diff options
| author | Craig Topper <craig.topper@intel.com> | 2018-08-16 21:54:02 +0000 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Craig Topper <craig.topper@intel.com> | 2018-08-16 21:54:02 +0000 |
| commit | bde2b43cb3386534dc2f66d6de29567cf1347b9d (patch) | |
| tree | 7bbf30342d07c0e0ddb8b12b35d6744ab3a8a7e6 /llvm/lib/Target | |
| parent | a6c34887f70d43d733157650d4c16a426574e868 (diff) | |
| download | bcm5719-llvm-bde2b43cb3386534dc2f66d6de29567cf1347b9d.tar.gz bcm5719-llvm-bde2b43cb3386534dc2f66d6de29567cf1347b9d.zip | |
[X86] In EFLAGS copy pass, don't emit EXTRACT_SUBREG instructions since we're after peephole
Normally the peephole pass converts EXTRACT_SUBREG to COPY instructions. But we're after peephole so we can't rely on it to clean these up.
To fix this, the eflags pass now emits a COPY with a subreg input.
I also noticed that in 32-bit mode we need to constrain the input to the copy to ensure the subreg is valid. Otherwise we'll fail verify-machineinstrs
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D50656
llvm-svn: 339945
Diffstat (limited to 'llvm/lib/Target')
| -rw-r--r-- | llvm/lib/Target/X86/X86FlagsCopyLowering.cpp | 17 |
1 files changed, 11 insertions, 6 deletions
diff --git a/llvm/lib/Target/X86/X86FlagsCopyLowering.cpp b/llvm/lib/Target/X86/X86FlagsCopyLowering.cpp index 0a4914d338e..778aa505b2d 100644 --- a/llvm/lib/Target/X86/X86FlagsCopyLowering.cpp +++ b/llvm/lib/Target/X86/X86FlagsCopyLowering.cpp @@ -97,6 +97,7 @@ public: private: MachineRegisterInfo *MRI; + const X86Subtarget *Subtarget; const X86InstrInfo *TII; const TargetRegisterInfo *TRI; const TargetRegisterClass *PromoteRC; @@ -346,10 +347,10 @@ bool X86FlagsCopyLoweringPass::runOnMachineFunction(MachineFunction &MF) { LLVM_DEBUG(dbgs() << "********** " << getPassName() << " : " << MF.getName() << " **********\n"); - auto &Subtarget = MF.getSubtarget<X86Subtarget>(); + Subtarget = &MF.getSubtarget<X86Subtarget>(); MRI = &MF.getRegInfo(); - TII = Subtarget.getInstrInfo(); - TRI = Subtarget.getRegisterInfo(); + TII = Subtarget->getInstrInfo(); + TRI = Subtarget->getRegisterInfo(); MDT = &getAnalysis<MachineDominatorTree>(); PromoteRC = &X86::GR8RegClass; @@ -960,10 +961,14 @@ void X86FlagsCopyLoweringPass::rewriteSetCarryExtended( .addReg(Reg) .addImm(SubRegIdx[OrigRegSize]); } else if (OrigRegSize > TargetRegSize) { - BuildMI(MBB, SetPos, SetLoc, TII->get(TargetOpcode::EXTRACT_SUBREG), + if (TargetRegSize == 1 && !Subtarget->is64Bit()) { + // Need to constrain the register class. + MRI->constrainRegClass(Reg, &X86::GR32_ABCDRegClass); + } + + BuildMI(MBB, SetPos, SetLoc, TII->get(TargetOpcode::COPY), NewReg) - .addReg(Reg) - .addImm(SubRegIdx[TargetRegSize]); + .addReg(Reg, 0, SubRegIdx[TargetRegSize]); } else { BuildMI(MBB, SetPos, SetLoc, TII->get(TargetOpcode::COPY), NewReg) .addReg(Reg); |

