Converted an overly aggressive assert to a conditional check in AddCombineTo64bitMLAL.

Said assert assumes that ADDC will always have a glue node as its second
argument and is checked before we even know that we are actually performing the
relevant MLAL optimization. This is incorrect since on ARM we *CAN* codegen ADDC
with a use list based second argument. Thus to have both effects, I converted
the assert to a conditional check which if it fails we do not perform the
optimization.

In terms of tests I can not produce an ADDC from the IR level until I get in my
multiprecision optimization patch which is forthcoming. The tests for said patch
would cause this assert to fail implying that said tests will provide the
relevant tests.

llvm-svn: 184230

1 files changed, 5 insertions, 2 deletions

diff --git a/llvm/lib/Target/ARM/ARMISelLowering.cpp b/llvm/lib/Target/ARM/ARMISelLowering.cpp
index ec0e9c2b54d..015b023dca1 100644
--- a/llvm/lib/Target/ARM/ARMISelLowering.cpp
+++ b/llvm/lib/Target/ARM/ARMISelLowering.cpp
@@ -7948,8 +7948,11 @@ static SDValue AddCombineTo64bitMLAL(SDNode *AddcNode,
 
   assert(AddcNode->getNumValues() == 2 &&
          AddcNode->getValueType(0) == MVT::i32 &&
-         AddcNode->getValueType(1) == MVT::Glue &&
-         "Expect ADDC with two result values: i32, glue");
+         "Expect ADDC with two result values. First: i32");
+
+  // Check that we have a glued ADDC node.
+  if (AddcNode->getValueType(1) != MVT::Glue)
+    return SDValue();
 
   // Check that the ADDC adds the low result of the S/UMUL_LOHI.
   if (AddcOp0->getOpcode() != ISD::UMUL_LOHI &&