| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
and validateInputSize.
The validateOutputSize and validateInputSize need to check whether
AVX or AVX512 are enabled. But this can be affected by the
target attribute so we need to factor that in.
This patch moves some of the code from CodeGen to create an
appropriate feature map that we can pass to the function.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68627
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Summary:
This adds parsing of the qualifiers __ptr32, __ptr64, __sptr, and __uptr and
lowers them to the corresponding address space pointer for 32-bit and 64-bit pointers.
(32/64-bit pointers added in https://reviews.llvm.org/D69639)
A large part of this patch is making these pointers ignore the address space
when doing things like overloading and casting.
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=42359
Reviewers: rnk, rsmith
Subscribers: jholewinski, jvesely, nhaehnle, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71039
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
validateOutputSize and validateInputSize."
This reverts commit e1578fd2b79fe5af5f80c0c166a8abd0f816c022.
It introduces a dependency on Attr.h which I am removing from
ASTContext.h.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
and validateInputSize.
The validateOutputSize and validateInputSize need to check whether
AVX or AVX512 are enabled. But this can be affected by the
target attribute so we need to factor that in.
This patch copies some of the code from CodeGen to create an
appropriate feature map that we can pass to the function. Probably
need some refactoring here to share more code with Codegen. Is
there a good place to do that? Also need to support the cpu_specific
attribute as well.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68627
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
for 32 bit signed, 32 bit unsigned, and 64 bit pointers."
This reverts 57076d3199fc2b0af4a3736b7749dd5462cacda5.
Original review at https://reviews.llvm.org/D64931.
Review for added fix at https://reviews.llvm.org/D66843.
llvm-svn: 371568
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
-Deprecate -mmpx and -mno-mpx command line options
-Remove CPUID detection of mpx for -march=native
-Remove MPX from all CPUs
-Remove MPX preprocessor define
I've left the "mpx" string in the backend so we don't fail on old IR, but its not connected to anything.
gcc has also deprecated these command line options. https://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=news_item&px=GCC-Patch-To-Drop-MPX
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D66669
llvm-svn: 370393
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
signed,"
This reverts commit r370083 because it caused check-lld failures on
sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast.
llvm-svn: 370142
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
32 bit unsigned, and 64 bit pointers.
llvm-svn: 370083
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This seems to be an old vestage of a previous implementation of getting
the default calling convention, and everything is now using
CXXABI/ASTContext's getDefaultCallingConvention. Remove it, since it
isn't doing anything.
llvm-svn: 367039
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This patch makes the driver option -mlong-double-128 available for X86
and PowerPC. The CC1 option -mlong-double-128 is available on all targets
for users to test on unsupported targets.
On PowerPC, -mlong-double-128 uses the IBM extended double format
because we don't support -mabi=ieeelongdouble yet (D64283).
Reviewed By: rnk
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64277
llvm-svn: 365866
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
These macro definitions don't depend on the template parameter, so they
don't need to be part of the template. Move them to a .cpp file.
llvm-svn: 365556
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
code
In gcc PowerPC, long double has 3 mangling schemes:
-mlong-double-64: `e`
-mlong-double-128 -mabi=ibmlongdouble: `g`
-mlong-double-128 -mabi=ieeelongdouble: `u9__ieee128` (gcc <= 8.1: `U10__float128`)
The current useFloat128ManglingForLongDouble() bisection is not suitable
when we support -mlong-double-128 in clang (D64277). Replace
useFloat128ManglingForLongDouble() with getLongDoubleMangling() and
getFloat128Mangling() to allow 3 mangling schemes.
I also deleted the `getTriple().isOSBinFormatELF()` check (the Darwin
support has gone: https://reviews.llvm.org/D50988).
For x86, change the mangled code of __float128 from `U10__float128` to `g`. `U10__float128` was wrongly copied from PowerPC.
The test will be added to `test/CodeGen/x86-long-double.cpp` in D64277.
Reviewed By: erichkeane
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64276
llvm-svn: 365480
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
For more details about these instructions, please refer to the latest
ISE document:
https://software.intel.com/en-us/download/intel-architecture-instruction-set-extensions-programming-reference.
Patch by Tianqing Wang (tianqing)
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D62282
llvm-svn: 362685
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Support intel AVX512 VP2INTERSECT instructions in clang
Patch by Xiang Zhang (xiangzhangllvm)
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D62367
llvm-svn: 362196
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Lake
Summary:
1. Enable infrastructure of AVX512_BF16, which is supported for BFLOAT16 in Cooper Lake;
2. Enable intrinsics for VCVTNE2PS2BF16, VCVTNEPS2BF16 and DPBF16PS instructions, which are Vector Neural Network Instructions supporting BFLOAT16 inputs and conversion instructions from IEEE single precision.
For more details about BF16 intrinsic, please refer to the latest ISE document: https://software.intel.com/en-us/download/intel-architecture-instruction-set-extensions-programming-reference
Patch by LiuTianle
Reviewers: craig.topper, smaslov, LuoYuanke, wxiao3, annita.zhang, spatel, RKSimon
Reviewed By: craig.topper
Subscribers: mgorny, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60552
llvm-svn: 360018
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Use the new cx8 feature flag that was added to the backend to represent support for cmpxchg8b. Use this flag to set the MaxAtomicInlineWidth.
This also assumes all the cmpxchg instructions are enabled for CK_Generic which is what cc1 defaults to when nothing is specified.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59566
llvm-svn: 356709
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59578
llvm-svn: 356580
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Update getConstraintRegister as X86 Asm flag output constraints are no
longer fully alphanumeric,
llvm-svn: 354211
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
to reflect the new license.
We understand that people may be surprised that we're moving the header
entirely to discuss the new license. We checked this carefully with the
Foundation's lawyer and we believe this is the correct approach.
Essentially, all code in the project is now made available by the LLVM
project under our new license, so you will see that the license headers
include that license only. Some of our contributors have contributed
code under our old license, and accordingly, we have retained a copy of
our old license notice in the top-level files in each project and
repository.
llvm-svn: 351636
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This patch should not introduce any behavior changes. It consists of
mostly one of two changes:
1. Replacing fall through comments with the LLVM_FALLTHROUGH macro
2. Inserting 'break' before falling through into a case block consisting
of only 'break'.
We were already using this warning with GCC, but its warning behaves
slightly differently. In this patch, the following differences are
relevant:
1. GCC recognizes comments that say "fall through" as annotations, clang
doesn't
2. GCC doesn't warn on "case N: foo(); default: break;", clang does
3. GCC doesn't warn when the case contains a switch, but falls through
the outer case.
I will enable the warning separately in a follow-up patch so that it can
be cleanly reverted if necessary.
Reviewers: alexfh, rsmith, lattner, rtrieu, EricWF, bollu
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D53950
llvm-svn: 345882
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Similar to how ICC handles CPU-Dispatch on Windows, this patch uses the
resolver function directly to forward the call to the proper function.
This is not nearly as efficient as IFuncs of course, but is still quite
useful for large functions specifically developed for certain
processors.
This is unfortunately still limited to x86, since it depends on
__builtin_cpu_supports and __builtin_cpu_is, which are x86 builtins.
The naming for the resolver/forwarding function for cpu-dispatch was
taken from ICC's implementation, which uses the unmodified name for this
(no mangling additions). This is possible, since cpu-dispatch uses '.A'
for the 'default' version.
In 'target' multiversioning, this function keeps the '.resolver'
extension in order to keep the default function keeping the default
mangling.
Change-Id: I4731555a39be26c7ad59a2d8fda6fa1a50f73284
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D53586
llvm-svn: 345298
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
As reported on http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/cfe-dev/2018-August/058760.html,
this broke i386-freebsd11 due to its lack of atomic 64 bit primitives.
While that's not really this commit's fault, let's revert back to the old
behaviour until this can be fixed. This means generating cmpxchg8b etc for i386
and i486 which don't technically support those, but that's been the behaviour
for a long time, so a little longer probably doesn't hurt that much.
> Adjust MaxAtomicInlineWidth for i386/i486 targets.
>
> This is to fix the bug reported in https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=34347#c6.
> Currently, all MaxAtomicInlineWidth of x86-32 targets are set to 64. However,
> i386 doesn't support any cmpxchg related instructions. i486 only supports cmpxchg.
> So in this patch MaxAtomicInlineWidth is reset as follows:
> For i386, the MaxAtomicInlineWidth should be 0 because no cmpxchg is supported.
> For i486, the MaxAtomicInlineWidth should be 32 because it supports cmpxchg.
> For others 32 bits x86 cpu, the MaxAtomicInlineWidth should be 64 because of cmpxchg8b.
>
> Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D42154
llvm-svn: 340666
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
subtarget features for indirect calls and indirect branches.
This is in preparation for enabling *only* the call retpolines when
using speculative load hardening.
I've continued to use subtarget features for now as they continue to
seem the best fit given the lack of other retpoline like constructs so
far.
The LLVM side is pretty simple. I'd like to eventually get rid of the
old feature, but not sure what backwards compatibility issues that will
cause.
This does remove the "implies" from requesting an external thunk. This
always seemed somewhat questionable and is now clearly not desirable --
you specify a thunk the same way no matter which set of things are
getting retpolines.
I really want to keep this nicely isolated from end users and just an
LLVM implementation detail, so I've moved the `-mretpoline` flag in
Clang to no longer rely on a specific subtarget feature by that name and
instead to be directly handled. In some ways this is simpler, but in
order to preserve existing behavior I've had to add some fallback code
so that users who relied on merely passing -mretpoline-external-thunk
continue to get the same behavior. We should eventually remove this
I suspect (we have never tested that it works!) but I've not done that
in this patch.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D51150
llvm-svn: 340515
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
sed -Ei 's/[[:space:]]+$//' include/**/*.{def,h,td} lib/**/*.{cpp,h}
llvm-svn: 338291
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Summary: Microsoft's C++ object model for ARM64 is the same as that for X86_64.
For example, small structs with non-trivial copy constructors or virtual
function tables are passed indirectly. Currently, they are passed in registers
when compiled with clang.
Reviewers: rnk, mstorsjo, TomTan, haripul, javed.absar
Reviewed By: rnk, mstorsjo
Subscribers: kristof.beyls, chrib, llvm-commits, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D49770
llvm-svn: 338076
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
As documented here: https://software.intel.com/en-us/node/682969 and
https://software.intel.com/en-us/node/523346. cpu_dispatch multiversioning
is an ICC feature that provides for function multiversioning.
This feature is implemented with two attributes: First, cpu_specific,
which specifies the individual function versions. Second, cpu_dispatch,
which specifies the location of the resolver function and the list of
resolvable functions.
This is valuable since it provides a mechanism where the resolver's TU
can be specified in one location, and the individual implementions
each in their own translation units.
The goal of this patch is to be source-compatible with ICC, so this
implementation diverges from the ICC implementation in a few ways:
1- Linux x86/64 only: This implementation uses ifuncs in order to
properly dispatch functions. This is is a valuable performance benefit
over the ICC implementation. A future patch will be provided to enable
this feature on Windows, but it will obviously more closely fit ICC's
implementation.
2- CPU Identification functions: ICC uses a set of custom functions to identify
the feature list of the host processor. This patch uses the cpu_supports
functionality in order to better align with 'target' multiversioning.
1- cpu_dispatch function def/decl: ICC's cpu_dispatch requires that the function
marked cpu_dispatch be an empty definition. This patch supports that as well,
however declarations are also permitted, since the linker will solve the
issue of multiple emissions.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D47474
llvm-svn: 337552
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
platforms."
Adding __attribute__((aligned(32))) to __m256 breaks the implementation
of _mm256_loadu_ps on Windows. On Windows, alignment attributes have
higher precedence than packing attributes.
We also might want to carefully consider the consequences of changing
our vector typedefs, since many users copy them and invent their own
new, non-Intel specific vector type names.
llvm-svn: 333958
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This fixes two major problems:
- We were not capping vector alignment as desired on 32-bit ARM.
- We were using different alignments based on the AVX settings on
Intel, so we did not have a consistent ABI.
This is an ABI break, but we think we can get away with it because
vectors tend to be used mostly in inline code (which is why not having
a consistent ABI has not proven disastrous on Intel).
Intel's AVX types are specified as having 32-byte / 64-byte alignment,
so align them explicitly instead of relying on the base ABI rule.
Note that this sort of attribute is stripped from template arguments
in template substitution, so there's a possibility that code templated
over vectors will produce inadequately-aligned objects. The right
long-term solution for this is for alignment attributes to be
interpreted as true qualifiers and thus preserved in the canonical type.
llvm-svn: 333791
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
An intrinsic for an old instruction, as described in the Intel SDM.
Reviewers: craig.topper, rnk
Reviewed By: craig.topper, rnk
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D47142
llvm-svn: 333256
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
in gcc by https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-cvs/2018-04/msg00534.html.
The -mibt feature flag is being removed, and the -fcf-protection
option now also defines a CET macro and causes errors when used
on non-X86 targets, while X86 targets no longer check for -mibt
and -mshstk to determine if -fcf-protection is supported. -mshstk
is now used only to determine availability of shadow stack intrinsics.
Comes with an LLVM patch (D46882).
Patch by mike.dvoretsky
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D46881
llvm-svn: 332704
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Reviewers: craig.topper, RKSimon
Reviewed By: craig.topper
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D46540
llvm-svn: 331962
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This is similar to the LLVM change https://reviews.llvm.org/D46290.
We've been running doxygen with the autobrief option for a couple of
years now. This makes the \brief markers into our comments
redundant. Since they are a visual distraction and we don't want to
encourage more \brief markers in new code either, this patch removes
them all.
Patch produced by
for i in $(git grep -l '\@brief'); do perl -pi -e 's/\@brief //g' $i & done
for i in $(git grep -l '\\brief'); do perl -pi -e 's/\\brief //g' $i & done
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D46320
llvm-svn: 331834
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Reviewers: craig.topper, zvi
Reviewed By: craig.topper
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D46431
llvm-svn: 331740
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Reviewers: spatel, craig.topper, RKSimon
Reviewed By: craig.topper
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D45984
llvm-svn: 331249
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Reviewers: craig.topper, zvi
Reviewed By: craig.topper
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D45254
llvm-svn: 330463
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Reviewers: craig.topper, zvi
Reviewed By: craig.topper
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D45257
llvm-svn: 329993
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The WBNOINVD instruction writes back all modified
cache lines in the processor’s internal cache to main memory
but does not invalidate (flush) the internal caches.
Reviewers: craig.topper, zvi, ashlykov
Reviewed By: craig.topper
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D43817
llvm-svn: 329848
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Microsoft has reserved 'U' for the PreserveMostCC which is used in the
swift runtime. Add support for this. This allows the swift runtime to
be built for Windows again.
llvm-svn: 329025
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
ObjC and ObjC++ pass non-trivial structs in a way that is incompatible
with each other. For example:
typedef struct {
id f0;
__weak id f1;
} S;
// this code is compiled in c++.
extern "C" {
void foo(S s);
}
void caller() {
// the caller passes the parameter indirectly and destructs it.
foo(S());
}
// this function is compiled in c.
// 'a' is passed directly and is destructed in the callee.
void foo(S a) {
}
This patch fixes the incompatibility by passing and returning structs
with __strong or weak fields using the C ABI in C++ mode. __strong and
__weak fields in a struct do not cause the struct to be destructed in
the caller and __strong fields do not cause the struct to be passed
indirectly.
Also, this patch fixes the microsoft ABI bug mentioned here:
https://reviews.llvm.org/D41039?id=128767#inline-364710
rdar://problem/38887866
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D44908
llvm-svn: 328731
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Summary:
Make clang accept `-msahf` (and `-mno-sahf`) flags to activate the
`+sahf` feature for the backend, for bug 36028 (Incorrect use of
pushf/popf enables/disables interrupts on amd64 kernels). This was
originally submitted in bug 36037 by Jonathan Looney
<jonlooney@gmail.com>.
As described there, GCC also uses `-msahf` for this feature, and the
backend already recognizes the `+sahf` feature. All that is needed is to
teach clang to pass this on to the backend.
The mapping of feature support onto CPUs may not be complete; rather, it
was chosen to match LLVM's idea of which CPUs support this feature (see
lib/Target/X86/X86.td).
I also updated the affected test case (CodeGen/attr-target-x86.c) to
match the emitted output.
Reviewers: craig.topper, coby, efriedma, rsmith
Reviewed By: craig.topper
Subscribers: emaste, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D43394
llvm-svn: 325446
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
A followup to: https://reviews.llvm.org/D42978
This patch adds X86 and X86_64 support for
enabling the march notes.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D43041
llvm-svn: 324674
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
No sense passing these by reference when a copy is about as free, and
saves on potential indirection later.
llvm-svn: 324540
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This is to fix the bug reported in https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=34347#c6.
Currently, all MaxAtomicInlineWidth of x86-32 targets are set to 64. However,
i386 doesn't support any cmpxchg related instructions. i486 only supports cmpxchg.
So in this patch MaxAtomicInlineWidth is reset as follows:
For i386, the MaxAtomicInlineWidth should be 0 because no cmpxchg is supported.
For i486, the MaxAtomicInlineWidth should be 32 because it supports cmpxchg.
For others 32 bits x86 cpu, the MaxAtomicInlineWidth should be 64 because of cmpxchg8b.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D42154
llvm-svn: 323281
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
speculative execution vulnerabilities disclosed today, specifically identified by CVE-2017-5715, "Branch Target Injection", and is one of the two halves to Spectre..
Summary:
First, we need to explain the core of the vulnerability. Note that this
is a very incomplete description, please see the Project Zero blog post
for details:
https://googleprojectzero.blogspot.com/2018/01/reading-privileged-memory-with-side.html
The basis for branch target injection is to direct speculative execution
of the processor to some "gadget" of executable code by poisoning the
prediction of indirect branches with the address of that gadget. The
gadget in turn contains an operation that provides a side channel for
reading data. Most commonly, this will look like a load of secret data
followed by a branch on the loaded value and then a load of some
predictable cache line. The attacker then uses timing of the processors
cache to determine which direction the branch took *in the speculative
execution*, and in turn what one bit of the loaded value was. Due to the
nature of these timing side channels and the branch predictor on Intel
processors, this allows an attacker to leak data only accessible to
a privileged domain (like the kernel) back into an unprivileged domain.
The goal is simple: avoid generating code which contains an indirect
branch that could have its prediction poisoned by an attacker. In many
cases, the compiler can simply use directed conditional branches and
a small search tree. LLVM already has support for lowering switches in
this way and the first step of this patch is to disable jump-table
lowering of switches and introduce a pass to rewrite explicit indirectbr
sequences into a switch over integers.
However, there is no fully general alternative to indirect calls. We
introduce a new construct we call a "retpoline" to implement indirect
calls in a non-speculatable way. It can be thought of loosely as
a trampoline for indirect calls which uses the RET instruction on x86.
Further, we arrange for a specific call->ret sequence which ensures the
processor predicts the return to go to a controlled, known location. The
retpoline then "smashes" the return address pushed onto the stack by the
call with the desired target of the original indirect call. The result
is a predicted return to the next instruction after a call (which can be
used to trap speculative execution within an infinite loop) and an
actual indirect branch to an arbitrary address.
On 64-bit x86 ABIs, this is especially easily done in the compiler by
using a guaranteed scratch register to pass the target into this device.
For 32-bit ABIs there isn't a guaranteed scratch register and so several
different retpoline variants are introduced to use a scratch register if
one is available in the calling convention and to otherwise use direct
stack push/pop sequences to pass the target address.
This "retpoline" mitigation is fully described in the following blog
post: https://support.google.com/faqs/answer/7625886
We also support a target feature that disables emission of the retpoline
thunk by the compiler to allow for custom thunks if users want them.
These are particularly useful in environments like kernels that
routinely do hot-patching on boot and want to hot-patch their thunk to
different code sequences. They can write this custom thunk and use
`-mretpoline-external-thunk` *in addition* to `-mretpoline`. In this
case, on x86-64 thu thunk names must be:
```
__llvm_external_retpoline_r11
```
or on 32-bit:
```
__llvm_external_retpoline_eax
__llvm_external_retpoline_ecx
__llvm_external_retpoline_edx
__llvm_external_retpoline_push
```
And the target of the retpoline is passed in the named register, or in
the case of the `push` suffix on the top of the stack via a `pushl`
instruction.
There is one other important source of indirect branches in x86 ELF
binaries: the PLT. These patches also include support for LLD to
generate PLT entries that perform a retpoline-style indirection.
The only other indirect branches remaining that we are aware of are from
precompiled runtimes (such as crt0.o and similar). The ones we have
found are not really attackable, and so we have not focused on them
here, but eventually these runtimes should also be replicated for
retpoline-ed configurations for completeness.
For kernels or other freestanding or fully static executables, the
compiler switch `-mretpoline` is sufficient to fully mitigate this
particular attack. For dynamic executables, you must compile *all*
libraries with `-mretpoline` and additionally link the dynamic
executable and all shared libraries with LLD and pass `-z retpolineplt`
(or use similar functionality from some other linker). We strongly
recommend also using `-z now` as non-lazy binding allows the
retpoline-mitigated PLT to be substantially smaller.
When manually apply similar transformations to `-mretpoline` to the
Linux kernel we observed very small performance hits to applications
running typical workloads, and relatively minor hits (approximately 2%)
even for extremely syscall-heavy applications. This is largely due to
the small number of indirect branches that occur in performance
sensitive paths of the kernel.
When using these patches on statically linked applications, especially
C++ applications, you should expect to see a much more dramatic
performance hit. For microbenchmarks that are switch, indirect-, or
virtual-call heavy we have seen overheads ranging from 10% to 50%.
However, real-world workloads exhibit substantially lower performance
impact. Notably, techniques such as PGO and ThinLTO dramatically reduce
the impact of hot indirect calls (by speculatively promoting them to
direct calls) and allow optimized search trees to be used to lower
switches. If you need to deploy these techniques in C++ applications, we
*strongly* recommend that you ensure all hot call targets are statically
linked (avoiding PLT indirection) and use both PGO and ThinLTO. Well
tuned servers using all of these techniques saw 5% - 10% overhead from
the use of retpoline.
We will add detailed documentation covering these components in
subsequent patches, but wanted to make the core functionality available
as soon as possible. Happy for more code review, but we'd really like to
get these patches landed and backported ASAP for obvious reasons. We're
planning to backport this to both 6.0 and 5.0 release streams and get
a 5.0 release with just this cherry picked ASAP for distros and vendors.
This patch is the work of a number of people over the past month: Eric, Reid,
Rui, and myself. I'm mailing it out as a single commit due to the time
sensitive nature of landing this and the need to backport it. Huge thanks to
everyone who helped out here, and everyone at Intel who helped out in
discussions about how to craft this. Also, credit goes to Paul Turner (at
Google, but not an LLVM contributor) for much of the underlying retpoline
design.
Reviewers: echristo, rnk, ruiu, craig.topper, DavidKreitzer
Subscribers: sanjoy, emaste, mcrosier, mgorny, mehdi_amini, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D41723
llvm-svn: 323155
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Summary: This patch adds -mrdpid/-mno-rdpid and the rdpid intrinsic. The corresponding LLVM commit has already been made.
Reviewers: RKSimon, spatel, zvi, AndreiGrischenko
Reviewed By: RKSimon
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D42272
llvm-svn: 323047
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Cf-protection is a target independent flag that instructs the back-end to instrument control flow mechanisms like: Branch, Return, etc.
For example in X86 this flag will be used to instrument Indirect Branch Tracking instructions.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D40478
Change-Id: I5126e766c0e6b84118cae0ee8a20fe78cc373dea
llvm-svn: 322063
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
GCC's attribute 'target', in addition to being an optimization hint,
also allows function multiversioning. We currently have the former
implemented, this is the latter's implementation.
This works by enabling functions with the same name/signature to coexist,
so that they can all be emitted. Multiversion state is stored in the
FunctionDecl itself, and SemaDecl manages the definitions.
Note that it ends up having to permit redefinition of functions so
that they can all be emitted. Additionally, all versions of the function
must be emitted, so this also manages that.
Note that this includes some additional rules that GCC does not, since
defining something as a MultiVersion function after a usage has been made illegal.
The only 'history rewriting' that happens is if a function is emitted before
it has been converted to a multiversion'ed function, at which point its name
needs to be changed.
Function templates and virtual functions are NOT yet supported (not supported
in GCC either).
Additionally, constructors/destructors are disallowed, but the former is
planned.
llvm-svn: 322028
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
added vbmi2 feature recognition
added intrinsics support for vbmi2 instructions
_mm[128,256,512]_mask[z]_compress_epi[16,32]
_mm[128,256,512]_mask_compressstoreu_epi[16,32]
_mm[128,256,512]_mask[z]_expand_epi[16,32]
_mm[128,256,512]_mask[z]_expandloadu_epi[16,32]
_mm[128,256,512]_mask[z]_sh[l,r]di_epi[16,32,64]
_mm[128,256,512]_mask_sh[l,r]dv_epi[16,32,64]
matching a similar work on the backend (D40206)
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D41557
llvm-svn: 321487
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
added vnni feature recognition
added intrinsics support for VNNI instructions
_mm256_mask_dpbusd_epi32
_mm256_maskz_dpbusd_epi32
_mm256_dpbusd_epi32
_mm256_mask_dpbusds_epi32
_mm256_maskz_dpbusds_epi32
_mm256_dpbusds_epi32
_mm256_mask_dpwssd_epi32
_mm256_maskz_dpwssd_epi32
_mm256_dpwssd_epi32
_mm256_mask_dpwssds_epi32
_mm256_maskz_dpwssds_epi32
_mm256_dpwssds_epi32
_mm128_mask_dpbusd_epi32
_mm128_maskz_dpbusd_epi32
_mm128_dpbusd_epi32
_mm128_mask_dpbusds_epi32
_mm128_maskz_dpbusds_epi32
_mm128_dpbusds_epi32
_mm128_mask_dpwssd_epi32
_mm128_maskz_dpwssd_epi32
_mm128_dpwssd_epi32
_mm128_mask_dpwssds_epi32
_mm128_maskz_dpwssds_epi32
_mm128_dpwssds_epi32
_mm512_mask_dpbusd_epi32
_mm512_maskz_dpbusd_epi32
_mm512_dpbusd_epi32
_mm512_mask_dpbusds_epi32
_mm512_maskz_dpbusds_epi32
_mm512_dpbusds_epi32
_mm512_mask_dpwssd_epi32
_mm512_maskz_dpwssd_epi32
_mm512_dpwssd_epi32
_mm512_mask_dpwssds_epi32
_mm512_maskz_dpwssds_epi32
_mm512_dpwssds_epi32
matching a similar work on the backend (D40208)
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D41558
llvm-svn: 321484
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
added bitalg feature recognition
added intrinsics support for bitalg instructions
_mm512_popcnt_epi16
_mm512_mask_popcnt_epi16
_mm512_maskz_popcnt_epi16
_mm512_popcnt_epi8
_mm512_mask_popcnt_epi8
_mm512_maskz_popcnt_epi8
_mm512_mask_bitshuffle_epi64_mask
_mm512_bitshuffle_epi64_mask
_mm256_popcnt_epi16
_mm256_mask_popcnt_epi16
_mm256_maskz_popcnt_epi16
_mm128_popcnt_epi16
_mm128_mask_popcnt_epi16
_mm128_maskz_popcnt_epi16
_mm256_popcnt_epi8
_mm256_mask_popcnt_epi8
_mm256_maskz_popcnt_epi8
_mm128_popcnt_epi8
_mm128_mask_popcnt_epi8
_mm128_maskz_popcnt_epi8
_mm256_mask_bitshuffle_epi32_mask
_mm256_bitshuffle_epi32_mask
_mm128_mask_bitshuffle_epi16_mask
_mm128_bitshuffle_epi16_mask
matching a similar work on the backend (D40222)
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D41564
llvm-svn: 321483
|