| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Change-Id: I1242a9f8733679afb0fee632e985ccf28096fbd9
RTC: 245516
Reviewed-on: http://rchgit01.rchland.ibm.com/gerrit1/87098
Tested-by: Jenkins Server <pfd-jenkins+hostboot@us.ibm.com>
Tested-by: Jenkins OP Build CI <op-jenkins+hostboot@us.ibm.com>
Tested-by: Jenkins OP HW <op-hw-jenkins+hostboot@us.ibm.com>
Tested-by: FSP CI Jenkins <fsp-CI-jenkins+hostboot@us.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Zane C Shelley <zshelle@us.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Paul Greenwood <paul.greenwood@ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Brian J Stegmiller <bjs@us.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Benjamen G Tyner <ben.tyner@ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Daniel M Crowell <dcrowell@us.ibm.com>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
We had a bug in the VPD map for the the DDR4_DDIMMs where we were
missing fields that were expected in the data collection for the
fruinventory. This commit adds the field we were missing and also
adds the PART_NUMBER field which the BMC is currently just leaving
blank.
Change-Id: I65dbfb0b79bef9d3a9a3bf2d6aa135c5df5ece56
Reviewed-on: http://rchgit01.rchland.ibm.com/gerrit1/86420
Reviewed-by: William G Hoffa <wghoffa@us.ibm.com>
Tested-by: Jenkins Server <pfd-jenkins+hostboot@us.ibm.com>
Tested-by: Jenkins OP Build CI <op-jenkins+hostboot@us.ibm.com>
Tested-by: Jenkins OP HW <op-hw-jenkins+hostboot@us.ibm.com>
Tested-by: FSP CI Jenkins <fsp-CI-jenkins+hostboot@us.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Matt Derksen <mderkse1@us.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Daniel M Crowell <dcrowell@us.ibm.com>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Originally we had this set to 0x30 (48) bytes but now it seems the
spec says its only 0x1E (30) bytes. This commit update to the new
value that the spec is indicating.
Change-Id: I3ba643411a51fdd0df731119dce371bd16435944
Reviewed-on: http://rchgit01.rchland.ibm.com/gerrit1/85432
Reviewed-by: Roland Veloz <rveloz@us.ibm.com>
Tested-by: Jenkins Server <pfd-jenkins+hostboot@us.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Matt Derksen <mderkse1@us.ibm.com>
Tested-by: Jenkins OP Build CI <op-jenkins+hostboot@us.ibm.com>
Tested-by: Jenkins OP HW <op-hw-jenkins+hostboot@us.ibm.com>
Tested-by: FSP CI Jenkins <fsp-CI-jenkins+hostboot@us.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Nicholas E Bofferding <bofferdn@us.ibm.com>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
With the DDR4 DDIMM SPD there are really two parts. There is the
640 bytes of information you typically see in a DIMM's SPD and then
there are 2 KB - 640 bytes of EFD (extensible function descriptors)
to give vendors space to add customized data. In many cases we want
the ENTIRE_SPD (including the EFD area) but in other cases we want
to save some time/space and only read in the first 640 bytes. This
new keyword will give us that flexibility.
Change-Id: I88ed58b37417b576f2ec4a779ee0c114791c6c21
Reviewed-on: http://rchgit01.rchland.ibm.com/gerrit1/84070
Tested-by: Jenkins Server <pfd-jenkins+hostboot@us.ibm.com>
Tested-by: Jenkins OP Build CI <op-jenkins+hostboot@us.ibm.com>
Tested-by: Jenkins OP HW <op-hw-jenkins+hostboot@us.ibm.com>
Tested-by: FSP CI Jenkins <fsp-CI-jenkins+hostboot@us.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Matt Derksen <mderkse1@us.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Matthew Raybuck <matthew.raybuck@ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Daniel M Crowell <dcrowell@us.ibm.com>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
ENTIRE_SPD field needs to be updated from 512 bytes
to 640 bytes for DDR DDIMM SPD.
Change-Id: I93ce4829336717bd621ecca4acb574daada7ae11
Reviewed-on: http://rchgit01.rchland.ibm.com/gerrit1/83030
Tested-by: Jenkins Server <pfd-jenkins+hostboot@us.ibm.com>
Tested-by: Jenkins OP Build CI <op-jenkins+hostboot@us.ibm.com>
Tested-by: Jenkins OP HW <op-hw-jenkins+hostboot@us.ibm.com>
Tested-by: FSP CI Jenkins <fsp-CI-jenkins+hostboot@us.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Glenn Miles <milesg@ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Christian R Geddes <crgeddes@us.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Daniel M Crowell <dcrowell@us.ibm.com>
|
|
The existing keyword logic didn't use bitmasking when searching for the
correct keyword entry. This commit refactors the code to allow for
bitmasking and changing the NA module specific keyword to mean that no
keyword was found for the given target rather than its previous
ambiguous meaning that could be confused with the ALL module specific
keyword.
Change-Id: I661b70c4eff2740911cd63f8c1042ee8a084d63a
RTC:203788
Reviewed-on: http://rchgit01.rchland.ibm.com/gerrit1/77357
Tested-by: Jenkins Server <pfd-jenkins+hostboot@us.ibm.com>
Tested-by: FSP CI Jenkins <fsp-CI-jenkins+hostboot@us.ibm.com>
Tested-by: Jenkins OP Build CI <op-jenkins+hostboot@us.ibm.com>
Tested-by: Jenkins OP HW <op-hw-jenkins+hostboot@us.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Christian R. Geddes <crgeddes@us.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Michael Baiocchi <mbaiocch@us.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Glenn Miles <milesg@ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Daniel M. Crowell <dcrowell@us.ibm.com>
|