revert:

        * cp-lang.c (cxx_types_compatible_p): To the middle-end,
        references and pointers are compatible.


git-svn-id: svn+ssh://gcc.gnu.org/svn/gcc/trunk@84820 138bc75d-0d04-0410-961f-82ee72b054a4

1 files changed, 1 insertions, 15 deletions

diff --git a/gcc/cp/cp-lang.c b/gcc/cp/cp-lang.c
index b6e933fede6..5f38fbb1025 100644
--- a/gcc/cp/cp-lang.c
+++ b/gcc/cp/cp-lang.c
@@ -317,23 +317,9 @@ cp_var_mod_type_p (tree type, tree fn)
   return false;
 }
 
-/* This compares two types for equivalence ("compatible" in C-based languages).
-   This routine should only return 1 if it is sure.  It should not be used
-   in contexts where erroneously returning 0 causes problems.  */
-
 static int cxx_types_compatible_p (tree x, tree y)
 {
-  if (same_type_ignoring_top_level_qualifiers_p (x, y))
-    return 1;
-
-  /* Once we get to the middle-end, references and pointers are
-     interchangeable.  FIXME should we try to replace all references with
-     pointers?  */
-  if (POINTER_TYPE_P (x) && POINTER_TYPE_P (y)
-      && same_type_p (TREE_TYPE (x), TREE_TYPE (y)))
-    return 1;
-
-  return 0;
+  return same_type_ignoring_top_level_qualifiers_p (x, y);
 }
 
 /* Construct a C++-aware pretty-printer for CONTEXT.  It is assumed