clocksource: Use a plain u64 instead of cycle_t

There is no point in having an extra type for extra confusion. u64 is
unambiguous.

Conversion was done with the following coccinelle script:

@rem@
@@
-typedef u64 cycle_t;

@fix@
typedef cycle_t;
@@
-cycle_t
+u64

Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org>

1 files changed, 1 insertions, 1 deletions

diff --git a/arch/m68k/coldfire/dma_timer.c b/arch/m68k/coldfire/dma_timer.c
index 235ad57c4707..8273eea57874 100644
--- a/arch/m68k/coldfire/dma_timer.c
+++ b/arch/m68k/coldfire/dma_timer.c
@@ -34,7 +34,7 @@
 #define DMA_DTMR_CLK_DIV_16	(2 << 1)
 #define DMA_DTMR_ENABLE		(1 << 0)
 
-static cycle_t cf_dt_get_cycles(struct clocksource *cs)
+static u64 cf_dt_get_cycles(struct clocksource *cs)
 {
 	return __raw_readl(DTCN0);
 }