diff options
author | Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> | 2016-05-26 10:35:03 +0200 |
---|---|---|
committer | Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> | 2016-06-14 11:55:15 +0200 |
commit | 726328d92a42b6d4b76078e2659f43067f82c4e8 (patch) | |
tree | 6df3622839432fc698c4404cbb0a0922a1357251 /arch/m32r/include/asm | |
parent | b464d1270a8016edcf1fd20d77cefdecf9b0b73e (diff) | |
download | talos-op-linux-726328d92a42b6d4b76078e2659f43067f82c4e8.tar.gz talos-op-linux-726328d92a42b6d4b76078e2659f43067f82c4e8.zip |
locking/spinlock, arch: Update and fix spin_unlock_wait() implementations
This patch updates/fixes all spin_unlock_wait() implementations.
The update is in semantics; where it previously was only a control
dependency, we now upgrade to a full load-acquire to match the
store-release from the spin_unlock() we waited on. This ensures that
when spin_unlock_wait() returns, we're guaranteed to observe the full
critical section we waited on.
This fixes a number of spin_unlock_wait() users that (not
unreasonably) rely on this.
I also fixed a number of ticket lock versions to only wait on the
current lock holder, instead of for a full unlock, as this is
sufficient.
Furthermore; again for ticket locks; I added an smp_rmb() in between
the initial ticket load and the spin loop testing the current value
because I could not convince myself the address dependency is
sufficient, esp. if the loads are of different sizes.
I'm more than happy to remove this smp_rmb() again if people are
certain the address dependency does indeed work as expected.
Note: PPC32 will be fixed independently
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: chris@zankel.net
Cc: cmetcalf@mellanox.com
Cc: davem@davemloft.net
Cc: dhowells@redhat.com
Cc: james.hogan@imgtec.com
Cc: jejb@parisc-linux.org
Cc: linux@armlinux.org.uk
Cc: mpe@ellerman.id.au
Cc: ralf@linux-mips.org
Cc: realmz6@gmail.com
Cc: rkuo@codeaurora.org
Cc: rth@twiddle.net
Cc: schwidefsky@de.ibm.com
Cc: tony.luck@intel.com
Cc: vgupta@synopsys.com
Cc: ysato@users.sourceforge.jp
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'arch/m32r/include/asm')
-rw-r--r-- | arch/m32r/include/asm/spinlock.h | 9 |
1 files changed, 7 insertions, 2 deletions
diff --git a/arch/m32r/include/asm/spinlock.h b/arch/m32r/include/asm/spinlock.h index fa13694eaae3..323c7fc953cd 100644 --- a/arch/m32r/include/asm/spinlock.h +++ b/arch/m32r/include/asm/spinlock.h @@ -13,6 +13,8 @@ #include <linux/atomic.h> #include <asm/dcache_clear.h> #include <asm/page.h> +#include <asm/barrier.h> +#include <asm/processor.h> /* * Your basic SMP spinlocks, allowing only a single CPU anywhere @@ -27,8 +29,11 @@ #define arch_spin_is_locked(x) (*(volatile int *)(&(x)->slock) <= 0) #define arch_spin_lock_flags(lock, flags) arch_spin_lock(lock) -#define arch_spin_unlock_wait(x) \ - do { cpu_relax(); } while (arch_spin_is_locked(x)) + +static inline void arch_spin_unlock_wait(arch_spinlock_t *lock) +{ + smp_cond_load_acquire(&lock->slock, VAL > 0); +} /** * arch_spin_trylock - Try spin lock and return a result |