diff options
author | Sergey Dmitrouk <sdmitrouk@accesssoftek.com> | 2015-04-28 11:56:37 +0000 |
---|---|---|
committer | Sergey Dmitrouk <sdmitrouk@accesssoftek.com> | 2015-04-28 11:56:37 +0000 |
commit | adb4c69d5ca854774f1ca1fef03ca8df541dc974 (patch) | |
tree | 89b272a9170e6e63d6f035cc55de45087f61cdbf /llvm/lib/Target/X86/X86ISelDAGToDAG.cpp | |
parent | ba945626b094899c7a4cae587398a69097da560c (diff) | |
download | bcm5719-llvm-adb4c69d5ca854774f1ca1fef03ca8df541dc974.tar.gz bcm5719-llvm-adb4c69d5ca854774f1ca1fef03ca8df541dc974.zip |
[DebugInfo] Add debug locations to constant SD nodes
This adds debug location to constant nodes of Selection DAG and updates
all places that create constants to pass debug locations
(see PR13269).
Can't guarantee that all locations are correct, but in a lot of cases choice
is obvious, so most of them should be. At least all tests pass.
Tests for these changes do not cover everything, instead just check it for
SDNodes, ARM and AArch64 where it's easy to get incorrect locations on
constants.
This is not complete fix as FastISel contains workaround for wrong debug
locations, which drops locations from instructions on processing constants,
but there isn't currently a way to use debug locations from constants there
as llvm::Constant doesn't cache it (yet). Although this is a bit different
issue, not directly related to these changes.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D9084
llvm-svn: 235977
Diffstat (limited to 'llvm/lib/Target/X86/X86ISelDAGToDAG.cpp')
-rw-r--r-- | llvm/lib/Target/X86/X86ISelDAGToDAG.cpp | 96 |
1 files changed, 53 insertions, 43 deletions
diff --git a/llvm/lib/Target/X86/X86ISelDAGToDAG.cpp b/llvm/lib/Target/X86/X86ISelDAGToDAG.cpp index 5da7acfc6ef..0219430f812 100644 --- a/llvm/lib/Target/X86/X86ISelDAGToDAG.cpp +++ b/llvm/lib/Target/X86/X86ISelDAGToDAG.cpp @@ -233,14 +233,15 @@ namespace { void EmitSpecialCodeForMain(); - inline void getAddressOperands(X86ISelAddressMode &AM, SDValue &Base, - SDValue &Scale, SDValue &Index, - SDValue &Disp, SDValue &Segment) { + inline void getAddressOperands(X86ISelAddressMode &AM, SDLoc DL, + SDValue &Base, SDValue &Scale, + SDValue &Index, SDValue &Disp, + SDValue &Segment) { Base = (AM.BaseType == X86ISelAddressMode::FrameIndexBase) ? CurDAG->getTargetFrameIndex(AM.Base_FrameIndex, TLI->getPointerTy()) : AM.Base_Reg; - Scale = getI8Imm(AM.Scale); + Scale = getI8Imm(AM.Scale, DL); Index = AM.IndexReg; // These are 32-bit even in 64-bit mode since RIP relative offset // is 32-bit. @@ -261,7 +262,7 @@ namespace { Disp = CurDAG->getTargetBlockAddress(AM.BlockAddr, MVT::i32, AM.Disp, AM.SymbolFlags); else - Disp = CurDAG->getTargetConstant(AM.Disp, MVT::i32); + Disp = CurDAG->getTargetConstant(AM.Disp, DL, MVT::i32); if (AM.Segment.getNode()) Segment = AM.Segment; @@ -271,14 +272,14 @@ namespace { /// getI8Imm - Return a target constant with the specified value, of type /// i8. - inline SDValue getI8Imm(unsigned Imm) { - return CurDAG->getTargetConstant(Imm, MVT::i8); + inline SDValue getI8Imm(unsigned Imm, SDLoc DL) { + return CurDAG->getTargetConstant(Imm, DL, MVT::i8); } /// getI32Imm - Return a target constant with the specified value, of type /// i32. - inline SDValue getI32Imm(unsigned Imm) { - return CurDAG->getTargetConstant(Imm, MVT::i32); + inline SDValue getI32Imm(unsigned Imm, SDLoc DL) { + return CurDAG->getTargetConstant(Imm, DL, MVT::i32); } /// getGlobalBaseReg - Return an SDNode that returns the value of @@ -801,11 +802,11 @@ static bool FoldMaskAndShiftToExtract(SelectionDAG &DAG, SDValue N, MVT VT = N.getSimpleValueType(); SDLoc DL(N); - SDValue Eight = DAG.getConstant(8, MVT::i8); - SDValue NewMask = DAG.getConstant(0xff, VT); + SDValue Eight = DAG.getConstant(8, DL, MVT::i8); + SDValue NewMask = DAG.getConstant(0xff, DL, VT); SDValue Srl = DAG.getNode(ISD::SRL, DL, VT, X, Eight); SDValue And = DAG.getNode(ISD::AND, DL, VT, Srl, NewMask); - SDValue ShlCount = DAG.getConstant(ScaleLog, MVT::i8); + SDValue ShlCount = DAG.getConstant(ScaleLog, DL, MVT::i8); SDValue Shl = DAG.getNode(ISD::SHL, DL, VT, And, ShlCount); // Insert the new nodes into the topological ordering. We must do this in @@ -849,7 +850,7 @@ static bool FoldMaskedShiftToScaledMask(SelectionDAG &DAG, SDValue N, MVT VT = N.getSimpleValueType(); SDLoc DL(N); - SDValue NewMask = DAG.getConstant(Mask >> ShiftAmt, VT); + SDValue NewMask = DAG.getConstant(Mask >> ShiftAmt, DL, VT); SDValue NewAnd = DAG.getNode(ISD::AND, DL, VT, X, NewMask); SDValue NewShift = DAG.getNode(ISD::SHL, DL, VT, NewAnd, Shift.getOperand(1)); @@ -955,9 +956,9 @@ static bool FoldMaskAndShiftToScale(SelectionDAG &DAG, SDValue N, X = NewX; } SDLoc DL(N); - SDValue NewSRLAmt = DAG.getConstant(ShiftAmt + AMShiftAmt, MVT::i8); + SDValue NewSRLAmt = DAG.getConstant(ShiftAmt + AMShiftAmt, DL, MVT::i8); SDValue NewSRL = DAG.getNode(ISD::SRL, DL, VT, X, NewSRLAmt); - SDValue NewSHLAmt = DAG.getConstant(AMShiftAmt, MVT::i8); + SDValue NewSHLAmt = DAG.getConstant(AMShiftAmt, DL, MVT::i8); SDValue NewSHL = DAG.getNode(ISD::SHL, DL, VT, NewSRL, NewSHLAmt); // Insert the new nodes into the topological ordering. We must do this in @@ -1198,7 +1199,7 @@ bool X86DAGToDAGISel::MatchAddressRecursively(SDValue N, X86ISelAddressMode &AM, } // Ok, the transformation is legal and appears profitable. Go for it. - SDValue Zero = CurDAG->getConstant(0, N.getValueType()); + SDValue Zero = CurDAG->getConstant(0, dl, N.getValueType()); SDValue Neg = CurDAG->getNode(ISD::SUB, dl, N.getValueType(), Zero, RHS); AM.IndexReg = Neg; AM.Scale = 1; @@ -1357,7 +1358,7 @@ bool X86DAGToDAGISel::SelectAddr(SDNode *Parent, SDValue N, SDValue &Base, if (!AM.IndexReg.getNode()) AM.IndexReg = CurDAG->getRegister(0, VT); - getAddressOperands(AM, Base, Scale, Index, Disp, Segment); + getAddressOperands(AM, SDLoc(N), Base, Scale, Index, Disp, Segment); return true; } @@ -1413,7 +1414,7 @@ bool X86DAGToDAGISel::SelectMOV64Imm32(SDValue N, SDValue &Imm) { if ((uint32_t)ImmVal != (uint64_t)ImmVal) return false; - Imm = CurDAG->getTargetConstant(ImmVal, MVT::i64); + Imm = CurDAG->getTargetConstant(ImmVal, SDLoc(N), MVT::i64); return true; } @@ -1449,9 +1450,9 @@ bool X86DAGToDAGISel::SelectLEA64_32Addr(SDValue N, SDValue &Base, // Base could already be %rip, particularly in the x32 ABI. Base = SDValue(CurDAG->getMachineNode( TargetOpcode::SUBREG_TO_REG, DL, MVT::i64, - CurDAG->getTargetConstant(0, MVT::i64), + CurDAG->getTargetConstant(0, DL, MVT::i64), Base, - CurDAG->getTargetConstant(X86::sub_32bit, MVT::i32)), + CurDAG->getTargetConstant(X86::sub_32bit, DL, MVT::i32)), 0); } @@ -1463,9 +1464,10 @@ bool X86DAGToDAGISel::SelectLEA64_32Addr(SDValue N, SDValue &Base, "Expect to be extending 32-bit registers for use in LEA"); Index = SDValue(CurDAG->getMachineNode( TargetOpcode::SUBREG_TO_REG, DL, MVT::i64, - CurDAG->getTargetConstant(0, MVT::i64), + CurDAG->getTargetConstant(0, DL, MVT::i64), Index, - CurDAG->getTargetConstant(X86::sub_32bit, MVT::i32)), + CurDAG->getTargetConstant(X86::sub_32bit, DL, + MVT::i32)), 0); } @@ -1531,7 +1533,7 @@ bool X86DAGToDAGISel::SelectLEAAddr(SDValue N, if (Complexity <= 2) return false; - getAddressOperands(AM, Base, Scale, Index, Disp, Segment); + getAddressOperands(AM, SDLoc(N), Base, Scale, Index, Disp, Segment); return true; } @@ -1555,7 +1557,7 @@ bool X86DAGToDAGISel::SelectTLSADDRAddr(SDValue N, SDValue &Base, AM.IndexReg = CurDAG->getRegister(0, MVT::i64); } - getAddressOperands(AM, Base, Scale, Index, Disp, Segment); + getAddressOperands(AM, SDLoc(N), Base, Scale, Index, Disp, Segment); return true; } @@ -1725,7 +1727,7 @@ static SDValue getAtomicLoadArithTargetConstant(SelectionDAG *CurDAG, // an immediate operand to sub. However, it still fits in 32 bits for the // add (since it is not negated) so we can return target-constant. if (CNVal == INT32_MIN) - return CurDAG->getTargetConstant(CNVal, NVT); + return CurDAG->getTargetConstant(CNVal, dl, NVT); // For atomic-load-add, we could do some optimizations. if (Op == ADD) { // Translate to INC/DEC if ADD by 1 or -1. @@ -1740,7 +1742,7 @@ static SDValue getAtomicLoadArithTargetConstant(SelectionDAG *CurDAG, CNVal = -CNVal; } } - return CurDAG->getTargetConstant(CNVal, NVT); + return CurDAG->getTargetConstant(CNVal, dl, NVT); } // If the value operand is single-used, try to optimize it. @@ -2053,12 +2055,14 @@ SDNode *X86DAGToDAGISel::SelectGather(SDNode *Node, unsigned Opc) { SDVTList VTs = CurDAG->getVTList(VSrc.getValueType(), VSrc.getValueType(), MVT::Other); + SDLoc DL(Node); + // Memory Operands: Base, Scale, Index, Disp, Segment - SDValue Disp = CurDAG->getTargetConstant(0, MVT::i32); + SDValue Disp = CurDAG->getTargetConstant(0, DL, MVT::i32); SDValue Segment = CurDAG->getRegister(0, MVT::i32); - const SDValue Ops[] = { VSrc, Base, getI8Imm(Scale->getSExtValue()), VIdx, + const SDValue Ops[] = { VSrc, Base, getI8Imm(Scale->getSExtValue(), DL), VIdx, Disp, Segment, VMask, Chain}; - SDNode *ResNode = CurDAG->getMachineNode(Opc, SDLoc(Node), VTs, Ops); + SDNode *ResNode = CurDAG->getMachineNode(Opc, DL, VTs, Ops); // Node has 2 outputs: VDst and MVT::Other. // ResNode has 3 outputs: VDst, VMask_wb, and MVT::Other. // We replace VDst of Node with VDst of ResNode, and Other of Node with Other @@ -2232,13 +2236,13 @@ SDNode *X86DAGToDAGISel::Select(SDNode *Node) { } // Emit the smaller op and the shift. - SDValue NewCst = CurDAG->getTargetConstant(Val >> ShlVal, CstVT); + SDValue NewCst = CurDAG->getTargetConstant(Val >> ShlVal, dl, CstVT); SDNode *New = CurDAG->getMachineNode(Op, dl, NVT, N0->getOperand(0),NewCst); if (ShlVal == 1) return CurDAG->SelectNodeTo(Node, AddOp, NVT, SDValue(New, 0), SDValue(New, 0)); return CurDAG->SelectNodeTo(Node, ShlOp, NVT, SDValue(New, 0), - getI8Imm(ShlVal)); + getI8Imm(ShlVal, dl)); } case X86ISD::UMUL8: case X86ISD::SMUL8: { @@ -2402,7 +2406,8 @@ SDNode *X86DAGToDAGISel::Select(SDNode *Node) { // Shift AX down 8 bits. Result = SDValue(CurDAG->getMachineNode(X86::SHR16ri, dl, MVT::i16, Result, - CurDAG->getTargetConstant(8, MVT::i8)), 0); + CurDAG->getTargetConstant(8, dl, MVT::i8)), + 0); // Then truncate it down to i8. ReplaceUses(SDValue(Node, 1), CurDAG->getTargetExtractSubreg(X86::sub_8bit, dl, MVT::i8, Result)); @@ -2522,7 +2527,8 @@ SDNode *X86DAGToDAGISel::Select(SDNode *Node) { ClrNode = SDValue(CurDAG->getMachineNode( TargetOpcode::EXTRACT_SUBREG, dl, MVT::i16, ClrNode, - CurDAG->getTargetConstant(X86::sub_16bit, MVT::i32)), + CurDAG->getTargetConstant(X86::sub_16bit, dl, + MVT::i32)), 0); break; case MVT::i32: @@ -2531,8 +2537,9 @@ SDNode *X86DAGToDAGISel::Select(SDNode *Node) { ClrNode = SDValue(CurDAG->getMachineNode( TargetOpcode::SUBREG_TO_REG, dl, MVT::i64, - CurDAG->getTargetConstant(0, MVT::i64), ClrNode, - CurDAG->getTargetConstant(X86::sub_32bit, MVT::i32)), + CurDAG->getTargetConstant(0, dl, MVT::i64), ClrNode, + CurDAG->getTargetConstant(X86::sub_32bit, dl, + MVT::i32)), 0); break; default: @@ -2584,8 +2591,9 @@ SDNode *X86DAGToDAGISel::Select(SDNode *Node) { Result = SDValue(CurDAG->getMachineNode( TargetOpcode::SUBREG_TO_REG, dl, MVT::i64, - CurDAG->getTargetConstant(0, MVT::i64), Result, - CurDAG->getTargetConstant(X86::sub_32bit, MVT::i32)), + CurDAG->getTargetConstant(0, dl, MVT::i64), Result, + CurDAG->getTargetConstant(X86::sub_32bit, dl, + MVT::i32)), 0); } } else { @@ -2642,7 +2650,7 @@ SDNode *X86DAGToDAGISel::Select(SDNode *Node) { if ((C->getZExtValue() & ~UINT64_C(0xff)) == 0 && (!(C->getZExtValue() & 0x80) || HasNoSignedComparisonUses(Node))) { - SDValue Imm = CurDAG->getTargetConstant(C->getZExtValue(), MVT::i8); + SDValue Imm = CurDAG->getTargetConstant(C->getZExtValue(), dl, MVT::i8); SDValue Reg = N0.getNode()->getOperand(0); // On x86-32, only the ABCD registers have 8-bit subregisters. @@ -2653,7 +2661,7 @@ SDNode *X86DAGToDAGISel::Select(SDNode *Node) { case MVT::i16: TRC = &X86::GR16_ABCDRegClass; break; default: llvm_unreachable("Unsupported TEST operand type!"); } - SDValue RC = CurDAG->getTargetConstant(TRC->getID(), MVT::i32); + SDValue RC = CurDAG->getTargetConstant(TRC->getID(), dl, MVT::i32); Reg = SDValue(CurDAG->getMachineNode(X86::COPY_TO_REGCLASS, dl, Reg.getValueType(), Reg, RC), 0); } @@ -2678,7 +2686,7 @@ SDNode *X86DAGToDAGISel::Select(SDNode *Node) { HasNoSignedComparisonUses(Node))) { // Shift the immediate right by 8 bits. SDValue ShiftedImm = CurDAG->getTargetConstant(C->getZExtValue() >> 8, - MVT::i8); + dl, MVT::i8); SDValue Reg = N0.getNode()->getOperand(0); // Put the value in an ABCD register. @@ -2689,7 +2697,7 @@ SDNode *X86DAGToDAGISel::Select(SDNode *Node) { case MVT::i16: TRC = &X86::GR16_ABCDRegClass; break; default: llvm_unreachable("Unsupported TEST operand type!"); } - SDValue RC = CurDAG->getTargetConstant(TRC->getID(), MVT::i32); + SDValue RC = CurDAG->getTargetConstant(TRC->getID(), dl, MVT::i32); Reg = SDValue(CurDAG->getMachineNode(X86::COPY_TO_REGCLASS, dl, Reg.getValueType(), Reg, RC), 0); @@ -2714,7 +2722,8 @@ SDNode *X86DAGToDAGISel::Select(SDNode *Node) { N0.getValueType() != MVT::i16 && (!(C->getZExtValue() & 0x8000) || HasNoSignedComparisonUses(Node))) { - SDValue Imm = CurDAG->getTargetConstant(C->getZExtValue(), MVT::i16); + SDValue Imm = CurDAG->getTargetConstant(C->getZExtValue(), dl, + MVT::i16); SDValue Reg = N0.getNode()->getOperand(0); // Extract the 16-bit subregister. @@ -2736,7 +2745,8 @@ SDNode *X86DAGToDAGISel::Select(SDNode *Node) { N0.getValueType() == MVT::i64 && (!(C->getZExtValue() & 0x80000000) || HasNoSignedComparisonUses(Node))) { - SDValue Imm = CurDAG->getTargetConstant(C->getZExtValue(), MVT::i32); + SDValue Imm = CurDAG->getTargetConstant(C->getZExtValue(), dl, + MVT::i32); SDValue Reg = N0.getNode()->getOperand(0); // Extract the 32-bit subregister. |