bcm5719-llvm - Project Ortega BCM5719 LLVM

	Commit message (Collapse)	Author	Age	Files	Lines
*	[lldb][NFC] Remove 'from __future__ import print_function' from all tests ↵	Raphael Isemann	2019-12-13	1	-1/+0
\| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \|	that don't actually call 'print()' Summary: A lot of tests do this trick but the vast majority of them don't even call `print()`. Most of this patch was generated by a script that just looks at all the files and deletes the line if there is no `print (` or `print(` anywhere else in the file. I checked the remaining tests manually and deleted the import if we never call print (but instead do stuff like `expr print(...)` and similar false-positives). I also corrected the additional empty lines after the import in the files that I manually edited. Reviewers: JDevlieghere, labath, jfb Reviewed By: labath Subscribers: dexonsmith, wuzish, nemanjai, kbarton, christof, arphaman, abidh, lldb-commits Tags: #lldb Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71452
*	TestFunctionStarts.py: add synchronization	Frederic Riss	2019-08-26	1	-2/+15
\| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \|	We have started to see the no_binary version of this test fail. The reason is that the binary was being removed before the spawn actually launched the inferior. Add a simple filesystem based synchronization to avoid this race. llvm-svn: 369930
*	[lldb][NFC] Remove unused imports in python tests	Raphael Isemann	2019-08-02	1	-2/+0
\| \| \| \|	llvm-svn: 367663
*	Fix a little thinko in generating ___lldb_unnamed_symbol symbols	Jim Ingham	2018-08-15	1	-0/+76
	when we have only an in-memory copy of the binary. Also added a test for the generation of these symbols in the in-memory and regular cases. <rdar://problem/43160401> llvm-svn: 339833