[TableGen] Fix a bug that MCSchedClassDesc is interfered between different SchedModel

Assume that, ModelA has scheduling resource for InstA and ModelB has scheduling resource for InstB. This is what the llvm::MCSchedClassDesc looks like:

llvm::MCSchedClassDesc ModelASchedClasses[] = {
...
InstA, 0, ...
InstB, -1,...
};

llvm::MCSchedClassDesc ModelBSchedClasses[] = {
...
InstA, -1,...
InstB, 0,...
};
The -1 means invalid num of macro ops, while it is valid if it is >=0. This is what we look like now:

llvm::MCSchedClassDesc ModelASchedClasses[] = {
...
InstA, 0, ...
InstB, 0,...
};

llvm::MCSchedClassDesc ModelBSchedClasses[] = {
...
InstA, 0,...
InstB, 0,...
};
And compiler hit the assertion here because the SCDesc is valid now for both InstA and InstB.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D67950

llvm-svn: 374524

1 files changed, 47 insertions, 0 deletions

diff --git a/llvm/test/TableGen/InvalidMCSchedClassDesc.td b/llvm/test/TableGen/InvalidMCSchedClassDesc.td
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..f1b4ed00a6a
--- /dev/null
+++ b/llvm/test/TableGen/InvalidMCSchedClassDesc.td
@@ -0,0 +1,47 @@
+// RUN: llvm-tblgen -gen-subtarget -I %p/../../include %s 2>&1 | FileCheck %s
+// Check if it is valid MCSchedClassDesc if didn't have the resources. 
+
+include "llvm/Target/Target.td"
+
+def MyTarget : Target;
+
+let OutOperandList = (outs), InOperandList = (ins) in {
+  def Inst_A : Instruction; 
+  def Inst_B : Instruction; 
+}
+
+let CompleteModel = 0 in {
+  def SchedModel_A: SchedMachineModel;
+  def SchedModel_B: SchedMachineModel;
+  def SchedModel_C: SchedMachineModel;
+}
+
+// Inst_B didn't have the resoures, and it is invalid.
+// CHECK: SchedModel_ASchedClasses[] = {
+// CHECK: {DBGFIELD("Inst_A")             1
+// CHECK-NEXT: {DBGFIELD("Inst_B")             16383 
+let SchedModel = SchedModel_A in {
+  def Write_A : SchedWriteRes<[]>;
+  def : InstRW<[Write_A], (instrs Inst_A)>;
+}
+
+// Inst_A didn't have the resoures, and it is invalid.
+// CHECK: SchedModel_BSchedClasses[] = {
+// CHECK: {DBGFIELD("Inst_A")             16383 
+// CHECK-NEXT: {DBGFIELD("Inst_B")             1 
+let SchedModel = SchedModel_B in {
+  def Write_B: SchedWriteRes<[]>; 
+  def : InstRW<[Write_B], (instrs Inst_B)>;
+}
+
+// CHECK: SchedModel_CSchedClasses[] = {
+// CHECK: {DBGFIELD("Inst_A")             1
+// CHECK-NEXT: {DBGFIELD("Inst_B")             1
+let SchedModel = SchedModel_C in {
+  def Write_C: SchedWriteRes<[]>; 
+  def : InstRW<[Write_C], (instrs Inst_A, Inst_B)>;
+}
+
+def ProcessorA: ProcessorModel<"ProcessorA", SchedModel_A, []>;
+def ProcessorB: ProcessorModel<"ProcessorB", SchedModel_B, []>;
+def ProcessorC: ProcessorModel<"ProcessorC", SchedModel_C, []>;