diff options
author | Johannes Weiner <jweiner@redhat.com> | 2012-01-12 17:18:02 -0800 |
---|---|---|
committer | Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> | 2012-01-12 20:13:05 -0800 |
commit | ad2b8e601099a23dffffb53f91c18d874fe98854 (patch) | |
tree | 6b7706f3005fd799f23d0ddc21fe5b33fd1e79ac /mm | |
parent | 5660048ccac8735d9bc0a46325a02e6a6518b5b2 (diff) | |
download | talos-op-linux-ad2b8e601099a23dffffb53f91c18d874fe98854.tar.gz talos-op-linux-ad2b8e601099a23dffffb53f91c18d874fe98854.zip |
mm: memcg: remove optimization of keeping the root_mem_cgroup LRU lists empty
root_mem_cgroup, lacking a configurable limit, was never subject to
limit reclaim, so the pages charged to it could be kept off its LRU
lists. They would be found on the global per-zone LRU lists upon
physical memory pressure and it made sense to avoid uselessly linking
them to both lists.
The global per-zone LRU lists are about to go away on memcg-enabled
kernels, with all pages being exclusively linked to their respective
per-memcg LRU lists. As a result, pages of the root_mem_cgroup must
also be linked to its LRU lists again. This is purely about the LRU
list, root_mem_cgroup is still not charged.
The overhead is temporary until the double-LRU scheme is going away
completely.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Weiner <jweiner@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
Reviewed-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.cz>
Reviewed-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill@shutemov.name>
Cc: Daisuke Nishimura <nishimura@mxp.nes.nec.co.jp>
Cc: Balbir Singh <bsingharora@gmail.com>
Cc: Ying Han <yinghan@google.com>
Cc: Greg Thelen <gthelen@google.com>
Cc: Michel Lespinasse <walken@google.com>
Cc: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
Cc: Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@gmail.com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Cc: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'mm')
-rw-r--r-- | mm/memcontrol.c | 12 |
1 files changed, 2 insertions, 10 deletions
diff --git a/mm/memcontrol.c b/mm/memcontrol.c index 750ed1449955..ad7f36f676ff 100644 --- a/mm/memcontrol.c +++ b/mm/memcontrol.c @@ -1031,8 +1031,6 @@ void mem_cgroup_del_lru_list(struct page *page, enum lru_list lru) mz = page_cgroup_zoneinfo(pc->mem_cgroup, page); /* huge page split is done under lru_lock. so, we have no races. */ MEM_CGROUP_ZSTAT(mz, lru) -= 1 << compound_order(page); - if (mem_cgroup_is_root(pc->mem_cgroup)) - return; VM_BUG_ON(list_empty(&pc->lru)); list_del_init(&pc->lru); } @@ -1057,13 +1055,11 @@ void mem_cgroup_rotate_reclaimable_page(struct page *page) return; pc = lookup_page_cgroup(page); - /* unused or root page is not rotated. */ + /* unused page is not rotated. */ if (!PageCgroupUsed(pc)) return; /* Ensure pc->mem_cgroup is visible after reading PCG_USED. */ smp_rmb(); - if (mem_cgroup_is_root(pc->mem_cgroup)) - return; mz = page_cgroup_zoneinfo(pc->mem_cgroup, page); list_move_tail(&pc->lru, &mz->lists[lru]); } @@ -1077,13 +1073,11 @@ void mem_cgroup_rotate_lru_list(struct page *page, enum lru_list lru) return; pc = lookup_page_cgroup(page); - /* unused or root page is not rotated. */ + /* unused page is not rotated. */ if (!PageCgroupUsed(pc)) return; /* Ensure pc->mem_cgroup is visible after reading PCG_USED. */ smp_rmb(); - if (mem_cgroup_is_root(pc->mem_cgroup)) - return; mz = page_cgroup_zoneinfo(pc->mem_cgroup, page); list_move(&pc->lru, &mz->lists[lru]); } @@ -1115,8 +1109,6 @@ void mem_cgroup_add_lru_list(struct page *page, enum lru_list lru) /* huge page split is done under lru_lock. so, we have no races. */ MEM_CGROUP_ZSTAT(mz, lru) += 1 << compound_order(page); SetPageCgroupAcctLRU(pc); - if (mem_cgroup_is_root(pc->mem_cgroup)) - return; list_add(&pc->lru, &mz->lists[lru]); } |