summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/libjava/classpath/external/jsr166/java/util/concurrent/package.html
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authortromey <tromey@138bc75d-0d04-0410-961f-82ee72b054a4>2007-01-09 19:58:05 +0000
committertromey <tromey@138bc75d-0d04-0410-961f-82ee72b054a4>2007-01-09 19:58:05 +0000
commit65bf3316cf384588453604be6b4f0ed3751a8b0f (patch)
tree996a5f57d4a68c53473382e45cb22f574cb3e4db /libjava/classpath/external/jsr166/java/util/concurrent/package.html
parent8fc56618a84446beccd45b80381cdfe0e94050df (diff)
downloadppe42-gcc-65bf3316cf384588453604be6b4f0ed3751a8b0f.tar.gz
ppe42-gcc-65bf3316cf384588453604be6b4f0ed3751a8b0f.zip
Merged gcj-eclipse branch to trunk.
git-svn-id: svn+ssh://gcc.gnu.org/svn/gcc/trunk@120621 138bc75d-0d04-0410-961f-82ee72b054a4
Diffstat (limited to 'libjava/classpath/external/jsr166/java/util/concurrent/package.html')
-rw-r--r--libjava/classpath/external/jsr166/java/util/concurrent/package.html222
1 files changed, 222 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/libjava/classpath/external/jsr166/java/util/concurrent/package.html b/libjava/classpath/external/jsr166/java/util/concurrent/package.html
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..20227e1fece
--- /dev/null
+++ b/libjava/classpath/external/jsr166/java/util/concurrent/package.html
@@ -0,0 +1,222 @@
+<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//IETF//DTD HTML//EN">
+<html> <head>
+<title>Concurrency Utilities</title>
+</head>
+
+<body>
+
+<p> Utility classes commonly useful in concurrent programming. This
+package includes a few small standardized extensible frameworks, as
+well as some classes that provide useful functionality and are
+otherwise tedious or difficult to implement. Here are brief
+descriptions of the main components. See also the <tt>locks</tt> and
+<tt>atomic</tt> packages.
+
+<h2>Executors</h2>
+
+<b>Interfaces.</b> {@link java.util.concurrent.Executor} is a simple
+standardized interface for defining custom thread-like subsystems,
+including thread pools, asynchronous IO, and lightweight task
+frameworks. Depending on which concrete Executor class is being used,
+tasks may execute in a newly created thread, an existing
+task-execution thread, or the thread calling <tt>execute()</tt>, and
+may execute sequentially or concurrently. {@link
+java.util.concurrent.ExecutorService} provides a more complete
+asynchronous task execution framework. An ExecutorService manages
+queuing and scheduling of tasks, and allows controlled shutdown. The
+{@link java.util.concurrent.ScheduledExecutorService} subinterface
+and associated interfaces add support for delayed and periodic task execution.
+ExecutorServices provide methods arranging asynchronous execution of
+any function expressed as {@link java.util.concurrent.Callable}, the
+result-bearing analog of {@link java.lang.Runnable}. A {@link
+java.util.concurrent.Future} returns the results of a function, allows
+determination of whether execution has completed, and provides a means to
+cancel execution. A {@link java.util.concurrent.RunnableFuture} is
+a Future that possesses a <tt>run</tt> method that upon execution,
+sets its results.
+
+<p>
+
+<b>Implementations.</b> Classes {@link
+java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor} and {@link
+java.util.concurrent.ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor} provide tunable,
+flexible thread pools. The {@link java.util.concurrent.Executors}
+class provides factory methods for the most common kinds and
+configurations of Executors, as well as a few utility methods for
+using them. Other utilities based on Executors include the concrete
+class {@link java.util.concurrent.FutureTask} providing a common
+extensible implementation of Futures, and {@link
+java.util.concurrent.ExecutorCompletionService}, that assists in
+coordinating the processing of groups of asynchronous tasks.
+
+<h2>Queues</h2>
+
+The java.util.concurrent {@link
+java.util.concurrent.ConcurrentLinkedQueue} class supplies an
+efficient scalable thread-safe non-blocking FIFO queue. Five
+implementations in java.util.concurrent support the extended {@link
+java.util.concurrent.BlockingQueue} interface, that defines blocking
+versions of put and take: {@link
+java.util.concurrent.LinkedBlockingQueue}, {@link
+java.util.concurrent.ArrayBlockingQueue}, {@link
+java.util.concurrent.SynchronousQueue}, {@link
+java.util.concurrent.PriorityBlockingQueue}, and {@link
+java.util.concurrent.DelayQueue}. The different classes cover the most
+common usage contexts for producer-consumer, messaging, parallel
+tasking, and related concurrent designs. The {@link
+java.util.concurrent.BlockingDeque} interface extends
+<tt>BlockingQueue</tt> to support both FIFO and LIFO (stack-based)
+operations. Class {@link java.util.concurrent.LinkedBlockingDeque}
+provides an implementation.
+
+
+<h2>Timing</h2>
+
+The {@link java.util.concurrent.TimeUnit} class provides multiple
+granularities (including nanoseconds) for specifying and controlling
+time-out based operations. Most classes in the package contain
+operations based on time-outs in addition to indefinite waits. In all
+cases that time-outs are used, the time-out specifies the minimum time
+that the method should wait before indicating that it
+timed-out. Implementations make a &quot;best effort&quot; to detect
+time-outs as soon as possible after they occur. However, an indefinite
+amount of time may elapse between a time-out being detected and a
+thread actually executing again after that time-out. All methods
+that accept timeout parameters treat values less than or equal to
+zero to mean not to wait at all. To wait "forever", you can use
+a value of <tt>Long.MAX_VALUE</tt>.
+
+<h2>Synchronizers</h2>
+
+Four classes aid common special-purpose synchronization idioms.
+{@link java.util.concurrent.Semaphore} is a classic concurrency tool.
+{@link java.util.concurrent.CountDownLatch} is a very simple yet very
+common utility for blocking until a given number of signals, events,
+or conditions hold. A {@link java.util.concurrent.CyclicBarrier} is a
+resettable multiway synchronization point useful in some styles of
+parallel programming. An {@link java.util.concurrent.Exchanger} allows
+two threads to exchange objects at a rendezvous point, and is useful
+in several pipeline designs.
+
+<h2>Concurrent Collections</h2>
+
+Besides Queues, this package supplies Collection implementations
+designed for use in multithreaded contexts:
+{@link java.util.concurrent.ConcurrentHashMap},
+{@link java.util.concurrent.ConcurrentSkipListMap},
+{@link java.util.concurrent.ConcurrentSkipListSet},
+{@link java.util.concurrent.CopyOnWriteArrayList}, and
+{@link java.util.concurrent.CopyOnWriteArraySet}.
+When many threads are expected to access a given collection,
+a <tt>ConcurrentHashMap</tt> is normally preferable to
+a synchronized <tt>HashMap</tt>, and a
+<tt>ConcurrentSkipListMap</tt> is normally preferable
+to a synchronized <tt>TreeMap</tt>. A
+<tt>CopyOnWriteArrayList</tt> is preferable to
+a synchronized <tt>ArrayList</tt> when the expected number of reads
+and traversals greatly outnumber the number of updates to a list.
+
+<p>The "Concurrent" prefix used with some classes in this package is a
+shorthand indicating several differences from similar "synchronized"
+classes. For example <tt>java.util.Hashtable</tt> and
+<tt>Collections.synchronizedMap(new HashMap())</tt> are
+synchronized. But {@link java.util.concurrent.ConcurrentHashMap} is
+"concurrent". A concurrent collection is thread-safe, but not
+governed by a single exclusion lock. In the particular case of
+ConcurrentHashMap, it safely permits any number of concurrent reads as
+well as a tunable number of concurrent writes. "Synchronized" classes
+can be useful when you need to prevent all access to a collection via
+a single lock, at the expense of poorer scalability. In other cases in
+which multiple threads are expected to access a common collection,
+"concurrent" versions are normally preferable. And unsynchronized
+collections are preferable when either collections are unshared, or
+are accessible only when holding other locks.
+
+<p> Most concurrent Collection implementations (including most Queues)
+also differ from the usual java.util conventions in that their Iterators
+provide <em>weakly consistent</em> rather than fast-fail traversal. A
+weakly consistent iterator is thread-safe, but does not necessarily
+freeze the collection while iterating, so it may (or may not) reflect
+any updates since the iterator was created.
+
+<a name="MemoryVisibility">
+<h2> Memory Consistency Properties </h2>
+
+<a href="http://java.sun.com/docs/books/jls/third_edition/html/memory.html">
+Chapter 17 of the Java Language Specification</a> defines the
+<i>happens-before</i> relation on memory operations such as reads and
+writes of shared variables. The results of a write by one thread are
+guaranteed to be visible to a read by another thread only if the write
+operation <i>happens-before</i> the read operation. The
+{@code synchronized} and {@code volatile} constructs, as well as the
+{@code Thread.start()} and {@code Thread.join()} methods, can form
+<i>happens-before</i> relationships. In particular:
+
+<ul>
+ <li>Each action in a thread <i>happens-before</i> every action in that
+ thread that comes later in the program's order.
+
+ <li>An unlock ({@code synchronized} block or method exit) of a
+ monitor <i>happens-before</i> every subsequent lock ({@code synchronized}
+ block or method entry) of that same monitor. And because
+ the <i>happens-before</i> relation is transitive, all actions
+ of a thread prior to unlocking <i>happen-before</i> all actions
+ subsequent to any thread locking that monitor.
+
+ <li>A write to a {@code volatile} field <i>happens-before</i> every
+ subsequent read of that same field. Writes and reads of
+ {@code volatile} fields have similar memory consistency effects
+ as entering and exiting monitors, but do <em>not</em> entail
+ mutual exclusion locking.
+
+ <li>A call to {@code start} on a thread <i>happens-before</i> any action in the
+ started thread.
+
+ <li>All actions in a thread <i>happen-before</i> any other thread
+ successfully returns from a {@code join} on that thread.
+
+</ul>
+
+
+The methods of all classes in {@code java.util.concurrent} and its
+subpackages extend these guarantees to higher-level
+synchronization. In particular:
+
+<ul>
+
+ <li>Actions in a thread prior to placing an object into any concurrent
+ collection <i>happen-before</i> actions subsequent to the access or
+ removal of that element from the collection in another thread.
+
+ <li>Actions in a thread prior to the submission of a {@code Runnable}
+ to an {@code Executor} <i>happen-before</i> its execution begins.
+ Similarly for {@code Callables} submitted to an {@code ExecutorService}.
+
+ <li>Actions taken by the asynchronous computation represented by a
+ {@code Future} <i>happen-before</i> actions subsequent to the
+ retrieval of the result via {@code Future.get()} in another thread.
+
+ <li>Actions prior to "releasing" synchronizer methods such as
+ {@code Lock.unlock}, {@code Semaphore.release}, and
+ {@code CountDownLatch.countDown} <i>happen-before</i> actions
+ subsequent to a successful "acquiring" method such as
+ {@code Lock.lock}, {@code Semaphore.acquire},
+ {@code Condition.await}, and {@code CountDownLatch.await} on the
+ same synchronizer object in another thread.
+
+ <li>For each pair of threads that successfully exchange objects via
+ an {@code Exchanger}, actions prior to the {@code exchange()}
+ in each thread <i>happen-before</i> those subsequent to the
+ corresponding {@code exchange()} in another thread.
+
+ <li>Actions prior to calling {@code CyclicBarrier.await}
+ <i>happen-before</i> actions performed by the barrier action, and
+ actions performed by the barrier action <i>happen-before</i> actions
+ subsequent to a successful return from the corresponding {@code await}
+ in other threads.
+
+</ul>
+
+@since 1.5
+
+</body> </html>
OpenPOWER on IntegriCloud