fix typos in comments; NFC

llvm-svn: 308127

3 files changed, 3 insertions, 3 deletions

diff --git a/llvm/lib/Target/AMDGPU/AMDGPUISelLowering.cpp b/llvm/lib/Target/AMDGPU/AMDGPUISelLowering.cpp
index 631420589fc..258b1737deb 100644
--- a/llvm/lib/Target/AMDGPU/AMDGPUISelLowering.cpp
+++ b/llvm/lib/Target/AMDGPU/AMDGPUISelLowering.cpp
@@ -885,7 +885,7 @@ CCAssignFn *AMDGPUCallLowering::CCAssignFnForReturn(CallingConv::ID CC,
 
 /// When the SelectionDAGBuilder computes the Ins, it takes care of splitting
 /// input values across multiple registers.  Each item in the Ins array
-/// represents a single value that will be stored in regsters.  Ins[x].VT is
+/// represents a single value that will be stored in registers.  Ins[x].VT is
 /// the value type of the value that will be stored in the register, so
 /// whatever SDNode we lower the argument to needs to be this type.
 ///
diff --git a/llvm/lib/Target/AMDGPU/AsmParser/AMDGPUAsmParser.cpp b/llvm/lib/Target/AMDGPU/AsmParser/AMDGPUAsmParser.cpp
index e3c90f25060..b37c274102b 100644
--- a/llvm/lib/Target/AMDGPU/AsmParser/AMDGPUAsmParser.cpp
+++ b/llvm/lib/Target/AMDGPU/AsmParser/AMDGPUAsmParser.cpp
@@ -1208,7 +1208,7 @@ bool AMDGPUOperand::isInlinableImm(MVT type) const {
 }
 
 bool AMDGPUOperand::isLiteralImm(MVT type) const {
-  // Check that this imediate can be added as literal
+  // Check that this immediate can be added as literal
   if (!isImmTy(ImmTyNone)) {
     return false;
   }
diff --git a/llvm/lib/Target/X86/X86FixupBWInsts.cpp b/llvm/lib/Target/X86/X86FixupBWInsts.cpp
index c28746f9643..95c6f2a3fa3 100644
--- a/llvm/lib/Target/X86/X86FixupBWInsts.cpp
+++ b/llvm/lib/Target/X86/X86FixupBWInsts.cpp
@@ -22,7 +22,7 @@
 /// instructions and register-to-register moves.  It would
 /// seem like cmov(s) would also be affected, but because of the way cmov is
 /// really implemented by most machines as reading both the destination and
-/// and source regsters, and then "merging" the two based on a condition,
+/// and source registers, and then "merging" the two based on a condition,
 /// it really already should be considered as having a true dependence on the
 /// destination register as well.
 ///