diff options
author | Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@intel.com> | 2011-06-11 18:10:12 -0600 |
---|---|---|
committer | Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@intel.com> | 2011-10-03 21:08:57 +0800 |
commit | 9d823e8f6b1b7b39f952d7d1795f29162143a433 (patch) | |
tree | 2ef4c0d29353452dd2f894e7dbd240a31bdd0a02 /include/linux/sched.h | |
parent | 7381131cbcf7e15d201a0ffd782a4698efe4e740 (diff) | |
download | talos-op-linux-9d823e8f6b1b7b39f952d7d1795f29162143a433.tar.gz talos-op-linux-9d823e8f6b1b7b39f952d7d1795f29162143a433.zip |
writeback: per task dirty rate limit
Add two fields to task_struct.
1) account dirtied pages in the individual tasks, for accuracy
2) per-task balance_dirty_pages() call intervals, for flexibility
The balance_dirty_pages() call interval (ie. nr_dirtied_pause) will
scale near-sqrt to the safety gap between dirty pages and threshold.
The main problem of per-task nr_dirtied is, if 1k+ tasks start dirtying
pages at exactly the same time, each task will be assigned a large
initial nr_dirtied_pause, so that the dirty threshold will be exceeded
long before each task reached its nr_dirtied_pause and hence call
balance_dirty_pages().
The solution is to watch for the number of pages dirtied on each CPU in
between the calls into balance_dirty_pages(). If it exceeds ratelimit_pages
(3% dirty threshold), force call balance_dirty_pages() for a chance to
set bdi->dirty_exceeded. In normal situations, this safeguarding
condition is not expected to trigger at all.
On the sqrt in dirty_poll_interval():
It will serve as an initial guess when dirty pages are still in the
freerun area.
When dirty pages are floating inside the dirty control scope [freerun,
limit], a followup patch will use some refined dirty poll interval to
get the desired pause time.
thresh-dirty (MB) sqrt
1 16
2 22
4 32
8 45
16 64
32 90
64 128
128 181
256 256
512 362
1024 512
The above table means, given 1MB (or 1GB) gap and the dd tasks polling
balance_dirty_pages() on every 16 (or 512) pages, the dirty limit won't
be exceeded as long as there are less than 16 (or 512) concurrent dd's.
So sqrt naturally leads to less overheads and more safe concurrent tasks
for large memory servers, which have large (thresh-freerun) gaps.
peter: keep the per-CPU ratelimit for safeguarding the 1k+ tasks case
CC: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Reviewed-by: Andrea Righi <andrea@betterlinux.com>
Signed-off-by: Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@intel.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'include/linux/sched.h')
-rw-r--r-- | include/linux/sched.h | 7 |
1 files changed, 7 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/include/linux/sched.h b/include/linux/sched.h index 41d0237fd449..a4a5582dc618 100644 --- a/include/linux/sched.h +++ b/include/linux/sched.h @@ -1525,6 +1525,13 @@ struct task_struct { int make_it_fail; #endif struct prop_local_single dirties; + /* + * when (nr_dirtied >= nr_dirtied_pause), it's time to call + * balance_dirty_pages() for some dirty throttling pause + */ + int nr_dirtied; + int nr_dirtied_pause; + #ifdef CONFIG_LATENCYTOP int latency_record_count; struct latency_record latency_record[LT_SAVECOUNT]; |