix the quoting there, it would be a bit icky, and none of the commands in this list are really relevant for what this test is doing, so I just remove the commands outright. Reviewers: JDevlieghere, jankratochvil Subscribers: lldb-commits Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D67173 llvm-svn: 371019
* [lldb-vscode] add `launchCommands` to handle launch specific commandsAlex Langford2019-08-191-13/+28
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | Summary: This can help `lldb-vscode` handle launch commands associate with remote platform attach request have field `attachCommands` to handle attach specific commands add a corresponding one for launch request if no launch command is provided, create a new target and launch; otherwise, execute the launch command Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D65363 Patch by Wanyi Ye <kusmour@gmail.com> llvm-svn: 369296
* [lldb] Increase testsuite packet-timeout 5secs -> 1minJan Kratochvil2019-07-291-1/+2
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | rL357954 did increase `packet-timeout` 1sec -> 5secs. Which is IMO about the maximum timeout reasonable for regular use. But for testsuite I think the timeout should be higher as the testsuite runs in parallel and it can be run even on slow hosts and with other load (moreover if it runs on some slow arch). I have chosen 60 secs, that should be enough hopefully. Larger value could make debugging with hanging `lldb-server` annoying. This patch was based on this testsuite timeout: http://lab.llvm.org:8014/builders/lldb-x86_64-fedora/builds/546/steps/test/logs/stdio FAIL: test_connect (TestGDBRemoteClient.TestGDBRemoteClient) Test connecting to a remote gdb server ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Traceback (most recent call last): File "/home/jkratoch/slave-lldb-x86_64-fedora/lldb-x86_64-fedora/llvm/tools/lldb/packages/Python/lldbsuite/test/functionalities/gdb_remote_client/TestGDBRemoteClient.py", line 13, in test_connect process = self.connect(target) File "/home/jkratoch/slave-lldb-x86_64-fedora/lldb-x86_64-fedora/llvm/tools/lldb/packages/Python/lldbsuite/test/functionalities/gdb_remote_client/gdbclientutils.py", line 480, in connect self.assertTrue(error.Success(), error.description) AssertionError: False is not True : failed to get reply to handshake packet Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D65271 llvm-svn: 367234
* Restore tests for lldb-server and lldb-vscode removed at rL366590Antonio Afonso2019-07-221-0/+288
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Summary: This was removed here rL366590 by accident. Reviewers: xiaobai, jfb Reviewed By: xiaobai Subscribers: dexonsmith, srhines, krytarowski, jfb, lldb-commits Tags: #lldb Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D65123 llvm-svn: 366766
* [lldb][NFC] Cleanup mentions and code related to lldb-miRaphael Isemann2019-07-191-288/+0
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Summary: lldb-mi has been removed, but there are still a bunch of references in the code base. This patch removes all of them. Reviewers: JDevlieghere, jfb Reviewed By: JDevlieghere Subscribers: dexonsmith, ki.stfu, mgorny, abidh, jfb, lldb-commits Tags: #lldb Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64992 llvm-svn: 366590
* Add a new tool named "lldb-vscode" that implements the Visual Studio Code ↵Greg Clayton2018-08-161-0/+288
Debug Adaptor Protocol This patch adds a new lldb-vscode tool that speaks the Microsoft Visual Studio Code debug adaptor protocol. It has full unit tests that test all packets. This tool can be easily packaged up into a native extension and used with Visual Studio Code, and it can also be used by Nuclide Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D50365 llvm-svn: 339911
OpenPOWER on IntegriCloud