diff options
author | Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> | 2015-12-16 10:57:24 -0800 |
---|---|---|
committer | Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> | 2015-12-16 10:57:24 -0800 |
commit | a5e90b1b075f89f084047628d4ef181aded0bbfb (patch) | |
tree | da0010e547be7bf0f3b2bac9d7c74015e5e8662f /arch/arm/lib/uaccess_with_memcpy.c | |
parent | edb42dc7bc0da0125ceacab810a553ce1f0cac8d (diff) | |
parent | 34bfbae33ae84107d0c257edd6c6a8689a09be26 (diff) | |
download | talos-op-linux-a5e90b1b075f89f084047628d4ef181aded0bbfb.tar.gz talos-op-linux-a5e90b1b075f89f084047628d4ef181aded0bbfb.zip |
Merge branch 'fixes' of git://ftp.arm.linux.org.uk/~rmk/linux-arm
Pull ARM fixes from Russell King:
"Further ARM fixes:
- Anson Huang noticed that we were corrupting a register we shouldn't
be during suspend on some CPUs.
- Shengjiu Wang spotted a bug in the 'swp' instruction emulation.
- Will Deacon fixed a bug in the ASID allocator.
- Laura Abbott fixed the kernel permission protection to apply to all
threads running in the system.
- I've fixed two bugs with the domain access control register
handling, one to do with printing an appropriate value at oops
time, and the other to further fix the uaccess_with_memcpy code"
* 'fixes' of git://ftp.arm.linux.org.uk/~rmk/linux-arm:
ARM: 8475/1: SWP emulation: Restore original *data when failed
ARM: 8471/1: need to save/restore arm register(r11) when it is corrupted
ARM: fix uaccess_with_memcpy() with SW_DOMAIN_PAN
ARM: report proper DACR value in oops dumps
ARM: 8464/1: Update all mm structures with section adjustments
ARM: 8465/1: mm: keep reserved ASIDs in sync with mm after multiple rollovers
Diffstat (limited to 'arch/arm/lib/uaccess_with_memcpy.c')
-rw-r--r-- | arch/arm/lib/uaccess_with_memcpy.c | 29 |
1 files changed, 23 insertions, 6 deletions
diff --git a/arch/arm/lib/uaccess_with_memcpy.c b/arch/arm/lib/uaccess_with_memcpy.c index d72b90905132..588bbc288396 100644 --- a/arch/arm/lib/uaccess_with_memcpy.c +++ b/arch/arm/lib/uaccess_with_memcpy.c @@ -88,6 +88,7 @@ pin_page_for_write(const void __user *_addr, pte_t **ptep, spinlock_t **ptlp) static unsigned long noinline __copy_to_user_memcpy(void __user *to, const void *from, unsigned long n) { + unsigned long ua_flags; int atomic; if (unlikely(segment_eq(get_fs(), KERNEL_DS))) { @@ -118,7 +119,9 @@ __copy_to_user_memcpy(void __user *to, const void *from, unsigned long n) if (tocopy > n) tocopy = n; + ua_flags = uaccess_save_and_enable(); memcpy((void *)to, from, tocopy); + uaccess_restore(ua_flags); to += tocopy; from += tocopy; n -= tocopy; @@ -145,14 +148,21 @@ arm_copy_to_user(void __user *to, const void *from, unsigned long n) * With frame pointer disabled, tail call optimization kicks in * as well making this test almost invisible. */ - if (n < 64) - return __copy_to_user_std(to, from, n); - return __copy_to_user_memcpy(to, from, n); + if (n < 64) { + unsigned long ua_flags = uaccess_save_and_enable(); + n = __copy_to_user_std(to, from, n); + uaccess_restore(ua_flags); + } else { + n = __copy_to_user_memcpy(to, from, n); + } + return n; } static unsigned long noinline __clear_user_memset(void __user *addr, unsigned long n) { + unsigned long ua_flags; + if (unlikely(segment_eq(get_fs(), KERNEL_DS))) { memset((void *)addr, 0, n); return 0; @@ -175,7 +185,9 @@ __clear_user_memset(void __user *addr, unsigned long n) if (tocopy > n) tocopy = n; + ua_flags = uaccess_save_and_enable(); memset((void *)addr, 0, tocopy); + uaccess_restore(ua_flags); addr += tocopy; n -= tocopy; @@ -193,9 +205,14 @@ out: unsigned long arm_clear_user(void __user *addr, unsigned long n) { /* See rational for this in __copy_to_user() above. */ - if (n < 64) - return __clear_user_std(addr, n); - return __clear_user_memset(addr, n); + if (n < 64) { + unsigned long ua_flags = uaccess_save_and_enable(); + n = __clear_user_std(addr, n); + uaccess_restore(ua_flags); + } else { + n = __clear_user_memset(addr, n); + } + return n; } #if 0 |