diff options
| author | Nicholas Bellinger <nab@linux-iscsi.org> | 2017-05-11 01:07:24 -0700 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> | 2017-06-14 13:16:23 +0200 |
| commit | 934d0a9f9c65d31cd76c376948128afe3da526a1 (patch) | |
| tree | 3c9af3af5ab167310e67fc118b379f47ad541ac6 | |
| parent | 94d3dafe96f321dfe5e7c3542f1c00c4125984b4 (diff) | |
| download | talos-op-linux-934d0a9f9c65d31cd76c376948128afe3da526a1.tar.gz talos-op-linux-934d0a9f9c65d31cd76c376948128afe3da526a1.zip | |
target: Re-add check to reject control WRITEs with overflow data
commit 4ff83daa0200affe1894bd33d17bac404e3d78d4 upstream.
During v4.3 when the overflow/underflow check was relaxed by
commit c72c525022:
commit c72c5250224d475614a00c1d7e54a67f77cd3410
Author: Roland Dreier <roland@purestorage.com>
Date: Wed Jul 22 15:08:18 2015 -0700
target: allow underflow/overflow for PR OUT etc. commands
to allow underflow/overflow for Windows compliance + FCP, a
consequence was to allow control CDBs to process overflow
data for iscsi-target with immediate data as well.
As per Roland's original change, continue to allow underflow
cases for control CDBs to make Windows compliance + FCP happy,
but until overflow for control CDBs is supported tree-wide,
explicitly reject all control WRITEs with overflow following
pre v4.3.y logic.
Reported-by: Bart Van Assche <bart.vanassche@sandisk.com>
Cc: Roland Dreier <roland@purestorage.com>
Signed-off-by: Nicholas Bellinger <nab@linux-iscsi.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
| -rw-r--r-- | drivers/target/target_core_transport.c | 23 |
1 files changed, 18 insertions, 5 deletions
diff --git a/drivers/target/target_core_transport.c b/drivers/target/target_core_transport.c index af301414a9f3..60743bf27f37 100644 --- a/drivers/target/target_core_transport.c +++ b/drivers/target/target_core_transport.c @@ -1154,15 +1154,28 @@ target_cmd_size_check(struct se_cmd *cmd, unsigned int size) if (cmd->unknown_data_length) { cmd->data_length = size; } else if (size != cmd->data_length) { - pr_warn("TARGET_CORE[%s]: Expected Transfer Length:" + pr_warn_ratelimited("TARGET_CORE[%s]: Expected Transfer Length:" " %u does not match SCSI CDB Length: %u for SAM Opcode:" " 0x%02x\n", cmd->se_tfo->get_fabric_name(), cmd->data_length, size, cmd->t_task_cdb[0]); - if (cmd->data_direction == DMA_TO_DEVICE && - cmd->se_cmd_flags & SCF_SCSI_DATA_CDB) { - pr_err("Rejecting underflow/overflow WRITE data\n"); - return TCM_INVALID_CDB_FIELD; + if (cmd->data_direction == DMA_TO_DEVICE) { + if (cmd->se_cmd_flags & SCF_SCSI_DATA_CDB) { + pr_err_ratelimited("Rejecting underflow/overflow" + " for WRITE data CDB\n"); + return TCM_INVALID_CDB_FIELD; + } + /* + * Some fabric drivers like iscsi-target still expect to + * always reject overflow writes. Reject this case until + * full fabric driver level support for overflow writes + * is introduced tree-wide. + */ + if (size > cmd->data_length) { + pr_err_ratelimited("Rejecting overflow for" + " WRITE control CDB\n"); + return TCM_INVALID_CDB_FIELD; + } } /* * Reject READ_* or WRITE_* with overflow/underflow for |
