| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
So far, we were using the 'go install' mechanism to build a package
and have its binary installed in
$$($(2)_WORKSPACE)/bin/linux_$$(GO_GOARCH). This worked fine when
building on x86-64 for ARM, but failed when building on x86-64 for
x86-64 because the binaries were installed in $$($(2)_WORKSPACE)/bin/.
Instead of doing some complicated logic to guess whether Go is going
to put our binaries in $$($(2)_WORKSPACE)/bin/ or in
$$($(2)_WORKSPACE)/bin/linux_$$(GO_GOARCH), we revert back to using
"go build", as it was done before the introduction of the golang
package infrastructure. "go build" lets us pass explicitly the
destination path of the binary to be generated.
There's just one complexity with how to decide on the name of the
binary that should be produced, and we have two cases:
- <pkg>_BUILD_TARGETS is the default, i.e ".". In this case we assume
a single binary is produced by "go build", and we name if after the
lower case package name. We allow this to be overridden thanks to
<pkg>_BIN_NAME.
- <pkg>_BUILD_TARGETS is non-default, and typically contains
something like "foo bar" or "cmd/foo cmd/bar". In this case, we
assume the binaries to be produced are "foo" and "bar", i.e we take
the non-directory part of the build target to name the binaries.
Because we're using this -o option, we no longer need to explicitly
create the binary directory, it is done by "go build".
Fixes:
http://autobuild.buildroot.net/results/1f9cd7c48e8c8f41326632a9c0de83915d72c45b/
[Peter: use $(or instead of $(if as suggested by Arnout]
Signed-off-by: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com>
Reviewed-by: "Yann E. MORIN" <yann.morin.1998@free.fr>
Signed-off-by: Peter Korsgaard <peter@korsgaard.com>
|
