x86: Unify cpu/apicid <-> NUMA node mapping between 32 and 64bit

The mapping between cpu/apicid and node is done via
apicid_to_node[] on 64bit and apicid_2_node[] +
apic->x86_32_numa_cpu_node() on 32bit. This difference makes it
difficult to further unify 32 and 64bit NUMA handling.

This patch unifies it by replacing both apicid_to_node[] and
apicid_2_node[] with __apicid_to_node[] array, which is accessed
by two accessors - set_apicid_to_node() and numa_cpu_node().  On
64bit, numa_cpu_node() always consults __apicid_to_node[]
directly while 32bit goes through apic->numa_cpu_node() method
to allow apic implementations to override it.

srat_detect_node() for amd cpus contains workaround for broken
NUMA configuration which assumes relationship between APIC ID,
HT node ID and NUMA topology.  Leave it to access
__apicid_to_node[] directly as mapping through CPU might result
in undesirable behavior change.  The comment is reformatted and
updated to note the ugliness.

Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Pekka Enberg <penberg@kernel.org>
Cc: eric.dumazet@gmail.com
Cc: yinghai@kernel.org
Cc: brgerst@gmail.com
Cc: gorcunov@gmail.com
Cc: shaohui.zheng@intel.com
Cc: rientjes@google.com
LKML-Reference: <1295789862-25482-14-git-send-email-tj@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>

1 files changed, 6 insertions, 6 deletions

diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/srat_64.c b/arch/x86/mm/srat_64.c
index 603d285d1daa..9a97261a2418 100644
--- a/arch/x86/mm/srat_64.c
+++ b/arch/x86/mm/srat_64.c
@@ -79,7 +79,7 @@ static __init void bad_srat(void)
 	printk(KERN_ERR "SRAT: SRAT not used.\n");
 	acpi_numa = -1;
 	for (i = 0; i < MAX_LOCAL_APIC; i++)
-		apicid_to_node[i] = NUMA_NO_NODE;
+		set_apicid_to_node(i, NUMA_NO_NODE);
 	for (i = 0; i < MAX_NUMNODES; i++) {
 		nodes[i].start = nodes[i].end = 0;
 		nodes_add[i].start = nodes_add[i].end = 0;
@@ -138,7 +138,7 @@ acpi_numa_x2apic_affinity_init(struct acpi_srat_x2apic_cpu_affinity *pa)
 		printk(KERN_INFO "SRAT: PXM %u -> APIC 0x%04x -> Node %u skipped apicid that is too big\n", pxm, apic_id, node);
 		return;
 	}
-	apicid_to_node[apic_id] = node;
+	set_apicid_to_node(apic_id, node);
 	node_set(node, cpu_nodes_parsed);
 	acpi_numa = 1;
 	printk(KERN_INFO "SRAT: PXM %u -> APIC 0x%04x -> Node %u\n",
@@ -178,7 +178,7 @@ acpi_numa_processor_affinity_init(struct acpi_srat_cpu_affinity *pa)
 		return;
 	}
 
-	apicid_to_node[apic_id] = node;
+	set_apicid_to_node(apic_id, node);
 	node_set(node, cpu_nodes_parsed);
 	acpi_numa = 1;
 	printk(KERN_INFO "SRAT: PXM %u -> APIC 0x%02x -> Node %u\n",
@@ -521,7 +521,7 @@ void __init acpi_fake_nodes(const struct bootnode *fake_nodes, int num_nodes)
 		 * node, it must now point to the fake node ID.
 		 */
 		for (j = 0; j < MAX_LOCAL_APIC; j++)
-			if (apicid_to_node[j] == nid &&
+			if (__apicid_to_node[j] == nid &&
 			    fake_apicid_to_node[j] == NUMA_NO_NODE)
 				fake_apicid_to_node[j] = i;
 	}
@@ -532,13 +532,13 @@ void __init acpi_fake_nodes(const struct bootnode *fake_nodes, int num_nodes)
 	 * value.
 	 */
 	for (i = 0; i < MAX_LOCAL_APIC; i++)
-		if (apicid_to_node[i] != NUMA_NO_NODE &&
+		if (__apicid_to_node[i] != NUMA_NO_NODE &&
 		    fake_apicid_to_node[i] == NUMA_NO_NODE)
 			fake_apicid_to_node[i] = 0;
 
 	for (i = 0; i < num_nodes; i++)
 		__acpi_map_pxm_to_node(fake_node_to_pxm_map[i], i);
-	memcpy(apicid_to_node, fake_apicid_to_node, sizeof(apicid_to_node));
+	memcpy(__apicid_to_node, fake_apicid_to_node, sizeof(__apicid_to_node));
 
 	nodes_clear(nodes_parsed);
 	for (i = 0; i < num_nodes; i++)