diff options
author | Bruno Cardoso Lopes <bruno.cardoso@gmail.com> | 2017-07-01 00:06:47 +0000 |
---|---|---|
committer | Bruno Cardoso Lopes <bruno.cardoso@gmail.com> | 2017-07-01 00:06:47 +0000 |
commit | df0ee34bc2523f11b907311670c776cb3de108c1 (patch) | |
tree | 1426e07d6db57ced9bfe03e6e1fe9b4f00e298c8 /clang/lib/AST/ASTStructuralEquivalence.cpp | |
parent | 057c82cf25a0c8bd4150eb715310b1d74a538aac (diff) | |
download | bcm5719-llvm-df0ee34bc2523f11b907311670c776cb3de108c1.tar.gz bcm5719-llvm-df0ee34bc2523f11b907311670c776cb3de108c1.zip |
[Modules] Implement ODR-like semantics for tag types in C/ObjC
Allow ODR for ObjC/C in the sense that we won't keep more that
one definition around (merge them). However, ensure the decl
pass the structural compatibility check in C11 6.2.7/1, for that,
reuse the structural equivalence checks used by the ASTImporter.
Few other considerations:
- Create error diagnostics for tag types mismatches and thread
them into the structural equivalence checks.
- Note that by doing this we only support redefinition between types
that are considered "compatible types" by C.
This is mixed approach of the suggestions discussed in
http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/cfe-dev/2017-March/053257.html
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31778
rdar://problem/31909368
llvm-svn: 306918
Diffstat (limited to 'clang/lib/AST/ASTStructuralEquivalence.cpp')
-rw-r--r-- | clang/lib/AST/ASTStructuralEquivalence.cpp | 58 |
1 files changed, 48 insertions, 10 deletions
diff --git a/clang/lib/AST/ASTStructuralEquivalence.cpp b/clang/lib/AST/ASTStructuralEquivalence.cpp index eff1aa5e323..ea7faab767e 100644 --- a/clang/lib/AST/ASTStructuralEquivalence.cpp +++ b/clang/lib/AST/ASTStructuralEquivalence.cpp @@ -735,13 +735,28 @@ static bool IsStructurallyEquivalent(StructuralEquivalenceContext &Context, // Check for equivalent field names. IdentifierInfo *Name1 = Field1->getIdentifier(); IdentifierInfo *Name2 = Field2->getIdentifier(); - if (!::IsStructurallyEquivalent(Name1, Name2)) + if (!::IsStructurallyEquivalent(Name1, Name2)) { + if (Context.Complain) { + Context.Diag2(Owner2->getLocation(), + Context.ErrorOnTagTypeMismatch + ? diag::err_odr_tag_type_inconsistent + : diag::warn_odr_tag_type_inconsistent) + << Context.ToCtx.getTypeDeclType(Owner2); + Context.Diag2(Field2->getLocation(), diag::note_odr_field_name) + << Field2->getDeclName(); + Context.Diag1(Field1->getLocation(), diag::note_odr_field_name) + << Field1->getDeclName(); + } return false; + } if (!IsStructurallyEquivalent(Context, Field1->getType(), Field2->getType())) { if (Context.Complain) { - Context.Diag2(Owner2->getLocation(), diag::warn_odr_tag_type_inconsistent) + Context.Diag2(Owner2->getLocation(), + Context.ErrorOnTagTypeMismatch + ? diag::err_odr_tag_type_inconsistent + : diag::warn_odr_tag_type_inconsistent) << Context.ToCtx.getTypeDeclType(Owner2); Context.Diag2(Field2->getLocation(), diag::note_odr_field) << Field2->getDeclName() << Field2->getType(); @@ -753,7 +768,10 @@ static bool IsStructurallyEquivalent(StructuralEquivalenceContext &Context, if (Field1->isBitField() != Field2->isBitField()) { if (Context.Complain) { - Context.Diag2(Owner2->getLocation(), diag::warn_odr_tag_type_inconsistent) + Context.Diag2(Owner2->getLocation(), + Context.ErrorOnTagTypeMismatch + ? diag::err_odr_tag_type_inconsistent + : diag::warn_odr_tag_type_inconsistent) << Context.ToCtx.getTypeDeclType(Owner2); if (Field1->isBitField()) { Context.Diag1(Field1->getLocation(), diag::note_odr_bit_field) @@ -780,7 +798,9 @@ static bool IsStructurallyEquivalent(StructuralEquivalenceContext &Context, if (Bits1 != Bits2) { if (Context.Complain) { Context.Diag2(Owner2->getLocation(), - diag::warn_odr_tag_type_inconsistent) + Context.ErrorOnTagTypeMismatch + ? diag::err_odr_tag_type_inconsistent + : diag::warn_odr_tag_type_inconsistent) << Context.ToCtx.getTypeDeclType(Owner2); Context.Diag2(Field2->getLocation(), diag::note_odr_bit_field) << Field2->getDeclName() << Field2->getType() << Bits2; @@ -799,7 +819,10 @@ static bool IsStructurallyEquivalent(StructuralEquivalenceContext &Context, RecordDecl *D1, RecordDecl *D2) { if (D1->isUnion() != D2->isUnion()) { if (Context.Complain) { - Context.Diag2(D2->getLocation(), diag::warn_odr_tag_type_inconsistent) + Context.Diag2(D2->getLocation(), + Context.ErrorOnTagTypeMismatch + ? diag::err_odr_tag_type_inconsistent + : diag::warn_odr_tag_type_inconsistent) << Context.ToCtx.getTypeDeclType(D2); Context.Diag1(D1->getLocation(), diag::note_odr_tag_kind_here) << D1->getDeclName() << (unsigned)D1->getTagKind(); @@ -927,7 +950,10 @@ static bool IsStructurallyEquivalent(StructuralEquivalenceContext &Context, Field1 != Field1End; ++Field1, ++Field2) { if (Field2 == Field2End) { if (Context.Complain) { - Context.Diag2(D2->getLocation(), diag::warn_odr_tag_type_inconsistent) + Context.Diag2(D2->getLocation(), + Context.ErrorOnTagTypeMismatch + ? diag::err_odr_tag_type_inconsistent + : diag::warn_odr_tag_type_inconsistent) << Context.ToCtx.getTypeDeclType(D2); Context.Diag1(Field1->getLocation(), diag::note_odr_field) << Field1->getDeclName() << Field1->getType(); @@ -942,7 +968,10 @@ static bool IsStructurallyEquivalent(StructuralEquivalenceContext &Context, if (Field2 != Field2End) { if (Context.Complain) { - Context.Diag2(D2->getLocation(), diag::warn_odr_tag_type_inconsistent) + Context.Diag2(D2->getLocation(), + Context.ErrorOnTagTypeMismatch + ? diag::err_odr_tag_type_inconsistent + : diag::warn_odr_tag_type_inconsistent) << Context.ToCtx.getTypeDeclType(D2); Context.Diag2(Field2->getLocation(), diag::note_odr_field) << Field2->getDeclName() << Field2->getType(); @@ -964,7 +993,10 @@ static bool IsStructurallyEquivalent(StructuralEquivalenceContext &Context, EC1 != EC1End; ++EC1, ++EC2) { if (EC2 == EC2End) { if (Context.Complain) { - Context.Diag2(D2->getLocation(), diag::warn_odr_tag_type_inconsistent) + Context.Diag2(D2->getLocation(), + Context.ErrorOnTagTypeMismatch + ? diag::err_odr_tag_type_inconsistent + : diag::warn_odr_tag_type_inconsistent) << Context.ToCtx.getTypeDeclType(D2); Context.Diag1(EC1->getLocation(), diag::note_odr_enumerator) << EC1->getDeclName() << EC1->getInitVal().toString(10); @@ -978,7 +1010,10 @@ static bool IsStructurallyEquivalent(StructuralEquivalenceContext &Context, if (!llvm::APSInt::isSameValue(Val1, Val2) || !IsStructurallyEquivalent(EC1->getIdentifier(), EC2->getIdentifier())) { if (Context.Complain) { - Context.Diag2(D2->getLocation(), diag::warn_odr_tag_type_inconsistent) + Context.Diag2(D2->getLocation(), + Context.ErrorOnTagTypeMismatch + ? diag::err_odr_tag_type_inconsistent + : diag::warn_odr_tag_type_inconsistent) << Context.ToCtx.getTypeDeclType(D2); Context.Diag2(EC2->getLocation(), diag::note_odr_enumerator) << EC2->getDeclName() << EC2->getInitVal().toString(10); @@ -991,7 +1026,10 @@ static bool IsStructurallyEquivalent(StructuralEquivalenceContext &Context, if (EC2 != EC2End) { if (Context.Complain) { - Context.Diag2(D2->getLocation(), diag::warn_odr_tag_type_inconsistent) + Context.Diag2(D2->getLocation(), + Context.ErrorOnTagTypeMismatch + ? diag::err_odr_tag_type_inconsistent + : diag::warn_odr_tag_type_inconsistent) << Context.ToCtx.getTypeDeclType(D2); Context.Diag2(EC2->getLocation(), diag::note_odr_enumerator) << EC2->getDeclName() << EC2->getInitVal().toString(10); |