diff options
author | Luis Marques <luismarques@lowrisc.org> | 2019-09-27 15:49:10 +0000 |
---|---|---|
committer | Luis Marques <luismarques@lowrisc.org> | 2019-09-27 15:49:10 +0000 |
commit | aae97bfd0c323edef5363ce296c9f6f79db410cf (patch) | |
tree | 2b40b835d4c7a0727675fe1dc01c0f38cb7a9bc7 /llvm/lib/Target/RISCV/AsmParser/RISCVAsmParser.cpp | |
parent | 623b0e6963e5cbf59e180a9aadb1da8e61d84b47 (diff) | |
download | bcm5719-llvm-aae97bfd0c323edef5363ce296c9f6f79db410cf.tar.gz bcm5719-llvm-aae97bfd0c323edef5363ce296c9f6f79db410cf.zip |
[RISCV] Rename FPRs and use Register arithmetic
The new names for FPRs ensure that the Register values within the same class are
enumerated consecutively (the order is determined by the `LessRecordRegister`
function object). Where there were tables mapping between 32- and 64-bit FPRs
(and vice versa) this patch replaces them with Register arithmetic. The
enumeration order between different register classes is expected to continue to
be arbitrary, although it does impact the conversion from the (overloaded) asm
FPR names to Register values, and therefore might require updates to the target
if the sorting algorithm is changed. Static asserts were added to ensure that
changes to the ordering that would impact the current implementation are
detected.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D67423
llvm-svn: 373096
Diffstat (limited to 'llvm/lib/Target/RISCV/AsmParser/RISCVAsmParser.cpp')
-rw-r--r-- | llvm/lib/Target/RISCV/AsmParser/RISCVAsmParser.cpp | 64 |
1 files changed, 16 insertions, 48 deletions
diff --git a/llvm/lib/Target/RISCV/AsmParser/RISCVAsmParser.cpp b/llvm/lib/Target/RISCV/AsmParser/RISCVAsmParser.cpp index 5f93db484b3..300ba8dc675 100644 --- a/llvm/lib/Target/RISCV/AsmParser/RISCVAsmParser.cpp +++ b/llvm/lib/Target/RISCV/AsmParser/RISCVAsmParser.cpp @@ -741,46 +741,9 @@ public: #define GET_MATCHER_IMPLEMENTATION #include "RISCVGenAsmMatcher.inc" -// Return the matching FPR64 register for the given FPR32. -// FIXME: Ideally this function could be removed in favour of using -// information from TableGen. -static Register convertFPR32ToFPR64(Register Reg) { - switch (Reg) { - default: - llvm_unreachable("Not a recognised FPR32 register"); - case RISCV::F0_32: return RISCV::F0_64; - case RISCV::F1_32: return RISCV::F1_64; - case RISCV::F2_32: return RISCV::F2_64; - case RISCV::F3_32: return RISCV::F3_64; - case RISCV::F4_32: return RISCV::F4_64; - case RISCV::F5_32: return RISCV::F5_64; - case RISCV::F6_32: return RISCV::F6_64; - case RISCV::F7_32: return RISCV::F7_64; - case RISCV::F8_32: return RISCV::F8_64; - case RISCV::F9_32: return RISCV::F9_64; - case RISCV::F10_32: return RISCV::F10_64; - case RISCV::F11_32: return RISCV::F11_64; - case RISCV::F12_32: return RISCV::F12_64; - case RISCV::F13_32: return RISCV::F13_64; - case RISCV::F14_32: return RISCV::F14_64; - case RISCV::F15_32: return RISCV::F15_64; - case RISCV::F16_32: return RISCV::F16_64; - case RISCV::F17_32: return RISCV::F17_64; - case RISCV::F18_32: return RISCV::F18_64; - case RISCV::F19_32: return RISCV::F19_64; - case RISCV::F20_32: return RISCV::F20_64; - case RISCV::F21_32: return RISCV::F21_64; - case RISCV::F22_32: return RISCV::F22_64; - case RISCV::F23_32: return RISCV::F23_64; - case RISCV::F24_32: return RISCV::F24_64; - case RISCV::F25_32: return RISCV::F25_64; - case RISCV::F26_32: return RISCV::F26_64; - case RISCV::F27_32: return RISCV::F27_64; - case RISCV::F28_32: return RISCV::F28_64; - case RISCV::F29_32: return RISCV::F29_64; - case RISCV::F30_32: return RISCV::F30_64; - case RISCV::F31_32: return RISCV::F31_64; - } +static Register convertFPR64ToFPR32(Register Reg) { + assert(Reg >= RISCV::F0_D && Reg <= RISCV::F31_D && "Invalid register"); + return Reg - RISCV::F0_D + RISCV::F0_F; } unsigned RISCVAsmParser::validateTargetOperandClass(MCParsedAsmOperand &AsmOp, @@ -790,16 +753,16 @@ unsigned RISCVAsmParser::validateTargetOperandClass(MCParsedAsmOperand &AsmOp, return Match_InvalidOperand; Register Reg = Op.getReg(); - bool IsRegFPR32 = - RISCVMCRegisterClasses[RISCV::FPR32RegClassID].contains(Reg); - bool IsRegFPR32C = - RISCVMCRegisterClasses[RISCV::FPR32CRegClassID].contains(Reg); + bool IsRegFPR64 = + RISCVMCRegisterClasses[RISCV::FPR64RegClassID].contains(Reg); + bool IsRegFPR64C = + RISCVMCRegisterClasses[RISCV::FPR64CRegClassID].contains(Reg); // As the parser couldn't differentiate an FPR32 from an FPR64, coerce the - // register from FPR32 to FPR64 or FPR32C to FPR64C if necessary. - if ((IsRegFPR32 && Kind == MCK_FPR64) || - (IsRegFPR32C && Kind == MCK_FPR64C)) { - Op.Reg.RegNum = convertFPR32ToFPR64(Reg); + // register from FPR64 to FPR32 or FPR64C to FPR32C if necessary. + if ((IsRegFPR64 && Kind == MCK_FPR32) || + (IsRegFPR64C && Kind == MCK_FPR32C)) { + Op.Reg.RegNum = convertFPR64ToFPR32(Reg); return Match_Success; } return Match_InvalidOperand; @@ -986,6 +949,11 @@ bool RISCVAsmParser::MatchAndEmitInstruction(SMLoc IDLoc, unsigned &Opcode, static bool matchRegisterNameHelper(bool IsRV32E, Register &RegNo, StringRef Name) { RegNo = MatchRegisterName(Name); + // The 32- and 64-bit FPRs have the same asm name. Check that the initial + // match always matches the 64-bit variant, and not the 32-bit one. + assert(!(RegNo >= RISCV::F0_F && RegNo <= RISCV::F31_F)); + // The default FPR register class is based on the tablegen enum ordering. + static_assert(RISCV::F0_D < RISCV::F0_F, "FPR matching must be updated"); if (RegNo == RISCV::NoRegister) RegNo = MatchRegisterAltName(Name); if (IsRV32E && RegNo >= RISCV::X16 && RegNo <= RISCV::X31) |