1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
|
/*
*
*
* PowerPC-specific semaphore code.
*
* Copyright (C) 1999 Cort Dougan <cort@cs.nmt.edu>
*
* This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or
* modify it under the terms of the GNU General Public License
* as published by the Free Software Foundation; either version
* 2 of the License, or (at your option) any later version.
*
* April 2001 - Reworked by Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
* to eliminate the SMP races in the old version between the updates
* of `count' and `waking'. Now we use negative `count' values to
* indicate that some process(es) are waiting for the semaphore.
*/
#include <linux/sched.h>
#include <linux/init.h>
#include <linux/module.h>
#include <asm/atomic.h>
#include <asm/semaphore.h>
#include <asm/errno.h>
/*
* Atomically update sem->count.
* This does the equivalent of the following:
*
* old_count = sem->count;
* tmp = MAX(old_count, 0) + incr;
* sem->count = tmp;
* return old_count;
*/
static inline int __sem_update_count(struct semaphore *sem, int incr)
{
int old_count, tmp;
__asm__ __volatile__("\n"
"1: lwarx %0,0,%3\n"
" srawi %1,%0,31\n"
" andc %1,%0,%1\n"
" add %1,%1,%4\n"
" stwcx. %1,0,%3\n"
" bne 1b"
: "=&r" (old_count), "=&r" (tmp), "=m" (sem->count)
: "r" (&sem->count), "r" (incr), "m" (sem->count)
: "cc");
return old_count;
}
void __up(struct semaphore *sem)
{
/*
* Note that we incremented count in up() before we came here,
* but that was ineffective since the result was <= 0, and
* any negative value of count is equivalent to 0.
* This ends up setting count to 1, unless count is now > 0
* (i.e. because some other cpu has called up() in the meantime),
* in which case we just increment count.
*/
__sem_update_count(sem, 1);
wake_up(&sem->wait);
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(__up);
/*
* Note that when we come in to __down or __down_interruptible,
* we have already decremented count, but that decrement was
* ineffective since the result was < 0, and any negative value
* of count is equivalent to 0.
* Thus it is only when we decrement count from some value > 0
* that we have actually got the semaphore.
*/
void __sched __down(struct semaphore *sem)
{
struct task_struct *tsk = current;
DECLARE_WAITQUEUE(wait, tsk);
__set_task_state(tsk, TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE);
add_wait_queue_exclusive(&sem->wait, &wait);
/*
* Try to get the semaphore. If the count is > 0, then we've
* got the semaphore; we decrement count and exit the loop.
* If the count is 0 or negative, we set it to -1, indicating
* that we are asleep, and then sleep.
*/
while (__sem_update_count(sem, -1) <= 0) {
schedule();
set_task_state(tsk, TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE);
}
remove_wait_queue(&sem->wait, &wait);
__set_task_state(tsk, TASK_RUNNING);
/*
* If there are any more sleepers, wake one of them up so
* that it can either get the semaphore, or set count to -1
* indicating that there are still processes sleeping.
*/
wake_up(&sem->wait);
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(__down);
int __sched __down_interruptible(struct semaphore * sem)
{
int retval = 0;
struct task_struct *tsk = current;
DECLARE_WAITQUEUE(wait, tsk);
__set_task_state(tsk, TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE);
add_wait_queue_exclusive(&sem->wait, &wait);
while (__sem_update_count(sem, -1) <= 0) {
if (signal_pending(current)) {
/*
* A signal is pending - give up trying.
* Set sem->count to 0 if it is negative,
* since we are no longer sleeping.
*/
__sem_update_count(sem, 0);
retval = -EINTR;
break;
}
schedule();
set_task_state(tsk, TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE);
}
remove_wait_queue(&sem->wait, &wait);
__set_task_state(tsk, TASK_RUNNING);
wake_up(&sem->wait);
return retval;
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(__down_interruptible);
|
