move googlemock files into googlemock/ subdir

1 files changed, 1286 insertions, 0 deletions

diff --git a/googlemock/test/gmock-generated-matchers_test.cc b/googlemock/test/gmock-generated-matchers_test.cc
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..0e9f77f5
--- /dev/null
+++ b/googlemock/test/gmock-generated-matchers_test.cc
@@ -0,0 +1,1286 @@
+// Copyright 2008, Google Inc.
+// All rights reserved.
+//
+// Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with or without
+// modification, are permitted provided that the following conditions are
+// met:
+//
+//     * Redistributions of source code must retain the above copyright
+// notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer.
+//     * Redistributions in binary form must reproduce the above
+// copyright notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer
+// in the documentation and/or other materials provided with the
+// distribution.
+//     * Neither the name of Google Inc. nor the names of its
+// contributors may be used to endorse or promote products derived from
+// this software without specific prior written permission.
+//
+// THIS SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED BY THE COPYRIGHT HOLDERS AND CONTRIBUTORS
+// "AS IS" AND ANY EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT
+// LIMITED TO, THE IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY AND FITNESS FOR
+// A PARTICULAR PURPOSE ARE DISCLAIMED. IN NO EVENT SHALL THE COPYRIGHT
+// OWNER OR CONTRIBUTORS BE LIABLE FOR ANY DIRECT, INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL,
+// SPECIAL, EXEMPLARY, OR CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES (INCLUDING, BUT NOT
+// LIMITED TO, PROCUREMENT OF SUBSTITUTE GOODS OR SERVICES; LOSS OF USE,
+// DATA, OR PROFITS; OR BUSINESS INTERRUPTION) HOWEVER CAUSED AND ON ANY
+// THEORY OF LIABILITY, WHETHER IN CONTRACT, STRICT LIABILITY, OR TORT
+// (INCLUDING NEGLIGENCE OR OTHERWISE) ARISING IN ANY WAY OUT OF THE USE
+// OF THIS SOFTWARE, EVEN IF ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGE.
+
+// Google Mock - a framework for writing C++ mock classes.
+//
+// This file tests the built-in matchers generated by a script.
+
+#include "gmock/gmock-generated-matchers.h"
+
+#include <list>
+#include <map>
+#include <set>
+#include <sstream>
+#include <string>
+#include <utility>
+#include <vector>
+
+#include "gmock/gmock.h"
+#include "gtest/gtest.h"
+#include "gtest/gtest-spi.h"
+
+namespace {
+
+using std::list;
+using std::map;
+using std::pair;
+using std::set;
+using std::stringstream;
+using std::vector;
+using testing::get;
+using testing::make_tuple;
+using testing::tuple;
+using testing::_;
+using testing::Args;
+using testing::Contains;
+using testing::ElementsAre;
+using testing::ElementsAreArray;
+using testing::Eq;
+using testing::Ge;
+using testing::Gt;
+using testing::Le;
+using testing::Lt;
+using testing::MakeMatcher;
+using testing::Matcher;
+using testing::MatcherInterface;
+using testing::MatchResultListener;
+using testing::Ne;
+using testing::Not;
+using testing::Pointee;
+using testing::PrintToString;
+using testing::Ref;
+using testing::StaticAssertTypeEq;
+using testing::StrEq;
+using testing::Value;
+using testing::internal::ElementsAreArrayMatcher;
+using testing::internal::string;
+
+// Returns the description of the given matcher.
+template <typename T>
+string Describe(const Matcher<T>& m) {
+  stringstream ss;
+  m.DescribeTo(&ss);
+  return ss.str();
+}
+
+// Returns the description of the negation of the given matcher.
+template <typename T>
+string DescribeNegation(const Matcher<T>& m) {
+  stringstream ss;
+  m.DescribeNegationTo(&ss);
+  return ss.str();
+}
+
+// Returns the reason why x matches, or doesn't match, m.
+template <typename MatcherType, typename Value>
+string Explain(const MatcherType& m, const Value& x) {
+  stringstream ss;
+  m.ExplainMatchResultTo(x, &ss);
+  return ss.str();
+}
+
+// Tests Args<k0, ..., kn>(m).
+
+TEST(ArgsTest, AcceptsZeroTemplateArg) {
+  const tuple<int, bool> t(5, true);
+  EXPECT_THAT(t, Args<>(Eq(tuple<>())));
+  EXPECT_THAT(t, Not(Args<>(Ne(tuple<>()))));
+}
+
+TEST(ArgsTest, AcceptsOneTemplateArg) {
+  const tuple<int, bool> t(5, true);
+  EXPECT_THAT(t, Args<0>(Eq(make_tuple(5))));
+  EXPECT_THAT(t, Args<1>(Eq(make_tuple(true))));
+  EXPECT_THAT(t, Not(Args<1>(Eq(make_tuple(false)))));
+}
+
+TEST(ArgsTest, AcceptsTwoTemplateArgs) {
+  const tuple<short, int, long> t(4, 5, 6L);  // NOLINT
+
+  EXPECT_THAT(t, (Args<0, 1>(Lt())));
+  EXPECT_THAT(t, (Args<1, 2>(Lt())));
+  EXPECT_THAT(t, Not(Args<0, 2>(Gt())));
+}
+
+TEST(ArgsTest, AcceptsRepeatedTemplateArgs) {
+  const tuple<short, int, long> t(4, 5, 6L);  // NOLINT
+  EXPECT_THAT(t, (Args<0, 0>(Eq())));
+  EXPECT_THAT(t, Not(Args<1, 1>(Ne())));
+}
+
+TEST(ArgsTest, AcceptsDecreasingTemplateArgs) {
+  const tuple<short, int, long> t(4, 5, 6L);  // NOLINT
+  EXPECT_THAT(t, (Args<2, 0>(Gt())));
+  EXPECT_THAT(t, Not(Args<2, 1>(Lt())));
+}
+
+// The MATCHER*() macros trigger warning C4100 (unreferenced formal
+// parameter) in MSVC with -W4.  Unfortunately they cannot be fixed in
+// the macro definition, as the warnings are generated when the macro
+// is expanded and macro expansion cannot contain #pragma.  Therefore
+// we suppress them here.
+#ifdef _MSC_VER
+# pragma warning(push)
+# pragma warning(disable:4100)
+#endif
+
+MATCHER(SumIsZero, "") {
+  return get<0>(arg) + get<1>(arg) + get<2>(arg) == 0;
+}
+
+TEST(ArgsTest, AcceptsMoreTemplateArgsThanArityOfOriginalTuple) {
+  EXPECT_THAT(make_tuple(-1, 2), (Args<0, 0, 1>(SumIsZero())));
+  EXPECT_THAT(make_tuple(1, 2), Not(Args<0, 0, 1>(SumIsZero())));
+}
+
+TEST(ArgsTest, CanBeNested) {
+  const tuple<short, int, long, int> t(4, 5, 6L, 6);  // NOLINT
+  EXPECT_THAT(t, (Args<1, 2, 3>(Args<1, 2>(Eq()))));
+  EXPECT_THAT(t, (Args<0, 1, 3>(Args<0, 2>(Lt()))));
+}
+
+TEST(ArgsTest, CanMatchTupleByValue) {
+  typedef tuple<char, int, int> Tuple3;
+  const Matcher<Tuple3> m = Args<1, 2>(Lt());
+  EXPECT_TRUE(m.Matches(Tuple3('a', 1, 2)));
+  EXPECT_FALSE(m.Matches(Tuple3('b', 2, 2)));
+}
+
+TEST(ArgsTest, CanMatchTupleByReference) {
+  typedef tuple<char, char, int> Tuple3;
+  const Matcher<const Tuple3&> m = Args<0, 1>(Lt());
+  EXPECT_TRUE(m.Matches(Tuple3('a', 'b', 2)));
+  EXPECT_FALSE(m.Matches(Tuple3('b', 'b', 2)));
+}
+
+// Validates that arg is printed as str.
+MATCHER_P(PrintsAs, str, "") {
+  return testing::PrintToString(arg) == str;
+}
+
+TEST(ArgsTest, AcceptsTenTemplateArgs) {
+  EXPECT_THAT(make_tuple(0, 1L, 2, 3L, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9),
+              (Args<9, 8, 7, 6, 5, 4, 3, 2, 1, 0>(
+                  PrintsAs("(9, 8, 7, 6, 5, 4, 3, 2, 1, 0)"))));
+  EXPECT_THAT(make_tuple(0, 1L, 2, 3L, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9),
+              Not(Args<9, 8, 7, 6, 5, 4, 3, 2, 1, 0>(
+                      PrintsAs("(0, 8, 7, 6, 5, 4, 3, 2, 1, 0)"))));
+}
+
+TEST(ArgsTest, DescirbesSelfCorrectly) {
+  const Matcher<tuple<int, bool, char> > m = Args<2, 0>(Lt());
+  EXPECT_EQ("are a tuple whose fields (#2, #0) are a pair where "
+            "the first < the second",
+            Describe(m));
+}
+
+TEST(ArgsTest, DescirbesNestedArgsCorrectly) {
+  const Matcher<const tuple<int, bool, char, int>&> m =
+      Args<0, 2, 3>(Args<2, 0>(Lt()));
+  EXPECT_EQ("are a tuple whose fields (#0, #2, #3) are a tuple "
+            "whose fields (#2, #0) are a pair where the first < the second",
+            Describe(m));
+}
+
+TEST(ArgsTest, DescribesNegationCorrectly) {
+  const Matcher<tuple<int, char> > m = Args<1, 0>(Gt());
+  EXPECT_EQ("are a tuple whose fields (#1, #0) aren't a pair "
+            "where the first > the second",
+            DescribeNegation(m));
+}
+
+TEST(ArgsTest, ExplainsMatchResultWithoutInnerExplanation) {
+  const Matcher<tuple<bool, int, int> > m = Args<1, 2>(Eq());
+  EXPECT_EQ("whose fields (#1, #2) are (42, 42)",
+            Explain(m, make_tuple(false, 42, 42)));
+  EXPECT_EQ("whose fields (#1, #2) are (42, 43)",
+            Explain(m, make_tuple(false, 42, 43)));
+}
+
+// For testing Args<>'s explanation.
+class LessThanMatcher : public MatcherInterface<tuple<char, int> > {
+ public:
+  virtual void DescribeTo(::std::ostream* os) const {}
+
+  virtual bool MatchAndExplain(tuple<char, int> value,
+                               MatchResultListener* listener) const {
+    const int diff = get<0>(value) - get<1>(value);
+    if (diff > 0) {
+      *listener << "where the first value is " << diff
+                << " more than the second";
+    }
+    return diff < 0;
+  }
+};
+
+Matcher<tuple<char, int> > LessThan() {
+  return MakeMatcher(new LessThanMatcher);
+}
+
+TEST(ArgsTest, ExplainsMatchResultWithInnerExplanation) {
+  const Matcher<tuple<char, int, int> > m = Args<0, 2>(LessThan());
+  EXPECT_EQ("whose fields (#0, #2) are ('a' (97, 0x61), 42), "
+            "where the first value is 55 more than the second",
+            Explain(m, make_tuple('a', 42, 42)));
+  EXPECT_EQ("whose fields (#0, #2) are ('\\0', 43)",
+            Explain(m, make_tuple('\0', 42, 43)));
+}
+
+// For testing ExplainMatchResultTo().
+class GreaterThanMatcher : public MatcherInterface<int> {
+ public:
+  explicit GreaterThanMatcher(int rhs) : rhs_(rhs) {}
+
+  virtual void DescribeTo(::std::ostream* os) const {
+    *os << "is greater than " << rhs_;
+  }
+
+  virtual bool MatchAndExplain(int lhs,
+                               MatchResultListener* listener) const {
+    const int diff = lhs - rhs_;
+    if (diff > 0) {
+      *listener << "which is " << diff << " more than " << rhs_;
+    } else if (diff == 0) {
+      *listener << "which is the same as " << rhs_;
+    } else {
+      *listener << "which is " << -diff << " less than " << rhs_;
+    }
+
+    return lhs > rhs_;
+  }
+
+ private:
+  int rhs_;
+};
+
+Matcher<int> GreaterThan(int n) {
+  return MakeMatcher(new GreaterThanMatcher(n));
+}
+
+// Tests for ElementsAre().
+
+TEST(ElementsAreTest, CanDescribeExpectingNoElement) {
+  Matcher<const vector<int>&> m = ElementsAre();
+  EXPECT_EQ("is empty", Describe(m));
+}
+
+TEST(ElementsAreTest, CanDescribeExpectingOneElement) {
+  Matcher<vector<int> > m = ElementsAre(Gt(5));
+  EXPECT_EQ("has 1 element that is > 5", Describe(m));
+}
+
+TEST(ElementsAreTest, CanDescribeExpectingManyElements) {
+  Matcher<list<string> > m = ElementsAre(StrEq("one"), "two");
+  EXPECT_EQ("has 2 elements where\n"
+            "element #0 is equal to \"one\",\n"
+            "element #1 is equal to \"two\"", Describe(m));
+}
+
+TEST(ElementsAreTest, CanDescribeNegationOfExpectingNoElement) {
+  Matcher<vector<int> > m = ElementsAre();
+  EXPECT_EQ("isn't empty", DescribeNegation(m));
+}
+
+TEST(ElementsAreTest, CanDescribeNegationOfExpectingOneElment) {
+  Matcher<const list<int>& > m = ElementsAre(Gt(5));
+  EXPECT_EQ("doesn't have 1 element, or\n"
+            "element #0 isn't > 5", DescribeNegation(m));
+}
+
+TEST(ElementsAreTest, CanDescribeNegationOfExpectingManyElements) {
+  Matcher<const list<string>& > m = ElementsAre("one", "two");
+  EXPECT_EQ("doesn't have 2 elements, or\n"
+            "element #0 isn't equal to \"one\", or\n"
+            "element #1 isn't equal to \"two\"", DescribeNegation(m));
+}
+
+TEST(ElementsAreTest, DoesNotExplainTrivialMatch) {
+  Matcher<const list<int>& > m = ElementsAre(1, Ne(2));
+
+  list<int> test_list;
+  test_list.push_back(1);
+  test_list.push_back(3);
+  EXPECT_EQ("", Explain(m, test_list));  // No need to explain anything.
+}
+
+TEST(ElementsAreTest, ExplainsNonTrivialMatch) {
+  Matcher<const vector<int>& > m =
+      ElementsAre(GreaterThan(1), 0, GreaterThan(2));
+
+  const int a[] = { 10, 0, 100 };
+  vector<int> test_vector(a, a + GTEST_ARRAY_SIZE_(a));
+  EXPECT_EQ("whose element #0 matches, which is 9 more than 1,\n"
+            "and whose element #2 matches, which is 98 more than 2",
+            Explain(m, test_vector));
+}
+
+TEST(ElementsAreTest, CanExplainMismatchWrongSize) {
+  Matcher<const list<int>& > m = ElementsAre(1, 3);
+
+  list<int> test_list;
+  // No need to explain when the container is empty.
+  EXPECT_EQ("", Explain(m, test_list));
+
+  test_list.push_back(1);
+  EXPECT_EQ("which has 1 element", Explain(m, test_list));
+}
+
+TEST(ElementsAreTest, CanExplainMismatchRightSize) {
+  Matcher<const vector<int>& > m = ElementsAre(1, GreaterThan(5));
+
+  vector<int> v;
+  v.push_back(2);
+  v.push_back(1);
+  EXPECT_EQ("whose element #0 doesn't match", Explain(m, v));
+
+  v[0] = 1;
+  EXPECT_EQ("whose element #1 doesn't match, which is 4 less than 5",
+            Explain(m, v));
+}
+
+TEST(ElementsAreTest, MatchesOneElementVector) {
+  vector<string> test_vector;
+  test_vector.push_back("test string");
+
+  EXPECT_THAT(test_vector, ElementsAre(StrEq("test string")));
+}
+
+TEST(ElementsAreTest, MatchesOneElementList) {
+  list<string> test_list;
+  test_list.push_back("test string");
+
+  EXPECT_THAT(test_list, ElementsAre("test string"));
+}
+
+TEST(ElementsAreTest, MatchesThreeElementVector) {
+  vector<string> test_vector;
+  test_vector.push_back("one");
+  test_vector.push_back("two");
+  test_vector.push_back("three");
+
+  EXPECT_THAT(test_vector, ElementsAre("one", StrEq("two"), _));
+}
+
+TEST(ElementsAreTest, MatchesOneElementEqMatcher) {
+  vector<int> test_vector;
+  test_vector.push_back(4);
+
+  EXPECT_THAT(test_vector, ElementsAre(Eq(4)));
+}
+
+TEST(ElementsAreTest, MatchesOneElementAnyMatcher) {
+  vector<int> test_vector;
+  test_vector.push_back(4);
+
+  EXPECT_THAT(test_vector, ElementsAre(_));
+}
+
+TEST(ElementsAreTest, MatchesOneElementValue) {
+  vector<int> test_vector;
+  test_vector.push_back(4);
+
+  EXPECT_THAT(test_vector, ElementsAre(4));
+}
+
+TEST(ElementsAreTest, MatchesThreeElementsMixedMatchers) {
+  vector<int> test_vector;
+  test_vector.push_back(1);
+  test_vector.push_back(2);
+  test_vector.push_back(3);
+
+  EXPECT_THAT(test_vector, ElementsAre(1, Eq(2), _));
+}
+
+TEST(ElementsAreTest, MatchesTenElementVector) {
+  const int a[] = { 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 };
+  vector<int> test_vector(a, a + GTEST_ARRAY_SIZE_(a));
+
+  EXPECT_THAT(test_vector,
+              // The element list can contain values and/or matchers
+              // of different types.
+              ElementsAre(0, Ge(0), _, 3, 4, Ne(2), Eq(6), 7, 8, _));
+}
+
+TEST(ElementsAreTest, DoesNotMatchWrongSize) {
+  vector<string> test_vector;
+  test_vector.push_back("test string");
+  test_vector.push_back("test string");
+
+  Matcher<vector<string> > m = ElementsAre(StrEq("test string"));
+  EXPECT_FALSE(m.Matches(test_vector));
+}
+
+TEST(ElementsAreTest, DoesNotMatchWrongValue) {
+  vector<string> test_vector;
+  test_vector.push_back("other string");
+
+  Matcher<vector<string> > m = ElementsAre(StrEq("test string"));
+  EXPECT_FALSE(m.Matches(test_vector));
+}
+
+TEST(ElementsAreTest, DoesNotMatchWrongOrder) {
+  vector<string> test_vector;
+  test_vector.push_back("one");
+  test_vector.push_back("three");
+  test_vector.push_back("two");
+
+  Matcher<vector<string> > m = ElementsAre(
+    StrEq("one"), StrEq("two"), StrEq("three"));
+  EXPECT_FALSE(m.Matches(test_vector));
+}
+
+TEST(ElementsAreTest, WorksForNestedContainer) {
+  const char* strings[] = {
+    "Hi",
+    "world"
+  };
+
+  vector<list<char> > nested;
+  for (size_t i = 0; i < GTEST_ARRAY_SIZE_(strings); i++) {
+    nested.push_back(list<char>(strings[i], strings[i] + strlen(strings[i])));
+  }
+
+  EXPECT_THAT(nested, ElementsAre(ElementsAre('H', Ne('e')),
+                                  ElementsAre('w', 'o', _, _, 'd')));
+  EXPECT_THAT(nested, Not(ElementsAre(ElementsAre('H', 'e'),
+                                      ElementsAre('w', 'o', _, _, 'd'))));
+}
+
+TEST(ElementsAreTest, WorksWithByRefElementMatchers) {
+  int a[] = { 0, 1, 2 };
+  vector<int> v(a, a + GTEST_ARRAY_SIZE_(a));
+
+  EXPECT_THAT(v, ElementsAre(Ref(v[0]), Ref(v[1]), Ref(v[2])));
+  EXPECT_THAT(v, Not(ElementsAre(Ref(v[0]), Ref(v[1]), Ref(a[2]))));
+}
+
+TEST(ElementsAreTest, WorksWithContainerPointerUsingPointee) {
+  int a[] = { 0, 1, 2 };
+  vector<int> v(a, a + GTEST_ARRAY_SIZE_(a));
+
+  EXPECT_THAT(&v, Pointee(ElementsAre(0, 1, _)));
+  EXPECT_THAT(&v, Not(Pointee(ElementsAre(0, _, 3))));
+}
+
+TEST(ElementsAreTest, WorksWithNativeArrayPassedByReference) {
+  int array[] = { 0, 1, 2 };
+  EXPECT_THAT(array, ElementsAre(0, 1, _));
+  EXPECT_THAT(array, Not(ElementsAre(1, _, _)));
+  EXPECT_THAT(array, Not(ElementsAre(0, _)));
+}
+
+class NativeArrayPassedAsPointerAndSize {
+ public:
+  NativeArrayPassedAsPointerAndSize() {}
+
+  MOCK_METHOD2(Helper, void(int* array, int size));
+
+ private:
+  GTEST_DISALLOW_COPY_AND_ASSIGN_(NativeArrayPassedAsPointerAndSize);
+};
+
+TEST(ElementsAreTest, WorksWithNativeArrayPassedAsPointerAndSize) {
+  int array[] = { 0, 1 };
+  ::testing::tuple<int*, size_t> array_as_tuple(array, 2);
+  EXPECT_THAT(array_as_tuple, ElementsAre(0, 1));
+  EXPECT_THAT(array_as_tuple, Not(ElementsAre(0)));
+
+  NativeArrayPassedAsPointerAndSize helper;
+  EXPECT_CALL(helper, Helper(_, _))
+      .With(ElementsAre(0, 1));
+  helper.Helper(array, 2);
+}
+
+TEST(ElementsAreTest, WorksWithTwoDimensionalNativeArray) {
+  const char a2[][3] = { "hi", "lo" };
+  EXPECT_THAT(a2, ElementsAre(ElementsAre('h', 'i', '\0'),
+                              ElementsAre('l', 'o', '\0')));
+  EXPECT_THAT(a2, ElementsAre(StrEq("hi"), StrEq("lo")));
+  EXPECT_THAT(a2, ElementsAre(Not(ElementsAre('h', 'o', '\0')),
+                              ElementsAre('l', 'o', '\0')));
+}
+
+TEST(ElementsAreTest, AcceptsStringLiteral) {
+  string array[] = { "hi", "one", "two" };
+  EXPECT_THAT(array, ElementsAre("hi", "one", "two"));
+  EXPECT_THAT(array, Not(ElementsAre("hi", "one", "too")));
+}
+
+#ifndef _MSC_VER
+
+// The following test passes a value of type const char[] to a
+// function template that expects const T&.  Some versions of MSVC
+// generates a compiler error C2665 for that.  We believe it's a bug
+// in MSVC.  Therefore this test is #if-ed out for MSVC.
+
+// Declared here with the size unknown.  Defined AFTER the following test.
+extern const char kHi[];
+
+TEST(ElementsAreTest, AcceptsArrayWithUnknownSize) {
+  // The size of kHi is not known in this test, but ElementsAre() should
+  // still accept it.
+
+  string array1[] = { "hi" };
+  EXPECT_THAT(array1, ElementsAre(kHi));
+
+  string array2[] = { "ho" };
+  EXPECT_THAT(array2, Not(ElementsAre(kHi)));
+}
+
+const char kHi[] = "hi";
+
+#endif  // _MSC_VER
+
+TEST(ElementsAreTest, MakesCopyOfArguments) {
+  int x = 1;
+  int y = 2;
+  // This should make a copy of x and y.
+  ::testing::internal::ElementsAreMatcher<testing::tuple<int, int> >
+          polymorphic_matcher = ElementsAre(x, y);
+  // Changing x and y now shouldn't affect the meaning of the above matcher.
+  x = y = 0;
+  const int array1[] = { 1, 2 };
+  EXPECT_THAT(array1, polymorphic_matcher);
+  const int array2[] = { 0, 0 };
+  EXPECT_THAT(array2, Not(polymorphic_matcher));
+}
+
+
+// Tests for ElementsAreArray().  Since ElementsAreArray() shares most
+// of the implementation with ElementsAre(), we don't test it as
+// thoroughly here.
+
+TEST(ElementsAreArrayTest, CanBeCreatedWithValueArray) {
+  const int a[] = { 1, 2, 3 };
+
+  vector<int> test_vector(a, a + GTEST_ARRAY_SIZE_(a));
+  EXPECT_THAT(test_vector, ElementsAreArray(a));
+
+  test_vector[2] = 0;
+  EXPECT_THAT(test_vector, Not(ElementsAreArray(a)));
+}
+
+TEST(ElementsAreArrayTest, CanBeCreatedWithArraySize) {
+  const char* a[] = { "one", "two", "three" };
+
+  vector<string> test_vector(a, a + GTEST_ARRAY_SIZE_(a));
+  EXPECT_THAT(test_vector, ElementsAreArray(a, GTEST_ARRAY_SIZE_(a)));
+
+  const char** p = a;
+  test_vector[0] = "1";
+  EXPECT_THAT(test_vector, Not(ElementsAreArray(p, GTEST_ARRAY_SIZE_(a))));
+}
+
+TEST(ElementsAreArrayTest, CanBeCreatedWithoutArraySize) {
+  const char* a[] = { "one", "two", "three" };
+
+  vector<string> test_vector(a, a + GTEST_ARRAY_SIZE_(a));
+  EXPECT_THAT(test_vector, ElementsAreArray(a));
+
+  test_vector[0] = "1";
+  EXPECT_THAT(test_vector, Not(ElementsAreArray(a)));
+}
+
+TEST(ElementsAreArrayTest, CanBeCreatedWithMatcherArray) {
+  const Matcher<string> kMatcherArray[] =
+    { StrEq("one"), StrEq("two"), StrEq("three") };
+
+  vector<string> test_vector;
+  test_vector.push_back("one");
+  test_vector.push_back("two");
+  test_vector.push_back("three");
+  EXPECT_THAT(test_vector, ElementsAreArray(kMatcherArray));
+
+  test_vector.push_back("three");
+  EXPECT_THAT(test_vector, Not(ElementsAreArray(kMatcherArray)));
+}
+
+TEST(ElementsAreArrayTest, CanBeCreatedWithVector) {
+  const int a[] = { 1, 2, 3 };
+  vector<int> test_vector(a, a + GTEST_ARRAY_SIZE_(a));
+  const vector<int> expected(a, a + GTEST_ARRAY_SIZE_(a));
+  EXPECT_THAT(test_vector, ElementsAreArray(expected));
+  test_vector.push_back(4);
+  EXPECT_THAT(test_vector, Not(ElementsAreArray(expected)));
+}
+
+#if GTEST_HAS_STD_INITIALIZER_LIST_
+
+TEST(ElementsAreArrayTest, TakesInitializerList) {
+  const int a[5] = { 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 };
+  EXPECT_THAT(a, ElementsAreArray({ 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 }));
+  EXPECT_THAT(a, Not(ElementsAreArray({ 1, 2, 3, 5, 4 })));
+  EXPECT_THAT(a, Not(ElementsAreArray({ 1, 2, 3, 4, 6 })));
+}
+
+TEST(ElementsAreArrayTest, TakesInitializerListOfCStrings) {
+  const string a[5] = { "a", "b", "c", "d", "e" };
+  EXPECT_THAT(a, ElementsAreArray({ "a", "b", "c", "d", "e" }));
+  EXPECT_THAT(a, Not(ElementsAreArray({ "a", "b", "c", "e", "d" })));
+  EXPECT_THAT(a, Not(ElementsAreArray({ "a", "b", "c", "d", "ef" })));
+}
+
+TEST(ElementsAreArrayTest, TakesInitializerListOfSameTypedMatchers) {
+  const int a[5] = { 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 };
+  EXPECT_THAT(a, ElementsAreArray(
+      { Eq(1), Eq(2), Eq(3), Eq(4), Eq(5) }));
+  EXPECT_THAT(a, Not(ElementsAreArray(
+      { Eq(1), Eq(2), Eq(3), Eq(4), Eq(6) })));
+}
+
+TEST(ElementsAreArrayTest,
+     TakesInitializerListOfDifferentTypedMatchers) {
+  const int a[5] = { 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 };
+  // The compiler cannot infer the type of the initializer list if its
+  // elements have different types.  We must explicitly specify the
+  // unified element type in this case.
+  EXPECT_THAT(a, ElementsAreArray<Matcher<int> >(
+      { Eq(1), Ne(-2), Ge(3), Le(4), Eq(5) }));
+  EXPECT_THAT(a, Not(ElementsAreArray<Matcher<int> >(
+      { Eq(1), Ne(-2), Ge(3), Le(4), Eq(6) })));
+}
+
+#endif  // GTEST_HAS_STD_INITIALIZER_LIST_
+
+TEST(ElementsAreArrayTest, CanBeCreatedWithMatcherVector) {
+  const int a[] = { 1, 2, 3 };
+  const Matcher<int> kMatchers[] = { Eq(1), Eq(2), Eq(3) };
+  vector<int> test_vector(a, a + GTEST_ARRAY_SIZE_(a));
+  const vector<Matcher<int> > expected(
+      kMatchers, kMatchers + GTEST_ARRAY_SIZE_(kMatchers));
+  EXPECT_THAT(test_vector, ElementsAreArray(expected));
+  test_vector.push_back(4);
+  EXPECT_THAT(test_vector, Not(ElementsAreArray(expected)));
+}
+
+TEST(ElementsAreArrayTest, CanBeCreatedWithIteratorRange) {
+  const int a[] = { 1, 2, 3 };
+  const vector<int> test_vector(a, a + GTEST_ARRAY_SIZE_(a));
+  const vector<int> expected(a, a + GTEST_ARRAY_SIZE_(a));
+  EXPECT_THAT(test_vector, ElementsAreArray(expected.begin(), expected.end()));
+  // Pointers are iterators, too.
+  EXPECT_THAT(test_vector, ElementsAreArray(a, a + GTEST_ARRAY_SIZE_(a)));
+  // The empty range of NULL pointers should also be okay.
+  int* const null_int = NULL;
+  EXPECT_THAT(test_vector, Not(ElementsAreArray(null_int, null_int)));
+  EXPECT_THAT((vector<int>()), ElementsAreArray(null_int, null_int));
+}
+
+// Since ElementsAre() and ElementsAreArray() share much of the
+// implementation, we only do a sanity test for native arrays here.
+TEST(ElementsAreArrayTest, WorksWithNativeArray) {
+  ::std::string a[] = { "hi", "ho" };
+  ::std::string b[] = { "hi", "ho" };
+
+  EXPECT_THAT(a, ElementsAreArray(b));
+  EXPECT_THAT(a, ElementsAreArray(b, 2));
+  EXPECT_THAT(a, Not(ElementsAreArray(b, 1)));
+}
+
+TEST(ElementsAreArrayTest, SourceLifeSpan) {
+  const int a[] = { 1, 2, 3 };
+  vector<int> test_vector(a, a + GTEST_ARRAY_SIZE_(a));
+  vector<int> expect(a, a + GTEST_ARRAY_SIZE_(a));
+  ElementsAreArrayMatcher<int> matcher_maker =
+      ElementsAreArray(expect.begin(), expect.end());
+  EXPECT_THAT(test_vector, matcher_maker);
+  // Changing in place the values that initialized matcher_maker should not
+  // affect matcher_maker anymore. It should have made its own copy of them.
+  typedef vector<int>::iterator Iter;
+  for (Iter it = expect.begin(); it != expect.end(); ++it) { *it += 10; }
+  EXPECT_THAT(test_vector, matcher_maker);
+  test_vector.push_back(3);
+  EXPECT_THAT(test_vector, Not(matcher_maker));
+}
+
+// Tests for the MATCHER*() macro family.
+
+// Tests that a simple MATCHER() definition works.
+
+MATCHER(IsEven, "") { return (arg % 2) == 0; }
+
+TEST(MatcherMacroTest, Works) {
+  const Matcher<int> m = IsEven();
+  EXPECT_TRUE(m.Matches(6));
+  EXPECT_FALSE(m.Matches(7));
+
+  EXPECT_EQ("is even", Describe(m));
+  EXPECT_EQ("not (is even)", DescribeNegation(m));
+  EXPECT_EQ("", Explain(m, 6));
+  EXPECT_EQ("", Explain(m, 7));
+}
+
+// This also tests that the description string can reference 'negation'.
+MATCHER(IsEven2, negation ? "is odd" : "is even") {
+  if ((arg % 2) == 0) {
+    // Verifies that we can stream to result_listener, a listener
+    // supplied by the MATCHER macro implicitly.
+    *result_listener << "OK";
+    return true;
+  } else {
+    *result_listener << "% 2 == " << (arg % 2);
+    return false;
+  }
+}
+
+// This also tests that the description string can reference matcher
+// parameters.
+MATCHER_P2(EqSumOf, x, y,
+           string(negation ? "doesn't equal" : "equals") + " the sum of " +
+           PrintToString(x) + " and " + PrintToString(y)) {
+  if (arg == (x + y)) {
+    *result_listener << "OK";
+    return true;
+  } else {
+    // Verifies that we can stream to the underlying stream of
+    // result_listener.
+    if (result_listener->stream() != NULL) {
+      *result_listener->stream() << "diff == " << (x + y - arg);
+    }
+    return false;
+  }
+}
+
+// Tests that the matcher description can reference 'negation' and the
+// matcher parameters.
+TEST(MatcherMacroTest, DescriptionCanReferenceNegationAndParameters) {
+  const Matcher<int> m1 = IsEven2();
+  EXPECT_EQ("is even", Describe(m1));
+  EXPECT_EQ("is odd", DescribeNegation(m1));
+
+  const Matcher<int> m2 = EqSumOf(5, 9);
+  EXPECT_EQ("equals the sum of 5 and 9", Describe(m2));
+  EXPECT_EQ("doesn't equal the sum of 5 and 9", DescribeNegation(m2));
+}
+
+// Tests explaining match result in a MATCHER* macro.
+TEST(MatcherMacroTest, CanExplainMatchResult) {
+  const Matcher<int> m1 = IsEven2();
+  EXPECT_EQ("OK", Explain(m1, 4));
+  EXPECT_EQ("% 2 == 1", Explain(m1, 5));
+
+  const Matcher<int> m2 = EqSumOf(1, 2);
+  EXPECT_EQ("OK", Explain(m2, 3));
+  EXPECT_EQ("diff == -1", Explain(m2, 4));
+}
+
+// Tests that the body of MATCHER() can reference the type of the
+// value being matched.
+
+MATCHER(IsEmptyString, "") {
+  StaticAssertTypeEq< ::std::string, arg_type>();
+  return arg == "";
+}
+
+MATCHER(IsEmptyStringByRef, "") {
+  StaticAssertTypeEq<const ::std::string&, arg_type>();
+  return arg == "";
+}
+
+TEST(MatcherMacroTest, CanReferenceArgType) {
+  const Matcher< ::std::string> m1 = IsEmptyString();
+  EXPECT_TRUE(m1.Matches(""));
+
+  const Matcher<const ::std::string&> m2 = IsEmptyStringByRef();
+  EXPECT_TRUE(m2.Matches(""));
+}
+
+// Tests that MATCHER() can be used in a namespace.
+
+namespace matcher_test {
+MATCHER(IsOdd, "") { return (arg % 2) != 0; }
+}  // namespace matcher_test
+
+TEST(MatcherMacroTest, WorksInNamespace) {
+  Matcher<int> m = matcher_test::IsOdd();
+  EXPECT_FALSE(m.Matches(4));
+  EXPECT_TRUE(m.Matches(5));
+}
+
+// Tests that Value() can be used to compose matchers.
+MATCHER(IsPositiveOdd, "") {
+  return Value(arg, matcher_test::IsOdd()) && arg > 0;
+}
+
+TEST(MatcherMacroTest, CanBeComposedUsingValue) {
+  EXPECT_THAT(3, IsPositiveOdd());
+  EXPECT_THAT(4, Not(IsPositiveOdd()));
+  EXPECT_THAT(-1, Not(IsPositiveOdd()));
+}
+
+// Tests that a simple MATCHER_P() definition works.
+
+MATCHER_P(IsGreaterThan32And, n, "") { return arg > 32 && arg > n; }
+
+TEST(MatcherPMacroTest, Works) {
+  const Matcher<int> m = IsGreaterThan32And(5);
+  EXPECT_TRUE(m.Matches(36));
+  EXPECT_FALSE(m.Matches(5));
+
+  EXPECT_EQ("is greater than 32 and 5", Describe(m));
+  EXPECT_EQ("not (is greater than 32 and 5)", DescribeNegation(m));
+  EXPECT_EQ("", Explain(m, 36));
+  EXPECT_EQ("", Explain(m, 5));
+}
+
+// Tests that the description is calculated correctly from the matcher name.
+MATCHER_P(_is_Greater_Than32and_, n, "") { return arg > 32 && arg > n; }
+
+TEST(MatcherPMacroTest, GeneratesCorrectDescription) {
+  const Matcher<int> m = _is_Greater_Than32and_(5);
+
+  EXPECT_EQ("is greater than 32 and 5", Describe(m));
+  EXPECT_EQ("not (is greater than 32 and 5)", DescribeNegation(m));
+  EXPECT_EQ("", Explain(m, 36));
+  EXPECT_EQ("", Explain(m, 5));
+}
+
+// Tests that a MATCHER_P matcher can be explicitly instantiated with
+// a reference parameter type.
+
+class UncopyableFoo {
+ public:
+  explicit UncopyableFoo(char value) : value_(value) {}
+ private:
+  UncopyableFoo(const UncopyableFoo&);
+  void operator=(const UncopyableFoo&);
+
+  char value_;
+};
+
+MATCHER_P(ReferencesUncopyable, variable, "") { return &arg == &variable; }
+
+TEST(MatcherPMacroTest, WorksWhenExplicitlyInstantiatedWithReference) {
+  UncopyableFoo foo1('1'), foo2('2');
+  const Matcher<const UncopyableFoo&> m =
+      ReferencesUncopyable<const UncopyableFoo&>(foo1);
+
+  EXPECT_TRUE(m.Matches(foo1));
+  EXPECT_FALSE(m.Matches(foo2));
+
+  // We don't want the address of the parameter printed, as most
+  // likely it will just annoy the user.  If the address is
+  // interesting, the user should consider passing the parameter by
+  // pointer instead.
+  EXPECT_EQ("references uncopyable 1-byte object <31>", Describe(m));
+}
+
+
+// Tests that the body of MATCHER_Pn() can reference the parameter
+// types.
+
+MATCHER_P3(ParamTypesAreIntLongAndChar, foo, bar, baz, "") {
+  StaticAssertTypeEq<int, foo_type>();
+  StaticAssertTypeEq<long, bar_type>();  // NOLINT
+  StaticAssertTypeEq<char, baz_type>();
+  return arg == 0;
+}
+
+TEST(MatcherPnMacroTest, CanReferenceParamTypes) {
+  EXPECT_THAT(0, ParamTypesAreIntLongAndChar(10, 20L, 'a'));
+}
+
+// Tests that a MATCHER_Pn matcher can be explicitly instantiated with
+// reference parameter types.
+
+MATCHER_P2(ReferencesAnyOf, variable1, variable2, "") {
+  return &arg == &variable1 || &arg == &variable2;
+}
+
+TEST(MatcherPnMacroTest, WorksWhenExplicitlyInstantiatedWithReferences) {
+  UncopyableFoo foo1('1'), foo2('2'), foo3('3');
+  const Matcher<const UncopyableFoo&> m =
+      ReferencesAnyOf<const UncopyableFoo&, const UncopyableFoo&>(foo1, foo2);
+
+  EXPECT_TRUE(m.Matches(foo1));
+  EXPECT_TRUE(m.Matches(foo2));
+  EXPECT_FALSE(m.Matches(foo3));
+}
+
+TEST(MatcherPnMacroTest,
+     GeneratesCorretDescriptionWhenExplicitlyInstantiatedWithReferences) {
+  UncopyableFoo foo1('1'), foo2('2');
+  const Matcher<const UncopyableFoo&> m =
+      ReferencesAnyOf<const UncopyableFoo&, const UncopyableFoo&>(foo1, foo2);
+
+  // We don't want the addresses of the parameters printed, as most
+  // likely they will just annoy the user.  If the addresses are
+  // interesting, the user should consider passing the parameters by
+  // pointers instead.
+  EXPECT_EQ("references any of (1-byte object <31>, 1-byte object <32>)",
+            Describe(m));
+}
+
+// Tests that a simple MATCHER_P2() definition works.
+
+MATCHER_P2(IsNotInClosedRange, low, hi, "") { return arg < low || arg > hi; }
+
+TEST(MatcherPnMacroTest, Works) {
+  const Matcher<const long&> m = IsNotInClosedRange(10, 20);  // NOLINT
+  EXPECT_TRUE(m.Matches(36L));
+  EXPECT_FALSE(m.Matches(15L));
+
+  EXPECT_EQ("is not in closed range (10, 20)", Describe(m));
+  EXPECT_EQ("not (is not in closed range (10, 20))", DescribeNegation(m));
+  EXPECT_EQ("", Explain(m, 36L));
+  EXPECT_EQ("", Explain(m, 15L));
+}
+
+// Tests that MATCHER*() definitions can be overloaded on the number
+// of parameters; also tests MATCHER_Pn() where n >= 3.
+
+MATCHER(EqualsSumOf, "") { return arg == 0; }
+MATCHER_P(EqualsSumOf, a, "") { return arg == a; }
+MATCHER_P2(EqualsSumOf, a, b, "") { return arg == a + b; }
+MATCHER_P3(EqualsSumOf, a, b, c, "") { return arg == a + b + c; }
+MATCHER_P4(EqualsSumOf, a, b, c, d, "") { return arg == a + b + c + d; }
+MATCHER_P5(EqualsSumOf, a, b, c, d, e, "") { return arg == a + b + c + d + e; }
+MATCHER_P6(EqualsSumOf, a, b, c, d, e, f, "") {
+  return arg == a + b + c + d + e + f;
+}
+MATCHER_P7(EqualsSumOf, a, b, c, d, e, f, g, "") {
+  return arg == a + b + c + d + e + f + g;
+}
+MATCHER_P8(EqualsSumOf, a, b, c, d, e, f, g, h, "") {
+  return arg == a + b + c + d + e + f + g + h;
+}
+MATCHER_P9(EqualsSumOf, a, b, c, d, e, f, g, h, i, "") {
+  return arg == a + b + c + d + e + f + g + h + i;
+}
+MATCHER_P10(EqualsSumOf, a, b, c, d, e, f, g, h, i, j, "") {
+  return arg == a + b + c + d + e + f + g + h + i + j;
+}
+
+TEST(MatcherPnMacroTest, CanBeOverloadedOnNumberOfParameters) {
+  EXPECT_THAT(0, EqualsSumOf());
+  EXPECT_THAT(1, EqualsSumOf(1));
+  EXPECT_THAT(12, EqualsSumOf(10, 2));
+  EXPECT_THAT(123, EqualsSumOf(100, 20, 3));
+  EXPECT_THAT(1234, EqualsSumOf(1000, 200, 30, 4));
+  EXPECT_THAT(12345, EqualsSumOf(10000, 2000, 300, 40, 5));
+  EXPECT_THAT("abcdef",
+              EqualsSumOf(::std::string("a"), 'b', 'c', "d", "e", 'f'));
+  EXPECT_THAT("abcdefg",
+              EqualsSumOf(::std::string("a"), 'b', 'c', "d", "e", 'f', 'g'));
+  EXPECT_THAT("abcdefgh",
+              EqualsSumOf(::std::string("a"), 'b', 'c', "d", "e", 'f', 'g',
+                          "h"));
+  EXPECT_THAT("abcdefghi",
+              EqualsSumOf(::std::string("a"), 'b', 'c', "d", "e", 'f', 'g',
+                          "h", 'i'));
+  EXPECT_THAT("abcdefghij",
+              EqualsSumOf(::std::string("a"), 'b', 'c', "d", "e", 'f', 'g',
+                          "h", 'i', ::std::string("j")));
+
+  EXPECT_THAT(1, Not(EqualsSumOf()));
+  EXPECT_THAT(-1, Not(EqualsSumOf(1)));
+  EXPECT_THAT(-12, Not(EqualsSumOf(10, 2)));
+  EXPECT_THAT(-123, Not(EqualsSumOf(100, 20, 3)));
+  EXPECT_THAT(-1234, Not(EqualsSumOf(1000, 200, 30, 4)));
+  EXPECT_THAT(-12345, Not(EqualsSumOf(10000, 2000, 300, 40, 5)));
+  EXPECT_THAT("abcdef ",
+              Not(EqualsSumOf(::std::string("a"), 'b', 'c', "d", "e", 'f')));
+  EXPECT_THAT("abcdefg ",
+              Not(EqualsSumOf(::std::string("a"), 'b', 'c', "d", "e", 'f',
+                              'g')));
+  EXPECT_THAT("abcdefgh ",
+              Not(EqualsSumOf(::std::string("a"), 'b', 'c', "d", "e", 'f', 'g',
+                              "h")));
+  EXPECT_THAT("abcdefghi ",
+              Not(EqualsSumOf(::std::string("a"), 'b', 'c', "d", "e", 'f', 'g',
+                              "h", 'i')));
+  EXPECT_THAT("abcdefghij ",
+              Not(EqualsSumOf(::std::string("a"), 'b', 'c', "d", "e", 'f', 'g',
+                              "h", 'i', ::std::string("j"))));
+}
+
+// Tests that a MATCHER_Pn() definition can be instantiated with any
+// compatible parameter types.
+TEST(MatcherPnMacroTest, WorksForDifferentParameterTypes) {
+  EXPECT_THAT(123, EqualsSumOf(100L, 20, static_cast<char>(3)));
+  EXPECT_THAT("abcd", EqualsSumOf(::std::string("a"), "b", 'c', "d"));
+
+  EXPECT_THAT(124, Not(EqualsSumOf(100L, 20, static_cast<char>(3))));
+  EXPECT_THAT("abcde", Not(EqualsSumOf(::std::string("a"), "b", 'c', "d")));
+}
+
+// Tests that the matcher body can promote the parameter types.
+
+MATCHER_P2(EqConcat, prefix, suffix, "") {
+  // The following lines promote the two parameters to desired types.
+  std::string prefix_str(prefix);
+  char suffix_char = static_cast<char>(suffix);
+  return arg == prefix_str + suffix_char;
+}
+
+TEST(MatcherPnMacroTest, SimpleTypePromotion) {
+  Matcher<std::string> no_promo =
+      EqConcat(std::string("foo"), 't');
+  Matcher<const std::string&> promo =
+      EqConcat("foo", static_cast<int>('t'));
+  EXPECT_FALSE(no_promo.Matches("fool"));
+  EXPECT_FALSE(promo.Matches("fool"));
+  EXPECT_TRUE(no_promo.Matches("foot"));
+  EXPECT_TRUE(promo.Matches("foot"));
+}
+
+// Verifies the type of a MATCHER*.
+
+TEST(MatcherPnMacroTest, TypesAreCorrect) {
+  // EqualsSumOf() must be assignable to a EqualsSumOfMatcher variable.
+  EqualsSumOfMatcher a0 = EqualsSumOf();
+
+  // EqualsSumOf(1) must be assignable to a EqualsSumOfMatcherP variable.
+  EqualsSumOfMatcherP<int> a1 = EqualsSumOf(1);
+
+  // EqualsSumOf(p1, ..., pk) must be assignable to a EqualsSumOfMatcherPk
+  // variable, and so on.
+  EqualsSumOfMatcherP2<int, char> a2 = EqualsSumOf(1, '2');
+  EqualsSumOfMatcherP3<int, int, char> a3 = EqualsSumOf(1, 2, '3');
+  EqualsSumOfMatcherP4<int, int, int, char> a4 = EqualsSumOf(1, 2, 3, '4');
+  EqualsSumOfMatcherP5<int, int, int, int, char> a5 =
+      EqualsSumOf(1, 2, 3, 4, '5');
+  EqualsSumOfMatcherP6<int, int, int, int, int, char> a6 =
+      EqualsSumOf(1, 2, 3, 4, 5, '6');
+  EqualsSumOfMatcherP7<int, int, int, int, int, int, char> a7 =
+      EqualsSumOf(1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, '7');
+  EqualsSumOfMatcherP8<int, int, int, int, int, int, int, char> a8 =
+      EqualsSumOf(1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, '8');
+  EqualsSumOfMatcherP9<int, int, int, int, int, int, int, int, char> a9 =
+      EqualsSumOf(1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, '9');
+  EqualsSumOfMatcherP10<int, int, int, int, int, int, int, int, int, char> a10 =
+      EqualsSumOf(1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, '0');
+
+  // Avoid "unused variable" warnings.
+  (void)a0;
+  (void)a1;
+  (void)a2;
+  (void)a3;
+  (void)a4;
+  (void)a5;
+  (void)a6;
+  (void)a7;
+  (void)a8;
+  (void)a9;
+  (void)a10;
+}
+
+// Tests that matcher-typed parameters can be used in Value() inside a
+// MATCHER_Pn definition.
+
+// Succeeds if arg matches exactly 2 of the 3 matchers.
+MATCHER_P3(TwoOf, m1, m2, m3, "") {
+  const int count = static_cast<int>(Value(arg, m1))
+      + static_cast<int>(Value(arg, m2)) + static_cast<int>(Value(arg, m3));
+  return count == 2;
+}
+
+TEST(MatcherPnMacroTest, CanUseMatcherTypedParameterInValue) {
+  EXPECT_THAT(42, TwoOf(Gt(0), Lt(50), Eq(10)));
+  EXPECT_THAT(0, Not(TwoOf(Gt(-1), Lt(1), Eq(0))));
+}
+
+// Tests Contains().
+
+TEST(ContainsTest, ListMatchesWhenElementIsInContainer) {
+  list<int> some_list;
+  some_list.push_back(3);
+  some_list.push_back(1);
+  some_list.push_back(2);
+  EXPECT_THAT(some_list, Contains(1));
+  EXPECT_THAT(some_list, Contains(Gt(2.5)));
+  EXPECT_THAT(some_list, Contains(Eq(2.0f)));
+
+  list<string> another_list;
+  another_list.push_back("fee");
+  another_list.push_back("fie");
+  another_list.push_back("foe");
+  another_list.push_back("fum");
+  EXPECT_THAT(another_list, Contains(string("fee")));
+}
+
+TEST(ContainsTest, ListDoesNotMatchWhenElementIsNotInContainer) {
+  list<int> some_list;
+  some_list.push_back(3);
+  some_list.push_back(1);
+  EXPECT_THAT(some_list, Not(Contains(4)));
+}
+
+TEST(ContainsTest, SetMatchesWhenElementIsInContainer) {
+  set<int> some_set;
+  some_set.insert(3);
+  some_set.insert(1);
+  some_set.insert(2);
+  EXPECT_THAT(some_set, Contains(Eq(1.0)));
+  EXPECT_THAT(some_set, Contains(Eq(3.0f)));
+  EXPECT_THAT(some_set, Contains(2));
+
+  set<const char*> another_set;
+  another_set.insert("fee");
+  another_set.insert("fie");
+  another_set.insert("foe");
+  another_set.insert("fum");
+  EXPECT_THAT(another_set, Contains(Eq(string("fum"))));
+}
+
+TEST(ContainsTest, SetDoesNotMatchWhenElementIsNotInContainer) {
+  set<int> some_set;
+  some_set.insert(3);
+  some_set.insert(1);
+  EXPECT_THAT(some_set, Not(Contains(4)));
+
+  set<const char*> c_string_set;
+  c_string_set.insert("hello");
+  EXPECT_THAT(c_string_set, Not(Contains(string("hello").c_str())));
+}
+
+TEST(ContainsTest, ExplainsMatchResultCorrectly) {
+  const int a[2] = { 1, 2 };
+  Matcher<const int (&)[2]> m = Contains(2);
+  EXPECT_EQ("whose element #1 matches", Explain(m, a));
+
+  m = Contains(3);
+  EXPECT_EQ("", Explain(m, a));
+
+  m = Contains(GreaterThan(0));
+  EXPECT_EQ("whose element #0 matches, which is 1 more than 0", Explain(m, a));
+
+  m = Contains(GreaterThan(10));
+  EXPECT_EQ("", Explain(m, a));
+}
+
+TEST(ContainsTest, DescribesItselfCorrectly) {
+  Matcher<vector<int> > m = Contains(1);
+  EXPECT_EQ("contains at least one element that is equal to 1", Describe(m));
+
+  Matcher<vector<int> > m2 = Not(m);
+  EXPECT_EQ("doesn't contain any element that is equal to 1", Describe(m2));
+}
+
+TEST(ContainsTest, MapMatchesWhenElementIsInContainer) {
+  map<const char*, int> my_map;
+  const char* bar = "a string";
+  my_map[bar] = 2;
+  EXPECT_THAT(my_map, Contains(pair<const char* const, int>(bar, 2)));
+
+  map<string, int> another_map;
+  another_map["fee"] = 1;
+  another_map["fie"] = 2;
+  another_map["foe"] = 3;
+  another_map["fum"] = 4;
+  EXPECT_THAT(another_map, Contains(pair<const string, int>(string("fee"), 1)));
+  EXPECT_THAT(another_map, Contains(pair<const string, int>("fie", 2)));
+}
+
+TEST(ContainsTest, MapDoesNotMatchWhenElementIsNotInContainer) {
+  map<int, int> some_map;
+  some_map[1] = 11;
+  some_map[2] = 22;
+  EXPECT_THAT(some_map, Not(Contains(pair<const int, int>(2, 23))));
+}
+
+TEST(ContainsTest, ArrayMatchesWhenElementIsInContainer) {
+  const char* string_array[] = { "fee", "fie", "foe", "fum" };
+  EXPECT_THAT(string_array, Contains(Eq(string("fum"))));
+}
+
+TEST(ContainsTest, ArrayDoesNotMatchWhenElementIsNotInContainer) {
+  int int_array[] = { 1, 2, 3, 4 };
+  EXPECT_THAT(int_array, Not(Contains(5)));
+}
+
+TEST(ContainsTest, AcceptsMatcher) {
+  const int a[] = { 1, 2, 3 };
+  EXPECT_THAT(a, Contains(Gt(2)));
+  EXPECT_THAT(a, Not(Contains(Gt(4))));
+}
+
+TEST(ContainsTest, WorksForNativeArrayAsTuple) {
+  const int a[] = { 1, 2 };
+  const int* const pointer = a;
+  EXPECT_THAT(make_tuple(pointer, 2), Contains(1));
+  EXPECT_THAT(make_tuple(pointer, 2), Not(Contains(Gt(3))));
+}
+
+TEST(ContainsTest, WorksForTwoDimensionalNativeArray) {
+  int a[][3] = { { 1, 2, 3 }, { 4, 5, 6 } };
+  EXPECT_THAT(a, Contains(ElementsAre(4, 5, 6)));
+  EXPECT_THAT(a, Contains(Contains(5)));
+  EXPECT_THAT(a, Not(Contains(ElementsAre(3, 4, 5))));
+  EXPECT_THAT(a, Contains(Not(Contains(5))));
+}
+
+TEST(AllOfTest, HugeMatcher) {
+  // Verify that using AllOf with many arguments doesn't cause
+  // the compiler to exceed template instantiation depth limit.
+  EXPECT_THAT(0, testing::AllOf(_, _, _, _, _, _, _, _, _,
+                                testing::AllOf(_, _, _, _, _, _, _, _, _, _)));
+}
+
+TEST(AnyOfTest, HugeMatcher) {
+  // Verify that using AnyOf with many arguments doesn't cause
+  // the compiler to exceed template instantiation depth limit.
+  EXPECT_THAT(0, testing::AnyOf(_, _, _, _, _, _, _, _, _,
+                                testing::AnyOf(_, _, _, _, _, _, _, _, _, _)));
+}
+
+namespace adl_test {
+
+// Verifies that the implementation of ::testing::AllOf and ::testing::AnyOf
+// don't issue unqualified recursive calls.  If they do, the argument dependent
+// name lookup will cause AllOf/AnyOf in the 'adl_test' namespace to be found
+// as a candidate and the compilation will break due to an ambiguous overload.
+
+// The matcher must be in the same namespace as AllOf/AnyOf to make argument
+// dependent lookup find those.
+MATCHER(M, "") { return true; }
+
+template <typename T1, typename T2>
+bool AllOf(const T1& t1, const T2& t2) { return true; }
+
+TEST(AllOfTest, DoesNotCallAllOfUnqualified) {
+  EXPECT_THAT(42, testing::AllOf(
+      M(), M(), M(), M(), M(), M(), M(), M(), M(), M()));
+}
+
+template <typename T1, typename T2> bool
+AnyOf(const T1& t1, const T2& t2) { return true; }
+
+TEST(AnyOfTest, DoesNotCallAnyOfUnqualified) {
+  EXPECT_THAT(42, testing::AnyOf(
+      M(), M(), M(), M(), M(), M(), M(), M(), M(), M()));
+}
+
+}  // namespace adl_test
+
+#ifdef _MSC_VER
+# pragma warning(pop)
+#endif
+
+}  // namespace