reset upstream subtrees to yocto 2.6

Reset the following subtrees on thud HEAD:

  poky: 87e3a9739d
  meta-openembedded: 6094ae18c8
  meta-security: 31dc4e7532
  meta-raspberrypi: a48743dc36
  meta-xilinx: c42016e2e6

Also re-apply backports that didn't make it into thud:
  poky:
    17726d0 systemd-systemctl-native: handle Install wildcards

  meta-openembedded:
    4321a5d libtinyxml2: update to 7.0.1
    042f0a3 libcereal: Add native and nativesdk classes
    e23284f libcereal: Allow empty package
    030e8d4 rsyslog: curl-less build with fmhttp PACKAGECONFIG
    179a1b9 gtest: update to 1.8.1

Squashed OpenBMC subtree compatibility updates:
  meta-aspeed:
    Brad Bishop (1):
          aspeed: add yocto 2.6 compatibility

  meta-ibm:
    Brad Bishop (1):
          ibm: prepare for yocto 2.6

  meta-ingrasys:
    Brad Bishop (1):
          ingrasys: set layer compatibility to yocto 2.6

  meta-openpower:
    Brad Bishop (1):
          openpower: set layer compatibility to yocto 2.6

  meta-phosphor:
    Brad Bishop (3):
          phosphor: set layer compatibility to thud
          phosphor: libgpg-error: drop patches
          phosphor: react to fitimage artifact rename

    Ed Tanous (4):
          Dropbear: upgrade options for latest upgrade
          yocto2.6: update openssl options
          busybox: remove upstream watchdog patch
          systemd: Rebase CONFIG_CGROUP_BPF patch

Change-Id: I7b1fe71cca880d0372a82d94b5fd785323e3a9e7
Signed-off-by: Brad Bishop <bradleyb@fuzziesquirrel.com>

1 files changed, 0 insertions, 99 deletions

diff --git a/poky/meta/recipes-core/systemd/systemd/0023-don-t-pass-AT_SYMLINK_NOFOLLOW-flag-to-faccessat.patch b/poky/meta/recipes-core/systemd/systemd/0023-don-t-pass-AT_SYMLINK_NOFOLLOW-flag-to-faccessat.patch
deleted file mode 100644
index 09c2b5c10..000000000
--- a/poky/meta/recipes-core/systemd/systemd/0023-don-t-pass-AT_SYMLINK_NOFOLLOW-flag-to-faccessat.patch
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,99 +0,0 @@
-From 7b802ada1207ed00ed3867b9804dd0f316641b9b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
-From: Andre McCurdy <armccurdy@gmail.com>
-Date: Tue, 10 Oct 2017 14:33:30 -0700
-Subject: [PATCH 23/31] don't pass AT_SYMLINK_NOFOLLOW flag to faccessat()
-
-Avoid using AT_SYMLINK_NOFOLLOW flag. It doesn't seem like the right
-thing to do and it's not portable (not supported by musl). See:
-
-  http://lists.landley.net/pipermail/toybox-landley.net/2014-September/003610.html
-  http://www.openwall.com/lists/musl/2015/02/05/2
-
-Note that laccess() is never passing AT_EACCESS so a lot of the
-discussion in the links above doesn't apply. Note also that
-(currently) all systemd callers of laccess() pass mode as F_OK, so
-only check for existence of a file, not access permissions.
-Therefore, in this case, the only distiction between faccessat()
-with (flag == 0) and (flag == AT_SYMLINK_NOFOLLOW) is the behaviour
-for broken symlinks; laccess() on a broken symlink will succeed with
-(flag == AT_SYMLINK_NOFOLLOW) and fail (flag == 0).
-
-The laccess() macros was added to systemd some time ago and it's not
-clear if or why it needs to return success for broken symlinks. Maybe
-just historical and not actually necessary or desired behaviour?
-
-Upstream-Status: Pending
-
-Signed-off-by: Andre McCurdy <armccurdy@gmail.com>
----
- src/basic/fs-util.h          | 22 +++++++++++++++++++++-
- src/shared/base-filesystem.c |  6 +++---
- 2 files changed, 24 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
-
-diff --git a/src/basic/fs-util.h b/src/basic/fs-util.h
-index 4dba1ea56..9c4b02ecc 100644
---- a/src/basic/fs-util.h
-+++ b/src/basic/fs-util.h
-@@ -50,7 +50,27 @@ int fchmod_umask(int fd, mode_t mode);
- 
- int fd_warn_permissions(const char *path, int fd);
- 
--#define laccess(path, mode) faccessat(AT_FDCWD, (path), (mode), AT_SYMLINK_NOFOLLOW)
-+/*
-+   Avoid using AT_SYMLINK_NOFOLLOW flag. It doesn't seem like the right thing to
-+   do and it's not portable (not supported by musl). See:
-+
-+     http://lists.landley.net/pipermail/toybox-landley.net/2014-September/003610.html
-+     http://www.openwall.com/lists/musl/2015/02/05/2
-+
-+   Note that laccess() is never passing AT_EACCESS so a lot of the discussion in
-+   the links above doesn't apply. Note also that (currently) all systemd callers
-+   of laccess() pass mode as F_OK, so only check for existence of a file, not
-+   access permissions. Therefore, in this case, the only distiction between
-+   faccessat() with (flag == 0) and (flag == AT_SYMLINK_NOFOLLOW) is the
-+   behaviour for broken symlinks; laccess() on a broken symlink will succeed
-+   with (flag == AT_SYMLINK_NOFOLLOW) and fail (flag == 0).
-+
-+   The laccess() macros was added to systemd some time ago and it's not clear if
-+   or why it needs to return success for broken symlinks. Maybe just historical
-+   and not actually necessary or desired behaviour?
-+*/
-+
-+#define laccess(path, mode) faccessat(AT_FDCWD, (path), (mode), 0)
- 
- int touch_file(const char *path, bool parents, usec_t stamp, uid_t uid, gid_t gid, mode_t mode);
- int touch(const char *path);
-diff --git a/src/shared/base-filesystem.c b/src/shared/base-filesystem.c
-index 3c25aa534..574ca71c7 100644
---- a/src/shared/base-filesystem.c
-+++ b/src/shared/base-filesystem.c
-@@ -71,7 +71,7 @@ int base_filesystem_create(const char *root, uid_t uid, gid_t gid) {
-                 return log_error_errno(errno, "Failed to open root file system: %m");
- 
-         for (i = 0; i < ELEMENTSOF(table); i ++) {
--                if (faccessat(fd, table[i].dir, F_OK, AT_SYMLINK_NOFOLLOW) >= 0)
-+                if (faccessat(fd, table[i].dir, F_OK, 0) >= 0)
-                         continue;
- 
-                 if (table[i].target) {
-@@ -79,7 +79,7 @@ int base_filesystem_create(const char *root, uid_t uid, gid_t gid) {
- 
-                         /* check if one of the targets exists */
-                         NULSTR_FOREACH(s, table[i].target) {
--                                if (faccessat(fd, s, F_OK, AT_SYMLINK_NOFOLLOW) < 0)
-+                                if (faccessat(fd, s, F_OK, 0) < 0)
-                                         continue;
- 
-                                 /* check if a specific file exists at the target path */
-@@ -90,7 +90,7 @@ int base_filesystem_create(const char *root, uid_t uid, gid_t gid) {
-                                         if (!p)
-                                                 return log_oom();
- 
--                                        if (faccessat(fd, p, F_OK, AT_SYMLINK_NOFOLLOW) < 0)
-+                                        if (faccessat(fd, p, F_OK, 0) < 0)
-                                                 continue;
-                                 }
- 
--- 
-2.13.0
-