| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
|---|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Since we started using CT buffers on all gens, the function pointers can
only be set to either the _nop() or the _ct() functions. Since the
_nop() case applies to when the CT are disabled, we can just handle that
case in the _ct() functions and call them directly.
v2: keep intel_guc_send() and make the CT send/receive functions work on
intel_guc_ct. (Michal)
Signed-off-by: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
Cc: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
Cc: John Harrison <John.C.Harrison@Intel.com>
Cc: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191217012316.13271-5-daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
For better isolation of the request tracking from the rest of the
CT-related data.
v2: split to separate patch, move next_fence to substructure (Michal)
Signed-off-by: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
Cc: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
Cc: John Harrison <John.C.Harrison@Intel.com>
Cc: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191217012316.13271-4-daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The GuC supports having multiple CT buffer pairs and we designed our
implementation with that in mind. However, the different channels are not
processed in parallel within the GuC, so there is very little advantage
in having multiple channels (independent locks?), compared to the
drawbacks (one channel can starve the other if messages keep being
submitted to it). Given this, it is unlikely we'll ever add a second
channel and therefore we can simplify our code by removing the
flexibility.
v2: split substructure grouping to separate patch, improve docs (Michal)
Signed-off-by: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
Cc: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
Cc: John Harrison <John.C.Harrison@Intel.com>
Cc: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191217012316.13271-3-daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
We track the status of the GuC much more closely now and we expect the
enable/disable functions to be correctly called only once. If this isn't
true we do want to flag it as a flow failure (via the BUG_ON in the ctch
functions) and not silently ignore the call.
Suggested-by: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191217012316.13271-2-daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The only difference from the GuC POV between guc_communication_stop and
guc_communication_disable is that the former can be called after GuC
has been reset. Instead of having two separate paths, we can just skip
the call into GuC in the disabling path and re-use that.
Note that by using the disable() path instead of the stop() one there
are two additional changes in SW side for the stop path:
- interrupts are now disabled before disabling the CT, which is ok
because we do not want interrupts with CT disabled;
- guc_get_mmio_msg() is called in the stop case as well, which is ok
because if there are errors before the reset we do want to record
them.
Signed-off-by: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
Cc: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
Cc: John Harrison <John.C.Harrison@Intel.com>
Cc: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191217012316.13271-1-daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
We already have a couple of use-cases in the code and another one will
come in one of the later patches in the series.
v2: use the new function for the CT object as well
Signed-off-by: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
Cc: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
Cc: John Harrison <John.C.Harrison@Intel.com>
Cc: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> #v1
Reviewed-by: John Harrison <John.C.Harrison@Intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191205220243.27403-2-daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Include 2019 in copyright years and start using SPDX tag.
Signed-off-by: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190812092935.21048-1-michal.wajdeczko@intel.com
|
|
|
Both microcontrollers are part of the GT HW and are closely related to
GT operations. To keep all the files cleanly together, they've been
placed in their own subdir inside the gt/ folder
Signed-off-by: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
Cc: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Acked-by: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190713100016.8026-6-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
|
