perf report: Don't shadow inlined symbol with different addr range

We can't assume inlined symbols with the same name are equal, because
their address range may be different. This will cause the symbols with
different addresses be shadowed when adding to the hist entry, and lead
to ERANGE error when checking the symbol address during sample parse,
the addr should be within the range of [sym.start, sym.end].

The error message is like: "0x36aea60 [0x8]: failed to process type: 68".

The second parameter of symbol__new() is the length of the fake symbol
for the inline frame, which is the subtraction of the end and start
address of base_sym.

Signed-off-by: He Kuang <hekuang@huawei.com>
Acked-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
Cc: Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Milian Wolff <milian.wolff@kdab.com>
Cc: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Fixes: aa441895f7b4 ("perf report: Compare symbol name for inlined frames when sorting")
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190219130531.15692-1-hekuang@huawei.com
Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>

1 files changed, 1 insertions, 1 deletions

diff --git a/tools/perf/util/srcline.c b/tools/perf/util/srcline.c
index 00f215580b5a..10ca1533937e 100644
--- a/tools/perf/util/srcline.c
+++ b/tools/perf/util/srcline.c
@@ -104,7 +104,7 @@ static struct symbol *new_inline_sym(struct dso *dso,
 	} else {
 		/* create a fake symbol for the inline frame */
 		inline_sym = symbol__new(base_sym ? base_sym->start : 0,
-					 base_sym ? base_sym->end : 0,
+					 base_sym ? (base_sym->end - base_sym->start) : 0,
 					 base_sym ? base_sym->binding : 0,
 					 base_sym ? base_sym->type : 0,
 					 funcname);