summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/lldb/packages/Python/lldbsuite/test/tools/lldb-server/TestGdbRemoteAttach.py
Commit message (Collapse)AuthorAgeFilesLines
* [lldb][NFC] Remove 'from __future__ import print_function' from all tests ↵Raphael Isemann2019-12-131-1/+0
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | that don't actually call 'print()' Summary: A lot of tests do this trick but the vast majority of them don't even call `print()`. Most of this patch was generated by a script that just looks at all the files and deletes the line if there is no `print (` or `print(` anywhere else in the file. I checked the remaining tests manually and deleted the import if we never call print (but instead do stuff like `expr print(...)` and similar false-positives). I also corrected the additional empty lines after the import in the files that I manually edited. Reviewers: JDevlieghere, labath, jfb Reviewed By: labath Subscribers: dexonsmith, wuzish, nemanjai, kbarton, christof, arphaman, abidh, lldb-commits Tags: #lldb Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71452
* [lldb] [test] Enable lldb-server tests on NetBSD, and set XFAILsMichał Górny2019-11-181-0/+1
| | | | Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D70335
* Restore tests for lldb-server and lldb-vscode removed at rL366590Antonio Afonso2019-07-221-0/+67
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Summary: This was removed here rL366590 by accident. Reviewers: xiaobai, jfb Reviewed By: xiaobai Subscribers: dexonsmith, srhines, krytarowski, jfb, lldb-commits Tags: #lldb Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D65123 llvm-svn: 366766
* [lldb][NFC] Cleanup mentions and code related to lldb-miRaphael Isemann2019-07-191-67/+0
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Summary: lldb-mi has been removed, but there are still a bunch of references in the code base. This patch removes all of them. Reviewers: JDevlieghere, jfb Reviewed By: JDevlieghere Subscribers: dexonsmith, ki.stfu, mgorny, abidh, jfb, lldb-commits Tags: #lldb Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64992 llvm-svn: 366590
* Initial patchset to get the testsuite running against armv7 and arm64 iOS ↵Jason Molenda2017-09-251-0/+1
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | devices. Normal customer devices won't be able to run these tests, we're hoping to get a public facing bot set up at some point. Both devices pass the testsuite without any errors or failures. I have seen some instability with the armv7 test runs, I may submit additional patches to address this. arm64 looks good. I'll be watching the bots for the rest of today; if any problems are introduced by this patch I'll revert it - if anyone sees a problem with their bot that I don't see, please do the same. I know it's a rather large patch. One change I had to make specifically for iOS devices was that debugserver can't create files. There were several tests that launch the inferior process redirecting its output to a file, then they retrieve the file. They were not trying to test file redirection in these tests, so I rewrote those to write their output to a file directly. llvm-svn: 314132
* Revert "Initial patchset to get the testsuite running against armv7 and ↵Chris Bieneman2017-09-251-1/+0
| | | | | | | | | | | | | arm64 iOS devices. Normal customer devices won't be able to run these devices, we're hoping to get a public facing bot set up at some point. Both devices pass the testsuite without any errors or failures." This patch has been causing LLDB test failures on ObjC tests. A test log may still be available here: http://lab.llvm.org:8080/green/view/LLDB/job/lldb/1650/ This reverts commit r314038. llvm-svn: 314122
* Initial patchset to get the testsuite running against armv7 and arm64 iOS ↵Jason Molenda2017-09-221-0/+1
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | devices. Normal customer devices won't be able to run these devices, we're hoping to get a public facing bot set up at some point. Both devices pass the testsuite without any errors or failures. I have seen some instability with the armv7 test runs, I may submit additional patches to address this. arm64 looks good. I'll be watching the bots for the rest of today; if any problems are introduced by this patch I'll revert it - if anyone sees a problem with their bot that I don't see, please do the same. I know it's a rather large patch. One change I had to make specifically for iOS devices was that debugserver can't create files. There were several tests that launch the inferior process redirecting its output to a file, then they retrieve the file. They were not trying to test file redirection in these tests, so I rewrote those to write their output to a file directly. llvm-svn: 314038
* Revert this patch; I was emailing with Eugene and they have some other ↵Jason Molenda2017-09-211-1/+0
| | | | | | | | | changes going in today and don't want the two changes to confuse the situation with the build bots. I'll commit tomorrow once they're known good. llvm-svn: 313934
* Initial patchset to get the testsuite running against armv7 and arm64 iOS ↵Jason Molenda2017-09-211-0/+1
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | devices. Normal customer devices won't be able to run these devices, we're hoping to get a public facing bot set up at some point. There will be some smaller follow-on patches. The changes to tools/lldb-server are verbose and I'm not thrilled with having to skip all of these tests manually. There are a few places where I'm making the assumption that "armv7", "armv7k", "arm64" means it's an ios device, and I need to review & clean these up with an OS check as well. (Android will show up as "arm" and "aarch64" so by pure luck they shouldn't cause problems, but it's not an assumption I want to rely on). I'll be watching the bots for the rest of today; if any problems are introduced by this patch I'll revert it - if anyone sees a problem with their bot that I don't see, please do the same. I know it's a rather large patch. One change I had to make specifically for iOS devices was that debugserver can't create files. There were several tests that launch the inferior process redirecting its output to a file, then they retrieve the file. They were not trying to test file redirection in these tests, so I rewrote those to write their output to a file directly. llvm-svn: 313932
* *** This commit represents a complete reformatting of the LLDB source codeKate Stone2016-09-061-5/+10
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | *** to conform to clang-format’s LLVM style. This kind of mass change has *** two obvious implications: Firstly, merging this particular commit into a downstream fork may be a huge effort. Alternatively, it may be worth merging all changes up to this commit, performing the same reformatting operation locally, and then discarding the merge for this particular commit. The commands used to accomplish this reformatting were as follows (with current working directory as the root of the repository): find . \( -iname "*.c" -or -iname "*.cpp" -or -iname "*.h" -or -iname "*.mm" \) -exec clang-format -i {} + find . -iname "*.py" -exec autopep8 --in-place --aggressive --aggressive {} + ; The version of clang-format used was 3.9.0, and autopep8 was 1.2.4. Secondly, “blame” style tools will generally point to this commit instead of a meaningful prior commit. There are alternatives available that will attempt to look through this change and find the appropriate prior commit. YMMV. llvm-svn: 280751
* Move the rest of the tests over to using the new decorator module.Zachary Turner2016-02-041-1/+2
| | | | llvm-svn: 259838
* Remove `use_lldb_suite` from the package, and don't import it anymore.Zachary Turner2015-11-031-1/+1
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | This module was originally intended to be imported by top-level scripts to be able to find the LLDB packages and third party libraries. Packages themselves shouldn't need to import it, because by the time it gets into the package, the top-level script should have already done this. Indeed, it was just adding the same values to sys.path multiple times, so this patch is essentially no functional change. To make sure it doesn't get re-introduced, we also delete the `use_lldb_suite` module from `lldbsuite/test`, although the original copy still remains in `lldb/test` llvm-svn: 251963
* Tighten up sys.path, and use absolute imports everywhere.Zachary Turner2015-11-031-1/+1
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | For convenience, we had added the folder that dotest.py was in to sys.path, so that we could easily write things like `import lldbutil` from anywhere and any test. This introduces a subtle problem when using Python's package system, because when unittest2 imports a particular test suite, the test suite is detached from the package. Thus, writing "import lldbutil" from dotest imports it as part of the package, and writing the same line from a test does a fresh import since the importing module was not part of the same package. The real way to fix this is to use absolute imports everywhere. Instead of writing "import lldbutil", we need to write "import lldbsuite.test.util". This patch fixes up that and all other similar cases, and additionally removes the script directory from sys.path to ensure that this can't happen again. llvm-svn: 251886
* Move lldb/test to lldb/packages/Python/lldbsuite/test.Zachary Turner2015-10-281-0/+60
This is the conclusion of an effort to get LLDB's Python code structured into a bona-fide Python package. This has a number of benefits, but most notably the ability to more easily share Python code between different but related pieces of LLDB's Python infrastructure (for example, `scripts` can now share code with `test`). llvm-svn: 251532
OpenPOWER on IntegriCloud