diff options
| author | Bruno Cardoso Lopes <bruno.cardoso@gmail.com> | 2017-07-01 00:06:47 +0000 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Bruno Cardoso Lopes <bruno.cardoso@gmail.com> | 2017-07-01 00:06:47 +0000 |
| commit | df0ee34bc2523f11b907311670c776cb3de108c1 (patch) | |
| tree | 1426e07d6db57ced9bfe03e6e1fe9b4f00e298c8 /clang/lib | |
| parent | 057c82cf25a0c8bd4150eb715310b1d74a538aac (diff) | |
| download | bcm5719-llvm-df0ee34bc2523f11b907311670c776cb3de108c1.tar.gz bcm5719-llvm-df0ee34bc2523f11b907311670c776cb3de108c1.zip | |
[Modules] Implement ODR-like semantics for tag types in C/ObjC
Allow ODR for ObjC/C in the sense that we won't keep more that
one definition around (merge them). However, ensure the decl
pass the structural compatibility check in C11 6.2.7/1, for that,
reuse the structural equivalence checks used by the ASTImporter.
Few other considerations:
- Create error diagnostics for tag types mismatches and thread
them into the structural equivalence checks.
- Note that by doing this we only support redefinition between types
that are considered "compatible types" by C.
This is mixed approach of the suggestions discussed in
http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/cfe-dev/2017-March/053257.html
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31778
rdar://problem/31909368
llvm-svn: 306918
Diffstat (limited to 'clang/lib')
| -rw-r--r-- | clang/lib/AST/ASTStructuralEquivalence.cpp | 58 | ||||
| -rw-r--r-- | clang/lib/Parse/ParseDecl.cpp | 19 | ||||
| -rw-r--r-- | clang/lib/Parse/ParseDeclCXX.cpp | 14 | ||||
| -rw-r--r-- | clang/lib/Sema/SemaDecl.cpp | 83 | ||||
| -rw-r--r-- | clang/lib/Sema/SemaType.cpp | 15 |
5 files changed, 164 insertions, 25 deletions
diff --git a/clang/lib/AST/ASTStructuralEquivalence.cpp b/clang/lib/AST/ASTStructuralEquivalence.cpp index eff1aa5e323..ea7faab767e 100644 --- a/clang/lib/AST/ASTStructuralEquivalence.cpp +++ b/clang/lib/AST/ASTStructuralEquivalence.cpp @@ -735,13 +735,28 @@ static bool IsStructurallyEquivalent(StructuralEquivalenceContext &Context, // Check for equivalent field names. IdentifierInfo *Name1 = Field1->getIdentifier(); IdentifierInfo *Name2 = Field2->getIdentifier(); - if (!::IsStructurallyEquivalent(Name1, Name2)) + if (!::IsStructurallyEquivalent(Name1, Name2)) { + if (Context.Complain) { + Context.Diag2(Owner2->getLocation(), + Context.ErrorOnTagTypeMismatch + ? diag::err_odr_tag_type_inconsistent + : diag::warn_odr_tag_type_inconsistent) + << Context.ToCtx.getTypeDeclType(Owner2); + Context.Diag2(Field2->getLocation(), diag::note_odr_field_name) + << Field2->getDeclName(); + Context.Diag1(Field1->getLocation(), diag::note_odr_field_name) + << Field1->getDeclName(); + } return false; + } if (!IsStructurallyEquivalent(Context, Field1->getType(), Field2->getType())) { if (Context.Complain) { - Context.Diag2(Owner2->getLocation(), diag::warn_odr_tag_type_inconsistent) + Context.Diag2(Owner2->getLocation(), + Context.ErrorOnTagTypeMismatch + ? diag::err_odr_tag_type_inconsistent + : diag::warn_odr_tag_type_inconsistent) << Context.ToCtx.getTypeDeclType(Owner2); Context.Diag2(Field2->getLocation(), diag::note_odr_field) << Field2->getDeclName() << Field2->getType(); @@ -753,7 +768,10 @@ static bool IsStructurallyEquivalent(StructuralEquivalenceContext &Context, if (Field1->isBitField() != Field2->isBitField()) { if (Context.Complain) { - Context.Diag2(Owner2->getLocation(), diag::warn_odr_tag_type_inconsistent) + Context.Diag2(Owner2->getLocation(), + Context.ErrorOnTagTypeMismatch + ? diag::err_odr_tag_type_inconsistent + : diag::warn_odr_tag_type_inconsistent) << Context.ToCtx.getTypeDeclType(Owner2); if (Field1->isBitField()) { Context.Diag1(Field1->getLocation(), diag::note_odr_bit_field) @@ -780,7 +798,9 @@ static bool IsStructurallyEquivalent(StructuralEquivalenceContext &Context, if (Bits1 != Bits2) { if (Context.Complain) { Context.Diag2(Owner2->getLocation(), - diag::warn_odr_tag_type_inconsistent) + Context.ErrorOnTagTypeMismatch + ? diag::err_odr_tag_type_inconsistent + : diag::warn_odr_tag_type_inconsistent) << Context.ToCtx.getTypeDeclType(Owner2); Context.Diag2(Field2->getLocation(), diag::note_odr_bit_field) << Field2->getDeclName() << Field2->getType() << Bits2; @@ -799,7 +819,10 @@ static bool IsStructurallyEquivalent(StructuralEquivalenceContext &Context, RecordDecl *D1, RecordDecl *D2) { if (D1->isUnion() != D2->isUnion()) { if (Context.Complain) { - Context.Diag2(D2->getLocation(), diag::warn_odr_tag_type_inconsistent) + Context.Diag2(D2->getLocation(), + Context.ErrorOnTagTypeMismatch + ? diag::err_odr_tag_type_inconsistent + : diag::warn_odr_tag_type_inconsistent) << Context.ToCtx.getTypeDeclType(D2); Context.Diag1(D1->getLocation(), diag::note_odr_tag_kind_here) << D1->getDeclName() << (unsigned)D1->getTagKind(); @@ -927,7 +950,10 @@ static bool IsStructurallyEquivalent(StructuralEquivalenceContext &Context, Field1 != Field1End; ++Field1, ++Field2) { if (Field2 == Field2End) { if (Context.Complain) { - Context.Diag2(D2->getLocation(), diag::warn_odr_tag_type_inconsistent) + Context.Diag2(D2->getLocation(), + Context.ErrorOnTagTypeMismatch + ? diag::err_odr_tag_type_inconsistent + : diag::warn_odr_tag_type_inconsistent) << Context.ToCtx.getTypeDeclType(D2); Context.Diag1(Field1->getLocation(), diag::note_odr_field) << Field1->getDeclName() << Field1->getType(); @@ -942,7 +968,10 @@ static bool IsStructurallyEquivalent(StructuralEquivalenceContext &Context, if (Field2 != Field2End) { if (Context.Complain) { - Context.Diag2(D2->getLocation(), diag::warn_odr_tag_type_inconsistent) + Context.Diag2(D2->getLocation(), + Context.ErrorOnTagTypeMismatch + ? diag::err_odr_tag_type_inconsistent + : diag::warn_odr_tag_type_inconsistent) << Context.ToCtx.getTypeDeclType(D2); Context.Diag2(Field2->getLocation(), diag::note_odr_field) << Field2->getDeclName() << Field2->getType(); @@ -964,7 +993,10 @@ static bool IsStructurallyEquivalent(StructuralEquivalenceContext &Context, EC1 != EC1End; ++EC1, ++EC2) { if (EC2 == EC2End) { if (Context.Complain) { - Context.Diag2(D2->getLocation(), diag::warn_odr_tag_type_inconsistent) + Context.Diag2(D2->getLocation(), + Context.ErrorOnTagTypeMismatch + ? diag::err_odr_tag_type_inconsistent + : diag::warn_odr_tag_type_inconsistent) << Context.ToCtx.getTypeDeclType(D2); Context.Diag1(EC1->getLocation(), diag::note_odr_enumerator) << EC1->getDeclName() << EC1->getInitVal().toString(10); @@ -978,7 +1010,10 @@ static bool IsStructurallyEquivalent(StructuralEquivalenceContext &Context, if (!llvm::APSInt::isSameValue(Val1, Val2) || !IsStructurallyEquivalent(EC1->getIdentifier(), EC2->getIdentifier())) { if (Context.Complain) { - Context.Diag2(D2->getLocation(), diag::warn_odr_tag_type_inconsistent) + Context.Diag2(D2->getLocation(), + Context.ErrorOnTagTypeMismatch + ? diag::err_odr_tag_type_inconsistent + : diag::warn_odr_tag_type_inconsistent) << Context.ToCtx.getTypeDeclType(D2); Context.Diag2(EC2->getLocation(), diag::note_odr_enumerator) << EC2->getDeclName() << EC2->getInitVal().toString(10); @@ -991,7 +1026,10 @@ static bool IsStructurallyEquivalent(StructuralEquivalenceContext &Context, if (EC2 != EC2End) { if (Context.Complain) { - Context.Diag2(D2->getLocation(), diag::warn_odr_tag_type_inconsistent) + Context.Diag2(D2->getLocation(), + Context.ErrorOnTagTypeMismatch + ? diag::err_odr_tag_type_inconsistent + : diag::warn_odr_tag_type_inconsistent) << Context.ToCtx.getTypeDeclType(D2); Context.Diag2(EC2->getLocation(), diag::note_odr_enumerator) << EC2->getDeclName() << EC2->getInitVal().toString(10); diff --git a/clang/lib/Parse/ParseDecl.cpp b/clang/lib/Parse/ParseDecl.cpp index 06a9d70144d..07054546f42 100644 --- a/clang/lib/Parse/ParseDecl.cpp +++ b/clang/lib/Parse/ParseDecl.cpp @@ -4319,8 +4319,15 @@ void Parser::ParseEnumSpecifier(SourceLocation StartLoc, DeclSpec &DS, return; } - if (Tok.is(tok::l_brace) && TUK != Sema::TUK_Reference) - ParseEnumBody(StartLoc, TagDecl); + if (Tok.is(tok::l_brace) && TUK != Sema::TUK_Reference) { + Decl *D = SkipBody.CheckSameAsPrevious ? SkipBody.New : TagDecl; + ParseEnumBody(StartLoc, D); + if (SkipBody.CheckSameAsPrevious && + !Actions.ActOnDuplicateDefinition(DS, TagDecl, SkipBody)) { + DS.SetTypeSpecError(); + return; + } + } if (DS.SetTypeSpecType(DeclSpec::TST_enum, StartLoc, NameLoc.isValid() ? NameLoc : StartLoc, @@ -4392,11 +4399,9 @@ void Parser::ParseEnumBody(SourceLocation StartLoc, Decl *EnumDecl) { } // Install the enumerator constant into EnumDecl. - Decl *EnumConstDecl = Actions.ActOnEnumConstant(getCurScope(), EnumDecl, - LastEnumConstDecl, - IdentLoc, Ident, - attrs.getList(), EqualLoc, - AssignedVal.get()); + Decl *EnumConstDecl = Actions.ActOnEnumConstant( + getCurScope(), EnumDecl, LastEnumConstDecl, IdentLoc, Ident, + attrs.getList(), EqualLoc, AssignedVal.get()); EnumAvailabilityDiags.back().done(); EnumConstantDecls.push_back(EnumConstDecl); diff --git a/clang/lib/Parse/ParseDeclCXX.cpp b/clang/lib/Parse/ParseDeclCXX.cpp index b1a84e7ab94..2301284b7f4 100644 --- a/clang/lib/Parse/ParseDeclCXX.cpp +++ b/clang/lib/Parse/ParseDeclCXX.cpp @@ -1910,8 +1910,18 @@ void Parser::ParseClassSpecifier(tok::TokenKind TagTokKind, else if (getLangOpts().CPlusPlus) ParseCXXMemberSpecification(StartLoc, AttrFixitLoc, attrs, TagType, TagOrTempResult.get()); - else - ParseStructUnionBody(StartLoc, TagType, TagOrTempResult.get()); + else { + Decl *D = + SkipBody.CheckSameAsPrevious ? SkipBody.New : TagOrTempResult.get(); + // Parse the definition body. + ParseStructUnionBody(StartLoc, TagType, D); + if (SkipBody.CheckSameAsPrevious && + !Actions.ActOnDuplicateDefinition(DS, TagOrTempResult.get(), + SkipBody)) { + DS.SetTypeSpecError(); + return; + } + } } if (!TagOrTempResult.isInvalid()) diff --git a/clang/lib/Sema/SemaDecl.cpp b/clang/lib/Sema/SemaDecl.cpp index fd172def2df..59bfa49066c 100644 --- a/clang/lib/Sema/SemaDecl.cpp +++ b/clang/lib/Sema/SemaDecl.cpp @@ -13233,6 +13233,55 @@ Decl *Sema::ActOnTag(Scope *S, unsigned TagSpec, TagUseKind TUK, if (TUK == TUK_Friend || TUK == TUK_Reference) Redecl = NotForRedeclaration; + /// Create a new tag decl in C/ObjC. Since the ODR-like semantics for ObjC/C + /// implemented asks for structural equivalence checking, the returned decl + /// here is passed back to the parser, allowing the tag body to be parsed. + auto createTagFromNewDecl = [&]() -> TagDecl * { + assert(!getLangOpts().CPlusPlus && "not meant for C++ usage"); + // If there is an identifier, use the location of the identifier as the + // location of the decl, otherwise use the location of the struct/union + // keyword. + SourceLocation Loc = NameLoc.isValid() ? NameLoc : KWLoc; + TagDecl *New = nullptr; + + if (Kind == TTK_Enum) { + New = EnumDecl::Create(Context, SearchDC, KWLoc, Loc, Name, nullptr, + ScopedEnum, ScopedEnumUsesClassTag, + !EnumUnderlying.isNull()); + // If this is an undefined enum, bail. + if (TUK != TUK_Definition && !Invalid) + return nullptr; + if (EnumUnderlying) { + EnumDecl *ED = cast<EnumDecl>(New); + if (TypeSourceInfo *TI = EnumUnderlying.dyn_cast<TypeSourceInfo *>()) + ED->setIntegerTypeSourceInfo(TI); + else + ED->setIntegerType(QualType(EnumUnderlying.get<const Type *>(), 0)); + ED->setPromotionType(ED->getIntegerType()); + } + } else { // struct/union + New = RecordDecl::Create(Context, Kind, SearchDC, KWLoc, Loc, Name, + nullptr); + } + + if (RecordDecl *RD = dyn_cast<RecordDecl>(New)) { + // Add alignment attributes if necessary; these attributes are checked + // when the ASTContext lays out the structure. + // + // It is important for implementing the correct semantics that this + // happen here (in ActOnTag). The #pragma pack stack is + // maintained as a result of parser callbacks which can occur at + // many points during the parsing of a struct declaration (because + // the #pragma tokens are effectively skipped over during the + // parsing of the struct). + if (TUK == TUK_Definition) { + AddAlignmentAttributesForRecord(RD); + AddMsStructLayoutForRecord(RD); + } + } + return New; + }; + LookupResult Previous(*this, Name, NameLoc, LookupTagName, Redecl); if (Name && SS.isNotEmpty()) { // We have a nested-name tag ('struct foo::bar'). @@ -13638,16 +13687,28 @@ Decl *Sema::ActOnTag(Scope *S, unsigned TagSpec, TagUseKind TUK, TSK_ExplicitSpecialization; } + // Note that clang allows ODR-like semantics for ObjC/C, i.e., do + // not keep more that one definition around (merge them). However, + // ensure the decl passes the structural compatibility check in + // C11 6.2.7/1 (or 6.1.2.6/1 in C89). NamedDecl *Hidden = nullptr; - if (SkipBody && getLangOpts().CPlusPlus && - !hasVisibleDefinition(Def, &Hidden)) { + if (SkipBody && !hasVisibleDefinition(Def, &Hidden)) { // There is a definition of this tag, but it is not visible. We // explicitly make use of C++'s one definition rule here, and // assume that this definition is identical to the hidden one // we already have. Make the existing definition visible and // use it in place of this one. - SkipBody->ShouldSkip = true; - makeMergedDefinitionVisible(Hidden); + if (!getLangOpts().CPlusPlus) { + // Postpone making the old definition visible until after we + // complete parsing the new one and do the structural + // comparison. + SkipBody->CheckSameAsPrevious = true; + SkipBody->New = createTagFromNewDecl(); + SkipBody->Previous = Hidden; + } else { + SkipBody->ShouldSkip = true; + makeMergedDefinitionVisible(Hidden); + } return Def; } else if (!IsExplicitSpecializationAfterInstantiation) { // A redeclaration in function prototype scope in C isn't @@ -13875,7 +13936,7 @@ CreateNewDecl: // the ASTContext lays out the structure. // // It is important for implementing the correct semantics that this - // happen here (in act on tag decl). The #pragma pack stack is + // happen here (in ActOnTag). The #pragma pack stack is // maintained as a result of parser callbacks which can occur at // many points during the parsing of a struct declaration (because // the #pragma tokens are effectively skipped over during the @@ -14011,6 +14072,16 @@ void Sema::ActOnTagStartDefinition(Scope *S, Decl *TagD) { AddPushedVisibilityAttribute(Tag); } +bool Sema::ActOnDuplicateDefinition(DeclSpec &DS, Decl *Prev, + SkipBodyInfo &SkipBody) { + if (!hasStructuralCompatLayout(Prev, SkipBody.New)) + return false; + + // Make the previous decl visible. + makeMergedDefinitionVisible(SkipBody.Previous); + return true; +} + Decl *Sema::ActOnObjCContainerStartDefinition(Decl *IDecl) { assert(isa<ObjCContainerDecl>(IDecl) && "ActOnObjCContainerStartDefinition - Not ObjCContainerDecl"); @@ -15432,7 +15503,7 @@ Decl *Sema::ActOnEnumConstant(Scope *S, Decl *theEnumDecl, Decl *lastEnumConst, // different from T: // - every enumerator of every member of class T that is an unscoped // enumerated type - if (!TheEnumDecl->isScoped()) + if (getLangOpts().CPlusPlus && !TheEnumDecl->isScoped()) DiagnoseClassNameShadow(TheEnumDecl->getDeclContext(), DeclarationNameInfo(Id, IdLoc)); diff --git a/clang/lib/Sema/SemaType.cpp b/clang/lib/Sema/SemaType.cpp index 8c8402e75e3..b19dcb2a509 100644 --- a/clang/lib/Sema/SemaType.cpp +++ b/clang/lib/Sema/SemaType.cpp @@ -15,6 +15,7 @@ #include "clang/AST/ASTConsumer.h" #include "clang/AST/ASTContext.h" #include "clang/AST/ASTMutationListener.h" +#include "clang/AST/ASTStructuralEquivalence.h" #include "clang/AST/CXXInheritance.h" #include "clang/AST/DeclObjC.h" #include "clang/AST/DeclTemplate.h" @@ -7111,6 +7112,20 @@ bool Sema::RequireCompleteType(SourceLocation Loc, QualType T, return false; } +bool Sema::hasStructuralCompatLayout(Decl *D, Decl *Suggested) { + llvm::DenseSet<std::pair<Decl *, Decl *>> NonEquivalentDecls; + if (!Suggested) + return false; + + // FIXME: Add a specific mode for C11 6.2.7/1 in StructuralEquivalenceContext + // and isolate from other C++ specific checks. + StructuralEquivalenceContext Ctx( + D->getASTContext(), Suggested->getASTContext(), NonEquivalentDecls, + false /*StrictTypeSpelling*/, true /*Complain*/, + true /*ErrorOnTagTypeMismatch*/); + return Ctx.IsStructurallyEquivalent(D, Suggested); +} + /// \brief Determine whether there is any declaration of \p D that was ever a /// definition (perhaps before module merging) and is currently visible. /// \param D The definition of the entity. |

