| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
|---|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
implementation
Summary:
A lot of our tests copied the setUp code from our TestSampleTest.py:
```
def setUp(self):
# Call super's setUp().
TestBase.setUp(self)
```
This code does nothing unless we actually do any setUp work in there, so let's remove all these method definitions.
Reviewers: labath, JDevlieghere
Reviewed By: labath
Subscribers: lldb-commits
Tags: #lldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71454
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
that don't actually call 'print()'
Summary:
A lot of tests do this trick but the vast majority of them don't even call `print()`.
Most of this patch was generated by a script that just looks at all the files and deletes the line if there is no `print (` or `print(` anywhere else in the file.
I checked the remaining tests manually and deleted the import if we never call print (but instead do stuff like `expr print(...)` and similar false-positives).
I also corrected the additional empty lines after the import in the files that I manually edited.
Reviewers: JDevlieghere, labath, jfb
Reviewed By: labath
Subscribers: dexonsmith, wuzish, nemanjai, kbarton, christof, arphaman, abidh, lldb-commits
Tags: #lldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71452
|
| |
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 367663
|
| |
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 360767
|
| |
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 355830
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Adjust the XFAIL-ing tests to match consistent results from buildbot.
I'm going to work on differences between them and my local results
following this.
llvm-svn: 355774
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Add a convenience 'expectedFailureNetBSD' decorator and mark all tests
currently failing on NetBSD with it. Also skip a few tests that hang
the test suite. This should establish a baseline for the test suite
and get us closer to enabling tests on buildbot. This will help us
catch regressions while we still have a lot of work to do to get tests
working.
It seems that there are also some flaky tests. I am going to address
them later on.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58527
llvm-svn: 355320
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
in TestBase::getBuildArtifact(). This NFC commit is in preparation for
https://reviews.llvm.org/D42281 (compile the LLDB tests out-of-tree).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D42280
llvm-svn: 323007
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
*** to conform to clang-format’s LLVM style. This kind of mass change has
*** two obvious implications:
Firstly, merging this particular commit into a downstream fork may be a huge
effort. Alternatively, it may be worth merging all changes up to this commit,
performing the same reformatting operation locally, and then discarding the
merge for this particular commit. The commands used to accomplish this
reformatting were as follows (with current working directory as the root of
the repository):
find . \( -iname "*.c" -or -iname "*.cpp" -or -iname "*.h" -or -iname "*.mm" \) -exec clang-format -i {} +
find . -iname "*.py" -exec autopep8 --in-place --aggressive --aggressive {} + ;
The version of clang-format used was 3.9.0, and autopep8 was 1.2.4.
Secondly, “blame” style tools will generally point to this commit instead of
a meaningful prior commit. There are alternatives available that will attempt
to look through this change and find the appropriate prior commit. YMMV.
llvm-svn: 280751
|
| |
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 260422
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
expectedFailureWindows is equivalent to using the general
expectedFailureAll decorator with oslist="windows". Additionally,
by moving towards these common decorators we can solve the issue
of having to support decorators that can be called with or without
arguments. Once all decorators are always called with arguments,
and this is enforced by design (because you can't specify the condition
you're decorating for without passing an argument) the implementation
of the decorators can become much simpler
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D16936
llvm-svn: 260134
|
| |
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 259838
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This module was originally intended to be imported by top-level
scripts to be able to find the LLDB packages and third party
libraries. Packages themselves shouldn't need to import it,
because by the time it gets into the package, the top-level
script should have already done this. Indeed, it was just
adding the same values to sys.path multiple times, so this
patch is essentially no functional change.
To make sure it doesn't get re-introduced, we also delete the
`use_lldb_suite` module from `lldbsuite/test`, although the
original copy still remains in `lldb/test`
llvm-svn: 251963
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
For convenience, we had added the folder that dotest.py was in
to sys.path, so that we could easily write things like
`import lldbutil` from anywhere and any test. This introduces
a subtle problem when using Python's package system, because when
unittest2 imports a particular test suite, the test suite is detached
from the package. Thus, writing "import lldbutil" from dotest imports
it as part of the package, and writing the same line from a test
does a fresh import since the importing module was not part of
the same package.
The real way to fix this is to use absolute imports everywhere. Instead
of writing "import lldbutil", we need to write "import
lldbsuite.test.util". This patch fixes up that and all other similar
cases, and additionally removes the script directory from sys.path
to ensure that this can't happen again.
llvm-svn: 251886
|
|
|
This is the conclusion of an effort to get LLDB's Python code
structured into a bona-fide Python package. This has a number
of benefits, but most notably the ability to more easily share
Python code between different but related pieces of LLDB's Python
infrastructure (for example, `scripts` can now share code with
`test`).
llvm-svn: 251532
|
