| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Summary:
As discussed on lldb-dev, this patch moves some LLDB tests into a hierarchy that more closely
resembles the commands we use in the LLDB interpreter. This patch should only move tests
that use the command interpreter and shouldn't touch any tests that primarily test the SB API.
Reviewers: #lldb, jfb, JDevlieghere
Reviewed By: #lldb, JDevlieghere
Subscribers: dexonsmith, arphaman, JDevlieghere, lldb-commits
Tags: #lldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D67033
llvm-svn: 370605
|
|
|
Summary:
This patch fixes the next situation. On Windows clang-cl makes no stub before
the main function, so the main function is located exactly on module entry
point. May be it is the same on other platforms. So consider the following
sequence:
- set a breakpoint on main and stop there;
- try to evaluate expression, which requires a code execution on the debuggee
side. Such an execution always returns to the module entry, and the plan waits
for it there;
- the plan understands that it is complete now and removes its breakpoint. But
the breakpoint site is still there, because we also have a breakpoint on
entry;
- StopInfo analyzes a situation. It sees that we have stopped on the breakpoint
site, and it sees that the breakpoint site has owners, and no one logical
breakpoint is internal (because the plan is already completed and it have
removed its breakpoint);
- StopInfo thinks that it's a user breakpoint and skips it to avoid recursive
computations;
- the program continues.
So in this situation the program continues without a stop right after
the expression evaluation. To avoid this an additional check that
the plan was completed was added.
Reviewers: jingham, zturner, boris.ulasevich
Reviewed by: jingham
Tags: #lldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D53761
llvm-svn: 347974
|
