summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/lldb/packages/Python/lldbsuite/test/functionalities/thread/step_out
Commit message (Collapse)AuthorAgeFilesLines
* [lldb][NFC] Remove 'from __future__ import print_function' from all tests ↵Raphael Isemann2019-12-131-1/+0
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | that don't actually call 'print()' Summary: A lot of tests do this trick but the vast majority of them don't even call `print()`. Most of this patch was generated by a script that just looks at all the files and deletes the line if there is no `print (` or `print(` anywhere else in the file. I checked the remaining tests manually and deleted the import if we never call print (but instead do stuff like `expr print(...)` and similar false-positives). I also corrected the additional empty lines after the import in the files that I manually edited. Reviewers: JDevlieghere, labath, jfb Reviewed By: labath Subscribers: dexonsmith, wuzish, nemanjai, kbarton, christof, arphaman, abidh, lldb-commits Tags: #lldb Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71452
* update TestThreadStepOut.py to expect correct source line on arm64.Jason Molenda2019-12-112-3/+3
|
* Modernize TestThreadStepOut.pyJim Ingham2019-10-281-43/+16
| | | | | | | | This test was timing out on the swift CI bots. I didn't see any obvious reason for that, and the test hasn't had problems on greendragon. OTOH, it was a bit oddly written, and needed modernizing, so I did that. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D69453
* [dotest] Avoid the need for LEVEL= makefile boilerplatePavel Labath2019-09-041-3/+1
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Summary: Instead of each test case knowing its depth relative to the test root, we can just have dotest add the folder containing Makefile.rules to the include path. This was motivated by r370616, though I have been wanting to do this ever since we moved to building tests out-of-tree. The only manually modified files in this patch are lldbinline.py and plugins/builder_base.py. The rest of the patch has been produced by this shell command: find . \( -name Makefile -o -name '*.mk' \) -exec sed --in-place -e '/LEVEL *:\?=/d' -e '1,2{/^$/d}' -e 's,\$(LEVEL)/,,' {} + Reviewers: teemperor, aprantl, espindola, jfb Subscribers: emaste, javed.absar, arichardson, christof, arphaman, lldb-commits Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D67083 llvm-svn: 370845
* [lldb][NFC] Remove unused imports in python testsRaphael Isemann2019-08-021-2/+0
| | | | llvm-svn: 367663
* [lldb] [test] Mark failing tests XFAIL on NetBSDMichal Gorny2019-03-041-0/+3
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Add a convenience 'expectedFailureNetBSD' decorator and mark all tests currently failing on NetBSD with it. Also skip a few tests that hang the test suite. This should establish a baseline for the test suite and get us closer to enabling tests on buildbot. This will help us catch regressions while we still have a lot of work to do to get tests working. It seems that there are also some flaky tests. I am going to address them later on. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58527 llvm-svn: 355320
* Update the file headers across all of the LLVM projects in the monorepoChandler Carruth2019-01-191-4/+3
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | to reflect the new license. We understand that people may be surprised that we're moving the header entirely to discuss the new license. We checked this carefully with the Foundation's lawyer and we believe this is the correct approach. Essentially, all code in the project is now made available by the LLVM project under our new license, so you will see that the license headers include that license only. Some of our contributors have contributed code under our old license, and accordingly, we have retained a copy of our old license notice in the top-level files in each project and repository. llvm-svn: 351636
* [lldbsuite, windows] Mark tests as XFAIL on Windows or skip themStella Stamenova2018-08-021-0/+3
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | Summary: 1) Several tests that are flakey on windows fail the run even if they are marked as expected to be flakey. This is because they fail frequently enough that even a retry won't help 2) Skip several tests on Windows that will occasionally hang rather than failing or exiting. This is causing the entire test suite to hang Reviewers: asmith, labath, zturner Reviewed By: zturner Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D50198 llvm-svn: 338769
* Wrap all references to build artifacts in the LLDB testsuite (NFC)Adrian Prantl2018-01-191-1/+1
| | | | | | | | | in TestBase::getBuildArtifact(). This NFC commit is in preparation for https://reviews.llvm.org/D42281 (compile the LLDB tests out-of-tree). Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D42280 llvm-svn: 323007
* Add support for running the lldb testsuite against an apple watchJason Molenda2017-09-271-0/+1
| | | | | | | | running watchos. These tests cannot run on normal customer devices, but I hope to some day have a public facing bot running against a device. llvm-svn: 314355
* Centralize libc++ test skipping logicPavel Labath2017-03-291-1/+1
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Summary: This aims to replace the different decorators we've had on each libc++ test with a single solution. Each libc++ will be assigned to the "libc++" category and a single central piece of code will decide whether we are actually able to run libc++ test in the given configuration by enabling or disabling the category (while giving the user the opportunity to override this). I started this effort because I wanted to get libc++ tests running on android, and none of the existing decorators worked for this use case: - skipIfGcc - incorrect, we can build libc++ executables on android with gcc (in fact, after this, we can now do it on linux as well) - lldbutil.skip_if_library_missing - this checks whether libc++.so is loaded in the proces, which fails in case of a statically linked libc++ (this makes copying executables to the remote target easier to manage). To make this work I needed to split out the pseudo_barrier code from the force-included file, as libc++'s atomic does not play well with gcc on linux, and this made every test fail, even though we need the code only in the threading tests. So far, I am only annotating one of the tests with this category. If this does not break anything, I'll proceed to update the rest. Reviewers: jingham, zturner, EricWF Subscribers: srhines, lldb-commits Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D30984 llvm-svn: 299028
* *** This commit represents a complete reformatting of the LLDB source codeKate Stone2016-09-061-34/+81
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | *** to conform to clang-format’s LLVM style. This kind of mass change has *** two obvious implications: Firstly, merging this particular commit into a downstream fork may be a huge effort. Alternatively, it may be worth merging all changes up to this commit, performing the same reformatting operation locally, and then discarding the merge for this particular commit. The commands used to accomplish this reformatting were as follows (with current working directory as the root of the repository): find . \( -iname "*.c" -or -iname "*.cpp" -or -iname "*.h" -or -iname "*.mm" \) -exec clang-format -i {} + find . -iname "*.py" -exec autopep8 --in-place --aggressive --aggressive {} + ; The version of clang-format used was 3.9.0, and autopep8 was 1.2.4. Secondly, “blame” style tools will generally point to this commit instead of a meaningful prior commit. There are alternatives available that will attempt to look through this change and find the appropriate prior commit. YMMV. llvm-svn: 280751
* Fix race in TestExitDuringStep and unify pseudo_barrier handlingPavel Labath2016-05-101-13/+1
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Summary: TestExitDuringStep was very rarely hanging on the buildbots. I can't be sure, but I believe this was because of the fact that it declared its pseudo_barrier variable as "volatile int", which is not sufficient to guarantee corectness (also, all other tests used atomic variables for this, and they were passing reliably AFAIK). Besides switching to an atomic variable in this test as well, I have also took this opportunity to unify all the copies of the pseudo_barrier code to a single place to reduce the chance of this happening again. Reviewers: clayborg Subscribers: lldb-commits Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D20065 llvm-svn: 269025
* Remove expectedFailureLinux decorator.Zachary Turner2016-02-101-6/+6
| | | | llvm-svn: 260422
* Remove expectedFailureWindows decorator.Zachary Turner2016-02-081-3/+3
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | expectedFailureWindows is equivalent to using the general expectedFailureAll decorator with oslist="windows". Additionally, by moving towards these common decorators we can solve the issue of having to support decorators that can be called with or without arguments. Once all decorators are always called with arguments, and this is enforced by design (because you can't specify the condition you're decorating for without passing an argument) the implementation of the decorators can become much simpler Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D16936 llvm-svn: 260134
* Move the rest of the tests over to using the new decorator module.Zachary Turner2016-02-041-1/+2
| | | | llvm-svn: 259838
* Remove `use_lldb_suite` from the package, and don't import it anymore.Zachary Turner2015-11-031-1/+1
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | This module was originally intended to be imported by top-level scripts to be able to find the LLDB packages and third party libraries. Packages themselves shouldn't need to import it, because by the time it gets into the package, the top-level script should have already done this. Indeed, it was just adding the same values to sys.path multiple times, so this patch is essentially no functional change. To make sure it doesn't get re-introduced, we also delete the `use_lldb_suite` module from `lldbsuite/test`, although the original copy still remains in `lldb/test` llvm-svn: 251963
* Tighten up sys.path, and use absolute imports everywhere.Zachary Turner2015-11-031-2/+2
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | For convenience, we had added the folder that dotest.py was in to sys.path, so that we could easily write things like `import lldbutil` from anywhere and any test. This introduces a subtle problem when using Python's package system, because when unittest2 imports a particular test suite, the test suite is detached from the package. Thus, writing "import lldbutil" from dotest imports it as part of the package, and writing the same line from a test does a fresh import since the importing module was not part of the same package. The real way to fix this is to use absolute imports everywhere. Instead of writing "import lldbutil", we need to write "import lldbsuite.test.util". This patch fixes up that and all other similar cases, and additionally removes the script directory from sys.path to ensure that this can't happen again. llvm-svn: 251886
* Move lldb/test to lldb/packages/Python/lldbsuite/test.Zachary Turner2015-10-283-0/+200
This is the conclusion of an effort to get LLDB's Python code structured into a bona-fide Python package. This has a number of benefits, but most notably the ability to more easily share Python code between different but related pieces of LLDB's Python infrastructure (for example, `scripts` can now share code with `test`). llvm-svn: 251532
OpenPOWER on IntegriCloud