summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/llvm/lib/CodeGen/MachineInstr.cpp
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorDavid L. Jones <dlj@google.com>2017-01-09 21:38:07 +0000
committerDavid L. Jones <dlj@google.com>2017-01-09 21:38:07 +0000
commitf55ce36c029dd68577743179884ed43d76697937 (patch)
tree8da157b6088c19aea80cc9162a38a781520a1c6f /llvm/lib/CodeGen/MachineInstr.cpp
parenta84ab073d968415eab0c44d6e695bd2072f4c027 (diff)
downloadbcm5719-llvm-f55ce36c029dd68577743179884ed43d76697937.tar.gz
bcm5719-llvm-f55ce36c029dd68577743179884ed43d76697937.zip
Allow constexpr construction of subobjects unconditionally, not just in C++14.
Summary: Per https://wg21.link/CWG1677, the C++11 standard did not clarify that constant initialization of an object allowed constexpr brace-or-equal initialization of subobjects: struct foo_t { union { int i; volatile int j; } u; }; __attribute__((__require_constant_initialization__)) static const foo_t x = {{0}}; Because foo_t::u has a volatile member, the initializer for x fails. However, there is really no good reason, because this: union foo_u { int i; volatile int j; }; __attribute__((__require_constant_initialization__)) static const foo_u x = {0}; does have a constant initializer. (This was triggered by musl's pthread_mutex_t type when building under C++11.) Reviewers: rsmith Subscribers: EricWF, cfe-commits Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D28427 llvm-svn: 291480
Diffstat (limited to 'llvm/lib/CodeGen/MachineInstr.cpp')
0 files changed, 0 insertions, 0 deletions
OpenPOWER on IntegriCloud