summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorDouglas Gregor <dgregor@apple.com>2010-04-09 21:02:29 +0000
committerDouglas Gregor <dgregor@apple.com>2010-04-09 21:02:29 +0000
commit06aa50417d79b0bf1e9bf90dbf2e2168436f79a9 (patch)
tree93f65c5f57e3acd5949f1eb0092173d816ad3b8b
parent4e8bd580016762cde37efc415044e56f5dc332e8 (diff)
downloadbcm5719-llvm-06aa50417d79b0bf1e9bf90dbf2e2168436f79a9.tar.gz
bcm5719-llvm-06aa50417d79b0bf1e9bf90dbf2e2168436f79a9.zip
Only complain about explicit instantiations following explicit
specializations when the explicit instantiation was... explicitly written, i.e., not the product of an explicit instantiation of an enclosing class. Fixes this spurious warning when Clang builds LLVM: /Volumes/Data/dgregor/Projects/llvm/lib/CodeGen/MachineDominators.cpp:22:1: warning: explicit instantiation of 'addRoot' that occurs after an explicit specialization will be ignored (C++0x extension) [-pedantic] llvm-svn: 100900
-rw-r--r--clang/lib/Sema/SemaTemplate.cpp3
-rw-r--r--clang/lib/Sema/SemaTemplateInstantiate.cpp13
-rw-r--r--clang/test/CXX/temp/temp.spec/temp.explicit/p4.cpp22
3 files changed, 26 insertions, 12 deletions
diff --git a/clang/lib/Sema/SemaTemplate.cpp b/clang/lib/Sema/SemaTemplate.cpp
index 7fc0cf85e3a..285495a41b0 100644
--- a/clang/lib/Sema/SemaTemplate.cpp
+++ b/clang/lib/Sema/SemaTemplate.cpp
@@ -4047,7 +4047,7 @@ Sema::CheckSpecializationInstantiationRedecl(SourceLocation NewLoc,
// instantiation has no effect.
//
// In C++98/03 mode, we only give an extension warning here, because it
- // is not not harmful to try to explicitly instantiate something that
+ // is not harmful to try to explicitly instantiate something that
// has been explicitly specialized.
if (!getLangOptions().CPlusPlus0x) {
Diag(NewLoc, diag::ext_explicit_instantiation_after_specialization)
@@ -4204,6 +4204,7 @@ Sema::CheckFunctionTemplateSpecialization(FunctionDecl *FD,
// Ignore access information; it doesn't figure into redeclaration checking.
FunctionDecl *Specialization = cast<FunctionDecl>(*Result);
+ Specialization->setLocation(FD->getLocation());
// FIXME: Check if the prior specialization has a point of instantiation.
// If so, we have run afoul of .
diff --git a/clang/lib/Sema/SemaTemplateInstantiate.cpp b/clang/lib/Sema/SemaTemplateInstantiate.cpp
index 6895364abf3..a24d00f5950 100644
--- a/clang/lib/Sema/SemaTemplateInstantiate.cpp
+++ b/clang/lib/Sema/SemaTemplateInstantiate.cpp
@@ -1381,6 +1381,10 @@ Sema::InstantiateClassMembers(SourceLocation PointOfInstantiation,
MemberSpecializationInfo *MSInfo
= Function->getMemberSpecializationInfo();
assert(MSInfo && "No member specialization information?");
+ if (MSInfo->getTemplateSpecializationKind()
+ == TSK_ExplicitSpecialization)
+ continue;
+
if (CheckSpecializationInstantiationRedecl(PointOfInstantiation, TSK,
Function,
MSInfo->getTemplateSpecializationKind(),
@@ -1413,6 +1417,10 @@ Sema::InstantiateClassMembers(SourceLocation PointOfInstantiation,
if (Var->isStaticDataMember()) {
MemberSpecializationInfo *MSInfo = Var->getMemberSpecializationInfo();
assert(MSInfo && "No member specialization information?");
+ if (MSInfo->getTemplateSpecializationKind()
+ == TSK_ExplicitSpecialization)
+ continue;
+
if (CheckSpecializationInstantiationRedecl(PointOfInstantiation, TSK,
Var,
MSInfo->getTemplateSpecializationKind(),
@@ -1444,6 +1452,11 @@ Sema::InstantiateClassMembers(SourceLocation PointOfInstantiation,
MemberSpecializationInfo *MSInfo = Record->getMemberSpecializationInfo();
assert(MSInfo && "No member specialization information?");
+
+ if (MSInfo->getTemplateSpecializationKind()
+ == TSK_ExplicitSpecialization)
+ continue;
+
if (CheckSpecializationInstantiationRedecl(PointOfInstantiation, TSK,
Record,
MSInfo->getTemplateSpecializationKind(),
diff --git a/clang/test/CXX/temp/temp.spec/temp.explicit/p4.cpp b/clang/test/CXX/temp/temp.spec/temp.explicit/p4.cpp
index 2b852136f30..d3043741151 100644
--- a/clang/test/CXX/temp/temp.spec/temp.explicit/p4.cpp
+++ b/clang/test/CXX/temp/temp.spec/temp.explicit/p4.cpp
@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
-// RUN: %clang_cc1 -fsyntax-only -verify %s
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -fsyntax-only -verify -pedantic %s
template<typename T> void f0(T); // expected-note{{here}}
template void f0(int); // expected-error{{explicit instantiation of undefined function template}}
@@ -16,20 +16,20 @@ template void X0<int>::f1(); // expected-error{{explicit instantiation of undefi
template int X0<int>::value; // expected-error{{explicit instantiation of undefined static data member}}
-template<> void f0(long);
-template void f0(long); // okay
+template<> void f0(long); // expected-note{{previous template specialization is here}}
+template void f0(long); // expected-warning{{explicit instantiation of 'f0<long>' that occurs after an explicit specialization will be ignored}}
-template<> void X0<long>::f1();
-template void X0<long>::f1();
+template<> void X0<long>::f1(); // expected-note{{previous template specialization is here}}
+template void X0<long>::f1(); // expected-warning{{explicit instantiation of 'f1' that occurs after an explicit specialization will be ignored}}
-template<> struct X0<long>::Inner;
-template struct X0<long>::Inner;
+template<> struct X0<long>::Inner; // expected-note{{previous template specialization is here}}
+template struct X0<long>::Inner; // expected-warning{{explicit instantiation of 'Inner' that occurs after an explicit specialization will be ignored}}
-template<> long X0<long>::value;
-template long X0<long>::value;
+template<> long X0<long>::value; // expected-note{{previous template specialization is here}}
+template long X0<long>::value; // expected-warning{{explicit instantiation of 'value' that occurs after an explicit specialization will be ignored}}
-template<> struct X0<double>;
-template struct X0<double>;
+template<> struct X0<double>; // expected-note{{previous template specialization is here}}
+template struct X0<double>; // expected-warning{{explicit instantiation of 'X0<double>' that occurs after an explicit specialization will be ignored}}
// PR 6458
namespace test0 {
OpenPOWER on IntegriCloud