| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
... | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Support -march=tigerlake for x86.
Compare with Icelake Client, It include 4 more new features ,they are
avx512vp2intersect, movdiri, movdir64b, shstk.
Patch by Xiang Zhang (xiangzhangllvm)
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D65840
llvm-svn: 368543
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This patch adds the SVE built-in types defined by the Procedure Call
Standard for the Arm Architecture:
https://developer.arm.com/docs/100986/0000
It handles the types in all relevant places that deal with built-in types.
At the moment, some of these places bail out with an error, including:
(1) trying to generate LLVM IR for the types
(2) trying to generate debug info for the types
(3) trying to mangle the types using the Microsoft C++ ABI
(4) trying to @encode the types in Objective C
(1) and (2) are fixed by follow-on patches but (unlike this patch)
they deal mostly with target-specific LLVM details, so seemed like
a logically separate change. There is currently no spec for (3) and
(4), so reporting an error seems like the correct behaviour for now.
The intention is that the types will become sizeless types:
http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/cfe-dev/2019-June/062523.html
The main purpose of the sizeless type extension is to diagnose
impossible or dangerous uses of the types, such as any that would
require sizeof to have a meaningful defined value.
Until then, the patch sets the alignments of the types to the values
specified in the link above. It also sets the sizes of the types to
zero, which is chosen to be consistently wrong and shouldn't affect
correctly-written code (i.e. code that would compile even with the
sizeless type extension).
The patch adds the common subset of functionality needed to test the
sizeless type extension on the one hand and to provide SVE intrinsic
functions on the other. After this patch, the two pieces of work are
essentially independent.
The patch is based on one by Graham Hunter:
https://reviews.llvm.org/D59245
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D62960
llvm-svn: 368413
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Summary:
The maximum alignment used by ARM arch
is 64bits, not 128.
This could cause overaligned memory
access for 128 bit neon vector that
have unpredictable behaviour.
This fixes: https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=42668
Reviewers: ostannard, dmgreen, srhines, danalbert, pirama, peter.smith
Reviewed By: pirama, peter.smith
Subscribers: phosek, thegameg, thakis, llvm-commits, carwil, peter.smith, javed.absar, kristof.beyls, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang, #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D65000
llvm-svn: 368288
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Re-commit r366322 after some fixes
TME is a future architecture technology, documented in
https://developer.arm.com/architectures/cpu-architecture/a-profile/exploration-tools
https://developer.arm.com/docs/ddi0601/a
More about the future architectures:
https://community.arm.com/developer/ip-products/processors/b/processors-ip-blog/posts/new-technologies-for-the-arm-a-profile-architecture
This patch adds support for the TME instructions TSTART, TTEST, TCOMMIT, and
TCANCEL and the target feature/arch extension "tme".
It also implements TME builtin functions, defined in ACLE Q2 2019
(https://developer.arm.com/docs/101028/latest)
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64416
Patch by Javed Absar and Momchil Velikov
llvm-svn: 367428
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Summary:
This adds the 'f' inline assembly constraint, as supported by GCC. An
'f'-constrained operand is passed in a floating point register. Exactly
which kind of floating-point register (32-bit or 64-bit) is decided
based on the operand type and the available standard extensions (-f and
-d, respectively).
This patch adds support in both the clang frontend, and LLVM itself.
Reviewers: asb, lewis-revill
Reviewed By: asb
Subscribers: hiraditya, rbar, johnrusso, simoncook, apazos, sabuasal, niosHD, kito-cheng, shiva0217, jrtc27, MaskRay, zzheng, edward-jones, rogfer01, MartinMosbeck, brucehoult, the_o, rkruppe, PkmX, jocewei, psnobl, benna, Jim, s.egerton, cfe-commits, llvm-commits
Tags: #clang, #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D65500
llvm-svn: 367403
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This adds support for parsing/emitting in IR the floating-point RISC-V
registers in inline assembly clobber lists.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64737
llvm-svn: 367399
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
make check-all currently fails on x86_64-pc-solaris2.11 when building with GCC 9:
Undefined first referenced
symbol in file
_ZN11__sanitizer14internal_lseekEimi SANITIZER_TEST_OBJECTS.sanitizer_libc_test.cc.i386.o
_ZN11__sanitizer23MapWritableFileToMemoryEPvmim SANITIZER_TEST_OBJECTS.sanitizer_libc_test.cc.i386.o
ld: fatal: symbol referencing errors
clang-9: error: linker command failed with exit code 1 (use -v to see invocation)
make[3]: *** [projects/compiler-rt/lib/sanitizer_common/tests/CMakeFiles/TSanitizer-i386-Test.dir/build.make:92: projects/compiler-rt/lib/sanitizer_common/tests/Sanitizer-i386-Test] Error 1
While e.g. __sanitizer::internal_lseek is defined in sanitizer_solaris.cc, g++ 9
predefines _FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 while clang++ currently does not.
This patch resolves this inconsistency by following the gcc lead, which allows
make check-all to finish successfully.
There's one caveat: gcc defines _LARGEFILE_SOURCE and _LARGEFILE64_SOURCE for C++ only, while clang has long been doing it for
all languages. I'd like to keep it this way because those macros do is to make
declarations of fseek/ftello (_LARGEFILE_SOURCE) resp. the 64-bit versions
of largefile functions (*64 with _LARGEFILE64_SOURCE) visible additionally.
However, _FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 changes all affected functions to be largefile-aware.
I'd like to restrict this to C++, just like gcc does.
To avoid a similar inconsistence with host compilers that don't predefine _FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64
(e.g. clang < 9, gcc < 9), this needs a compantion patch https://reviews.llvm.org/D64483.
Tested on x86_64-pc-solaris2.11.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64482
llvm-svn: 367305
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The Arm C Language Extensions for SVE document specifies that
__ARM_FEATURE_SVE should be set when the compiler supports SVE and
implements all the extensions described in the document.
This is currently not yet the case, so the feature should be disabled
until the compiler can provide all the extensions as described.
Reviewers: c-rhodes, rengolin, rovka, ktkachov
Reviewed By: rengolin
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D65404
llvm-svn: 367301
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This reverts commit r367119.
This broke several bots:
http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/clang-atom-d525-fedora-rel/builds/26891/steps/ninja%20check%201/logs/FAIL%3A%20Clang%3A%3Aexception-alignment.cpp
http://green.lab.llvm.org/green/job/clang-stage1-cmake-RA-incremental/245/consoleFull
llvm-svn: 367166
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The maximum alignment used by ARM arch
is 64bits, not 128.
This could cause overaligned memory
access for 128 bit neon vector that
have unpredictable behaviour.
This fixes: https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=42668
Patch by: Diogo Sampaio(diogo.sampaio@arm.com)
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D65000
Change-Id: I5a62b766491f15dd51e4cfe6625929db897f67e3
llvm-svn: 367119
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This seems to be an old vestage of a previous implementation of getting
the default calling convention, and everything is now using
CXXABI/ASTContext's getDefaultCallingConvention. Remove it, since it
isn't doing anything.
llvm-svn: 367039
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Removed 2 trailing whitespaces in 2 files that used to be in different
repos to test my new github monorepo workflow.
llvm-svn: 366904
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Adds the SVE vector and predicate registers to the list of known registers.
Patch by Kerry McLaughlin.
Reviewers: erichkeane, sdesmalen, rengolin
Reviewed By: sdesmalen
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64739
llvm-svn: 366878
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Clang :: Headers/max_align.c currently FAILs on 64-bit SPARC:
error: 'error' diagnostics seen but not expected:
File /vol/llvm/src/clang/dist/test/Headers/max_align.c Line 12: static_assert failed due to requirement '8 == _Alignof(max_align_t)' ""
1 error generated.
This happens because SuitableAlign isn't defined for SPARCv9 unlike SPARCv8
(which uses the default of 64 bits). gcc's sparc/sparc.h has
#define BIGGEST_ALIGNMENT (TARGET_ARCH64 ? 128 : 64)
This patch sets SuitableAlign to match and updates the corresponding testcase.
Tested on sparcv9-sun-solaris2.11.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64487
llvm-svn: 366820
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
PS4 now only allows "cdecl", and its equivalent on PS4, "sysv_abi".
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64780
llvm-svn: 366617
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The RISC-V hard float calling convention requires the frontend to:
* Detect cases where, once "flattened", a struct can be passed using
int+fp or fp+fp registers under the hard float ABI and coerce to the
appropriate type(s)
* Track usage of GPRs and FPRs in order to gate the above, and to
determine when signext/zeroext attributes must be added to integer
scalars
This patch attempts to do this in compliance with the documented ABI,
and uses ABIArgInfo::CoerceAndExpand in order to do this. @rjmccall, as
author of that code I've tagged you as reviewer for initial feedback on
my usage.
Note that a previous version of the ABI indicated that when passing an
int+fp struct using a GPR+FPR, the int would need to be sign or
zero-extended appropriately. GCC never did this and the ABI was changed,
which makes life easier as ABIArgInfo::CoerceAndExpand can't currently
handle sign/zero-extension attributes.
Re-landed after backing out 366450 due to missed hunks.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60456
llvm-svn: 366480
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The commit was missing a few hunks. Will fix and recommit.
llvm-svn: 366454
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The RISC-V hard float calling convention requires the frontend to:
* Detect cases where, once "flattened", a struct can be passed using
int+fp or fp+fp registers under the hard float ABI and coerce to the
appropriate type(s) * Track usage of GPRs and FPRs in order to gate the
above, and to
determine when signext/zeroext attributes must be added to integer
scalars
This patch attempts to do this in compliance with the documented ABI,
and uses ABIArgInfo::CoerceAndExpand in order to do this. @rjmccall, as
author of that code I've tagged you as reviewer for initial feedback on
my usage.
Note that a previous version of the ABI indicated that when passing an
int+fp struct using a GPR+FPR, the int would need to be sign or
zero-extended appropriately. GCC never did this and the ABI was changed,
which makes life easier as ABIArgInfo::CoerceAndExpand can't currently
handle sign/zero-extension attributes.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60456
llvm-svn: 366450
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This reverts r366322 (git commit 4b8da3a503e434ddbc08ecf66582475765f449bc)
llvm-svn: 366355
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
TME is a future architecture technology, documented in
https://developer.arm.com/architectures/cpu-architecture/a-profile/exploration-tools
https://developer.arm.com/docs/ddi0601/a
More about the future architectures:
https://community.arm.com/developer/ip-products/processors/b/processors-ip-blog/posts/new-technologies-for-the-arm-a-profile-architecture
This patch adds support for the TME instructions TSTART, TTEST, TCOMMIT, and
TCANCEL and the target feature/arch extension "tme".
It also implements TME builtin functions, defined in ACLE Q2 2019
(https://developer.arm.com/docs/101028/latest)
Patch by Javed Absar and Momchil Velikov
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64416
llvm-svn: 366322
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64415
Committed as obvious.
llvm-svn: 366315
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The jcvt intrinsic defined in ACLE [1] is available when ARM_FEATURE_JCVT is defined.
This change introduces the AArch64 intrinsic, wires it up to the instruction and a new clang builtin function.
The __ARM_FEATURE_JCVT macro is now defined when an Armv8.3-A or higher target is used.
I've implemented the target detection logic in Clang so that this feature is enabled for architectures from armv8.3-a onwards (so -march=armv8.4-a also enables this, for example).
make check-all didn't show any new failures.
[1] https://developer.arm.com/docs/101028/latest/data-processing-intrinsics
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64495
llvm-svn: 366197
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
gcc PowerPC supports 3 representations of long double:
* -mlong-double-64
long double has the same representation of double but is mangled as `e`.
In clang, this is the default on AIX, FreeBSD and Linux musl.
* -mlong-double-128
2 possible 128-bit floating point representations:
+ -mabi=ibmlongdouble
IBM extended double format. Mangled as `g`
In clang, this is the default on Linux glibc.
+ -mabi=ieeelongdouble
IEEE 754 quadruple-precision format. Mangled as `u9__ieee128` (`U10__float128` before gcc 8.2)
This is currently unavailable.
This patch adds -mabi=ibmlongdouble and -mabi=ieeelongdouble, and thus
makes the IEEE 754 quadruple-precision long double available for
languages supported by clang.
Reviewed By: hfinkel
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64283
llvm-svn: 366044
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Summary:
GCC supports named address spaces macros:
https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Named-Address-Spaces.html
clang does as well with address spaces:
https://clang.llvm.org/docs/LanguageExtensions.html#memory-references-to-specified-segments
Add the __seg_fs and __seg_gs macros for compatibility with GCC.
<rdar://problem/52944935>
Subscribers: jkorous, dexonsmith, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64676
llvm-svn: 366028
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This patch series adds support for the next-generation arch13
CPU architecture to the SystemZ backend.
This includes:
- Basic support for the new processor and its features.
- Support for low-level builtins mapped to new LLVM intrinsics.
- New high-level intrinsics in vecintrin.h.
- Indicate support by defining __VEC__ == 10303.
Note: No currently available Z system supports the arch13
architecture. Once new systems become available, the
official system name will be added as supported -march name.
llvm-svn: 365933
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This patch makes the driver option -mlong-double-128 available for X86
and PowerPC. The CC1 option -mlong-double-128 is available on all targets
for users to test on unsupported targets.
On PowerPC, -mlong-double-128 uses the IBM extended double format
because we don't support -mabi=ieeelongdouble yet (D64283).
Reviewed By: rnk
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64277
llvm-svn: 365866
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64364
llvm-svn: 365799
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
These macro definitions don't depend on the template parameter, so they
don't need to be part of the template. Move them to a .cpp file.
llvm-svn: 365556
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64430
llvm-svn: 365528
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
code
In gcc PowerPC, long double has 3 mangling schemes:
-mlong-double-64: `e`
-mlong-double-128 -mabi=ibmlongdouble: `g`
-mlong-double-128 -mabi=ieeelongdouble: `u9__ieee128` (gcc <= 8.1: `U10__float128`)
The current useFloat128ManglingForLongDouble() bisection is not suitable
when we support -mlong-double-128 in clang (D64277). Replace
useFloat128ManglingForLongDouble() with getLongDoubleMangling() and
getFloat128Mangling() to allow 3 mangling schemes.
I also deleted the `getTriple().isOSBinFormatELF()` check (the Darwin
support has gone: https://reviews.llvm.org/D50988).
For x86, change the mangled code of __float128 from `U10__float128` to `g`. `U10__float128` was wrongly copied from PowerPC.
The test will be added to `test/CodeGen/x86-long-double.cpp` in D64277.
Reviewed By: erichkeane
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64276
llvm-svn: 365480
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
-mlong-double-64 is supported on some ports of gcc (i386, x86_64, and ppc{32,64}).
On many other targets, there will be an error:
error: unrecognized command line option '-mlong-double-64'
This patch makes the driver option -mlong-double-64 available for x86
and ppc. The CC1 option -mlong-double-64 is available on all targets for
users to test on unsupported targets.
LongDoubleSize is added as a VALUE_LANGOPT so that the option can be
shared with -mlong-double-128 when we support it in clang.
Also, make powerpc*-linux-musl default to use 64-bit long double. It is
currently the only supported ABI on musl and is also how people
configure powerpc*-linux-musl-gcc.
Reviewed By: rnk
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64067
llvm-svn: 365412
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Implements the handling of __builtin_eh_return_regno().
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D63417
Patch by Edward Jones.
llvm-svn: 365305
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Summary:
"ww" and "ws" are both constraint codes for VSX vector registers that
hold scalar double data. "ww" is preferred for float while "ws" is
preferred for double.
Reviewed By: jsji
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64119
llvm-svn: 365106
|
|
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 364380
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
"To" selects an odd-numbered GPR, and "Te" an even one. There are some
8.1-M instructions that have one too few bits in their register fields
and require registers of particular parity, without necessarily using
a consecutive even/odd pair.
Also, the constraint letter "t" should select an MVE q-register, when
MVE is present. This didn't need any source changes, but some extra
tests have been added.
Reviewers: dmgreen, samparker, SjoerdMeijer
Subscribers: javed.absar, eraman, kristof.beyls, hiraditya, cfe-commits, llvm-commits
Tags: #clang, #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60709
llvm-svn: 364331
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This wasn't setting some of the features from older generations.
llvm-svn: 364123
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Inform Clang that TLS is implemented by LLVM for RISC-V
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57055
llvm-svn: 363776
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
error: 'error' diagnostics expected but not seen:
File /vol/llvm/src/clang/local/test/Sema/wchar.c Line 22: initializing wide char array with non-wide string literal
error: 'error' diagnostics seen but not expected:
File /vol/llvm/src/clang/local/test/Sema/wchar.c Line 20: array initializer must be an initializer list
File /vol/llvm/src/clang/local/test/Sema/wchar.c Line 22: array initializer must be an initializer list
It turns out the definition is wrong, as can be seen in GCC's gcc/config/sol2.h:
/* wchar_t is called differently in <wchar.h> for 32 and 64-bit
compilations. This is called for by SCD 2.4.1, p. 6-83, Figure 6-65
(32-bit) and p. 6P-10, Figure 6.38 (64-bit). */
#undef WCHAR_TYPE
#define WCHAR_TYPE (TARGET_64BIT ? "int" : "long int")
The following patch implements this, and at the same time corrects the wint_t
definition which is the same:
/* Same for wint_t. See SCD 2.4.1, p. 6-83, Figure 6-66 (32-bit). There's
no corresponding 64-bit definition, but this is what Solaris 8
<iso/wchar_iso.h> uses. */
#undef WINT_TYPE
#define WINT_TYPE (TARGET_64BIT ? "int" : "long int")
Clang :: Preprocessor/wchar_t.c and Clang :: Sema/format-strings.c need to
be adjusted to account for that.
Tested on i386-pc-solaris2.11, x86_64-pc-solaris2.11, and x86_64-pc-linux-gnu.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D62944
llvm-svn: 363612
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
ARM has a special target feature called soft-float-abi. This feature is
special, since we get it passed to us explicitly in the frontend, but
filter it out before it can land in any target feature strings in LLVM
IR.
__attribute__((target(""))) doesn't quite filter these features out
properly, so today, we get warnings about soft-float-abi being an
unknown feature from the backend.
This CL has us filter soft-float-abi out at a slightly different point,
so we don't end up passing these invalid features to the backend.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D61750
llvm-svn: 363346
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D63308
llvm-svn: 363345
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This allows the constraints I, J & K to be used in inline asm for
RISC-V, with the following semantics (equivalent to GCC):
I: Any 12-bit signed immediate.
J: Integer zero only.
K: Any 5-bit unsigned immediate.
See the GCC definitions here:
https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gccint/Machine-Constraints.html
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D54091
llvm-svn: 363055
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
and maintainable
The recently added cooperlake CPU has made our already ugly switch statement even worse. There's a CPU exclusion list around the bf16 feature in the cooper lake block. I worry that we'll have to keep adding new CPUs to that until bf16 intercepts a client space CPU. We have several other exclusion lists in other parts of the switch due to skylakeserver, cascadelake, and cooperlake not having sgx. Another for cannonlake not having clwb but having all other features from skx.
This removes all these special ifs at the cost of some duplication of features and a goto. I've copied all of the skx features into either cannonlake or icelakeclient(for clwb). And pulled sklyakeserver, cascadelake, and cooperlake out of the main inheritance chain into their own chain. At the end of skylakeserver we merge back into the main chain at skylakeclient but below sgx. I think this is at least easier to follow.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D63018
llvm-svn: 362965
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Fixup uninitialised variable.
llvm-svn: 362814
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
If MVE is present at all, then the macro __ARM_FEATURE_MVE is defined
to a value which has bit 0 set for integer MVE, and bit 1 set for
floating-point MVE.
(Floating-point MVE implies integer MVE, so if this macro is defined
at all then it will be set to 1 or 3, never 2.)
Patch mostly by Simon Tatham
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60710
llvm-svn: 362806
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Change D60691 caused some knock-on failures that weren't caught by the
existing tests. Firstly, selecting a CPU that should have had a
restricted FPU (e.g. `-mcpu=cortex-m4`, which should have 16 d-regs
and no double precision) could give the unrestricted version, because
`ARM::getFPUFeatures` returned a list of features including subtracted
ones (here `-fp64`,`-d32`), but `ARMTargetInfo::initFeatureMap` threw
away all the ones that didn't start with `+`. Secondly, the
preprocessor macros didn't reliably match the actual compilation
settings: for example, `-mfpu=softvfp` could still set `__ARM_FP` as
if hardware FP was available, because the list of features on the cc1
command line would include things like `+vfp4`,`-vfp4d16` and clang
didn't realise that one of those cancelled out the other.
I've fixed both of these issues by rewriting `ARM::getFPUFeatures` so
that it returns a list that enables every FP-related feature
compatible with the selected FPU and disables every feature not
compatible, which is more verbose but means clang doesn't have to
understand the dependency relationships between the backend features.
Meanwhile, `ARMTargetInfo::handleTargetFeatures` is testing for all
the various forms of the FP feature names, so that it won't miss cases
where it should have set `HW_FP` to feed into feature test macros.
That in turn caused an ordering problem when handling `-mcpu=foo+bar`
together with `-mfpu=something_that_turns_off_bar`. To fix that, I've
arranged that the `+bar` suffixes on the end of `-mcpu` and `-march`
cause feature names to be put into a separate vector which is
concatenated after the output of `getFPUFeatures`.
Another side effect of all this is to fix a bug where `clang -target
armv8-eabi` by itself would fail to set `__ARM_FEATURE_FMA`, even
though `armv8` (aka Arm v8-A) implies FP-Armv8 which has FMA. That was
because `HW_FP` was being set to a value including only the `FPARMV8`
bit, but that feature test macro was testing only the `VFP4FPU` bit.
Now `HW_FP` ends up with all the bits set, so it gives the right
answer.
Changes to tests included in this patch:
* `arm-target-features.c`: I had to change basically all the expected
results. (The Cortex-M4 test in there should function as a
regression test for the accidental double-precision bug.)
* `arm-mfpu.c`, `armv8.1m.main.c`: switched to using `CHECK-DAG`
everywhere so that those tests are no longer sensitive to the order
of cc1 feature options on the command line.
* `arm-acle-6.5.c`: been updated to expect the right answer to that
FMA test.
* `Preprocessor/arm-target-features.c`: added a regression test for
the `mfpu=softvfp` issue.
Reviewers: SjoerdMeijer, dmgreen, ostannard, samparker, JamesNagurne
Reviewed By: ostannard
Subscribers: srhines, javed.absar, kristof.beyls, hiraditya, cfe-commits, llvm-commits
Tags: #clang, #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D62998
llvm-svn: 362791
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Support intel -march=cooperlake in clang
Patch by Shengchen Kan (skan)
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D62835
llvm-svn: 362781
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
For more details about these instructions, please refer to the latest
ISE document:
https://software.intel.com/en-us/download/intel-architecture-instruction-set-extensions-programming-reference.
Patch by Tianqing Wang (tianqing)
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D62282
llvm-svn: 362685
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Support intel AVX512 VP2INTERSECT instructions in clang
Patch by Xiang Zhang (xiangzhangllvm)
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D62367
llvm-svn: 362196
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Given the existing infrastructure in LLVM side for +fp and +fp.dp,
this is more or less trivial, needing only one tiny source change and
a couple of tests.
Patch by Simon Tatham.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60699
llvm-svn: 362096
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Those two subtarget features were awkward because their semantics are
reversed: each one indicates the _lack_ of support for something in
the architecture, rather than the presence. As a consequence, you
don't get the behavior you want if you combine two sets of feature
bits.
Each SubtargetFeature for an FP architecture version now comes in four
versions, one for each combination of those options. So you can still
say (for example) '+vfp2' in a feature string and it will mean what
it's always meant, but there's a new string '+vfp2d16sp' meaning the
version without those extra options.
A lot of this change is just mechanically replacing positive checks
for the old features with negative checks for the new ones. But one
more interesting change is that I've rearranged getFPUFeatures() so
that the main FPU feature is appended to the output list *before*
rather than after the features derived from the Restriction field, so
that -fp64 and -d32 can override defaults added by the main feature.
Reviewers: dmgreen, samparker, SjoerdMeijer
Subscribers: srhines, javed.absar, eraman, kristof.beyls, hiraditya, zzheng, Petar.Avramovic, cfe-commits, llvm-commits
Tags: #clang, #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60691
llvm-svn: 361845
|