glibc: add security patches for CVE-2015-1472

Fixes CVE-2015-1472 - heap buffer overflow in wscanf.

Signed-off-by: Gustavo Zacarias <gustavo@zacarias.com.ar>
Signed-off-by: Peter Korsgaard <peter@korsgaard.com>

4 files changed, 352 insertions, 0 deletions

diff --git a/package/glibc/2.18-svnr23787/0005-CVE-2015-1472.patch b/package/glibc/2.18-svnr23787/0005-CVE-2015-1472.patch
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000..a0da626cbf
--- /dev/null
+++ b/package/glibc/2.18-svnr23787/0005-CVE-2015-1472.patch
@@ -0,0 +1,88 @@
+Fix CVE-2015-1472 - heap buffer overflow in wscanf
+Backport from upstream:
+https://sourceware.org/git/?p=glibc.git;a=commitdiff;h=5bd80bfe9ca0d955bfbbc002781bc7b01b6bcb06
+See: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1188235
+
+Signed-off-by: Gustavo Zacarias <gustavo@zacarias.com.ar>
+
+diff --git a/stdio-common/tst-sscanf.c b/stdio-common/tst-sscanf.c
+index aece3f2..8a2eb9e 100644
+--- a/libc/stdio-common/tst-sscanf.c
++++ b/libc/stdio-common/tst-sscanf.c
+@@ -233,5 +233,38 @@ main (void)
+ 	}
+     }
+ 
++  /* BZ #16618
++     The test will segfault during SSCANF if the buffer overflow
++     is not fixed.  The size of `s` is such that it forces the use
++     of malloc internally and this triggers the incorrect computation.
++     Thus the value for SIZE is arbitrariy high enough that malloc
++     is used.  */
++  {
++#define SIZE 131072
++    CHAR *s = malloc ((SIZE + 1) * sizeof (*s));
++    if (s == NULL)
++      abort ();
++    for (size_t i = 0; i < SIZE; i++)
++      s[i] = L('0');
++    s[SIZE] = L('\0');
++    int i = 42;
++    /* Scan multi-digit zero into `i`.  */
++    if (SSCANF (s, L("%d"), &i) != 1)
++      {
++	printf ("FAIL: bug16618: SSCANF did not read one input item.\n");
++	result = 1;
++      }
++    if (i != 0)
++      {
++	printf ("FAIL: bug16618: Value of `i` was not zero as expected.\n");
++	result = 1;
++      }
++    free (s);
++    if (result != 1)
++      printf ("PASS: bug16618: Did not crash.\n");
++#undef SIZE
++  }
++
++
+   return result;
+ }
+diff --git a/stdio-common/vfscanf.c b/stdio-common/vfscanf.c
+index cd129a8..0e204e7 100644
+--- a/libc/stdio-common/vfscanf.c
++++ b/libc/stdio-common/vfscanf.c
+@@ -272,9 +272,10 @@ _IO_vfscanf_internal (_IO_FILE *s, const char *format, _IO_va_list argptr,
+       if (__glibc_unlikely (wpsize == wpmax))				      \
+ 	{								    \
+ 	  CHAR_T *old = wp;						    \
+-	  size_t newsize = (UCHAR_MAX + 1 > 2 * wpmax			    \
+-			    ? UCHAR_MAX + 1 : 2 * wpmax);		    \
+-	  if (use_malloc || !__libc_use_alloca (newsize))		    \
++	  bool fits = __glibc_likely (wpmax <= SIZE_MAX / sizeof (CHAR_T) / 2); \
++	  size_t wpneed = MAX (UCHAR_MAX + 1, 2 * wpmax);		    \
++	  size_t newsize = fits ? wpneed * sizeof (CHAR_T) : SIZE_MAX;	    \
++	  if (!__libc_use_alloca (newsize))				    \
+ 	    {								    \
+ 	      wp = realloc (use_malloc ? wp : NULL, newsize);		    \
+ 	      if (wp == NULL)						    \
+@@ -286,14 +287,13 @@ _IO_vfscanf_internal (_IO_FILE *s, const char *format, _IO_va_list argptr,
+ 		}							    \
+ 	      if (! use_malloc)						    \
+ 		MEMCPY (wp, old, wpsize);				    \
+-	      wpmax = newsize;						    \
++	      wpmax = wpneed;						    \
+ 	      use_malloc = true;					    \
+ 	    }								    \
+ 	  else								    \
+ 	    {								    \
+ 	      size_t s = wpmax * sizeof (CHAR_T);			    \
+-	      wp = (CHAR_T *) extend_alloca (wp, s,			    \
+-					     newsize * sizeof (CHAR_T));    \
++	      wp = (CHAR_T *) extend_alloca (wp, s, newsize);		    \
+ 	      wpmax = s / sizeof (CHAR_T);				    \
+ 	      if (old != NULL)						    \
+ 		MEMCPY (wp, old, wpsize);				    \
+-- 
+1.9.4
+
diff --git a/package/glibc/2.19-svnr25243/0004-CVE-2015-1472.patch b/package/glibc/2.19-svnr25243/0004-CVE-2015-1472.patch
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000..a0da626cbf
--- /dev/null
+++ b/package/glibc/2.19-svnr25243/0004-CVE-2015-1472.patch
@@ -0,0 +1,88 @@
+Fix CVE-2015-1472 - heap buffer overflow in wscanf
+Backport from upstream:
+https://sourceware.org/git/?p=glibc.git;a=commitdiff;h=5bd80bfe9ca0d955bfbbc002781bc7b01b6bcb06
+See: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1188235
+
+Signed-off-by: Gustavo Zacarias <gustavo@zacarias.com.ar>
+
+diff --git a/stdio-common/tst-sscanf.c b/stdio-common/tst-sscanf.c
+index aece3f2..8a2eb9e 100644
+--- a/libc/stdio-common/tst-sscanf.c
++++ b/libc/stdio-common/tst-sscanf.c
+@@ -233,5 +233,38 @@ main (void)
+ 	}
+     }
+ 
++  /* BZ #16618
++     The test will segfault during SSCANF if the buffer overflow
++     is not fixed.  The size of `s` is such that it forces the use
++     of malloc internally and this triggers the incorrect computation.
++     Thus the value for SIZE is arbitrariy high enough that malloc
++     is used.  */
++  {
++#define SIZE 131072
++    CHAR *s = malloc ((SIZE + 1) * sizeof (*s));
++    if (s == NULL)
++      abort ();
++    for (size_t i = 0; i < SIZE; i++)
++      s[i] = L('0');
++    s[SIZE] = L('\0');
++    int i = 42;
++    /* Scan multi-digit zero into `i`.  */
++    if (SSCANF (s, L("%d"), &i) != 1)
++      {
++	printf ("FAIL: bug16618: SSCANF did not read one input item.\n");
++	result = 1;
++      }
++    if (i != 0)
++      {
++	printf ("FAIL: bug16618: Value of `i` was not zero as expected.\n");
++	result = 1;
++      }
++    free (s);
++    if (result != 1)
++      printf ("PASS: bug16618: Did not crash.\n");
++#undef SIZE
++  }
++
++
+   return result;
+ }
+diff --git a/stdio-common/vfscanf.c b/stdio-common/vfscanf.c
+index cd129a8..0e204e7 100644
+--- a/libc/stdio-common/vfscanf.c
++++ b/libc/stdio-common/vfscanf.c
+@@ -272,9 +272,10 @@ _IO_vfscanf_internal (_IO_FILE *s, const char *format, _IO_va_list argptr,
+       if (__glibc_unlikely (wpsize == wpmax))				      \
+ 	{								    \
+ 	  CHAR_T *old = wp;						    \
+-	  size_t newsize = (UCHAR_MAX + 1 > 2 * wpmax			    \
+-			    ? UCHAR_MAX + 1 : 2 * wpmax);		    \
+-	  if (use_malloc || !__libc_use_alloca (newsize))		    \
++	  bool fits = __glibc_likely (wpmax <= SIZE_MAX / sizeof (CHAR_T) / 2); \
++	  size_t wpneed = MAX (UCHAR_MAX + 1, 2 * wpmax);		    \
++	  size_t newsize = fits ? wpneed * sizeof (CHAR_T) : SIZE_MAX;	    \
++	  if (!__libc_use_alloca (newsize))				    \
+ 	    {								    \
+ 	      wp = realloc (use_malloc ? wp : NULL, newsize);		    \
+ 	      if (wp == NULL)						    \
+@@ -286,14 +287,13 @@ _IO_vfscanf_internal (_IO_FILE *s, const char *format, _IO_va_list argptr,
+ 		}							    \
+ 	      if (! use_malloc)						    \
+ 		MEMCPY (wp, old, wpsize);				    \
+-	      wpmax = newsize;						    \
++	      wpmax = wpneed;						    \
+ 	      use_malloc = true;					    \
+ 	    }								    \
+ 	  else								    \
+ 	    {								    \
+ 	      size_t s = wpmax * sizeof (CHAR_T);			    \
+-	      wp = (CHAR_T *) extend_alloca (wp, s,			    \
+-					     newsize * sizeof (CHAR_T));    \
++	      wp = (CHAR_T *) extend_alloca (wp, s, newsize);		    \
+ 	      wpmax = s / sizeof (CHAR_T);				    \
+ 	      if (old != NULL)						    \
+ 		MEMCPY (wp, old, wpsize);				    \
+-- 
+1.9.4
+
diff --git a/package/glibc/2.19/0004-CVE-2015-1472.patch b/package/glibc/2.19/0004-CVE-2015-1472.patch
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000..b2f8e49d46
--- /dev/null
+++ b/package/glibc/2.19/0004-CVE-2015-1472.patch
@@ -0,0 +1,88 @@
+Fix CVE-2015-1472 - heap buffer overflow in wscanf
+Backport from upstream:
+https://sourceware.org/git/?p=glibc.git;a=commitdiff;h=5bd80bfe9ca0d955bfbbc002781bc7b01b6bcb06
+See: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1188235
+
+Signed-off-by: Gustavo Zacarias <gustavo@zacarias.com.ar>
+
+diff --git a/stdio-common/tst-sscanf.c b/stdio-common/tst-sscanf.c
+index aece3f2..8a2eb9e 100644
+--- a/stdio-common/tst-sscanf.c
++++ b/stdio-common/tst-sscanf.c
+@@ -233,5 +233,38 @@ main (void)
+ 	}
+     }
+ 
++  /* BZ #16618
++     The test will segfault during SSCANF if the buffer overflow
++     is not fixed.  The size of `s` is such that it forces the use
++     of malloc internally and this triggers the incorrect computation.
++     Thus the value for SIZE is arbitrariy high enough that malloc
++     is used.  */
++  {
++#define SIZE 131072
++    CHAR *s = malloc ((SIZE + 1) * sizeof (*s));
++    if (s == NULL)
++      abort ();
++    for (size_t i = 0; i < SIZE; i++)
++      s[i] = L('0');
++    s[SIZE] = L('\0');
++    int i = 42;
++    /* Scan multi-digit zero into `i`.  */
++    if (SSCANF (s, L("%d"), &i) != 1)
++      {
++	printf ("FAIL: bug16618: SSCANF did not read one input item.\n");
++	result = 1;
++      }
++    if (i != 0)
++      {
++	printf ("FAIL: bug16618: Value of `i` was not zero as expected.\n");
++	result = 1;
++      }
++    free (s);
++    if (result != 1)
++      printf ("PASS: bug16618: Did not crash.\n");
++#undef SIZE
++  }
++
++
+   return result;
+ }
+diff --git a/stdio-common/vfscanf.c b/stdio-common/vfscanf.c
+index cd129a8..0e204e7 100644
+--- a/stdio-common/vfscanf.c
++++ b/stdio-common/vfscanf.c
+@@ -272,9 +272,10 @@ _IO_vfscanf_internal (_IO_FILE *s, const char *format, _IO_va_list argptr,
+       if (__glibc_unlikely (wpsize == wpmax))				      \
+ 	{								    \
+ 	  CHAR_T *old = wp;						    \
+-	  size_t newsize = (UCHAR_MAX + 1 > 2 * wpmax			    \
+-			    ? UCHAR_MAX + 1 : 2 * wpmax);		    \
+-	  if (use_malloc || !__libc_use_alloca (newsize))		    \
++	  bool fits = __glibc_likely (wpmax <= SIZE_MAX / sizeof (CHAR_T) / 2); \
++	  size_t wpneed = MAX (UCHAR_MAX + 1, 2 * wpmax);		    \
++	  size_t newsize = fits ? wpneed * sizeof (CHAR_T) : SIZE_MAX;	    \
++	  if (!__libc_use_alloca (newsize))				    \
+ 	    {								    \
+ 	      wp = realloc (use_malloc ? wp : NULL, newsize);		    \
+ 	      if (wp == NULL)						    \
+@@ -286,14 +287,13 @@ _IO_vfscanf_internal (_IO_FILE *s, const char *format, _IO_va_list argptr,
+ 		}							    \
+ 	      if (! use_malloc)						    \
+ 		MEMCPY (wp, old, wpsize);				    \
+-	      wpmax = newsize;						    \
++	      wpmax = wpneed;						    \
+ 	      use_malloc = true;					    \
+ 	    }								    \
+ 	  else								    \
+ 	    {								    \
+ 	      size_t s = wpmax * sizeof (CHAR_T);			    \
+-	      wp = (CHAR_T *) extend_alloca (wp, s,			    \
+-					     newsize * sizeof (CHAR_T));    \
++	      wp = (CHAR_T *) extend_alloca (wp, s, newsize);		    \
+ 	      wpmax = s / sizeof (CHAR_T);				    \
+ 	      if (old != NULL)						    \
+ 		MEMCPY (wp, old, wpsize);				    \
+-- 
+1.9.4
+
diff --git a/package/glibc/2.20/0003-CVE-2015-1472.patch b/package/glibc/2.20/0003-CVE-2015-1472.patch
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000..b2f8e49d46
--- /dev/null
+++ b/package/glibc/2.20/0003-CVE-2015-1472.patch
@@ -0,0 +1,88 @@
+Fix CVE-2015-1472 - heap buffer overflow in wscanf
+Backport from upstream:
+https://sourceware.org/git/?p=glibc.git;a=commitdiff;h=5bd80bfe9ca0d955bfbbc002781bc7b01b6bcb06
+See: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1188235
+
+Signed-off-by: Gustavo Zacarias <gustavo@zacarias.com.ar>
+
+diff --git a/stdio-common/tst-sscanf.c b/stdio-common/tst-sscanf.c
+index aece3f2..8a2eb9e 100644
+--- a/stdio-common/tst-sscanf.c
++++ b/stdio-common/tst-sscanf.c
+@@ -233,5 +233,38 @@ main (void)
+ 	}
+     }
+ 
++  /* BZ #16618
++     The test will segfault during SSCANF if the buffer overflow
++     is not fixed.  The size of `s` is such that it forces the use
++     of malloc internally and this triggers the incorrect computation.
++     Thus the value for SIZE is arbitrariy high enough that malloc
++     is used.  */
++  {
++#define SIZE 131072
++    CHAR *s = malloc ((SIZE + 1) * sizeof (*s));
++    if (s == NULL)
++      abort ();
++    for (size_t i = 0; i < SIZE; i++)
++      s[i] = L('0');
++    s[SIZE] = L('\0');
++    int i = 42;
++    /* Scan multi-digit zero into `i`.  */
++    if (SSCANF (s, L("%d"), &i) != 1)
++      {
++	printf ("FAIL: bug16618: SSCANF did not read one input item.\n");
++	result = 1;
++      }
++    if (i != 0)
++      {
++	printf ("FAIL: bug16618: Value of `i` was not zero as expected.\n");
++	result = 1;
++      }
++    free (s);
++    if (result != 1)
++      printf ("PASS: bug16618: Did not crash.\n");
++#undef SIZE
++  }
++
++
+   return result;
+ }
+diff --git a/stdio-common/vfscanf.c b/stdio-common/vfscanf.c
+index cd129a8..0e204e7 100644
+--- a/stdio-common/vfscanf.c
++++ b/stdio-common/vfscanf.c
+@@ -272,9 +272,10 @@ _IO_vfscanf_internal (_IO_FILE *s, const char *format, _IO_va_list argptr,
+       if (__glibc_unlikely (wpsize == wpmax))				      \
+ 	{								    \
+ 	  CHAR_T *old = wp;						    \
+-	  size_t newsize = (UCHAR_MAX + 1 > 2 * wpmax			    \
+-			    ? UCHAR_MAX + 1 : 2 * wpmax);		    \
+-	  if (use_malloc || !__libc_use_alloca (newsize))		    \
++	  bool fits = __glibc_likely (wpmax <= SIZE_MAX / sizeof (CHAR_T) / 2); \
++	  size_t wpneed = MAX (UCHAR_MAX + 1, 2 * wpmax);		    \
++	  size_t newsize = fits ? wpneed * sizeof (CHAR_T) : SIZE_MAX;	    \
++	  if (!__libc_use_alloca (newsize))				    \
+ 	    {								    \
+ 	      wp = realloc (use_malloc ? wp : NULL, newsize);		    \
+ 	      if (wp == NULL)						    \
+@@ -286,14 +287,13 @@ _IO_vfscanf_internal (_IO_FILE *s, const char *format, _IO_va_list argptr,
+ 		}							    \
+ 	      if (! use_malloc)						    \
+ 		MEMCPY (wp, old, wpsize);				    \
+-	      wpmax = newsize;						    \
++	      wpmax = wpneed;						    \
+ 	      use_malloc = true;					    \
+ 	    }								    \
+ 	  else								    \
+ 	    {								    \
+ 	      size_t s = wpmax * sizeof (CHAR_T);			    \
+-	      wp = (CHAR_T *) extend_alloca (wp, s,			    \
+-					     newsize * sizeof (CHAR_T));    \
++	      wp = (CHAR_T *) extend_alloca (wp, s, newsize);		    \
+ 	      wpmax = s / sizeof (CHAR_T);				    \
+ 	      if (old != NULL)						    \
+ 		MEMCPY (wp, old, wpsize);				    \
+-- 
+1.9.4
+