diff options
author | Stephen Lin <stephenwlin@gmail.com> | 2013-07-09 18:16:56 +0000 |
---|---|---|
committer | Stephen Lin <stephenwlin@gmail.com> | 2013-07-09 18:16:56 +0000 |
commit | 73de7bf5dec63e8ca45a446373ab61a2e22d103c (patch) | |
tree | 61dd22e9276131538d96c046212d55199febb05b /llvm/lib/Target/X86/X86ISelLowering.cpp | |
parent | ff666bd962a4446d80955fe75619201c29795501 (diff) | |
download | bcm5719-llvm-73de7bf5dec63e8ca45a446373ab61a2e22d103c.tar.gz bcm5719-llvm-73de7bf5dec63e8ca45a446373ab61a2e22d103c.zip |
AArch64/PowerPC/SystemZ/X86: This patch fixes the interface, usage, and all
in-tree implementations of TargetLoweringBase::isFMAFasterThanMulAndAdd in
order to resolve the following issues with fmuladd (i.e. optional FMA)
intrinsics:
1. On X86(-64) targets, ISD::FMA nodes are formed when lowering fmuladd
intrinsics even if the subtarget does not support FMA instructions, leading
to laughably bad code generation in some situations.
2. On AArch64 targets, ISD::FMA nodes are formed for operations on fp128,
resulting in a call to a software fp128 FMA implementation.
3. On PowerPC targets, FMAs are not generated from fmuladd intrinsics on types
like v2f32, v8f32, v4f64, etc., even though they promote, split, scalarize,
etc. to types that support hardware FMAs.
The function has also been slightly renamed for consistency and to force a
merge/build conflict for any out-of-tree target implementing it. To resolve,
see comments and fixed in-tree examples.
llvm-svn: 185956
Diffstat (limited to 'llvm/lib/Target/X86/X86ISelLowering.cpp')
-rw-r--r-- | llvm/lib/Target/X86/X86ISelLowering.cpp | 21 |
1 files changed, 21 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/llvm/lib/Target/X86/X86ISelLowering.cpp b/llvm/lib/Target/X86/X86ISelLowering.cpp index a680ac09b5f..f00df3543a8 100644 --- a/llvm/lib/Target/X86/X86ISelLowering.cpp +++ b/llvm/lib/Target/X86/X86ISelLowering.cpp @@ -12966,6 +12966,27 @@ bool X86TargetLowering::isZExtFree(SDValue Val, EVT VT2) const { return false; } +bool +X86TargetLowering::isFMAFasterThanFMulAndFAdd(EVT VT) const { + if (!(Subtarget->hasFMA() || Subtarget->hasFMA4())) + return false; + + VT = VT.getScalarType(); + + if (!VT.isSimple()) + return false; + + switch (VT.getSimpleVT().SimpleTy) { + case MVT::f32: + case MVT::f64: + return true; + default: + break; + } + + return false; +} + bool X86TargetLowering::isNarrowingProfitable(EVT VT1, EVT VT2) const { // i16 instructions are longer (0x66 prefix) and potentially slower. return !(VT1 == MVT::i32 && VT2 == MVT::i16); |