| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The test was printing a char[3] variable without a terminating nul. The
memory after that variable (an unnamed bitfield) was not initialized. If
the memory happened to be nonzero, the summary provider for the variable
would run off into the next field.
This is probably not the right behavior (it should stop at the end of
the array), but this is not the purpose of this test. I have filed
pr44649 for this bug, and fixed the test to not depend on this behavior.
(cherry picked from commit 77cedb0cdb8623ff9eb22dbf3b9302ee4d9f8a20)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
We ran into an assert when debugging clang and performing an expression on a class derived from DeclContext. The assert was indicating we were getting the offsets wrong for RecordDeclBitfields. We were getting both the size and offset of unnamed bit-field members wrong. We could fix this case with a quick change but as I extended the test suite to include more combinations we kept finding more cases that were being handled incorrectly. A fix that handled all the new cases as well as the cases already covered required a refactor of the existing technique.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D72953
(cherry picked from commit fcaf5f6c01a09f23b948afb8c91c4dd951d4525e)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Summary:
This patch adds a new function to lldbtest: `expect_expr`. This function is supposed to replace the current approach
of calling `expect`/`runCmd` with `expr`, `p` etc.
`expect_expr` allows evaluating expressions and matching their value/summary/type/error message without
having to do any string matching that might allow unintended passes (e.g., `self.expect("expr 3+4", substrs=["7"])`
can unexpectedly pass for results like `(Class7) $0 = 7`, `(int) $7 = 22`, `(int) $0 = 77` and so on).
This only uses the function in a few places to test and demonstrate it. I'll migrate the tests in follow up commits.
Reviewers: JDevlieghere, shafik, labath
Reviewed By: labath
Subscribers: christof, abidh, lldb-commits
Tags: #lldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D70314
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Add a test for the CMTime data formatter. The coverage report showed
that this code path was untested.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The primary motivation for this is to add another dimension to the
Swift LLDB test matrix, but this seems generally useful.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D72662
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
TestNamespace.NamespaceBreakpointTestCase is now passing on Windows
After https://reviews.llvm.org/D70846, the test is now passing on Windows
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
ManualDWARFIndex::GetFunctions
Summary:
This change is connected with
https://reviews.llvm.org/D69843
In large codebases, we sometimes see Module::FindFunctions (when called from
ClangExpressionDeclMap::FindExternalVisibleDecls) returning huge amounts of
functions.
In current fix I trying to return only function_fullnames from ManualDWARFIndex::GetFunctions when eFunctionNameTypeFull is passed as argument.
Reviewers: labath, jarin, aprantl
Reviewed By: labath
Subscribers: shafik, clayborg, teemperor, arphaman, lldb-commits
Tags: #lldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D70846
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
When trying to interpret an expression with a function call, if the
process hasn't been launched, the expression fails to be interpreted
and the user gets the following error message:
```error: Can't run the expression locally```
This message doesn't explain why the expression failed to be
interpreted, that's why this patch improves the error message that is
displayed when trying to run an expression while no process is running.
rdar://11991708
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D72510
Signed-off-by: Med Ismail Bennani <medismail.bennani@gmail.com>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Summary:
This renames the test `rdar-12481949` to `get-value-32bit-int` as it just tests that we return the
correct result get calling GetValueAsSigned/GetValueAsUnsigned on 32-bit integers.
It also deletes all the strange things going on in this test including resetting the data formatters (which are to my
knowledge not used to calculate scalar values) and testing Python's long integers (let's just assume that our Python
distribution works correctly). Also modernises the setup code.
Reviewers: labath, aprantl
Reviewed By: aprantl
Subscribers: JDevlieghere, lldb-commits
Tags: #lldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D72593
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
uninitialized memory at the end.
Summary:
`SBThread.GetStopDescription` is a curious API as it takes a buffer length as a parameter that specifies
how many bytes the buffer we pass has. Then we fill the buffer until the specified length (or the length
of the stop description string) and return the string length. If the buffer is a nullptr however, we instead
return how many bytes we would have written to the buffer so that the user can allocate a buffer with
the right size and pass that size to a subsequent `SBThread.GetStopDescription` call.
Funnily enough, it is not possible to pass a nullptr via the Python SWIG bindings, so that might be the
first API in LLDB that is not only hard to use correctly but impossible to use correctly. The only way to
call this function via Python is to throw in a large size limit that is hopefully large enough to contain the
stop description (otherwise we only get the truncated stop description).
Currently passing a size limit that is smaller than the returned stop description doesn't cause the
Python bindings to return the stop description but instead the truncated stop description + uninitialized characters
at the end of the string. The reason for this is that we return the result of `snprintf` from the method
which returns the amount of bytes that *would* have been written (which is larger than the buffer).
This causes our Python bindings to return a string that is as large as full stop description but the
buffer that has been filled is only as large as the passed in buffer size.
This patch fixes this issue by just recalculating the string length in our buffer instead of relying on the wrong
return value. We also have to do this in a new type map as the old type map is also used for all methods
with the given argument pair `char *dst, size_t dst_len` (e.g. SBProcess.GetSTDOUT`). These methods have
different semantics for these arguments and don't null-terminate the returned buffer (they instead return the
size in bytes) so we can't change the existing typemap without breaking them.
Reviewers: labath, jingham
Reviewed By: labath
Subscribers: clayborg, shafik, abidh, JDevlieghere, lldb-commits
Tags: #lldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D72086
|
|
|
|
|
| |
It seems ddf044290ede7d7fd47f4f673e3e628f551a8aac caused the test to
time out on the Windows bot, but it's unclear to me why.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Summary:
This just adds `NO_DEBUG_INFO_TESTCASE` to tests that don't really exercise anything debug information specific
and therefore don't need to be rerun for all debug information variants.
Reviewers: labath, jingham, aprantl, mib, jfb
Reviewed By: aprantl
Subscribers: dexonsmith, JDevlieghere, lldb-commits
Tags: #lldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D72447
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This allows an unsanitized test process which loads a sanitized DSO (the
motivating example is a Swift runtime dylib) to launch on Darwin.
rdar://57290132
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71379
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
There already are decorators and "--excluded" option to mark test-cases/files
as expected to fail. However, when a new test file is added and it which relates
to a feature that a target doesn't support, this requires either adding decorators
to that file or modifying the file provided as "--excluded" option value.
The purpose of this patch is to avoid any modifications in such cases.
E.g. if a target doesn't support "watchpoints" and passes "--xfail-category watchpoint"
to dotest, a testing job will not fail after a new watchpoint-related test file is added.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71906
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
folders upwards
This is needed to not re-write parent's categories by categories of a nested folder,
e.g. commands/expression/completion specify "cmdline" category, however it still belongs
to parent's "expression" category.
The sentinel ".categories" in the test-suite root directory is no longer needed.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71905
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Summary:
Motivation: When formatting an array of typedefed chars, we would like to display the array as a string.
The string formatter currently does not trigger because the formatter lookup does not resolve typedefs for array elements (this behavior is inconsistent with pointers, for those we do look through pointee typedefs). This patch tries to make the array formatter lookup somewhat consistent with the pointer formatter lookup.
Reviewers: teemperor, clayborg
Reviewed By: teemperor, clayborg
Subscribers: clayborg, lldb-commits
Tags: #lldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D72133
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
qemu has a very small maximum packet size (4096) and it actually
only uses half of that buffer for some implementation reason,
so when lldb asks for the register target definitions, the x86_64
definition is larger than 4096/2 and we need to fetch it in two parts.
This patch and test is fixing a bug in
GDBRemoteCommunicationClient::ReadExtFeature when reading a target
file in multiple parts. lldb was assuming that it would always
get back the maximum packet size response (4096) instead of
using the actual size received and asking for the next group of
bytes.
We now have two tests in gdb_remote_client for unique features
of qemu - TestNestedRegDefinitions.py would test the ability
of lldb to follow multiple levels of xml includes; I opted to
create a separate TestRegDefinitionInParts.py test to test this
wrinkle in qemu's gdb remote serial protocol stub implementation.
Instead of combining both tests into a single test file.
<rdar://problem/49537922>
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The command here failed due to the type in 'create' but the expect
did not actually check for the error message. This fixes the typo
and adds a check for the actuall error message we should see.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Looking at a sometimes-passing test case on a platform
where random values were being returned - sometimes
the expected digit ('1' or '2') would be included in the
random returned value. Add a prefix to reduce the likelihood of
this a bit.
|
|
|
|
| |
skipTestIfFn can only be used to decorate a test method.
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This test is timing out on the sanitized bot on GreenDragon. Temporarily
disable it to increase the signal-to-noise ration.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Currently, there is no option to delete all the watchpoint without LLDB
asking for a confirmation. Besides making the watchpoint delete command
homogeneous with the breakpoint delete command, this option could also
become handy to trigger automated watchpoint deletion i.e. using
breakpoint actions.
rdar://42560586
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D72096
Signed-off-by: Med Ismail Bennani <medismail.bennani@gmail.com>
|
|
|
|
| |
This reverts commit 3620e5f28a4d2800fb6c325ec24b3d660e48b9ba.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Currently, there is no option to delete all the watchpoint without LLDB
asking for a confirmation. Besides making the watchpoint delete command
homogeneous with the breakpoint delete command, this option could also
become handy to trigger automated watchpoint deletion i.e. using
breakpoint actions.
rdar://42560586
Signed-off-by: Med Ismail Bennani <medismail.bennani@gmail.com>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
FunctionTemplateDecl inside a record.
Summary:
We currently don't set access specifiers for function template declarations. This seems to be fine
as long as the function template is not declared inside any record in which case Clang asserts
with the following once we try to query it's access:
```
Assertion failed: (Access != AS_none && "Access specifier is AS_none inside a record decl"), function AccessDeclContextSanity,
```
This patch just marks these function template declarations as public to make Clang happy.
Reviewers: shafik, teemperor
Reviewed By: teemperor
Subscribers: JDevlieghere, lldb-commits
Tags: #lldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71909
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Now that we are building the python bindings on Windows once more, the
extended testsuite is running. Mark a few failing tests and skip a few
tests which hang. This should at least bring the bot back to green
without reverting the Python changes which are an improvement for the
build system and enable another ~35% of the test suite which was
previously disabled.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This patch adds skipif decorator to TestWatchLocationWithWatchSet.py.
Decorator will trigger for aarch64-linux as this test passes randomly
causing buildbot failure.
|
|
|
|
|
| |
GCC produces incorrect .debug_macro section when "-include" option is used:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93075.
|
|
|
|
| |
Required to make the category manually disableable.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
If a remote target is not connected, SBPlatform's GetTriple function returns None.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
`/OPT:REF` is needed for link to dead strip functions, `/Gy` by itself
is not sufficient.
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Adjust the flags for the LLDB test on Windows. This test was previously
not running, but after the fix to the python detection, we now run this.
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Add a new decorator that checks if LLDB was build with editline support
and mark the relevant tests as skipped when that's not the case.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
In some environments (typically, buildbots), this variable may not be
available. This can cause tests to behave differently.
Explicitly set the variable to "vt100" to ensure consistent test
behavior. It should not matter that we do not inherit the process TERM
variable, as the child process runs in a new virtual terminal anyway.
|
|
|
|
| |
As pointed out in D71694 this wasn't tested before in LLDB.
|
|
|
|
| |
Fixed by 92211b.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
complete each FieldDecl of a RecordDecl when we are importing the definiton
This fix was motivated by a crashes in expression parsing during code generation in which we had a RecordDecl that had incomplete FieldDecl. During code generation when computing the layout for the RecordDecl we crash because we have several incomplete FieldDecl.
This fixes the issue by assuring that during ImportDefinition(...) for a RecordDecl we also import the definitions for each FieldDecl.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71378
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Summary:
As discussed on the mailing list [1] we have to make a decision for how to proceed with the modern-type-lookup.
This patch removes modern-type-lookup from LLDB. This just removes all the code behind the modern-type-lookup
setting but it does *not* remove any code from Clang (i.e., the ExternalASTMerger and the clang-import-test stay around
for now).
The motivation for this is that I don't think that the current approach of implementing modern-type-lookup
will work out. Especially creating a completely new lookup system behind some setting that is never turned on by anyone
and then one day make one big switch to the new system seems wrong. It doesn't fit into the way LLVM is developed and has
so far made the transition work much more complicated than it has to be.
A lot of the benefits that were supposed to come with the modern-type-lookup are related to having a better organization
in the way types move across LLDB and having less dependencies on unrelated LLDB code. By just looking at the current code (mostly
the ClangASTImporter) I think we can reach the same goals by just incrementally cleaning up, documenting, refactoring
and actually testing the existing code we have.
[1] http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/lldb-dev/2019-December/015831.html
Reviewers: shafik, martong
Subscribers: rnkovacs, christof, arphaman, JDevlieghere, usaxena95, lldb-commits, friss
Tags: #lldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71562
|
|
|
|
| |
Previously each test was annotated manually. This does the same thing.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
evaluator.
Summary:
D69991 introduced `__attribute__((objc_direct))` that allows directly calling methods without message passing.
This patch adds support for calling methods with this attribute to LLDB's expression evaluator.
The patch can be summarised in that LLDB just adds the same attribute to our module AST when we find a
method with `__attribute__((objc_direct))` in our debug information.
Reviewers: aprantl, shafik
Reviewed By: shafik
Subscribers: JDevlieghere, lldb-commits
Tags: #lldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71196
|
|
|
|
| |
These files built on macos but not on Debian Linux. Let's see if this fixes it.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
If you don't do this you end up running arbitrary code with
only one thread allowed to run, which can cause deadlocks.
<rdar://problem/56422478>
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71440
|
|
|
|
| |
The is the best method we have at the moment for attach-style tests.
|